Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3861. The Truth about STB Leadership, coming from their head FC/Director and Diplomat. - in The War Room [original thread]
Roman837 wrote: Hey that's a great idea! Why didn't I think of doing that? Why didn't I fight for months for change. Why didn't I confront them in private in our leadership channel.. You are so smart! Oh wait, I did that you moron, I put up wit...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 07:04:00
|
3862. Damage Mods really mess with that TTK lmao - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remember when it was complex mods and a Duvolle? Woooooo. People LOATHED ARs then.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 06:25:00
|
3863. 823. thank you community - in General Discussions [original thread]
misleading thread title, clearly OP has 825. I am disappoint
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 06:23:00
|
3864. I'm not seeing the "OP'ness" of the CR - in General Discussions [original thread]
The mercs of New Eden couldn't possibly start a new year without declaring a weapon OP. "What do you mean the guns are balanced? it's CCP, something is wrong with the weapons, right?"
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 02:06:00
|
3865. The Truth about STB Leadership, coming from their head FC/Director and Diplomat. - in The War Room [original thread]
Roman837 wrote: The responsibility of all leaders, is to protect their soldiers from the other leaders, put them before yourself. But first, a leader must display tact. A leader must be honorable. A leader must think outside of himself in...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 02:04:00
|
3866. Tanks aren't to blame - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge only speaks for what's good for his Dust experience. Not for what is good for the game overall.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 01:32:00
|
3867. Please remove or better yet revist - in General Discussions [original thread]
xSynnx x wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Nope. It's working as intended. Frontline (infantry) is setup perfectly for a basic infantry soldier. Rifle, sidearm pistol. Case closed. Medic has a rifle and SMG as its secondary, which makes sense for t...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 01:29:00
|
3868. Tell me why a combat rifle does more damage than an HMG? - in General Discussions [original thread]
There's plenty of witch hunts to go around. This thread is one of em...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 01:27:00
|
3869. MLT TANKS GETTING NERFED!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ninjanomyx wrote: All of you are so woefully clueless........ The problem is not the Tank, nor the Price, & nowhere near PG/CPU........... Modules were "Homogenized" & have been hit with a form of Tiericide. There is Zero Difference bet...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 01:24:00
|
3870. Am i the only one who thinks that the rail rifle is a bit ridiculous at all ranges. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: You can say the same about the CR too , let's not forget . Oh but I do. LOL, I am a Caldari loyalist
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:59:00
|
3871. Am i the only one who thinks that the rail rifle is a bit ridiculous at all ranges. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: being killed by hip fire form RR at 40-or less is not balance. especially when useing a duvolle. 40 or less is where the AR is ''supposed to shine'' but apparnetly RR dosnt have a conecpt of range. Are you talking ...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:56:00
|
3872. Am i the only one who thinks that the rail rifle is a bit ridiculous at all ranges. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fire of Prometheus wrote: I find it balanced, the only concern is how quickly you can ADS. I've noticed the adv rr snaps ads a lot quicker than the basic one and roughly the same as the proto rr. Idk but I feel the rail rifle is "my" weapon. I...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:50:00
|
3873. Please remove or better yet revist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nope. It's working as intended. Frontline (infantry) is setup perfectly for a basic infantry soldier. Rifle, sidearm pistol. Case closed. Medic has a rifle and SMG as its secondary, which makes sense for the medic guy. So, it's working as intende...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:45:00
|
3874. AR is the most useless Assault Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Each weapon carries a uniqueness that is good for unique combat scenarios. So it's...working as intended
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:42:00
|
3875. A typical Logi scenario. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Uh, what did I just walk into? I will moonwalk back out then...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:37:00
|
3876. Please change the minmatar Assault suit in some way! - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol @ Minmatar assaults. They make pretty good logis though.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:35:00
|
3877. CCP PLES DO DIS :P :)) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Michael Arck wrote: LOL make a sniper dedication thread and see people how many people can name "dedicated" snipers. Dedicated doesn't equate to being good at your role. Done . Now go hug your Duvolle. It's a SB-39, sir...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.05 00:31:00
|
3878. aim assist gone bad - in General Discussions [original thread]
So now folks acting like the aim game was SOOO much better before Uprising? Please. It was not. And threads were numerous complaining about the aiming problems. Now it's aim assist is OP. Can you folks make up your minds?
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.04 11:23:00
|
3879. Isn't it time we removed 3rd person view from vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
No. I'm not even a DS pilot now (will be eventually) but I feel the third person view allows you to see your surroundings and make adjustments instead of being confined to tunnel vision.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.04 11:10:00
|
3880. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Um, yes and no. Maybe take em out for now until the tank thing is sorted out and then bring em back at a later time.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.01.04 09:07:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |