| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2241. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: A compilation of quotes that Spkr4theDead wrote: Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being tog...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:49:00
|
2242. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Checkmate has a point that armor can easily mitigate its only disadvantages through the use of equipment, whereas shields cannot, and have less health, and are vulnerable to far more potent weapo...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:47:00
|
2243. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to? ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:44:00
|
2244. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
A compilation of things that Spkr4theDead wrote: Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being together. In the low slots, they need kin cats and c...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:42:00
|
2245. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to? ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony? NOOOOOO!!!!! STOOOOPP!!!! IT ...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:38:00
|
2246. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to? ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!!
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:35:00
|
2247. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Tanks should be slow. Balance > Realism. Although if you want to go the realism route, tanks can't shoot near as fast as they do in game. So should we nerf railguns to a 15 sec charge up time? ...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:32:00
|
2248. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
everyone on this thread needs to stop farming likes lol excluding spkr of course
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:27:00
|
2249. Aim Assist - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Knight Solitaire wrote: SILENTSAM 69 wrote: Aim assist is a good thing. It helps level the playing field. It helped a lot of weaker players, and the main people complaining are the people who normally protostomp. So no,...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:24:00
|
2250. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Another thing- if shields are buffed, we will see weapons like the AR and ScR get their niches back, as far more people will shield tank their suits. People complain that these weapons have been displaced by the RR and CR, and this is the case, ho...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:14:00
|
2251. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Protocake JR wrote: The biggest difference is the fact that "teamwork" is treated as a balancing factor between shields and armor. Armor gets pathetically low reps, and if you want to increase it by any respectable amo...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 02:10:00
|
2252. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 00:33:00
|
2253. The PG on the kin cats...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
the problem is shield extender pg being way too high to use them with
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.16 00:21:00
|
2254. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: TANKAHIRO! WHERE IS MY PUBLIC APOLOGY!? I think you still owe me one after i proved you wrong about rail guns oh so long ago, and i have been anticipating it with bated breath. I think? so...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:39:00
|
2255. OP and UP, clarified - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: nope, your sig answered my question, thanks! Your post made this thread less mind numbingly stupid to read
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:36:00
|
2256. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer extender in my opinion) Th...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:34:00
|
2257. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer extender in my opinion) Thanks! np at all....
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:33:00
|
2258. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: id say your fitting was pretty spot on; the pg reduction is what will really help out extenders use (along with a high buffer extender in my opinion) Thanks!
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:16:00
|
2259. Tankers: Pick two of three poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
TANKAHIRO! WHERE IS MY PUBLIC APOLOGY!? I think you still owe me one after i proved you wrong about rail guns oh so long ago, and i have been anticipating it with bated breath.
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:14:00
|
2260. An easy fix to shield and armor disparity - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Do you agree with the numbers that i put in my OP? 44 hp at STd, 58 at ADV, and 72 at PRO, with a 4 pg reduction at PRO? I would say no. Reason for it, as the increase is to minimal to make a ...
- by Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p - at 2014.02.15 22:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |