| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3321. Has anyone noticed - in General Discussions [original thread]
calvin b wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: calvin b wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Can you show a picture of the runway? Next time I find it I will take a PIC Awsome don't forget you are only playing on about 1/25 of the total map! Thanks...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 15:11:00
|
3322. Has anyone noticed - in General Discussions [original thread]
calvin b wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Can you show a picture of the runway? Next time I find it I will take a PIC Awsome don't forget you are only playing on about 1/25 of the total map!
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 15:05:00
|
3323. Has anyone noticed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: calvin b wrote: Not a QQ or rage forum just a few questions to see if the community is seeing what I am seeing. 1. Swarm Launcher's. I have proto SL and should have no problem with this weapon, but I do. It seems after ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 15:01:00
|
3324. Are there plans to change the Minmatar Assault Racial Bonus? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Zeylon Rho wrote: I think once there's a Combat and Precision rifle (that is, more Minmatar light weapons than sidearms), then it gets kinda silly to have a sidearm assault bonus coming from the same race with two rifles an...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:57:00
|
3325. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: There's no bubble to burst, I stated my opinion with some facts, you stated your opinion. I'm amarr logi, working as intended and I skilled into it the moment I found it had a sidearm at proto when it was gimped My opini...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:44:00
|
3326. Is Planetary Conquest at a Stalemate? - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: In eve numbers matter in Dust514 you top 16 is all u need that's why PC is a bust tbh if they up the match count to 64 players dust would properly become a lot more fun as teamwork overrides all stars How about 1024v1...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:39:00
|
3327. Is Planetary Conquest at a Stalemate? - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Like bamm and hooker said on their video for the eve link, planetary conquest needs to beifit alliances, massively! There is not enough of a reason for it at the moment, planetary conquest should be something ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:37:00
|
3328. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Poonmunch wrote: h3110 kitty wrote: CCP just seems to be skating around the real issues people got tired of being sniped from roof tops by sniper and forge snipers so let **** everyone and but a lip around all ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:31:00
|
3329. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: Someone drag this dead horse away...and then slap some sense into the OP. I don't have the strength argue against this failed logic anymore. Get past the one-on-one you just lost in your latest Instant Battle, do some real f**kin...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:25:00
|
3330. Is Planetary Conquest at a Stalemate? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like bamm and hooker said on their video for the eve link, planetary conquest needs to beifit alliances, massively! There is not enough of a reason for it at the moment, planetary conquest should be something eve allainces want tonhire dust mercs ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:23:00
|
3331. Has anyone noticed - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can you show a picture of the runway?
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:08:00
|
3332. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: I would've preferred having the building tops without the border/railing, but also lacking cover. You can snipe, but you're out in the open. Securing objectives, etc. below ground is also good (and makes sense). I dislike the...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 14:04:00
|
3333. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: TechMechMeds wrote: Sarducar Kahn wrote: They are super assaulters simply because they can stack complex HP/DPS mods why not reduce the amount if slots to make up for the gain in equipment slots. While t...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:56:00
|
3334. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Dunk Mujunk wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: you have got to be ******* serious, or trolling. 1 person, easily destroy a TANK??? then whats the point of a TANK? 1v1 blas...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:46:00
|
3335. Why do logis have so many slots? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TechMechMeds wrote: Sarducar Kahn wrote: They are super assaulters simply because they can stack complex HP/DPS mods why not reduce the amount if slots to make up for the gain in equipment slots. While the have slots, pg and CPU the will alw...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 13:42:00
|
3336. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: An OP weapon is when the ONLY way to take out a weapon x is with a weapon x! Now if they were roof camping, redline camping, or somewhere in the back beyond with a full view of the entire map, that was...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 12:06:00
|
3337. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: There was considerably less risk to sniping then any other proffesion, if camper found a good spoint and glitched his barrel through the terrain he could be untoachable. And don't forget if the only wa...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:45:00
|
3338. anti-vehicle and tankers alike, let me enlighten you - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Dunk Mujunk wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: you have got to be ******* serious, or trolling. 1 person, easily destroy a TANK??? then whats the point of a TANK? 1v1 blaster, this isn't ******* COD kid, whoever shoo...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:26:00
|
3339. it makes me laugh when i see some of ccp supposed fixes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: I would argue that sniping has always had an appropriate level of risk. The easiest people to snipe are snipers. I think part of the problem is that people fit for CQC find that they can't take out a sniper with their own ...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:20:00
|
3340. Matchmaking- The Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Tiercide: remove tiers and at the same time, tears. There will be minor despair and doomsaying about loss of progression, but to be honest tiercide is the best-looking alternative to this gear system which many seem to disag...
- by Monkey MAC - at 2013.09.26 11:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |