Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sev Alcatraz
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
217
|
Posted - 2013.04.20 18:14:00 -
[61] - Quote
Only problem I have is that there all eve players |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2060
|
Posted - 2013.04.20 18:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
Sev Alcatraz wrote:Only problem I have is that there all eve players
That may not be a bad thing. Remember, Dust will be impacting Eve in some way in the future. It would make sense to get a Dust player who understand Eve Online so that no major screw ups can occur. Of course, I also want non-Eve players to get involved so I can see where that can be a problem. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1358
|
Posted - 2013.04.20 18:53:00 -
[63] - Quote
Fuzzy Jello wrote:THE GREY CARDINAL wrote:People need to chill out. If you are unhappy with the current memmbers then just remember that this is just an innitial intake of what CCP called a beta version of the CPM for DUST 514. If this is to be a democratic thing moving forward, where the community will vote in the members, then those who aren't fit for the role will be weeded out.
I am unhappy with the current members of the CPM. But not from a perspective that calls into question their capabilities to perform the role since I believe the individuals chosen are capable. My beef extends from the fact that I believe CCP is showing favoritism. And make no mistake, favoritism IS being shown: Kain Spero, former member of Betamax. Ironwolf, member of Betamax. jenza aranda, ceo of Betamax. Hans Jagerblizten, former member of Betamax. "Oh but its okay! CCP can appoint the CPM because we are in beta!" I call bull****. The fact that we are in a beta is in "title" anyway. People are paying real money into this game, an attribute not shared with the every day run of the muck "beta." It is generally known and accepted by the player base (at least by the bitter vets) that Dust 514 being considered a beta is just an excuse for why it has remained in the current dreary state it is in. The fact is that Dust 514 is diverse with multiple cultures being represented. You have the hardcore fpsers, like those that came form MAG. You also have current and veteran New Eden denizens. You also have the casual new player that picked up the game (I mean beta, even though its marketed with: "download full game"). Are all the aforementioned cultures being represented by the appointed CPM? Why the favoritism? I have a theory. "God forbid CCP choose individuals associated with Goons or TEST for CPM!" Because we all know that if they went in that direction, all the "non-veteran New Eden pubbies" may perceive that as favoritism towards Goons; given to them from CCP on a silver platter. Say it isn't so! And for what? Fear. Fear that Dust 514 won't get up off the ground because the pubbies would get their toes stepped on and lose steam for this game. Fear that showing any additional good will to Goons or TEST (in Dust 514) will cause the pubbies to gain "why bother" syndrome. ("Why bother, if we are only going to get stomped by Goons and TEST in the end. Oh hell, CCP keeps giving them more and more attention, we won't last a chance!") I understand CCP's decision making for the CPM, contrary to what other's may claim. But the bottom line is this: Don't forget that Dust 514 is made up of diverse groups and cultures. Don't forget that the CPM should represent the entire Dust 514 player base and not a select (and pandered to) few. And most of all, don't forget those of us that helped make New Eden great in the first place; those of us that intend to continue on doing just that...
There are lots of others that would have been good for the cpm too. I just dont think there is a reason to pick a Goon/TEST rep because of what they are in EvE.
|
Fuzzy Jello
Immobile Infantry
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 00:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:Fuzzy Jello wrote:THE GREY CARDINAL wrote:People need to chill out. If you are unhappy with the current memmbers then just remember that this is just an innitial intake of what CCP called a beta version of the CPM for DUST 514. If this is to be a democratic thing moving forward, where the community will vote in the members, then those who aren't fit for the role will be weeded out.
I am unhappy with the current members of the CPM. But not from a perspective that calls into question their capabilities to perform the role since I believe the individuals chosen are capable. My beef extends from the fact that I believe CCP is showing favoritism. And make no mistake, favoritism IS being shown: Kain Spero, former member of Betamax. Ironwolf, member of Betamax. jenza aranda, ceo of Betamax. Hans Jagerblizten, former member of Betamax. "Oh but its okay! CCP can appoint the CPM because we are in beta!" I call bull****. The fact that we are in a beta is in "title" anyway. People are paying real money into this game, an attribute not shared with the every day run of the muck "beta." It is generally known and accepted by the player base (at least by the bitter vets) that Dust 514 being considered a beta is just an excuse for why it has remained in the current dreary state it is in. The fact is that Dust 514 is diverse with multiple cultures being represented. You have the hardcore fpsers, like those that came form MAG. You also have current and veteran New Eden denizens. You also have the casual new player that picked up the game (I mean beta, even though its marketed with: "download full game"). Are all the aforementioned cultures being represented by the appointed CPM? Why the favoritism? I have a theory. "God forbid CCP choose individuals associated with Goons or TEST for CPM!" Because we all know that if they went in that direction, all the "non-veteran New Eden pubbies" may perceive that as favoritism towards Goons; given to them from CCP on a silver platter. Say it isn't so! And for what? Fear. Fear that Dust 514 won't get up off the ground because the pubbies would get their toes stepped on and lose steam for this game. Fear that showing any additional good will to Goons or TEST (in Dust 514) will cause the pubbies to gain "why bother" syndrome. ("Why bother, if we are only going to get stomped by Goons and TEST in the end. Oh hell, CCP keeps giving them more and more attention, we won't last a chance!") I understand CCP's decision making for the CPM, contrary to what other's may claim. But the bottom line is this: Don't forget that Dust 514 is made up of diverse groups and cultures. Don't forget that the CPM should represent the entire Dust 514 player base and not a select (and pandered to) few. And most of all, don't forget those of us that helped make New Eden great in the first place; those of us that intend to continue on doing just that... There are lots of others that would have been good for the cpm too. I just dont think there is a reason to pick a Goon/TEST rep because of what they are in EvE.
I was only using Goons/TEST as an example because we are the example mostly harped on by the community over these issues. |
pink FLUFF
Immobile Infantry
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 05:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
Free Beers wrote:Fuzzy Jello wrote:THE GREY CARDINAL wrote:People need to chill out. If you are unhappy with the current memmbers then just remember that this is just an innitial intake of what CCP called a beta version of the CPM for DUST 514. If this is to be a democratic thing moving forward, where the community will vote in the members, then those who aren't fit for the role will be weeded out.
I am unhappy with the current members of the CPM. But not from a perspective that calls into question their capabilities to perform the role since I believe the individuals chosen are capable. My beef extends from the fact that I believe CCP is showing favoritism. And make no mistake, favoritism IS being shown: Kain Spero, former member of Betamax. Ironwolf, member of Betamax. jenza aranda, ceo of Betamax. Hans Jagerblizten, former member of Betamax. "Oh but its okay! CCP can appoint the CPM because we are in beta!" I call bull****. The fact that we are in a beta is in "title" anyway. People are paying real money into this game, an attribute not shared with the every day run of the muck "beta." It is generally known and accepted by the player base (at least by the bitter vets) that Dust 514 being considered a beta is just an excuse for why it has remained in the current dreary state it is in. The fact is that Dust 514 is diverse with multiple cultures being represented. You have the hardcore fpsers, like those that came form MAG. You also have current and veteran New Eden denizens. You also have the casual new player that picked up the game (I mean beta, even though its marketed with: "download full game"). Are all the aforementioned cultures being represented by the appointed CPM? Why the favoritism? I have a theory. "God forbid CCP choose individuals associated with Goons or TEST for CPM!" Because we all know that if they went in that direction, all the "non-veteran New Eden pubbies" may perceive that as favoritism towards Goons; given to them from CCP on a silver platter. Say it isn't so! And for what? Fear. Fear that Dust 514 won't get up off the ground because the pubbies would get their toes stepped on and lose steam for this game. Fear that showing any additional good will to Goons or TEST (in Dust 514) will cause the pubbies to gain "why bother" syndrome. ("Why bother, if we are only going to get stomped by Goons and TEST in the end. Oh hell, CCP keeps giving them more and more attention, we won't last a chance!") I understand CCP's decision making for the CPM, contrary to what other's may claim. But the bottom line is this: Don't forget that Dust 514 is made up of diverse groups and cultures. Don't forget that the CPM should represent the entire Dust 514 player base and not a select (and pandered to) few. And most of all, don't forget those of us that helped make New Eden great in the first place; those of us that intend to continue on doing just that... There are lots of others that would have been good for the cpm too. I just dont think there is a reason to pick a Goon/TEST rep because of what they are in EvE.
To the majority of players Goons / Test really have a bad reputation. However, you have to look at everything they do. For the most part both groups have tried to make the EVE universe better in many different ways. There newbie programs are by far better than any other groups period. They take care of their new guys. They generate in game content for their members and find ways to make the game fun. They create or have created some of New Edens most used programs and distribute it for free. (evemon / Goonmetrics). I dont know what test has made. They have a core of leadership that is unequal to almost all other alliancesn (At the moment test is not doing well but its test they will bounce back). Yeah we have a bad reputation, but that does not mean we hate the game. It is not right to judge where a person is from. However when everyone is picked from a small group of people then this causes problems. I think all of the individuals that were chosen want the right thing for the game but from such a small group as this? The BoB fiasco looms over this story. I would have each candidate actually create a resume while leaving the name section BLANK and have the community select the person who they believe has the most creds.
On that note vote Pink Fluff! Resume ~ I Play eve Things that I have done ~ Played eve for 10 years now Things I will do ~ Play eve some more. Things I can do ~ I speak multiple languages Things I wont do ~ Actual work
But on the most part good luck with the initial WC. |
DeadlyAztec11
One-Armed Bandits Atrocitas
69
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 05:41:00 -
[66] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:GoD-NoVa wrote:hell half the CPM are AFKers lol Well at least I do not afk-leech, if I do afk its because something is happening in RL and its typically in a place where I could get killed. Been a few times I get kicked because it took longer than I thought. You just earned so much respect from me! +1 '^_^ |
Fuzzy Jello
Immobile Infantry
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 08:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
pink FLUFF wrote:Free Beers wrote:Fuzzy Jello wrote:THE GREY CARDINAL wrote:People need to chill out. If you are unhappy with the current memmbers then just remember that this is just an innitial intake of what CCP called a beta version of the CPM for DUST 514. If this is to be a democratic thing moving forward, where the community will vote in the members, then those who aren't fit for the role will be weeded out.
I am unhappy with the current members of the CPM. But not from a perspective that calls into question their capabilities to perform the role since I believe the individuals chosen are capable. My beef extends from the fact that I believe CCP is showing favoritism. And make no mistake, favoritism IS being shown: Kain Spero, former member of Betamax. Ironwolf, member of Betamax. jenza aranda, ceo of Betamax. Hans Jagerblizten, former member of Betamax. "Oh but its okay! CCP can appoint the CPM because we are in beta!" I call bull****. The fact that we are in a beta is in "title" anyway. People are paying real money into this game, an attribute not shared with the every day run of the muck "beta." It is generally known and accepted by the player base (at least by the bitter vets) that Dust 514 being considered a beta is just an excuse for why it has remained in the current dreary state it is in. The fact is that Dust 514 is diverse with multiple cultures being represented. You have the hardcore fpsers, like those that came form MAG. You also have current and veteran New Eden denizens. You also have the casual new player that picked up the game (I mean beta, even though its marketed with: "download full game"). Are all the aforementioned cultures being represented by the appointed CPM? Why the favoritism? I have a theory. "God forbid CCP choose individuals associated with Goons or TEST for CPM!" Because we all know that if they went in that direction, all the "non-veteran New Eden pubbies" may perceive that as favoritism towards Goons; given to them from CCP on a silver platter. Say it isn't so! And for what? Fear. Fear that Dust 514 won't get up off the ground because the pubbies would get their toes stepped on and lose steam for this game. Fear that showing any additional good will to Goons or TEST (in Dust 514) will cause the pubbies to gain "why bother" syndrome. ("Why bother, if we are only going to get stomped by Goons and TEST in the end. Oh hell, CCP keeps giving them more and more attention, we won't last a chance!") I understand CCP's decision making for the CPM, contrary to what other's may claim. But the bottom line is this: Don't forget that Dust 514 is made up of diverse groups and cultures. Don't forget that the CPM should represent the entire Dust 514 player base and not a select (and pandered to) few. And most of all, don't forget those of us that helped make New Eden great in the first place; those of us that intend to continue on doing just that... There are lots of others that would have been good for the cpm too. I just dont think there is a reason to pick a Goon/TEST rep because of what they are in EvE. The BoB fiasco looms over this story. I would have each candidate actually create a resume while leaving the name section BLANK and have the community select the person who they believe has the most creds.
This. CPM favoritism reaks of BoB favoritism.
|
THE GREY CARDINAL
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
51
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 09:15:00 -
[68] - Quote
pink FLUFF wrote:
On that note vote Pink Fluff! Resume ~ I Play eve Things that I have done ~ Played eve for 10 years now Things I will do ~ Play eve some more. Things I can do ~ I speak multiple languages Things I wont do ~ Actual work
But on the most part good luck with the initial WC.
I'll vote for you if you vote for me. :D
Here's a part of my resume. |
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1174
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 15:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:Cry me a river, boys. So you don't like the council, I'm shocked. So here's how its going to work. Regardless of what you may think of us, or whether we're "hardcore" enough for you, you have two options: 1.) Give us the benefit of the doubt, stop recycling the bullhonkey and trying to stir up drama, and reach out to your representatives (whether you approve of them or not) 2.) Ignore us, and let us do whatever we want with CCP. In this case, you not only lose out on your voice with them, you lose out on the ability to influence Dust's development (Naysayers can go get an education about what the CPM will be capable over here), but most importantly - you'll lose your right to ***** and moan about what comes down the pike.I have little interest in sitting around telling CCP how to develop the game. I have great interest in telling them how YOU want the game developed. I've spent the last year going toe-to-toe against CCP on a wide variety of issues, and I've served players in EVE from many different background vastly different from my own. Why? Because they didn't act like a bunch of crybabies, and sacked up and came to the CSM anyways with their issues and got results. I'm sure there will be many more threads like this, and I pretty much plan to ignore them the rest of the term. They're a waste of our time, they're a waste of your time, and a waste of CCP's time. If you want to make a difference, move to a constructive thread or write us a mail with your feedback, your questions for us to ask the devs. I'm also available all day long on Skype: Hans.Jagerblitzen is the name. I have all the time in the world to discuss Dust514 and how we can get it on the right track. I have zero time for the hand-wringing, hair-pulling, tinfoil, skepticism, or blatant ignorance about the council, its responsibilities, and the past successes of the CSM. So grow up, get to work, and get back in the game - and if you're unhappy with the roster, step up to the plate and run once we've set up proper elections. Believe me guys - this is not my first rodeo, and you're hardly the first bunch of sad pandas trying to Nostradamus my failure. I look forward to torpedoing your misconceptions in the coming months the way I have my detractors in EVE all last year. o7
See, here's the problem Hans...
CSM 7 didn't listen. To anyone. About anything. Maybe their own corporations/alliances but beyond that the only time the CSM ever came out of hiding was to pull this number:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213947
Seriously, the CSM complains about CSM members not talking or doing anything while at the summits so they go through this entire facade of putting together some bullshit system that makes it to where only a limited number of CSM members from CSM 8 can go to the summits....
... and then doesn't even explain their reasoning/answers when they decline player opinions! It's not your job to weigh whether or not you like the idea and discuss it with CCP if it suits you, you're supposed to show some form of neutrality as A REPRESENTATIVE.
So yeah, torpedo our misconceptions - have at it - make yourself look WORSE because it doesn't get much worse than absolutely failing at the only job that could literally be described as "middle man".
You want to do right by the community? Speak on the community's behalf. Do something for the community. Don't just play the game to hit your SP cap and then be done with it so that when something you -do- like comes around you're prepared for it, and don't play the role of 'representative' if the only ideals you're going to represent are your own.
I can't even count how many times the CSM has outright lied their way through the voting process when discussing concepts and ideas with players just so that they get a vote, and the fact that you didn't get elected and that you were CHOSEN just goes to show that you must really advertise yourself.
Why do I say this? Because the only issues you've commented on were Forge Guns and Active SP.
Do something with your role. Don't ride it out. It's not hourly wages. |
Fuzzy Jello
Immobile Infantry
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 17:47:00 -
[70] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:See, here's the problem Hans... CSM 7 didn't listen. To anyone. About anything. Maybe their own corporations/alliances but beyond that the only time the CSM ever came out of hiding was to pull this number: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=213947Seriously, the CSM complains about CSM members not talking or doing anything while at the summits so they go through this entire facade of putting together some bullshit system that makes it to where only a limited number of CSM members from CSM 8 can go to the summits.... ... and then doesn't even explain their reasoning/answers when they decline player opinions! It's not your job to weigh whether or not you like the idea and discuss it with CCP if it suits you, you're supposed to show some form of neutrality as A REPRESENTATIVE. So yeah, torpedo our misconceptions - have at it - make yourself look WORSE because it doesn't get much worse than absolutely failing at the only job that could literally be described as "middle man". You want to do right by the community? Speak on the community's behalf. Do something for the community. Don't just play the game to hit your SP cap and then be done with it so that when something you -do- like comes around you're prepared for it, and don't play the role of 'representative' if the only ideals you're going to represent are your own. I can't even count how many times the CSM has outright lied their way through the voting process when discussing concepts and ideas with players just so that they get a vote, and the fact that you didn't get elected and that you were CHOSEN just goes to show that you must really advertise yourself. Why do I say this? Because the only issues you've commented on were Forge Guns and Active SP. Do something with your role. Don't ride it out. It's not hourly wages. Edit: Also, who the **** approved the Gallente Battleship changes?! They all got out-right MURDERED, as if flying Gallente wasn't a death sentence to begin with.
The last CSM failed us. No one disagrees with that statement. And quite honestly, I am concerned that this "CPM 0" that CCP is touting will do the same because of the narrow culture within DUST 514 in which they represent. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against Hans and in all honesty I am "okay" with CCP appointing him for CPM. As I have said before, I believe that he is capable of fulfilling this role. What is not okay, in general, was how the appointees were chosen and the fact that based on who was chosen shows favoritism on the part of CCP.
I am not okay with appointing anyone for these roles but I am also not privy to CCP's perspective on this issue. If it is true that CCP saw no other way to properly manage "CPM 0" than to appoint people to these roles then I am fine with that. However, if that is not true from their perspective then setting up a voter system would have been the most fair and ideal way to go about things. That way, the DUST 514 community (which, for the moment, is alive and well) would have confidence that their choices represent their interests.
I have yet to see any evidence that the current appointees represent my interests, the interests of my corporation or anyone else that is not connected to the Betamax. + Imperfects + pro CCP subculture. When I see Hans saying: "Cry me a river, boys. So you don't like the council, I'm shocked," that just further confirms my feeling that the current CPM does not and most likely will not properly represent the DUST 514 playerbase and that as of present; it is just a mechanism to represent CCP's interests.
But let us assume that it was absolutely necessary if not required for CCP to appoint certain players to this role. It would have been better to have shared the pool of players they were considering to appoint and allow time for the community to provide feedback. This is a beta, so they claim. Last I checked, betas were times in the systems development life cycle of a new software or game. Being that this so-called beta is a mechanism for CCP to receive player feedback, it would have made the most sense for CCP to share the pool of who they were considering for CPM. That way they could weigh the DUST 514 playerbase's feedback in their decision making before making the CPM appointments.
That being said, it is true that some would still complain about the appointments, but CCP would have always been able to fall back on: "Well, we showed you which players we were considering and took into account your feedback when making our decision." A response like that would have done wonders compared to the new lows CCP has taken us today. Anyway, I hope you all are happy with the CPM and CCP's decision making. I still continue to maintain my position: I am not happy because: "Oh look! CCP is showing favoritism!" |
|
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1175
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 19:32:00 -
[71] - Quote
Fuzzy Jello pretty much hit it right on the dot.
It's the general attitude of the CSM 7 that was just ridiculous, this sense of, "Well, you don't like what I want so **** you." Not to point fingers - actually, to hell with it, I've already gotten consequences for personal attacks, anyway - that sounds a lot like the Goonswarm/Imperfects style and probably has a major factor in the choices of CCP for the CPM representatives.
Which, while we're on the topic of Representatives - I'd like to bring up something...
http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/dust-514-council-of-planetary-management-1/
Being as they explicitly use the word "representatives", my question is: Just who the hell are they representing, exactly? They weren't elected, they were CHOSEN by CCP. So, obviously there's not any semblance of our "representatives" representing the things the players want to represent because they weren't elected to do so. CCP chose them to (and this is just a shot in the dark) represent CCP.
That, or to represent a common factor. Being as the only common factor that these individuals share is their gross amount of publicity by whatever means (tournaments, CSM, charity or otherwise) it's not so far out of the realm of disbelief to assume that they were represented solely for PUBLICITY and with that in mind the CPM is not necessarily a council of representatives so much as one big advertisement stunt.
Unless, of course, you look at the next common factor: Affiliation with BetaMax. Call bull all you want, but that's a resounding feature that stands out among all other things and is a great reason to call favoritism.
On the assumption that these theories are completely wrong, however, and they've actually been chosen under the ideal that they are the best candidates to represent our wants/needs in Dust 514.... Why the bloody **** aren't they more resounding in their representation of certain issues? Not one of these people is known for having an opinion on any gameplay issue that pops on the forums and if they did it was weeks if not MONTHS ago.
So, I ask it yet again, who the hell are these people representing? |
Scheneighnay McBob
Bojo's School of the Trades
1269
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 19:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
ReGnUM Public Relations wrote:GoD-NoVa wrote:http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/dust-514-council-of-planetary-management-1/
Not naming any names but i feel as tho one of these people need to prove themselves they should be apart of this group. They have been known to take things wayyyy too seriously and often don't provide anything for their community. Past podcasts revealed this person to be unresponsive to discussions and very unreliable. This isn't a "i hate you message" but more of a "if you are trying to be apart of something this important then you need to show us you can put forth something greater".
Many of you who read this wont understand what im talking about, but the vets that do......you all understand. Imperfects will be releasing a statement on who we approve. To be completely honest with you guys, that will only make things MUCH MUCH worse, if you really do care about that. |
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1175
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 19:56:00 -
[73] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:ReGnUM Public Relations wrote:GoD-NoVa wrote:http://dust514.com/news/blog/2013/04/dust-514-council-of-planetary-management-1/
Not naming any names but i feel as tho one of these people need to prove themselves they should be apart of this group. They have been known to take things wayyyy too seriously and often don't provide anything for their community. Past podcasts revealed this person to be unresponsive to discussions and very unreliable. This isn't a "i hate you message" but more of a "if you are trying to be apart of something this important then you need to show us you can put forth something greater".
Many of you who read this wont understand what im talking about, but the vets that do......you all understand. Imperfects will be releasing a statement on who we approve. To be completely honest with you guys, that will only make things MUCH MUCH worse, if you really do care about that.
Couldn't POSSIBLY be Kain Spero. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
853
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 20:16:00 -
[74] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote: (Stuff)
So, I ask it yet again, who the hell are these people representing?
Just because players did not choose this CPM, does not mean any of cannot 'represent' you (our fellow players)
The burden is on us to actually listen, like you said in the above posts. To that end, It doesn't really matter who's in the hotseat as the 'middleman' or who chose them if they actually listen objectively to anyone who approaches them and passes things on without bias as appropriate.
I've made a point over the last year to talk to as many people and interact with as many corps as possible (Not because of the CPM, but because that's how I find my enjoyment in gaming... by being a social butterfly) I've stayed in an NPC corp so that everyone I interact with knows that is my only agenda, I just want to play and chat with everyone, and there is no corp drama/beef/other interests to get in the way of that. I am in as many corp public channels as I can be without my game freezing, and as soon as they increase that limit I'll be in a lot more, hopefully!
Like others have said above though... Some people are entirely misunderstanding the purpose of CPM0. This is mostly CCP's olive branch to the players. They wanted the community to define how the 'real' CPM will be chosen, set up, and what they'll be doing. To do this, they chose the people they thought would best be able to accomplish that. Some like their choices, and obviously some do not. But for anyone who wants it, my contact info is all at the bottom of this post and I will chat with anyone about anything at pretty much any time.
Like Hans said in his above post : CPM0 is not something everyone is happy about. Nothing CCP does will ever make everyone happy (Though the oppposite is true often enough :P) Most of that hate is unjustified, but the point is.... Like it or not. We're here. The burden is half on us to listen, and half on our peers in the playerbase to actually talk to us.
Just have a little faith :) |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3604
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 20:20:00 -
[75] - Quote
I will tell you one thing, if we do screw up then you have the right to be more angry. |
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1176
|
Posted - 2013.04.21 20:55:00 -
[76] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I will tell you one thing, if we do screw up then you have the right to be more angry.
Nah, I'm angry now just because I'm tired of putting faith into systems that don't work.
CSM, for instance. In fact, just about every CSM.
Nothing more infuriating than a group of people who all fly in power blocs that use the same fleet doctrine (Drakes/Hurricanes) commenting about ships they haven't flown in years.
Hell, prove me wrong - but as I've said previously the current CPM members haven't shown that they actually can collect the thoughts/opinions of the majority (not the most vocal majority, mind you) and act on it. That much was shown solely based on previous forum posts.
As far as involvement with things actually related to the game, Iron Wolf Saber does a great job at keeping us involved/informed from things ranging from Role-Playing and Lore Immersion all the way to New Build/Update Features, but even that isn't necessarily part of the job description; it's just more beneficial to the community than charity events and tournaments.
Quote:"-a group of selected delegates from the playerbase to meet with developers and discuss issues and topics of importance to both the playerbase and the future of the universe that would grow to become the EVE Online we know today."
Is the description given in the dev blog. Issues and topics of importance to the playerbase and the future of the game(s). But, in order to do that, you have to be communicative with the playerbase. That's where my issue is. CSM does a **** job about that and when they do communicate with us, it's in a snobby, self-serving manner that just shows how little they honestly care. Entire gameplay systems get changed solely because of the CSM (and soon the CPM) and not always for the better.
For instance: Allies in War Declaration. The excuse for changing it was that "people get locked into a war" and "no-one likes being dog piled" but by comparison CCP Soundwave goes on to state that "war isn't fair and shouldn't be fair". So which is it? The attacker gets into a situation they can't handle, can't back out of and suddenly they're the victim because it's unfair that they couldn't see what they were getting into? Toss that in with the fact that tacking on Allies costs exponentially more for every ally and you could be spending billions/trillions just trying to even the odds - AND THEN THEY INTRODUCED AN ENTIRE SKILL TO REDUCE THE COSTS
And that's just in Eve Online. If a system comes up in Dust 514, you can't start throwing out changes two frakking weeks after it gets implemented. It hasn't had time to evolve and just because one corporation/alliance bitches about it in unison doesn't mean that it's entirely broken, it just means they got into a situation they weren't prepared for - I.E: Welcome to New Eden syndrome.
If these five individuals can actually show that they aren't going to have some kind of bias towards these features and design mechanics, and adhere to what the community as a whole wants, than I'll be impressed let alone confident in their ability. I've beta tested this game since June 2012 and since then it's just spiraled downward into a game that's becoming more and more irritating to play. My favorite game features were removed and replaced with tosser ideas that just standardized everything. It's a second job that I've got to come home to and grind SP for the sake of having a shot in hell against the opposition in the long run.
Honestly, a good place to start is to come up with a forum sub-section that the CPM can post in. THIS DOES NOT MEAN ASSEMBLY HALL - THAT WAS A FAILURE. We don't need another 'Feedback/Ideas' subsection - what it needs to be is a subsection in which the CPM can post ONE ISSUE per TOPIC that they can get the feedback of the players on. That's the only way it's going to work with any form of organization because simply posting in the unorganized drabble that is General Discussion and Feedback/Ideas is just not going to work with any semblance of order, but you were chosen so I'll leave that to you. Just throwing out my 2 ISK. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |