| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
161. [SUGGESTION] Remove AFK SP Retroactively - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm for anything that gets these people out of the MCC and into battle, whether a system designed to detect and punish, or simply a revamping of the SP system.
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.18 14:59:00
|
162. Corporation Tax - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: There has been a bit of discussion about corporation taxes after our dev blog update to Planetary Conquest so I wanted to start a thread specifically on that. 1. Are you in favour of having a corporation tax system, allowi...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.18 14:51:00
|
163. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
While we can only field a couple of squads (on a good day) and don't intend to get much bigger, the 0RCS are willing to help whenever we can. Whether you are a small or a large corporation, if you believe this is an effort that will make the DUST ...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.18 14:38:00
|
164. Want an AUR Refund? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: Drud Green wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: [quote=JL3Eleven]So why all the arguing and not asking for answers from CCP? That's where we all should focus our attention and not wait till May You're the ones posting it on the ...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.17 20:38:00
|
165. Passive + Active Boosters should cost? - in General Discussions [original thread]
XeroTheBigBoss wrote: Link please? The one where CCP hired you for marketing. Not sure if troll. I haz bacon? Plan to update this over the weekend, though. My intent was to bring attention to how much CCP is trying to make this game cost fo...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.16 14:44:00
|
166. [Recommendation] - Make Refunds an Option, Not Mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
blue gt wrote: Ryder Azorria wrote: [quote=Ryder Azorria]Putting any legal stuff aside for now, you seem to have conveniently skipped over the part where you you have no Moral right to demand a second, free, merc pack. Basically YOU HAVE...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.16 14:37:00
|
167. The Federation of Small Corperations - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
0RCS may be interested in joining this endeavor. We can regularly field one squad, occasionally two. We're just a corp of real life friends (and friends of friends) that isn't actively recruiting. We're not necessarily interested in owning a dis...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.16 02:42:00
|
168. Passive + Active Boosters should cost? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ah, crap. This is outdated. The math is based on the cost of AURUM on the date of the original post. Seems CCP is doing a sale or some such now. Bleh. Will update the original post to reflect the outdated information.
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 17:46:00
|
169. Is this Catastrophic? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Mr Internet Lawyer, you agreed to a contract not to take CCP to court. Nice. A stalker. How . . . pathetic. As I responded to you in another thread, when you posted the exact same, horribly uninformed, comment-- you ...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 17:43:00
|
170. [Recommendation] - Make Refunds an Option, Not Mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally bind...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 17:31:00
|
171. Is this Catastrophic? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SmileB4Death wrote: I don't understand what their complaining about. They want free Aurum?.. No. The merc packs originally stated that they would be refunded every SP reset AND upon commercial release. Some people purchased them without read...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 17:09:00
|
172. Greed amazes me - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Exactly right Those who want an AUR refund just want to use all the boosters again and add to the SP they already have Notice how many do not want a full reset including items/SP and ISK for them to get the full am...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:55:00
|
173. [Recommendation] - Make Refunds an Option, Not Mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Ryder Azorria wrote: JL3Eleven wrote: If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff y...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:48:00
|
174. Community Topic 4/14/2013: How much are you willing to pay? - in General Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=657697#post657697 There I break down the cost of having both boosters activated over a month and my opinion on this very topic.
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:45:00
|
175. [Recommendation] - Make Refunds an Option, Not Mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause. Arguably. Would a court rule in favor of CCP if they took that approach? Nope, as they would be resetting the SP of only the people that bought the merc packs and as...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:35:00
|
176. [REQUEST] Formalizing a refusal of merc pack refuds - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ivan Avogadro wrote: Even if you did spend SP frivolously, you're getting a respec. Spend it better this time. But to be allowed to keep your boosted SP and to be given another set of boosters and AUR is essentially doubling up your purchase. ...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:27:00
|
177. [Recommendation] - Make Refunds an Option, Not Mandatory - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: I am rather serious about this, the terms of sale never included getting two (or however many you'd like since the number does for all intents and purposes simply does not exist) for the price of one purchase, it included...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 16:22:00
|
178. Something catastrophic . . . - in General Discussions [original thread]
Methinks it is time to plan for implementation of the something catastrophic clause of the 'there will be no more SP resets unless . . . " statement. Discuss. I'd say keep the flaming to a minimum but who am I kidding? BAsically, there are people...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 15:58:00
|
179. [REQUEST] Formalizing a refusal of merc pack refuds - in General Discussions [original thread]
Plastic-Jesus wrote: To me it sounded like they meant for there to be a reset at release and you would get a refund. But since there will be no reset on commercial release now, you are not entitled to a refund. I don't care either way, I got wh...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 15:53:00
|
180. Greed amazes me - in General Discussions [original thread]
Inability to read and comprehend purchase agreements amazes me. I should make a thread titled as such for all the people that fail to comprehend such basis concepts--CCP sold merc packs with the clearly stated caveat that they would be refunded on...
- by Illuminaughty-696 - at 2013.04.15 15:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |