| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
141. Get rid of the god damn Jihad Jeeps please - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: Implying fire and forget requires skill...... Resource Management
Timing
Positioning
Situational Awareness
Ability to Take Evasive Action
Ability ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.26 16:28:00
|
142. Add ADV/PRO tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No. Tiercide for infantry, not vehicles. and vehicles needs better slot layouts.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.26 03:07:00
|
143. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: 1: That punishes armor based vehicles 2: It's very easy to get on top of a vehicle 3: We're most likely sealed in pods (same for DS pilots), and therefore makes even less sense, since that's ad...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 22:37:00
|
144. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Well one thing is I am not expecting a single individual taking out the vehicles easily on their lonesome emptying the entire contents of their weapons into the weak spots...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 22:26:00
|
145. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: Roger, you are amazing. You did not came with single idea in this topic, and all you do is keep criticize other's, like this is a hard part . I did not need to, this idea in itself, being able to disable or harm v...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 22:25:00
|
146. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Well one thing is I am not expecting a single individual taking out the vehicles easily on their lonesome emptying the entire contents of their weapons into the weak spots and if they do it for the wrong reasons they shou...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 20:41:00
|
147. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I wouldn't mind having differing armour values depending on where I am hit. E,g- Frontal Armour- 10% Damage Resistance Side Armour- 0% modifications to -10% Damage Resistance Rear Armour- On top of the vulnerable spot a s...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 20:36:00
|
148. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aighun wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: In that case, let me shoot someone in the leg and force them to wait to get repairs for it. otherwise they are left laying on the ground. small arms shouldn't be able to do much of anything to a vehicle....
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 20:33:00
|
149. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syeven Reed wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Syeven Reed wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Ideas and thoughts This is a good concept, although I could see it being to hard to manage. I'd imagine something like this would be balanced with givi...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 20:10:00
|
150. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: True Adamance wrote: I wouldn't mind having differing armour values depending on where I am hit. E,g- Frontal Armour- 10% Damage Resistance Side Armour- 0% modifications to -10% Damage Resistance Rear Armour- On...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 20:04:00
|
151. Balance is IMPOSSIBLE! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not sure how 12 people shooting at one is broken, unless those 12 people can very quickly swap back to murdering infantry
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 02:42:00
|
152. I have serious doubts Legion will ever come to be. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eruditus 920 wrote: We are coming up on 3 months (May 2) since the announcement of DUST's death and Legion and CCP has still not announced that this "project" is even green lit. Does this resonant with anyone else? There have been no updates, ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.25 02:37:00
|
153. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syeven Reed wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Ideas and thoughts This is a good concept, although I could see it being to hard to manage. I'd imagine something like this would be balanced with giving the vehicle a counter such as an 'escape'. ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 20:25:00
|
154. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aighun wrote: After playing a lot of Warthunder recently I am in favor of more sophisticated damage models for vehicles. For every weak-spot that any engineers eradicate from mobile armor, there is another one that engineers will design weapon...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 20:22:00
|
155. PC Gamer article, closer to greenlight? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kain Spero wrote: I still think that killing off the link to Eve in order to have Legion "stand on it's own" is silly mantra that has been circulating at CCP for far too long. I'm sorry but I don't see Legion competing in the quality of PvE wit...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 03:55:00
|
156. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Let's consider how weak spots would be handled by actual engineers if the technology in the Eve universe was real. Personally, I believe shields would be adjusted to co...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 01:56:00
|
157. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Let's consider how weak spots would be handled by actual engineers if the technology in the Eve universe was real. Personally, I believe shields would be adjusted to compensate for these weak ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 00:29:00
|
158. Age restriction on legion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hawk-eye Occultus wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: sir, what in god's name does that supposed to mean, and can you at least type it with proper grammar? Oh, the irony! Oh the huge manatee ! Question: are you drunk and/or high?
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.24 00:18:00
|
159. Age restriction on legion - in General Discussions [original thread]
RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: RogueTrooper 2000AD wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: And all a kid has to do is "lie" about their age. True but when they come on comms, they will be reported. All I have generally seen for ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.23 23:35:00
|
160. Vehicle Weak Spots and Non AV Weaponry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Thoughts suggestions ideas expansions and addiums? Yea, it would be cool if people could put giant potato in to LAV exhaust pipe which could trigger some chain reaction and big explosion ....
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.07.23 22:29:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |