Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] |
381. [Request] Give the amarr logistic the same PG output of the other races - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The really strange thing is that the Amarr proto logi has less PG than the Amarr proto assault. It makes no sense.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.10 10:59:00
|
382. Announcement:Dev Blog: Balancing the Conquest of Planets - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
MlDDLE MANGEMENT wrote: Leither Yiltron wrote: Basically it allows for a dynamic timer manipulation at the cost of clones. Here's the scenario: MLG Pro Skeelz [MPS] is a small corp with around 100 characters in it. Counting alts and acti...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.10 01:33:00
|
383. Announcement:Dev Blog: Balancing the Conquest of Planets - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: Flyingconejo wrote: ......super long post about new corps..... The combination of 1) and 2) makes very difficult for corps that are not already in PC to enter Molden Heath by themselves. In most cases, they have to attac...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.09 19:50:00
|
384. Announcement:Dev Blog: Balancing the Conquest of Planets - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
Thanks for sharing the incoming changes with us, and for trying to fix some of the problems Planetary Conquest have. That said, I can't say that I liked many of those incoming changes. I think they will make PC more static and risk averse than it ...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.09 18:14:00
|
385. Looking to Get into PC? Look no Further! - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 to the OP, the more the merrier. If those corps fear being attacked after paying to get in Molden Heath, then the sad truth is that they should not be in Molden Heath at all. Playing Planetary Conquest is accepting the risk of being attacked b...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.09 09:51:00
|
386. If you played yesterday you lost SP we were lied to - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bob Teller wrote: Was it that hard not to play for 1 day? Was it that hard to make the 3x SP event start on Wednesday? Because that was the easiest path, and would have prevented this situation. Not everyone visits the forums or reads newsl...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.07.04 13:34:00
|
387. Rise of Legion vs The League of Infamy - in The War Room [original thread]
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.06.25 13:04:00
|
388. Rise of Legion vs The League of Infamy - in The War Room [original thread]
Scrote Schroder wrote: we are proud to have fought alongside them as long as we could. Much respect to KEQ's skills and members. The same to you. Thanks to all the TSOLE members I have played with. Fun guys and solid players. As someone wi...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.06.24 10:00:00
|
389. Rise of Legion vs The League of Infamy - in The War Room [original thread]
It is sad, but the forums are more fun than the game itself.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.06.19 22:24:00
|
390. Rise of Legion vs The League of Infamy - in The War Room [original thread]
DJINN Punisher wrote: [quote=bigolenuts] As far as leaving rofl, your ceo has been talking to me about it, guess he didn't share that with anyone. I will be happy to post his messages "So don't use loyalty, as an issue of debate here." ...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.06.19 22:10:00
|
391. Creating a list of what HAV needs. All Good Tankers are welcome. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Trying to balance proto AV and turrets against standard hulls is a waste of time. Because they are not supposed to be balanced. Give the tank drivers their toys and bring out the proto hulls, CCP. Properly priced, of course.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.22 09:52:00
|
392. SP Respec for AUR? Why not? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would say yes to this. Limited to 2-3 times a year. For 20-25$ if paid with Aurum (someone has to pay for the game) For 100-200 mill if paid with ISK. The negative SP is also a good idea. Not making you lose SP that you have already won, b...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.13 23:20:00
|
393. Announcement:Uprising between now, 5/14 and beyond - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
I have. Nonetheless, since I can't tell everyone, I still think that everybody getting a respec without needing to petition for it, would be faster, easier and prevent future problems for CCP.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.13 18:47:00
|
394. Human Endurance Event BPO? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why do everyone think it will be a BPO? Prepare for 100 copies of the advanced active scanner, or something like that.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.13 10:37:00
|
395. Announcement:Uprising between now, 5/14 and beyond - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
About the respec, I think that making it optional is a bad idea, for two reasons: * First, not everyone will know they have that option: - Most people don't come to the forums, so they can't learn about the optional respec from reading them. -...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.13 10:05:00
|
396. Horray for Proto Caldari Logis! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: [quote=RKKR][quote=Deadeye Dic] . I have also had blueberries start panicing and throwing grenades and shooting at me when I repair them as they seem to think I have set them on fire or something, there is nothing so comical/s...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.10 01:23:00
|
397. Mass Driver area denial..NOT - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've just seen the new MD stats. 115 hp of splash damage? A damage that is reduced against shields, in a build where finding suits with 500+ shields is going to be common? What area denial? They are not going to even feel it. You may get kill...
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.07 12:43:00
|
398. Hacked Ex-0 AV grenades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Those must be there by mistake. They even cost the same than regular Ex-0.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.07 11:43:00
|
399. For those that want to be relevant and actually heard by CCP.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
bump
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.07 00:32:00
|
400. To Iron Wolf Saber, Constructive Criticism only! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You raised good points. +1 for trying. But the forums are on fire right now, a lot of people making threads, so the good ideas will probably get lost without being noticed. Wait a couple of days.
- by Flyingconejo - at 2013.05.07 00:22:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |