Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2741. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: @ Spkr4theDead: ''Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks'' Since most tankers here in the forums are DEMENTED, BIASED spit***s like yourself, it has come to infantry having to decide. YES. And we should. Look...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:26:00
|
2742. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tan...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:24:00
|
2743. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:23:00
|
2744. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Spkr4theDead = least respected player in dust thats all that needs to be said here Whatever you say, ADAM-AND-STEVE.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:20:00
|
2745. How to easily get rid of redline rail tankers hilariously - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or, you know, you could squad with tanker and destroy all their tanks, which is what I did a little while ago.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:17:00
|
2746. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
LEHON Xeon wrote: My big issue is with the range on blaster tanks. I do not know how any person could think that Ambush is completely balanced with tankers in an 80 clone match going 61-0 due to "smart spawn" camping. I don't play ambush, are...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 23:31:00
|
2747. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
R F Gyro wrote: So, I normally play Minmatar logi. I would like Minmatar logi suits to get a 10,000% bonus to swarm launcher damage. You, not being Minmatar logi, have no right to argue against this. As fate would have it, I'm interested in...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 23:26:00
|
2748. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Get dedicated dropship and tank pilots, not just one dropship pilot who happens to hate railguns. I stopped reading after this. If you are referring to Judge Rhadamanthus (who I assume you are) ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:48:00
|
2749. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Better than listening to you! The same guy that would get rid of all AV weaponry if he could, the same guy that thinks that we need to make maps more vehicle friendly, the same guy that made a thread complaining a guy kille...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:47:00
|
2750. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: I've seen maybe 2 or 3 tankers actually talk about tank and vehicle balance. You and Taka however...not once have I seen you two even try to talk about balance. You've actually said "Too bad, AV was OP now tanks get to be O...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:46:00
|
2751. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALT2 acc wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What gives tankers the right to decide the fate of infantry? Because that's exactly what they're doing now. Practically every match comes down to who spams the most tanks. Hav cap per team, simple.....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:46:00
|
2752. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What gives tankers the right to decide the fate of infantry? Because that's exactly what they're doing now. Practically every match comes down to who spams the most tanks. LOL That's in the game. I'm referring to inf...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:45:00
|
2753. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank pilots, not just one dropship pilot who happens t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:34:00
|
2754. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Funkmaster Whale wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I will always throw out this little tidbit. When infantry complained about the contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry told them to ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:16:00
|
2755. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
D3LTA Blitzkrieg II wrote: AV was never too strong. Just never did we have a Sagaris in uprising. Never too strong? Were you ever on either side of swarms? PRO with proficiency and plenty of damage mods plowed through a third of a Madrugar's...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:15:00
|
2756. Massive Flaw in CCP's "Window of Opportunity" Vehicle ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I will always through out this little tidbit. When infantry complained about the contact grenades, they were nerfed into the ground. When tankers complained about AV grenades, infantry told them to HTFU.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:09:00
|
2757. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infant...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 20:07:00
|
2758. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 19:58:00
|
2759. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Tanks right now are fast, durable, and can deal massive damage to infantry. Which two aspects would you like to keep? Because you're not allowed to have all three. So then as infantry, YOU choose 2, because you can't have a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 19:49:00
|
2760. Tanks - 1.8 changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP fixed tanks already. Infantry forced them to. Why aren't you happy with what you forced on them?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.15 18:50:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |