| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2081. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 01:56:00
|
2082. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 01:54:00
|
2083. Delete basic equipment idea - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I use Standard and Militia modules almost exclusively.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 01:01:00
|
2084. Balac's Assault Ck.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
If he was true Caldari, he would be keeping the suit, not selling it.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 00:23:00
|
2085. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Pokey, the more commentary I read from you in tryng to justify this the more utterly divorced from the reality of the topic I realize you are. We've seen bpo's fielded in PC ever since bpo's were available. "Serious" battl...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 22:54:00
|
2086. May someone explain?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Considering you're engaging slightly above its optimal range (40m) its to be expected that he's going to wreck you. Assault Rifle has higher DPS than the RR, so if you engage at or near their optimal range, they will easily out-dps you.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 22:51:00
|
2087. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
nickmunson wrote: you are taking out roles that ccp intended to be played in every game, there is no such thing as a cheap logi suit that would be viable, bpo links why? 15 seconds can not be used tactically . tanks forget about it, so there f...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 21:06:00
|
2088. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: No combat bonuses, not p2w. The bonuses can be earned without spending aurum. Faster =/= p2w If you can't pay aurum at least pay attention. P2W is such a lame buzzword. People love to toss it around in order to make ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 20:00:00
|
2089. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: If they don't care about the win, they'll use cheap gear and try to dupe you into burning ISK on expensive stuff. And I think many are missing the fundemental of what PC is. It's not about bringing c...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:42:00
|
2090. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: If this game was worth investing in I would. Anyway- the team that brings the more isk stands a better chance at winning. Also, trading (pay for loyalty 4) = more officer weapons to some people = win. Y...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:26:00
|
2091. Plasma Cannon Advice - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jumping with a PLC is the scrubby way to use it. With practice and skill you can be extremely successful with both feet firmly on the ground. It's difficult to give specific advice other than learn how to lead your target depending on range. I typ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:21:00
|
2092. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: This isn't some pub match, this is the end game meta. If there is one mode where the best of the best is encouraged to be used, this is it. Your idea on what PC should be is just wrong. There should be absolutely no incentive t...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:15:00
|
2093. [Request] Buff n' Nerf - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kinyuhk Goluhh wrote: Quote: doesn't it stand to reason that more DPS be balanced with less range? The proto HMG is the highest grade, nobody even flinches from lower versions. The DPS for these lower variations is also too poor to make a...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 18:09:00
|
2094. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside. What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than ex...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 18:05:00
|
2095. [Suggestion] Commando Buffs (FAO Cross!) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Added my proposal. Movement Speed updated based off of Kallas's suggestion, placing Commandos directly between Assaults and Sentinels. His logic is solid on that. Stamina also increased based off of Kalla's suggestion. While I feel the Logistics...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 07:41:00
|
2096. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside. What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than exploiting a defensive move to freely defend a...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 04:07:00
|
2097. [Suggestion] Commando Buffs (FAO Cross!) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sorry, took me a bit of time to get around to actually doing it. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PSrsxiqZFBOWEHhFmTapZvB5gt6mO9e07zCHPk98bgo/edit?usp=sharing I figure we can start using this is as a master proposal sheet to compare var...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 00:43:00
|
2098. [Vote For Idea(s)] Permanent/Wound Damage Idea - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Number 6. The general concept of HP and regen is fine. No need to change it.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.14 22:50:00
|
2099. Sticky:[Feedback] FW and Skirmish - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kaze Eyrou wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: As for encouraging Vets to do Facwar....from the sounds of it, the planned Acquisition game mode is pretty much as close as we're going to get to a true "Attack and Defend" game mode, which to me seems l...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.14 22:49:00
|
2100. Armor and Shield upgrade - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Incorrect. Base Dropsuit Stats Armor: 140 Shield: 160 Armor and Shield Upgrades Level 1 Armor: 147 Shield 168 You're basing your assumption that the base stats are equal to when the skills are level 1, when in fact its supposed to be level 0 S...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.14 20:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |