| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
221. Swarms again. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Stupid Blueberry wrote: Okay, have we thought of just making them dumbfire again with a single round magazine like the PLC? It shoots one missile at a ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 13:50:00
|
222. Swarms again. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stupid Blueberry wrote: Lazer guided would be UP against ground vehicles. 1. How? 2. If i actually go behind cover it will not avoid it and they will lose lock and the missile will blow up
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 13:43:00
|
223. Swarms again. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Stupid Blueberry wrote: Okay, have we thought of just making them dumbfire again with a single round magazine like the PLC? It shoots one missile at a much higher velocity than current swarms. Bas...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 13:39:00
|
224. Swarms again. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stupid Blueberry wrote: Okay, have we thought of just making them dumbfire again with a single round magazine like the PLC? It shoots one missile at a much higher velocity than current swarms. Basically a Caldari PLC instead of the current s...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 13:19:00
|
225. Invincible Gunnlogi Q.Q - in General Discussions [original thread]
FLAY LOCKED wrote: Me = Wyrkomi Swarms + proficiency 5 + 2 complex damage mods Blueberry #1: KLA 90 PLC Blueberry #2: some proto cal assault with what I believe to be proto swarms V.S. Gunnlogi that just sat there, barely took any damage, a...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 13:17:00
|
226. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: [quote=Lazer Fo Cused] 6. Remote reps are area of effect to remove the dodgy targeting system 6a. Remote reps can rep as many vehicles as is in the AOE, the rep rate its self will be divided by as many vehicles which ar...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 12:43:00
|
227. Do you HAV a HAV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
1. Logi DS need a kick out button 2. Specalized hulls work on a role bonus and then a racial bonus, this can be upto 3 skills max 2a. Either 2 bonus skills for its role and 1 racial or vice versa - This is seen in infantry suits such as the Minma...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 18:13:00
|
228. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Logi DS need a kick out button 2. Specalized hulls work on a role bonus and then a racial bonus, this can be upto 3 skills max 2a. Either 2 bonus skills for its role and 1 racial or vice versa - This is seen in infantry suits such as the Min...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 16:33:00
|
229. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: meh screw it, I'm not talking to you any more lazer. I'll do my thing, you do yours. Your ability to justify anything so long as vehicles are untouchable by infantry is nothing short of amazing. 1. Dont get mad because ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:59:00
|
230. Hello there Rattati: "to what end" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: deezy dabest wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Personally, to make Dust 514 a better game because I passionately care about it and the players. Bandwidth is amazing fixed The only people I've seen ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:54:00
|
231. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: 1. Rattati would like a 35000+ Laser strike to get rid of a marauder Right, you want it to be kittens and rainbows. 2. You buff what is weak to make it strong and viable compared to something that is already strong and t...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:45:00
|
232. The problem with Vehicles and lack of purpose..... and AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: shooting for 30 seconds at a standing still sagaris was in no way adequate. beside that it would not stands till and was as fast as current LAVs 1. Yea militia AV does that 2. You want vehicle pilots to stay still...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:31:00
|
233. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: I'd love to add Swarm Pods as a Small Turret...and Guided Missiles as a Large Turret (Guided missiles being controlled by where you are pointed, while swarm pods are lock-on) but swarm pods seem like they'd be a bit aw...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:25:00
|
234. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: your scaling is only fine if you want it to require a squad to kill it. The Surya's EHP was the sticking point in chrome that pissed people off. The sagaris was manageable, but the Surya's tank was both inordinate and exce...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 13:22:00
|
235. The problem with Vehicles and lack of purpose..... and AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Mex-0 wrote: Remember Tank514? What "Tank 514" are you talking about? 1. 1.7 where they were 'OP' for about a month before the nerfs rolled in 2. That was pilots a...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 12:59:00
|
236. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m7G9wnM6gcnNM6oP6mw5oYgHQZF6XYelYh0PTgk72iM/pubhtml 1. Chrome with altered numbers, not finished either Y...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 11:34:00
|
237. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: What if you had 3 flavors? Resistance Amps - 15% Passive, Always On, Zero Downtime Active Hardener - 25% Active, Moderate Duration, Long Downtime Flux Active Harder - 40%, Active, Short Duration, Long Downtime 1. Had the...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 10:48:00
|
238. The problem with Vehicles and lack of purpose..... and AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Mex-0 wrote: Remember Tank514? What "Tank 514" are you talking about? 1. 1.7 where they were 'OP' for about a month before the nerfs rolled in 2. That was pilots adapting to what CCP had given them but it was no...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 10:45:00
|
239. Vehicle recall time (too much) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 2. CCP would break it so that the SL can still lock on and that it can still take damage and die on the way back Um... yes, that would be part of it. Obviously. That's not "broken". One of the bigg...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 10:42:00
|
240. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1m7G9wnM6gcnNM6oP6mw5oYgHQZF6XYelYh0PTgk72iM/pubhtml 1. Chrome with altered numbers, not finished either Your marauder resistances are set both too high an...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.14 10:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |