| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3501. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dro...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:24:00
|
3502. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keri Starlight wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: LOL If you drive tanks and you can only take down so few, you're obviously doing it wrong. Oh sure, if you can't take down 6 decent tankers all by yourself you are doing it wrong? Who do you thi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:23:00
|
3503. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Letting infantry dictate balance resulted in tanks bei...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:22:00
|
3504. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:14:00
|
3505. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dropsuits.and 100% more effective in everything but...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:13:00
|
3506. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win. I'll say it again. 16 Cal Logis on ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:11:00
|
3507. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:10:00
|
3508. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keri Starlight wrote: Spkr, it's not about having a good tanker in your squad all the time, which is already limiting and frustrating. When you run into 6 enemy tanks you might take down 1 or 2 of them if they are dumb and spread too much, but...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:09:00
|
3509. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Letting infantry dictate balance resulted in tanks being nerfed what, 5 or 6 builds in a row? CCP fo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:08:00
|
3510. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: I have a similar story, though the AV nerf is just the straw that broke the camels back. So CCP should've left AV where it was so nobody would tank ever again?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:06:00
|
3511. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tank...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:05:00
|
3512. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: This a FPS game. When you say you need one weapon to counter the other its called... wait for it... no, you know the word for it. Cause your not dumb. You yourself can see what your asking. infantry wanted a cod? no. BF b...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:04:00
|
3513. PS3 due to Tank stomp - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mary Overdrive wrote: My roommate actually broke his PS3 over his knee due to a Full squad of Tankers on a Domination match. No one could do anything without being tanked down. Well funny thing is he asked to play dust on my console ofcourse I ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:03:00
|
3514. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* They're remote explosives, and they also detonate if a friendly tank rolls over them. Therefore,...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:00:00
|
3515. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer.....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:00:00
|
3516. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:59:00
|
3517. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: It looks like Dev is on today's menu, mercs! Keep an eye out for "Other Contracts" in your Battle Finder - first set of contracts will show up in about 40 minutes. Let the Dev Invasion begin! How will this align with US E...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:58:00
|
3518. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP ma...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:53:00
|
3519. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play beca...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:47:00
|
3520. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |