| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2721. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Canari Elphus wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:35:00
|
2722. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:35:00
|
2723. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lightning Bolt2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:34:00
|
2724. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating the...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:32:00
|
2725. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:31:00
|
2726. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on chang...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:29:00
|
2727. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:28:00
|
2728. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry. That do...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:27:00
|
2729. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:26:00
|
2730. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Makes up a bunch of rubbish. Can anyone guess who I am? KING CHECKMATE? ADAM-AND-STEVE? Atiim? Like infantry that said during the period before 1.7, that a Soma could survive an alpha strike of 16,000 damage? You mean tho...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:21:00
|
2731. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what a load of crap.....you really do think your something special dont you. everything in dust should revolve around you. its players like you who are the problem with dust. If you say so, ADAM-AND-STEVE.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:20:00
|
2732. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry. That doesn't even make sens...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:19:00
|
2733. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Tanks should be slow. Balance > Realism. Although if you want to go the realism route, tanks can't shoot near as fast as they do in game. So should we nerf railguns to a 15 sec charge up time? This isn't WWII where...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:18:00
|
2734. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: Hynox Xitio wrote: I dunno man, I think tanks move fast in real life, they go like, multiple miles per hour. Then again I'm a heavy, so I think sedimentary rock erodes away faster than I sprint. C&C renegage has...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:17:00
|
2735. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Its unbalanced when a tank can go so FAST. This is not The FAST and the Furious 514. Infantry moves at 5m to 7m. Reduce the tanks speed to 19m Problem solved. LOL Go to Call of Duty if you don't want to deal with ve...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:16:00
|
2736. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry. That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted mo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:13:00
|
2737. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toby Flenderson wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What gives tankers the right to decide the fate of infantry? Because that's exactly what they're doing now. Practically every match comes down to who spams the most tanks...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:54:00
|
2738. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toby Flenderson wrote: Haha I'm just now reading the posts by the OP above my response. This is hilarious, forget everything I said about changing threads like these. It's far more entertaining to read this guy talk about how good he is. The l...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:47:00
|
2739. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
I forced a guy from STB trying to tank into the redline by taking his tank from him a few times. He started by his redline, anyway. They tried getting a forge gunner after me, but he died a couple times. So that's hiding behind the smallest hill, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:36:00
|
2740. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 01:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |