| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
801. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So Takihiro, I'm calling you out, give me an answer. Why should it take multiple AV units to destroy a single player in a tank? What reason do you have ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 23:45:00
|
802. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: So Takihiro, I'm calling you out, give me an answer. Why should it take multiple AV units to destroy a single player in a tank? What reason do you have that permits a single person to surpass more th...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 23:20:00
|
803. Confirmed..!!!..Jets are coming 5/28/14 - in General Discussions [original thread]
So glad it appears to have gone back to its roots, not that rubbish with dogfight mod and all that b*llsh*t
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 22:41:00
|
804. Turret Proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yoma Carrim wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Yoma Carrim wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Heh heh heh, Well first just doesn't make sense lore wise. And the second would be absolutely bloody hilarious. No what you need to do is to decrease accurac...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 22:28:00
|
805. Turret Proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yoma Carrim wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: You know how weapons have really low efficiency against vehicles, why not make large turrets have this efficiency against Infantry? That way we still get to keep strong turrets for...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 22:05:00
|
806. Turret Proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: You know how weapons have really low efficiency against vehicles, why not make turrets have this efficiency against Infantry? That way we still get to keep strong turrets for engaging other Vehicles, but t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 22:03:00
|
807. Turret Proposal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: You know how weapons have really low efficiency against vehicles, why not make large turrets have this efficiency against Infantry? That way we still get to keep strong turrets for engaging other Vehicles, but then Infantry...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 21:58:00
|
808. do you get 20 kills a match? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes I regularly get 15-20 kills, but I do it by hacking some obscure yet important installation, hacking that point with just a few people guarding it, holding that flank no one thinks anyone will try. So umm, should said guy follow me to where h...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 21:54:00
|
809. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
So Takihiro, I'm calling you out, give me an answer. Why should it take multiple AV units to destroy a single player in a tank? What reason do you have that permits a single person to surpass more than multiplemof hos designated counter?
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 21:49:00
|
810. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheherazade VII wrote: LittleCuteBunny wrote: 1 AV player shouldn't solo a tank. BRILLIANT TANKER LOGIC No teamwork for me but teamwork for thee I think that's Spk4rs ****** thing he says now I'm turning it on it's head. You can't ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 18:52:00
|
811. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Gelhad Thremyr wrote: 1) Lets all agree on one thing, mechanized infantry (tanks) should have high HP and should be able to create opportunities for infantry. With that being said, if the level design of m...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 18:50:00
|
812. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: And tanks can kill lots of infantry, by themselves. Your missing the point, you are saying 1 AV should only be capable of suppressing tanks. So we turned it on its head, would you be happy if, it ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 18:39:00
|
813. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gelhad Thremyr wrote: 1) Lets all agree on one thing, mechanized infantry (tanks) should have high HP and should be able to create opportunities for infantry. With that being said, if the level design of maps doesnt give enough possibilities to...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 16:58:00
|
814. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
BIind Shot wrote: Quote: And I strongly disagree with you. Why are all of you so hell-bent on destroying tanks? Is it not enough if you managed to make it activate its modules and retreat? That's how it should be. A dedicated AV vs a dedic...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 16:54:00
|
815. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Zaaeed Massani wrote: Harpyja wrote: Please tell me WHY you HAVE to destroy the tank to consider your job done. Again, let me ask you, is it not enough if you forc...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 16:47:00
|
816. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Zaaeed Massani wrote: Harpyja wrote: Please tell me WHY you HAVE to destroy the tank to consider your job done. Again, let me ask you, is it not enough if you forced the tank to retreat? When tanks consider th...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 14:57:00
|
817. Proto swarms Vs 3 rep maddy (video) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Harpyja wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Minor Treat wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Ok, obviously it's broken and needs fixed and I'm not trying to defend it, but have you tried: Similarly tiered forgeguns? What about Proto...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 14:40:00
|
818. Tanks: Separate Driver From Main Gunner - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Its a 'good' idea, but it just wouldn't work in practice. Unfortunately. As I have said and always lived by. Teamwork should be optional, but not compulsor...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.30 10:03:00
|
819. Tanks: Separate Driver From Main Gunner - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Its a 'good' idea, but it just wouldn't work in practice. Unfortunately. As I have said and always lived by. Teamwork should be optional, but not compulsory It does however say something about the po...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.29 23:04:00
|
820. Tanks: Separate Driver From Main Gunner - in General Discussions [original thread]
Its a 'good' idea, but it just wouldn't work in practice. Unfortunately. As I have said and always lived by. Teamwork should be optional, but not compulsory It does however say something about the power of tanks if this idea comes up so many ti...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2014.04.29 22:53:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |