| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
161. Introducing Pirate Faction Gear - Could Even Put a Stop to Re-Specs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The problem with this is that bonuses are applied by skills ... not by items ... so to introduce a pirate faction dropsuit, it would need a pirate faction skill if it wanted any bonuses. I've said this all along, bonuses should be item based. It ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 22:09:00
|
162. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sadly I don't think it will be possible to limit where points are spent and I have to agree there's no easy way to manage the points invested in the tree as it is being crossed over to the 1.7 changes. I've said all along that re-allocations are ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 21:45:00
|
163. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: All I read was "Your bad judgements, and stopped reading". LOL Then I'll make it simple for you ... Needless Sacermendor wrote: Answer me one question daishi ... why should one section of the community be allowed to make th...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 21:10:00
|
164. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: Edit: I swear to god, SCKR4LIFE, your full quotes and quadruple posts will lead to a bitter end. I give up on him ... there's no point trying to debate ... he doesn't read, he just picks up on a couple of words and argues a...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 20:55:00
|
165. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
daishi mk03 wrote: They did the same last patch, altered a skill and refunded all SP. Hmm nothing in the patch notes, which skill was that ? See, every vehicle skill tree gets fundamentally changed and there is absolutely no way to transfer ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 20:49:00
|
166. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: I see 'CHANGES' ... could you clarify your statement though ... I see a Vehicle Command skill in there, we have that now so that's one that's not being removed ... hmm pretty sure we have a Large ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 20:17:00
|
167. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: so if I reinvest the same SP Shouldn't you have said **Spoiler Alert** Would be a bit ridiculous if they didn't re...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 19:11:00
|
168. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: so if I reinvest the same SP Shouldn't you have said **Spoiler Alert** Would be a bit ridiculous if they didn't refund SP after changing the tree like they have. I ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 16:28:00
|
169. Issue With Gunnlogi in 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: so if I reinvest the same SP Shouldn't you have said **Spoiler Alert**
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 16:19:00
|
170. Character sp transpose - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can say for almost certain they won't go transferring sp between accounts ... what they will more than likely do is try to help you regain access to your other account somehow. As has been said, just contact [email protected] and they'll do...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.11.01 16:05:00
|
171. Uprising 1.7 is content locked. Who wants to make some bets? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Krom Ganesh wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Aesiron Kor-Azor wrote: what does content lock mean? That no more features are going to be shoved into that patch but bug fixes and corrections can. In other words, the point at which we sta...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.31 20:00:00
|
172. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: technically that's not true, im a vet tanker with over 10 million SP in tanks yet I am adaptable and can survive outside of my tank. I also have sp into gallente assault, I make your statement invalid. Yes ... you are special...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.31 00:29:00
|
173. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void ... seriously give it a rest ... you're making a fool of yourself arguing points people haven't even made. Come back when you've learnt a little reading comprehension. You're hung up on my quoting of the Heavy dropsuit description in game w...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.31 00:27:00
|
174. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: So... what exactly is the point of tanks, in the end? I drive the damn things and I've not a clue. What's their role? What are they supposed to be used for? How can you balance them if you don't know what FOR? ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.31 00:06:00
|
175. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think Void Echo skipped debating 101 class !
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:57:00
|
176. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Void Echo wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: And he did say that. If a thing is not superior, then it has no properties that are greater than; then this means it is ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:53:00
|
177. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Void Echo wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: And he did say that. If a thing is not superior, then it has no properties that are greater than; then this means it is equal. A single prop...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:34:00
|
178. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: How about this: LIGHT AV weapons should be good at taking out light vehicles, but ineffective at taking out heavy vehicles, while heavy AV kills all vehicles relatively quickly. Doesn't that make sens...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:22:00
|
179. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Okay solo fine but your talking about a frigate trying to destroy a battle cruiser here. Its not that ******* easy. We don't want it to be easy ... granted the weapon itself is easy to operate, but gaining the tactical ...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:16:00
|
180. AV Users, stop crying, you've had your fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: And he did say that. If a thing is not superior, then it has no properties that are greater than; then this means it is equal. A single property that is greater/superior would mean the whole is greater if no other prop...
- by Needless Sacermendor - at 2013.10.30 23:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |