| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
381. WHY WHY WHY WHY R U STILL CHEATING - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't worry. Once Nova is green lit for the PC, Big Brother... err... I mean Tranquility will be watching them sleep.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.05 23:14:00
|
382. Dust cave discovered - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's a glitch.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.05 23:12:00
|
383. ...This is How the Game Ends? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I look at it this way. It could have been far, far worse. The legacy of Dust, and I'm not talking about its code, could have died right there on the PS3 and left abandoned with no successor to carry on its legacy to another platform. Imagine gett...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.05 23:09:00
|
384. How i got into DUST 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Posted by Cat Merc. Want a PC? Have no idea what is dedotaded wam? Look here!Subscribe https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=226136&find=unread
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.05 04:23:00
|
385. Project Nova thoughts, Why Dust Flopped - in General Discussions [original thread]
To me, these are the principle reasons why Dust failed. 1. Terrible, terrible, TERRRRRIBLE legacy code. It's so bad that CCP said it's the main reason why some critical fixes and features weren't possible to implement in Dust. 2. Entering an alre...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.04 02:45:00
|
386. Not freeing up SP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let me reiterate what CCP Frame said in his official post in the Announcement section of the forums. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=225484&find=unread "Since this new game will be different from DUST 514 (although ke...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.04 02:37:00
|
387. Not freeing up SP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AldnoahZero wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Only under the condition that CCP takes a snapshot of our current stats before doing that just in case they find a way to transfer our character data to Project Nova if the time comes. How would that m...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.04 02:29:00
|
388. Not freeing up SP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Only under the condition that CCP takes a snapshot of our current stats before doing that just in case they find a way to transfer our character data to Project Nova if the time comes. The snaps...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.04 02:28:00
|
389. Not freeing up SP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Only under the condition that CCP takes a snapshot of our current stats before doing that just in case they find a way to transfer our character data to Project Nova if the time comes. That will never h...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.04 02:27:00
|
390. CCP Frame needs our help - in General Discussions [original thread]
We are here for you, Frame. We all want Project Nova to be a thing.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.03 03:37:00
|
391. . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, definitely troll. Nothing to see here folks. Move along.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 22:21:00
|
392. . - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can't tell if this is a troll post or a legitimate complaint.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 21:35:00
|
393. Nova sounds so uninteresting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nstomper wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Nstomper wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Pictured: ambition https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z_GRjNL7l40 Let's stick to properly paced development and caution, something CCP has proven ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 20:37:00
|
394. Not freeing up SP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Only under the condition that CCP takes a snapshot of our current stats before doing that just in case they find a way to transfer our character data to Project Nova if the time comes.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 20:02:00
|
395. Professional griefing. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Shaun Iwairo wrote: So where are you going with this post OP? You've sarcastically congratulated CCP for deciding to move to PC then you've waffled on for far too long about the ways that ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:59:00
|
396. Professional griefing. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Hmmmm serious ? Checks eve online search for ''account'' , ''hacked'', Finds many results about stolen Eve characters, lost assets, etc 1. Those accounts that were hacked either had poorly-chosen passcodes and/or lack...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:56:00
|
397. Nova sounds so uninteresting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: For the record, I don't think that the developers of Star Citizen have any intention to directly compete with the likes of Eve Online. They just want to be their own different game. But it looks fun =ƒ...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:46:00
|
398. Nova sounds so uninteresting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Nstomper wrote: Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Pictured: ambition https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z_GRjNL7l40 Let's stick to properly paced development and caution, something CCP has proven they do better than...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:45:00
|
399. Nova sounds so uninteresting - in General Discussions [original thread]
For the record, I don't think that the developers of Star Citizen have any intention to directly compete with the likes of Eve Online. They just want to be their own different game.
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:41:00
|
400. Nova sounds so uninteresting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Asakura wrote: Skihids wrote: If you have been around for any length of time you know that CCP is the absolute worst company at communication. If you are basing your views on the ramblings of one member of CCP you are most assuredly de...
- by Maken Tosch - at 2016.05.01 19:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |