- Added HMG 'Doom mode'- a new gun camera firing position
- Lowered HMG zoom FOV from 65 to 60 degrees
- Increased HMG zoom speed by 0.2 seconds
- Reduced Burst HMG fire interval

yes, let's whine about a free game that gets free expansions that is in beta, because you know, beta testing is nothing but your WORK and you have to expect everything to be delivered to you like you DEMAND it!

ah, beta testers.

reading patch notes and then saying "im disappoint" aint helpful either.

reading patch notes and then saying "im disappoint" aint helpful either. i wait for patch to come then i whine but some ppl just like to do the other way

+1, waiting for deployement to test it before final feedback...

One thing : Sensitivity is now equal in all directions when aiming down the sights with any weapon

Does this mean that Heavies with HMG or FG will turn as fast as Scout ?

Thx...

No, it means that the sensitivity is the same in both the X and Y directions. One of the weird issues in the present build is that the Y-axis sensitivity is lower than the X-axis sensitivity, and you can't change it whatsoever. This isn't that bad when you're using a DualShock 3, but it's kinda annoying with the mouse and keyboard.

I'll stop you right now.

Yeah dude.. I think this is what you should do. You see.. most of us here already know that we are beta testing the game. Those of you who don-¦t should obviously turn to something else.

Yeah dude.. I think this is what you should do. You see.. Most of us here already know that we are beta testing the game. Those of you who don-¦t should obviously turn to something else.

What i'm disappointed most with is there apparently isn't that much new content yet. I know the new weapons are coming but i see no mention of maps or even if the 5 objective skirmish maps are fixed and back.

Also, no progression on the interaction with EVE yet.

What i read was that the new build has 4 "variation" maps. So it doesn't really sounds like new maps. Either way, i miss the big 5 point skirmish maps. When they didn't lag, they were cool.

Laurent is trying to help the game, why don't you take your attitude elsewhere.

So, like all of you i red the patchnotes this morning with unconcealed joy. And boy was i disappointed.... I'll stop you right now, i knew this build was about fixing the game more than adding stuff to it but even on that matter, i just dont see much going on.

For the record, the PERFORMANCE section has.... one line. Makes sense for a technical fix oriented build....

=> No reference to lag
- Improved projectile behavior in networks with high latency.
=> No reference to micro-freeze
=> No reference to any enhancement in infantry physic model (wall of glass, collision, etc...)
=> No reference to timeout error
=> No reference to hard freeze when battle starts
=> No reference to long long loading time of contact list (unless the "- Optimized non-battle related networking connections" is about that)
=> No reference to fixing lasers (lack of over-heat on advanced, proto ; range evolution through sharpshooter)
=> No reference to spawning mechanics enhancement


Yet, we get stuff such as :


=> How in hell is that usefull ? or even remotely needed at this time ? What about breach AR then ? And SMG ? getting just a decrease in recoil ? What about range ? Guess it's all about heavies love...

also :



Is that serious ? People already play most of the time with militia shotgun, or AR or anything because the difference isnt that big when using damagers. they're actually reducing the gap even MORE. I dont see how that's a progression in gameplay really.... Imo, it's another way to catter, once more, to crybabies. Soon, there'll be no difference between any tier of module\weapon except for their PG\CPU consumption..... And it seems like a very weird decision to make in a build supposed to be fixing things..


I'm not very confident for this coming build... I'll wait and see till i get to actually play it.. But i have a very bad vibe about it.
Yet, kudos on fixing the grenade animation, and improving swarm launchers. Even though, it wont be enough imo.

and here i was thinking that the purpose of a beta was for a developper to see expectations from the players in order to enhance their game.

Foolish me. Beside, if you had red the post, you would have notice it's not about "me wants more guns" or "me wants more game modes"..

[quote=Laurent Cazaderon]So, like all of you i red the patchnotes this morning with unconcealed joy. And boy was i disappointed.... I'll stop you right now, i knew this build was about fixing the game more than adding stuff to it but even on that matter, i just dont see much going on.

For the record, the PERFORMANCE section has.... one line. Makes sense for a technical fix oriented build....

=> No reference to lag
- Improved projectile behavior in networks with high latency.

For your information. Most dropship/tank/LAV missile weapons are projectile based......

LAG being caused by projectiles from vehicles is now better or its fixed.

Fixed.

Not opposed to this. As a Tactical Assault Rifle user I pulled a lot of stupid **** that I honestly shouldn't have survived just because I was using an Advanced variant. You don't notice the damage difference until you tie in skills like Weaponry and Assault Rifle Operation. Then that 67.5 damage looks something like 84.4 for every bullet.