| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
261. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: UHAVS ( 3 infantry ) are going to need built in perma hardeners ( at least 25% ) or else their TTK will be laughable versus any group of organized AV ( 3 infantry ). How long would it take 3 full proto commando swarmers to pop a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.18 03:08:00
|
262. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nearly forgot about the shield mods. Why make them much harder to fit? Again, this is supposed to be sandbox, not pigeonholing us into only a few viable fits, which is what we have now. We want variety, not a total of 5 or 7 accepted fits.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.18 02:05:00
|
263. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: So no "useful" feedback, no numbers. I believe you wanted, 7 slots, you have them, you also wanted more fitting space and progression, and no extra skills for SHAVs. Where's the love? I already did my numbers . I think ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.18 01:56:00
|
264. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: A) fixing the fitting of Gallente HAVs making them competitive Can be done with the Chrome - Uprising 1.6 slot layout and restoring the CPU and PG skills to 5% per level. B) introducing HAV progression You could just gi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.17 13:26:00
|
265. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV and SHAV Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well, I know that anything I reply with, will get me banned and the post will be deleted. Congratulations, infantry, those of you who don't use vehicles, you've won. I won't bother commenting if and unless Rattati gives me a go-ahead to start t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.17 13:06:00
|
266. Slow, constant shield recharge and active armor reps - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: . It kinda is your fault for losing tanks in the redline chasing red tanks back to it. But you know I agree on AV. It relentlessly pounds the ever loving hell out of any and all vehicles, rendering them useless and powerless t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.16 18:07:00
|
267. Slow, constant shield recharge and active armor reps - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I don't know, I think Pokey did the baseline fits but tentatively it looks like the Cal UHAV will have up to roughly 11,749 EHP. current alpha if I recall that's 7.72 Forge gun shots, so 8 shots to solo. Don't miss. the ga...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.15 14:22:00
|
268. @rattati AV Spreadsheet error - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: A guy that doesn't play the game getting this much say... What say, numbnuts? I can make suggestions and if rattati finds them reasonable he might use them. OMG AVspiracy to ruin DUST just for you...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.15 14:21:00
|
269. @rattati AV Spreadsheet error - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A guy that doesn't play the game getting this much say...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.14 13:24:00
|
270. Slow, constant shield recharge and active armor reps - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Just as a player, I have not been able to kill a single vehicle in the last few weeks. And I am dedicating myself, to really see how it is, by always spawning in as AV when I se...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.14 13:19:00
|
271. Slow, constant shield recharge and active armor reps - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: spkr wants it that way. he has literally said being killed in a tank by infantry is unfair in the past. All I've said is that I want vehicle SP and ISK to be worth it. Never have I said I want to be invincible.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.14 13:13:00
|
272. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: the projected EHP of the PRO armor HAVs is higher than the gunnlogi. Even with my numbers for AV it'll still require a reload to kill one that's maxed out. Believe it or not the Gunnlogi will hold well vs. the forge gun ev...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:55:00
|
273. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So how exactly will the meta levels be balanced against themselves? Will PRO AV not be able to damage STD hulls? I imagine it would behave similarly to what happens when you...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:53:00
|
274. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Michael Epic wrote: Look man....I was in 3 matches last night where the raspberry team called in THREE assault dropships, totally proto everything and shield hardeners and all they did was circle around the domination objective dropping ordinan...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:35:00
|
275. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ku Shala wrote: correct me if im wrong but the higher level vehicles were removed to make balancing av easier? That was the sorry excuse given to us.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:18:00
|
276. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: Ku Shala wrote: you are forgetting the current tanks are milita/basic when proto tanks return do you want it to take a whole team to destroy one should work like basic av can destroy basic tank ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:13:00
|
277. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Ku Shala wrote: and pilots dont have that effect on infantry now? Only if that team spawns no AV in response. more specifically if the team is unlucky enough to not have someone who runs dedicat...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 19:02:00
|
278. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ku Shala wrote: and pilots dont have that effect on infantry now? So tanks should have absolutely no anti infantry role at all?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 18:58:00
|
279. CCP Rattati: A Plea For Caution - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: Don't buff the AV. They are FINE as is. They require coordination and that is FINE. It should NOT go back to Lone Wolf, Low-SP, AV'rs able to hold off entire tank groups. I have to coordinate to engage and disengage to survi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 18:51:00
|
280. Slow, constant shield recharge and active armor reps - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: tritan abbattere wrote: from the few replies i have read from you you seem to jump to conclusions with out thinking much. I usually don't need to spend time thinking of a reply, or spending 3 ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2015.02.13 13:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |