| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 |
781. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Goat of Dover wrote: fenrir storm wrote: DEADPOOL5241 wrote: +1 CCP for fixing issues, instead of adding more issues on top of the ones you have. Yes because in previous builds things they said were fixed worked right People like...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 22:31:00
|
782. Who complained about the AR damage gap?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sephirian Fair wrote: Ydubbs81 RND wrote: I hope I'm misunderstanding the patch note that says, "reducing damage gap" between standard, adv, and proto weapons. I hope they're not bringing them closer to together. The 3hp damage gap between ...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 22:16:00
|
783. 'Exile' Assault Rifle is out - in General Discussions [original thread]
same ADS as well ?
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 11:45:00
|
784. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Replication build. You were trying to hide beside a large blaster turret with your team on attack and mine on defense. You died. So?? Everybody dies sooner or later. Whoah that's old. And was just teasing :D Do we ev...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 11:17:00
|
785. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Laurent Cazaderon wrote: Quote: - Reduced the damage gap between Standard, Advanced, and Prototype tiers of all handheld weapons Not opposed to this. As a Tactical Assault Rifle user I p...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 11:11:00
|
786. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Laurent Cazaderon wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: [quote=Laurent Cazaderon]So, like all of you i red the patchnotes this morning with unconcealed joy. And boy was i disappointed.... I'll stop you right now, i knew this ...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 11:02:00
|
787. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: [quote=Laurent Cazaderon]So, like all of you i red the patchnotes this morning with unconcealed joy. And boy was i disappointed.... I'll stop you right now, i knew this build was about fixing the game more than adding stuf...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 10:49:00
|
788. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
and here i was thinking that the purpose of a beta was for a developper to see expectations from the players in order to enhance their game. Foolish me. Beside, if you had red the post, you would have notice it's not about "me wants more guns" or...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 10:28:00
|
789. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yagihige wrote: What i read was that the new build has 4 "variation" maps. So it doesn't really sounds like new maps. Either way, i miss the big 5 point skirmish maps. When they didn't lag, they were cool. it's probably the variations we had...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 10:13:00
|
790. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
honestly guys. i never expected 16vs16 or much new stuff in the coming build. The build is supposed to be oriented on the technical aspect of the game. And the lack of informations on that matter inside the patchnotes is what disappoints me. Maybe...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 10:09:00
|
791. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: Laurent Cazaderon wrote: I'll stop you right now. Yeah dude.. I think this is what you should do. You see.. Most of us here already know that we are beta testing the game. Those of you who don-Št should obviously turn...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 09:24:00
|
792. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aotherea wrote: reading patch notes and then saying "im disappoint" aint helpful either. Except that's not the only thing i'm saying. proof again you red nothing but the title....
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 09:05:00
|
793. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aotherea wrote: yes, let's whine about a free game that gets free expansions that is in beta, because you know, beta testing is nothing but your WORK and you have to expect everything to be delivered to you like you DEMAND it! ah, beta testers...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 09:02:00
|
794. Patchnotes ? disappointing much ? imo, yes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
So, like all of you i red the patchnotes this morning with unconcealed joy. And boy was i disappointed.... I'll stop you right now, i knew this build was about fixing the game more than adding stuff to it but even on that matter, i just dont see m...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.17 08:56:00
|
795. Petition for SP Wipe next build. - in General Discussions [original thread]
not necessary for next build (hopefully this week). wait till open beta now.
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.16 23:10:00
|
796. Maps for the Event this weekend - in General Discussions [original thread]
i'm not so much bothered by the fact it's old maps modified into new variations. I'm more disappointed of "game mode variations" being classic skirmish. I was hoping the "3 point variation" would actually change mechanics to avoid pure "domination...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.07 08:07:00
|
797. to defend or kill rogue agents? - in General Discussions [original thread]
what if CCP gives those agents a brand new auto-bomb trigger at death thingy ? Guess that would surprise quite a bit of people
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.06 15:48:00
|
798. build and wipe - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Many dusters have said that the devs have said that they will not wipe again until release. I hope that isn't true because they need to do a wipe for the open beta, at the very least. But I hope they wipe everything so you ...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.06 15:42:00
|
799. Commander Wang tease of the day on new build ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Umbat Boki wrote: As I wrote in another thread, I think that they need new build to have new dropsuite model available in game. As it's written in the event announcement, "Quafe agents should be readily identifiable by the unique Quafe dropsu...
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.06 11:53:00
|
800. Commander Wang tease of the day on new build ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado, you men of little faith. Codex isnt the best gameplay build. But not everything is bad about it. It offered a lot of improvements compared to precursor on many technical problems.
- by Laurent Cazaderon - at 2012.12.06 11:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |