| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
501. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
...having more slots, more CPU and more PG equals more health and more damage. The intention is for people to use that CPU and PG on equipment to play a support role. Instead its used on shield and armor boosts to become a tank.
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:28:00
|
502. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: So, a few extra nano-hives make them better assaults how exactly? That's not the stupidest thing I've heard all day And yes, they should have more surviveability than an assault, at least HP wise, or do you think think they'...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:18:00
|
503. Oh NOES, i'm under fire - log off LOG OFF! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is this even a real problem? I'm sure people log off all the time for whatever real reason, but I don't know if its a ton of rage quitting.
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:15:00
|
504. When end-game players avoid items... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: When crossbows were invented during the medieval ages, the Pope at the time felt that the crossbow was OP and decided to ban them from warfare. This was the first recorded nerf of any first person shooter in human history. ...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:08:00
|
505. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nemo Bluntz wrote: HTFU ADAPT OR DIIIIIIIIIIIIIE That's... totally not hypocritical "Oh yeah, lets just nerf these guys because we failed to adapt and then tell them to adapt " - Dust Forum's Logic I was mocking the ...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:03:00
|
506. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: We need to be able to run people over so the driver gets decent WP. Haha, and there is no possible way to remedy that.
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 15:02:00
|
507. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Amarr Logi / hread. Two 'S' slots? \thread
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 14:59:00
|
508. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Bettie Boop 2100190003 wrote: You can all go suck a duck trying to mess with logistics suits! Stop trying to get logies nerfed because you think assault suits suck, find constructive ideas for assault suits rather than dest...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 14:50:00
|
509. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Hope you know this idea has been discussed at least 100 times since Uprising released. If I knew that, do you think I would've made a thread about it? I honestly never saw the idea proposed, and my one search yielded peo...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 05:50:00
|
510. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Is this really another "All logis are the problem herp-derp" topic? Really? ....no. This is a "hey, everyone agrees that Logis are better than assault.... is there a simple, "makes sense" solution to that thread. HTFU ADAPT ...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 05:44:00
|
511. A simple fix (Assault Logi) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just a passing idea... There's the obvious running issue of Logi players playing as beefed up assault characters. There is little incentive for a Logi to hang back and actually play his role as support because they are simply better at eating bull...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 05:40:00
|
512. Cal Logi isn't OP... - in General Discussions [original thread]
hackerzilla wrote: Adapt or Die Read: 'Ignore awful game design.'
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 05:13:00
|
513. Keyboard sprint strafe - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Xero The Mishima wrote: XiBravo wrote: XiBravo wrote: Plug up a kb and try it. They are doing SOMETHING. Could be that mod that somebody showed in general discussion where they are tricking the PC it is a Controller and programming...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 04:59:00
|
514. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: Nemo Bluntz wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: [quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.16 02:25:00
|
515. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: Nemo Bluntz wrote: That's a different discussion, start a new topic. Headline it with something like " I'm a cry baby who can't hold a conversation and wants to change the subject " or something then list any reasons ...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:52:00
|
516. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: Nemo Bluntz wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:49:00
|
517. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a wa...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:43:00
|
518. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: Nemo Bluntz wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: [quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that?...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:34:00
|
519. How to Semi fix Dust kart 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
LT Dans Legs wrote: Or just make them not able to hurt infantry at all if they try to run them over. Of course half the player count would quit playin cuz thats the ONLY way they can kill anyone. Efin poonannies. Wait, no, they would just snipe...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:30:00
|
520. Could LAVs be working as intended? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldiersaint wrote: [quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy ...
- by Nemo Bluntz - at 2013.07.15 21:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |