| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2461. Tanks, CCP are you going to do something ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
skippy678 wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Th3rdSun wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: i beat tank spam and SO CAN YOU! its called maintaining perimiter defence and rolling in a squad. this isnt to say that tanks arnt a problem right now, some...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 22:35:00
|
2462. If We Get A Respec In 1.8... - in General Discussions [original thread]
AP Grasshopper wrote: How many respecs have you gotten in eve? EVE pilots get one neural remap every year.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 22:33:00
|
2463. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roofer Madness wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Roofer Madness wrote: Look, at much as people want to fight the fact, when one certain item is constantly spammed by noobs and vets alike it can only mean 2 things: 1. It's new and everyone is ha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 22:26:00
|
2464. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: Drunk troll is Drunk? No, tanker is better than you'll ever be. Are you implying that tanking requires "skill"? For you, it was always "I take out tanks with my AV," yet you had access t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 22:22:00
|
2465. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: They're ruining the game for people because they need a squad of 6 PRO-stomping try-hards to win, and cannot be bothered to squad with 5 infantry and 1 tanker. Why should anyone be forced to squad with a t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 22:14:00
|
2466. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: In the 5 days I've played 1.7 I've destroyed more tanks than the rest of my previous DUST career combined. Yes, most tankers on the field are stupid, because they aren't actual tankers. They are people using FoTM exploits. People ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:46:00
|
2467. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roofer Madness wrote: Look, at much as people want to fight the fact, when one certain item is constantly spammed by noobs and vets alike it can only mean 2 things: 1. It's new and everyone is having a laugh. The problem will sort itself out o...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:43:00
|
2468. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Killing **** tankers in **** tanks with **** AV doesn't mean ****. <-- and for clarity, all 4 of those censored words are the "s word". "oh look, I am running against horrible players in horrible tanks who know nothin...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:42:00
|
2469. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Elmo Love U wrote: Killed 4 proto tanks yesterday. 3 sets of remotes, one suit. Jumped off tower,landed on roof. Click click pull. We don't have PRO tanks.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:41:00
|
2470. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: So yea, my brother got me back for the PS3 I gave him about a month ago by getting me a new one. Decided to log onto my 4.7m SP alt to see what all the tank QQ is about. Holy **** you guys mu...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:39:00
|
2471. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Eltra Ardell wrote: tl;dr: I played against braindead cargo culters and am wondering why I did well. Get a ladder and get on my level. Say w...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:35:00
|
2472. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Eltra Ardell wrote: tl;dr: I played against braindead cargo culters and am wondering why I did well. Get a ladder and get on my level. Say what you will. There's a pile of dead tanks under my...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:31:00
|
2473. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Drunk troll is Drunk? No, tanker is better than you'll ever be.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:30:00
|
2474. Got a new PS3. AV QQ is unfounded. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aizen Intiki wrote: Pssst. Gimmie 2 eq. slots on my Gal Scout. And the cloak. We'll be seeing real QQ then lol. What, need another crutch?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:29:00
|
2475. Tanks, CCP are you going to do something ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Necandi Brasil wrote: Because otherwise I will just move on... Infantry combat is useless right now, just spam tanks first and you will win ! Squad with a competent tanker, and your problems will go away for the most part.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 18:27:00
|
2476. CCP, Why Do You Directly Support and Encourage - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Low skill, lower risk, high reward "tactics" such as red line sniping and rail tanking? I've been here almost 2 years, and I still can't grasp the reasoning behind this. What inspired you to throw out the risk vs reward formu...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 11:04:00
|
2477. dream Tech3 weapon - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: My main tech 3 weapon when it come's out will be a sniper rifle with rail rifle scope and a suppresor what are your plans? Forge gun with sniper scope? Something that seeks out PRO-stomping try-hards.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.28 08:29:00
|
2478. A proposal for Tanks/AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: What is it with you and wanting tankers to only use 1 hardener? You sound like a die-hard infantryman. Are you sick or something? I don't like seeing broken mechanics end up nerfing us, fact is we ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.27 19:17:00
|
2479. Remote explosives should be buffed to 3000 damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Instant fix to tanker problem You really do need giant crutches.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.27 18:58:00
|
2480. A proposal for Tanks/AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
What is it with you and wanting tankers to only use 1 hardener? You sound like a die-hard infantryman. Are you sick or something?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.27 18:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |