| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
9021. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I am saying that if a player provides a base item that get modified by the 'virus' you bought to reduce its skills or fitting requirements it would leave the base item in the hands of the original manufacturer to still be...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 23:27:00
|
9022. AUR Items and The New Eden Economy - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: One little cavat, the clothes are very destructable if put in the cargo bay. It would make sense not to wear clothes in the pod. Funny, my esquire coat never moved to the cargohold whenever I jumped into the pod. My c...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 23:21:00
|
9023. AUR Items and The New Eden Economy - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm not gonna lie. This is going to be a complex discussion because of the nature of economics and how confusing it's going to be for players who are coming from other games that don't have their own economy. So let's try to keep this as simple as...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 23:12:00
|
9024. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talking about the economic impact on these items is a very complex subject especially when you have to consider the dynamics that come with an economy that is based on the basic laws of supply and demand. Like you said, Altina, that is an entirely...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 22:13:00
|
9025. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
@Altina It's better to just keep pushing the issue so that CCP can be reminded about their promise of no P2W. If you don't feel like reporting it, then that's ok.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 21:45:00
|
9026. MAY 5th - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know what difference this will make. Probably none considering we're going to have our gear removed and refunded anyways.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 21:39:00
|
9027. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
Altina McAlterson wrote: This is pretty much what I've posted at least 50 times recently. And I felt completely correct in saying it until yesterday (maybe day before) when they added a new light damage modifier that's just like those two I sai...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 21:36:00
|
9028. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: CCP has to get money somehow, giving players an advantage in exchange for money makes sense, at least from CCP's standpoint. It may drive away casual players but chances are that players that stick with the game will spend ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 21:33:00
|
9029. They say not p2w - in General Discussions [original thread]
They will get fixed.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:45:00
|
9030. Ladders who needs ladders? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I want elevators with cheaply-ripped off music playing in them.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:26:00
|
9031. The reason why tanks are no longer worth it... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's a little late to talk about this at this point. May 6 is almost around the corner. Better to wait until then to see what CCP did.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:23:00
|
9032. Planetary Conquest and PSN Update schedules. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bendtner92 wrote: Arramakaian Eka wrote: OP poses a legitimate concern, ignored by trolls above. USians will get a 24 hour or longer head start over EU in the gold rush to claim districts if CCP uses PSN update schedule to determine when dis...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:22:00
|
9033. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sev Alcatraz wrote: Only problem I have is that there all eve players That may not be a bad thing. Remember, Dust will be impacting Eve in some way in the future. It would make sense to get a Dust player who understand Eve Online so that no ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:18:00
|
9034. Disappointed In CCP's CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: @Iron Wolf Saber Doom? XD It also had destroyable vases! OMG That is so revolutionary. Broken vases? Who da thunk it?
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:16:00
|
9035. Planetary Conquest and PSN Update schedules. - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's a good point. Very well put. But if I recall from previous announcements from either Sony or CCP, both of those companies are able to make exceptions when it comes to scheduling and might be more willing to allow the update to be universal ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:11:00
|
9036. Disappointed In CCP's CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
@Iron Wolf Saber Doom? XD
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 18:07:00
|
9037. CPM 0 : Nova Knife says stuff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote: I like the OP a lot Nova... But how do you intended to stop dead weight on the CPM?.. I initially suggested that CCP should continue to handpick members, no voting and give them the right the remove people at a mom...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 16:10:00
|
9038. Disappointed In CCP's CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see any problem with this selection. Iron Wolf Saber, Nova Knife, Jenza, etc. are all active members of the forums. I could've joined. In fact, someone here in the forums even recommended me, but I rejected the offer because I felt like I ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 15:57:00
|
9039. "For Factional Warfare and Corporation battles we are adding a latency indi... - in General Discussions [original thread]
arimal lavaren wrote: Someone seems to have missed that this isn't a peer hosted game. So you're saying that the latency info for each individual player is not possible at all in a single-server like Tranquility where CCP, and only CCP, is t...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 15:34:00
|
9040. "For Factional Warfare and Corporation battles we are adding a latency indi... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also, if I remember correctly, doesn't the server automatically kick out the player (the one who lags the most) for us already? We have seen plenty of players reportedly getting kicked out probably for this reason alone. If so, then there is no po...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2013.04.20 15:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |