Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
684
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 20:59:00 -
[31] - Quote
People should not be running around in the open on a battle field.
The fact that they do is the result of high health short AR ranges and dancing bunny hop mechanics.
In other words normally bullets would keep them from running around in the open...LAVs do tend to stop this. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
173
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:01:00 -
[32] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:First off, I would like to say: http://youtu.be/ussCHoQttyQSecond: let's see the description Quote:The Light Attack Vehicle (LAV) represents a new generation of mobile support vehicle, an agile and effective unit, adept at assisting both infantry and other vehicles on the battlefield with its cadre of electronic warfare subsystems and all-terrain maneuverability modules. Whether employed as a scout vehicle or as an anti-infantry unit, the LAV is a ubiquitous part of New Eden's modern battlefield. So, more or less, LAVs are meant to support infantry and vehicles; I can't find it online, but the scout LAV description also says they're meant for hit-and-run attacks. While I'm almost positive the turret is supposed to do the majority of the fighting, you could say that LAVs are doing their job- supporting infantry by running people over, and supporting vehicles by running AVers over. The turret just makes it more efficient at that. As far as LLAVs, they can't do their intended job anyway because their built-in rep is garbage. IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2367
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
hooc order wrote:People should not be running around in the open on a battle field.
The fact that they do is the result of high health short AR ranges and dancing bunny hop mechanics.
In other words normally bullets would keep them from running around in the open...LAVs do tend to stop this. No, the reason why they do it is AV dominance. I remember when infantry wouldn't run around in the open because HAVs would tear them apart if they did. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
684
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:hooc order wrote:People should not be running around in the open on a battle field.
The fact that they do is the result of high health short AR ranges and dancing bunny hop mechanics.
In other words normally bullets would keep them from running around in the open...LAVs do tend to stop this. No, the reason why they do it is AV dominance. I remember when infantry wouldn't run around in the open because HAVs would tear them apart if they did.
I there was no bunny hop dance and ARs had 500 meter range i guarantee no one would cross open ground without cover ever.
So yes it is the reason.
Let me guess Dust is the only FPS you have ever played? |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
109
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks.....
And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective."
|
VonSpliff
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
15
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:29:00 -
[36] - Quote
LAV work great, minus the DPS. Throttle, Steering, Mod fits, all great. It's the DPS.
The amount of DMG done with no penalty. Plus they can out run most AV. Murder Taxi tactic is about As lame as Core Flaylock as a primary weapon.
Best fix it a penalty to steering acceleration and over all speed after running over someone. It's only fair.
VonSpliff, Merc |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:29:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective."
its just common sense
ofc a moving VEHICLE can do you harm DUHH
and killing someone with LAV turret is a pain in the ass
|
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
VonSpliff wrote:LAV work great, minus the DPS. Throttle, Steering, Mod fits, all great. It's the DPS.
The amount of DMG done with no penalty. Plus they can out run most AV. Murder Taxi tactic is about As lame as Core Flaylock as a primary weapon.
Best fix it a penalty to steering acceleration and over all speed after running over someone. It's only fair.
VonSpliff, Merc
when i run over full speed an heavy i kill them but my LAV reacts like i hit a wall
rear wheels actually go up in the air and nose down , reminds me of ( face down , ass up its the way i like to fk song) and sometimes the whole LAV jumps of the ground from impact
not all the time but i feel the impact |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
109
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective." its just common sense ofc a moving VEHICLE can do you harm DUHH and killing someone with LAV turret is a pain in the ass
Then wouldn't the fix be "buff the turret, take away impact damage?" Even make it harder to hit the guy on the turret too?
I feel like a lot of you are trying to "make sense" of a video game about multiple races of immortal clones fighting across the galaxy. It's a video game. None of anything going on in it makes a whole lot of sense "realistically". But for some reason, you guys are drawing the line here.
Imagine how bad ass it would be to have the Logi LAV working as intended (giving health support to infantry and tanks). It makes sense for it to have that much health so it can be in the fight without worrying about being immediately blown up. Instead, since you can use it as a super fast, high health battering ram, of course people go that route. It's crazy lame. |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2368
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
VonSpliff wrote:LAV work great, minus the DPS. Throttle, Steering, Mod fits, all great. It's the DPS.
The amount of DMG done with no penalty. Plus they can out run most AV. Murder Taxi tactic is about As lame as Core Flaylock as a primary weapon.
Best fix it a penalty to steering acceleration and over all speed after running over someone. It's only fair.
VonSpliff, Merc The problem is that the turret sucks |
|
Daxxis KANNAH
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
196
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Wrong kind of "hit and run". How so? Either way, it's drive in, kill someone, drive out before AV can react.
You are supposed to fear the turret not the bumper |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2368
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective." Might as well be, since you need prototype to kill with it while moving. |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective." its just common sense ofc a moving VEHICLE can do you harm DUHH and killing someone with LAV turret is a pain in the ass Then wouldn't the fix be "buff the turret, take away impact damage?" Even make it harder to hit the guy on the turret too? I feel like a lot of you are trying to "make sense" of a video game about multiple races of immortal clones fighting across the galaxy. It's a video game. None of anything going on in it makes a whole lot of sense "realistically". But for some reason, you guys are drawing the line here. Imagine how bad ass it would be to have the Logi LAV working as intended (giving health support to infantry and tanks). It makes sense for it to have that much health so it can be in the fight without worrying about being immediately blown up. Instead, since you can use it as a super fast, high health battering ram, of course people go that route. It's crazy lame.
yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
|
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
113
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:43:00 -
[44] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced.
Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun.
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2369
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective." its just common sense ofc a moving VEHICLE can do you harm DUHH and killing someone with LAV turret is a pain in the ass Then wouldn't the fix be "buff the turret, take away impact damage?" Even make it harder to hit the guy on the turret too? I feel like a lot of you are trying to "make sense" of a video game about multiple races of immortal clones fighting across the galaxy. It's a video game. None of anything going on in it makes a whole lot of sense "realistically". But for some reason, you guys are drawing the line here. Imagine how bad ass it would be to have the Logi LAV working as intended (giving health support to infantry and tanks). It makes sense for it to have that much health so it can be in the fight without worrying about being immediately blown up. Instead, since you can use it as a super fast, high health battering ram, of course people go that route. It's crazy lame. yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse And you're ignoring that the turret should be buffed.
Btw, we're in full high-tec body armor. Shouldn't we be able to survive getting hit by a car? |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2369
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Daxxis KANNAH wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Wrong kind of "hit and run". How so? Either way, it's drive in, kill someone, drive out before AV can react. You are supposed to fear the turret not the bumper Well right now, the turret isn't scary at all because it takes to long to kill, and the physics for firing from a moving vehicle are broken. |
CoD isAIDS
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
Skyhound Solbrave wrote:If you remove LLAVs and buff the scout ones somehow, I would say yes. Some people may just want to be the best driver in new esen, drifting over the bodies of their enemies.
I never understood why logi vehicles were so hard to kill, but the infantry can be killed like wet paper. LLAVs need to be less difficult to kill. It should take only one, MAYBE 2 AV grenades of equivalent meta level to pop an LLAV. It would force real drivers to think about their maneuvers instead of just bull rushing a fire fight. You can't aim a forge gun? |
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2369
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall The tanks weapons are built to destroy full high-tec body armor. I don't think the bumper of LAVs are. |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
115
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall
That's a different discussion, start a new topic. Headline it with something like "I'm a cry baby who can't hold a conversation and wants to change the subject" or something then list any reasons you can come up with in there that you have against the tank.
The LAV situation, on the other hand, is a real problem and is breaking the game away from some of the really cool mechanics it could have. If you could take a step back away from "what makes sense in a video game" and talk more about "what makes a game fun" you might see the topic with clearer eyes. |
|
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:49:00 -
[51] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall The tanks weapons are built to destroy full high-tec body armor. I don't think the bumper of LAVs are.
LAV is not made from PAPER , it has weight add some speed to that , i mean come on its simple as 1+1=2
|
Daxxis KANNAH
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
196
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Daxxis KANNAH wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Wrong kind of "hit and run". How so? Either way, it's drive in, kill someone, drive out before AV can react. You are supposed to fear the turret not the bumper Well right now, the turret isn't scary at all because it takes to long to kill, and the physics for firing from a moving vehicle are broken.
Yeah - so NOT WORKING AS INTENDED op |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
10
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall That's a different discussion, start a new topic. Headline it with something like " I'm a cry baby who can't hold a conversation and wants to change the subject" or something then list any reasons you can come up with in there that you have against the tank. The LAV situation, on the other hand, is a real problem and is breaking the game away from some of the really cool mechanics it could have. If you could take a step back away from "what makes sense in a video game" and talk more about "what makes a game fun" you might see the topic with clearer eyes. ur last defense is trolling? how sad
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2370
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:52:00 -
[54] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall The tanks weapons are built to destroy full high-tec body armor. I don't think the bumper of LAVs are. LAV is not made from PAPER , it has weight add some speed to that , i mean come on its simple as 1+1=2 We can survive a fall at terminal velocity. |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
115
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 21:52:00 -
[55] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:That's a different discussion, start a new topic. Headline it with something like "I'm a cry baby who can't hold a conversation and wants to change the subject" or something then list any reasons you can come up with in there that you have against the tank.
The LAV situation, on the other hand, is a real problem and is breaking the game away from some of the really cool mechanics it could have. If you could take a step back away from "what makes sense in a video game" and talk more about "what makes a game fun" you might see the topic with clearer eyes. ur last defense is trolling? how sad
No. That's not a 'defense' and its certainly not trolling.
My current response to your nonsense is condescension. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
177
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 22:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:[quote=Scheneighnay McBob]IT SAYS ANTI INFANTRY ON IT...ARE YOU PEOPLE FREAKING BLIND? RUNNING PEOPLE OVER IS PART OF ANTI INFANTRY.......you people are amazing you know that? why is it that stupid assault rifle can destroy but nothing else can?....leave the lav the way it is.....so people can keep smashing those stupid infantry only assault rifle punks..... And the gun on top is just there as an ornate piece of abstract art. CCP was totally thinking "you know what? The gun is there, but let's have the front bumper be literally 10,000 times more effective." the turret is worthless. thats why everyone just goes for road kills. |
TEBOW BAGGINS
Greatness Achieved Through Training EoN.
749
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 23:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Daxxis KANNAH wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Wrong kind of "hit and run". How so? Either way, it's drive in, kill someone, drive out before AV can react. You are supposed to fear the turret not the bumper Well right now, the turret isn't scary at all because it takes to long to kill, and the physics for firing from a moving vehicle are broken.
idk.. i have some good gunners who can get down with neutron scatter + 2 complex dmg mods. but i also drive/park good to get them shots instead of like most ppl who go full throttle the whole time. |
Thor McStrut
Reckoners
65
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 23:24:00 -
[58] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:yeah lets just ignore everything by using the clones excuse
I'm using the video game excuse. Street Fighter isn't a fighting sim, its a game, they make concessions to realism so it's balanced. Battlefield isn't a war simulator, they make concessions so it's balanced. Company of Heroes isn't a tactics sim, they made concessions so it's balanced. Shall I go on? It's a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Fun comes, in large part, from balance. One hit kill drive bys courtesy of a, near invincible to all infantry, speeding brick is not balanced and its not fun. i dont like tank either , lets do something about them too , its a video game afterall and we do wear full high-tec body armor afterall That's a different discussion, start a new topic. Headline it with something like " I'm a cry baby who can't hold a conversation and wants to change the subject" or something then list any reasons you can come up with in there that you have against the tank. The LAV situation, on the other hand, is a real problem and is breaking the game away from some of the really cool mechanics it could have. If you could take a step back away from "what makes sense in a video game" and talk more about "what makes a game fun" you might see the topic with clearer eyes. ur last defense is trolling? how sad
What's sad is the man has a clear and concise argument, and all you can do is troll with, "It's not broke cus it works for me."
Have you ever hit a large animal with a car, a car of any size? Even a truck? And yes, a human at 180lbs+ is a large animal. If you have, then you'd know that even in your "realistic" sci-fi world/gaming universe, that the vehicle should be damn near undrivable. The steering should pull, the engine should barely be servicable, and the body should probably be totaled.
So pull your head out of your selfish ass and look at the big picture. Not only does game balance need to be looked at here in this case, but even your "realistic go play in the street" view doesn't apply to what LAVs are currently capable of.
|
Scheneighnay McBob
Tribal Band Dust Mercenaries Immortals of War
2372
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 23:24:00 -
[59] - Quote
TEBOW BAGGINS wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Daxxis KANNAH wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Wrong kind of "hit and run". How so? Either way, it's drive in, kill someone, drive out before AV can react. You are supposed to fear the turret not the bumper Well right now, the turret isn't scary at all because it takes to long to kill, and the physics for firing from a moving vehicle are broken. idk.. i have some good gunners who can get down with neutron scatter + 2 complex dmg mods. but i also drive/park good to get them shots instead of like most ppl who go full throttle the whole time. Well, my gunners can kill easily- if it's parked. But a speed-based vehicle should be able to kill with a driveby. |
Spademan
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
171
|
Posted - 2013.07.15 23:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
Aren't speeders coming soon-ish, or the ccp definition of soon? If so, surely they'd replace the LAV as the freebie, no? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |