| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
701. No proto week - Jan. 22-29 - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: No. Imma cap out as quick as possible. Since we get 5x the SP per match but the cap is only 3x as normal shouldn't we be able to vcap out faster anyway?
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.20 11:04:00
|
702. No proto week - Jan. 22-29 - in General Discussions [original thread]
With the upcoming accelerated SP week (Jan. 22-29) I propose to make this week a no proto, no advanced gear week. Yea, I know, but hear me out. I see people, probably new players, going 0/5, 0/8, 0/12 or even worse in every single match and I ca...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.20 10:44:00
|
703. Announcement:Feedback Request: Dropsuit Stats and Skills! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm not a Heavy, but looking at the stats and realising that the Minmatar Sentinals stats are (more or less) the exact average of the stats of the other suits except for total HP (-12%) and speed (+7%) I think it is justified giving the Minmatar S...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.17 13:40:00
|
704. So, I just got back from school and am reading the stats of the bolt pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Jebus McKing wrote: ROF 0.4 + 0.25 charge up time + 6 round clip + 14 PG requirement on PRO level
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.17 10:47:00
|
705. So, I just got back from school and am reading the stats of the bolt pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
ROF 0.4
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.17 10:37:00
|
706. For 1.8 what do we as a community want most?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
stable 30 fps no more lag dropsuit bonus rework
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.14 11:20:00
|
707. Tiercide - in General Discussions [original thread]
My name is Jebus McKing, I'm a nobody who's been here since closed beta, and I approve this message.
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.12 21:13:00
|
708. If there is a better time to ask for tiercide, it is now - in General Discussions [original thread]
I fully support the idea of a tiercide.
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.11 13:36:00
|
709. 1.8 possible changes to come (unconfirmed) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Outer Raven wrote: Solid 50 fps gameplay : CCP supposedly stated that they were able to finally get the game to run at a smooth 50 fps (essentially lag free), will wait and see how this plays out in real time as opposed to theory crafting. ...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.10 22:59:00
|
710. Common Sense: Make the Assault class mirror the Logistics class - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: The proposed bonuses seem better... Except the Caldari. Charge time on the Rail Rifle is negligible. Zoom is already fine, as I can constantly kill at ranges that exceed 90m. Honestly, I'd prefer...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.08 09:17:00
|
711. Common Sense: Make the Assault class mirror the Logistics class - in General Discussions [original thread]
yup, this makes more sense than most things I've read here in the last couple of months. +1
- by Jebus McKing - at 2014.01.08 08:25:00
|
712. What needs changes in 1.8 and beyond - in General Discussions [original thread]
In my opinion there is no need to continue developing this game if CCP can't finally get us a stable framerate of 30fps in absolutely every situation and get rid of the ridiculous lag issues. I've really had enough of this BS.
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.19 20:31:00
|
713. How can you not say the active scanner is OP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
PARKOUR PRACTIONER wrote: How much sp does a complex damp cost.... Way more than an ADV active scanner...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.18 12:24:00
|
714. How can you not say the active scanner is OP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
So, by using 1x complex dampener on a medium suit I will make anyone in a match with ADV active scanners (or worse) waste an equipment slot and the CPU/PG needed to fit them, and deprive their squads of the ability to scan me, and all that for the...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.18 12:20:00
|
715. How can you not say the active scanner is OP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: How can you not say the active scanner is OP. It is simple. I use dampeners. So I can say it quite easily. Active scanner is not OP.
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.18 09:25:00
|
716. Rules Question re: player run isk exchange between Dust and Eve - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just wanted to say that everything worked fine and say thank you to Gyn for this awesome service!
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.18 09:21:00
|
717. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Jebus McKing wrote: Use dampeners. You won't be gimped. Except, of course, if the only "tactic" you are able to use is running straight at people. I'm running a medium suit that has 418 total HP, 2x damage mods, 1x complex da...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.13 11:25:00
|
718. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Jebus McKing wrote: Use dampeners. You won't be gimped. Except, of course, if the only "tactic" you are able to use is running straight at people. I'm running a medium suit that has 418 total HP, 2x damage mods, 1x complex ...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.13 11:11:00
|
719. CCP, It's Time. We need FRAMERATE! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I fully support this cause.
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.13 11:05:00
|
720. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Use dampeners. You won't be gimped. Except, of course, if the only "tactic" you are able to use is running straight at people. I'm running a medium suit that has 418 total HP, 2x damage mods, 1x complex dampener for the last couple of weeks. And...
- by Jebus McKing - at 2013.12.13 11:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |