| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: iv also known abut dust since 2004 so yeah stick with it noob Dust didn't exist in 2004. I call bullshit.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.24 00:42:00
|
182. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheEnd762 wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: And yes, they are unavoidable. They're not. I just stated several ways how they can be avoided, and that's not even ALL the ways. Let's see: 1- destroying a LAV is neigh impossible with a nitro e...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.24 00:41:00
|
183. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: TheEnd762 wrote: JLAVs are AV. I never said anything about 3x reps, specifically. I said tankers don't want to have to contend with an AV tactic like JLAVs because it's not somethi...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.24 00:30:00
|
184. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheEnd762 wrote: JLAVs are AV. I never said anything about 3x reps, specifically. I said tankers don't want to have to contend with an AV tactic like JLAVs because it's not something they can flee/rep from. So the occasional tank/installation...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.24 00:16:00
|
185. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TheEnd762 wrote: You're just butt-hurt because people are popping your mobile murder fortress without an opportunity for your to flee and/or ultra rep. Sorry I interrupted you mowing people down with reckless abandon and running away once the s...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.24 00:00:00
|
186. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Smoky Fingers wrote: Same argument as ramship vs ADS, groundwise . The tools are there, except countering such tactics is tough and require complete attention on the task. Most of the time , vehicle users have infantry kill farming as priority ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 23:56:00
|
187. CHANGE RAILGUNS BACK NOW! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Denied.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 22:05:00
|
188. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: And I ask why. Quite literally why. Why are they still in the game? They are no way in hell a legit kill, and it's no way in hell a fair kill. AV is much better than before (actually usable by noobs...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 22:04:00
|
189. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seymour KrelbornX wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: And I ask why. Quite literally why. Why are they still in the game? They are no way in hell a legit kill, and it's no way in hell a fair kill. AV is much better than before (actually usable by no...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 22:01:00
|
190. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: And I ask why. Quite literally why. Why are they still in the game? They are no way in hell a legit kill, and it's no way in hell a fair kill. AV is much better than before (actually usable by noobs...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 21:42:00
|
191. Tanks should be... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Satori Particle wrote: + More HP + More Damage Output + More Expensive + Higher ISK Reward and WP When Destroyed Make them monsters who stand and fight, not hit and run. Tanks should be less common but more devastating....
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 19:49:00
|
192. New Vehicle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Harpyja wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: DESTROYER STAR wrote: True Adamance wrote: It's called and MTAC as was planned for Dust. With half the HP of an LAV on a vehicle frame it would be worth less than a Senti...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 19:47:00
|
193. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BLOOD Ruler wrote: Because Tanks suck Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Yes I'm mad, deal with it. No, you deal with it.[/thread] neither of these are arguments whatsoever.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 19:44:00
|
194. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Argetlam Thorson wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: And I ask why. Quite literally why. Why are they still in the game? They are no way in hell a legit kill, and it's no way in hell a fair kill. AV is much better than before (actually usable by noo...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 19:43:00
|
195. Proximity Mine Buffs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Proxies can be considered OHK weapons and CCP is against having such weapons. Yet the bug that is JLAV's have stayed in the game for what, 7 months?
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 14:32:00
|
196. {Request} Dust 514 = Anti New Players - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: sandbox pve legion
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 14:30:00
|
197. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Are you Godin? Depends, am I, am I not? Is this the matrix? Are you Neo?
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 14:29:00
|
198. I see that JLAV's are still a thing - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
And I ask why. Quite literally why. Why are they still in the game? They are no way in hell a legit kill, and it's no way in hell a fair kill. AV is much better than before (actually usable by noobs, which is why most of you wanted to keep it), so...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 14:19:00
|
199. New Vehicle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
jaksol JAK darnson wrote: True Adamance wrote: It's called and MTAC as was planned for Dust. With half the HP of an LAV on a vehicle frame it would be worth less than a Sentinel Suit. https://wiki.eveonline.com/wikiEN/images/3/3a/CCP_Game...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 14:07:00
|
200. (feedback) shield tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
jaksol exendent wrote: Den-tredje Baron wrote: jaksol JAK darnson wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: You're terrible. Spend some money and make some good fittings. Hell, I'm having a great time with a fully MLT fit Sica rather than my P...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.06.23 13:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |