| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
721. 12/7 [ Never Forget ] 9/11 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Yes, because we should all have respect for war mongers and murderers. Tell me how far does that respect of yours extend to the leaders of the third reich? You'll have to f...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 08:02:00
|
722. 12/7 [ Never Forget ] 9/11 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Yes, because we should all have respect for war mongers and murderers. Tell me how far does that respect of yours extend to the leaders of the third reich? You'll have to forgive me if I have some lingering respect for the...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 07:31:00
|
723. 12/7 [ Never Forget ] 9/11 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Respect given on my part, there is a reason it was called the greatest generation In regards to the rest of your answers You also have to remember gaming communities are mostly filled with Left Wingers, Liberals, Idealists, Globalists, Keynesian...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 06:23:00
|
724. [request] Scouts should share passive scan results with their squad - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
At least going back to the OP, this could work if we didn't have active scanners, I think the scout shared vision plus the active scanner for anybody with an equipment slot would equate to a little too much omniscience. One or the other gets the j...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 05:11:00
|
725. FW needs to be able to attach status to Console IDs (not PSN ID) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote: What are you the NSA? we as players don't need to know console id but the punishment could still be applied across the console, which Sony already has info on. No privacy is invaded if no extra information is given.
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 04:22:00
|
726. FW needs to be able to attach status to Console IDs (not PSN ID) - in General Discussions [original thread]
If we had the power over Console IDs then we could theoretically mark players as kill on sight for any character they bring into a faction. Restoration has to be done for each character on that playstation ID separately, they would have to fight b...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 03:03:00
|
727. [10mil giveaway] What makes you mad? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Do I get a two for one special (the guy on the voice is not me)
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.08 02:32:00
|
728. How are Scrambler Pistols? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Cloned Soldier wrote: And how do they compare to SMGs? Many are discouraged by the low effectiveness of the early models, but their power increases drastically as they are skilled up. A Carthum Assault Scrambler Pisto...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 23:43:00
|
729. Why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: T8R Raid wrote: CCP was VERY QUICK to nerf tanks/heavies/tac ARs/forge guns/render range, whats taking so long with the scrambler rifle? you slip on ice and whack your head and need time off? get with the program. ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 23:37:00
|
730. Caldari Corps - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
Ku Shala wrote: corporations fighting for more than one faction (aside from Amarr) should be put on a watch list and kept separate from any private channels. we need more pilots, we need squads to switch to team chat upon deployment or Tuesd...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 23:31:00
|
731. Active Suit modules? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awesome Pantaloons wrote: I can think of only three possibilities. 1) Active camouflage 2) Epic shield buff that boosts damage resistance 3) Epic temporary speed boost The reason that active modules would be so limited is because unlike vehicle...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 19:15:00
|
732. No december events? - in General Discussions [original thread]
December doesn't start until the new patch and doesn't end until the next patch, more so than monthly events they are patch events.
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 19:08:00
|
733. [request] Scouts should share passive scan results with their squad - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Oswald Rehnquist wrote: Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Minmatar scouts say, "what good does this do me?" This would just be another buff to gallente, who are the recon based scouts. Minmatar which are assassins and combat ...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 19:04:00
|
734. [request] Scouts should share passive scan results with their squad - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Minmatar scouts say, "what good does this do me?" This would just be another buff to gallente, who are the recon based scouts. Minmatar which are assassins and combat support have zero use for this. As cool as this see...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 18:03:00
|
735. which weapon will yal choose... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ivy Zalinto wrote: Ill still be using my pistols but my scout may have a ranged option now with the rail rifles coming out. I like the idea of an automatic railgun for some reason... The charge on the railgun is also mitigated by the fact th...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 09:28:00
|
736. How to fix Armor v Shield - in General Discussions [original thread]
If scouts are ever getting cloaks, then we will need active scanners to counter them, that is what I believe what the focus is there for. So I don't actually have a problem with the numbers they have per say. I eventually would like scouts to have...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 09:26:00
|
737. How to fix Armor v Shield - in General Discussions [original thread]
If scouts are ever getting cloaks, then we will need active scanners to counter them, that is what I believe what the focus is there for. What does need to happen to scanners is 1) Scanning is like ADSing, meaning no crazy spinning or just make...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 09:18:00
|
738. Pro-tip for FW - in General Discussions [original thread]
nor asha wrote: I wish FW was 6 man squads que only... Forcing full team deploy is too much. But with the squad finder... I wish public matches were non squad based. No squads at all. the FW is squads only. we need a 6v6 mode, or even a 6v6...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 09:10:00
|
739. [request] Scouts should share passive scan results with their squad - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Samantha Hunyz wrote: Shotty GoBang wrote: The last time we Scouts debated the idea ... which we debated at length ... the majority were opposed unless we could toggle it off/on (ON for PC, otherwise OFF). Quite a few of us rely on sneak att...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 09:08:00
|
740. FOTM fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote: All that to say - correlation =/= causation. People cried over the Flaylock because it was actually broken. CCP fixed the Flaylock because it was broken, not because people cried. And now, word is spreading that th...
- by Oswald Rehnquist - at 2013.12.07 06:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |