| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 |
781. Could vehicle spam be intended by CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: I was watching all the trailers earlier and it struck me to see almost as many vehicles as infantry (it also looks really epic tbh). It made me realise that maybe CCP INTENDS to have 5 tanks/vehicle...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.15 03:37:00
|
782. Could vehicle spam be intended by CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was watching all the trailers earlier and it struck me to see almost as many vehicles as infantry (it also looks really epic tbh). It made me realise that maybe CCP INTENDS to have 5 tanks/vehicles on each side per battle. Tanks are really fun t...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.15 03:32:00
|
783. Vehicles are becoming a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Senator Snipe wrote: 1st. I would like to start off with the nerf of the forge gun. I understand people are pussies and don't like being blasted away cus they are simply not that god damn good in the game. So okay, you nerf the indirect damage...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.15 02:52:00
|
784. lets do something nice! - in General Discussions [original thread]
ME ME ME
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.15 02:47:00
|
785. Tanks and NLOS weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Salviatino Maiano wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: no. i am not having a gunner for my turret. just no. it's my tank and i control it all. Then you should have a driver for your tank. Either way you sir should not be given a tank and b...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 22:30:00
|
786. balance vs content - in General Discussions [original thread]
Balancing WITH new content (such as webifiers to slow down vehicles)
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 22:24:00
|
787. WOW! 1.7 is really popular! - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: 80% are tanks ragers AV players raging or tank pilots raging?
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 21:29:00
|
788. WOW! 1.7 is really popular! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sweet, that means that all the incessant QQ on the forum is only from a small fraction of the actual player base. It means that people are enjoying vehicles and the new rifles as they should, it's fun :D Now, if only they could fix that ******* v...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 21:00:00
|
789. Feeling Discouraged - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: What "skills" have any vehicle (bar the Dropship) ever required? what ever it is it's more than locking and shooting with a swarm or running around with an instakill rifle.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:55:00
|
790. Help me get 100 likes!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
General John Ripper wrote: farming likes is wrong. shame on you! Pffffffffffffff, hypocrite
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:49:00
|
791. How to Balance Tanks and AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: TunRa wrote: More like QQ 514. lmao I assume you weren't reading threads from pilots pre 1.7 about how they can't consistently go 60/0. WE DON'T WANT TO GO 60 ******* 0!!!!!! STOP ******* CLAIMING THAT. All we wanted was t...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:46:00
|
792. How to balance Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: No no no no no no no no no no no no no. This is new eden, A single pilot can control a 12km long ship. Surely controlling a tank isn't too hard for one person? I also don't want to invest sp in tanks j...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:42:00
|
793. How to balance Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
No no no no no no no no no no no no no. This is new eden, A single pilot can control a 12km long ship. Surely controlling a tank isn't too hard for one person? I also don't want to invest sp in tanks just to get a stupid blueberry in my turret, th...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:37:00
|
794. Constructive arguments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Trying to balance when 50% of the content is not even here (webifiers, great example) is also hard... thats the beauty of 1.7, becasue they completely redid vehicles to make them simpler, it become...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:31:00
|
795. For the love of kittens! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yea, the infinite range on missile INSTALLATIONS is really annoying.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:15:00
|
796. Constructive arguments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Trying to balance when 50% of the content is not even here (webifiers, great example) is also hard...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:12:00
|
797. Constructive arguments - in General Discussions [original thread]
With this brain depraved community? Good ******* luck with that
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:10:00
|
798. tanks make this game boring - in General Discussions [original thread]
What is wrong with having 5 tanks on each side? Most of the time they are too occupied to even look at infantry (at least, I am). Have you seen the trailers? Theirs Vehicles ALL OVER THE PLACE. Vehicles just weren't good enough before to be consid...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 20:08:00
|
799. mlt tanks are OP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The thing that's op is the ability to spam 7 of them in a match. 1 militia tank on it's own isn't op, it's the pack of 5 that is. CCP should limit the amount of tanks per match to something like 4
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 19:53:00
|
800. tanks aren't op - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: Cosgar wrote: Seymor Krelborn wrote: I agree a tank is not OP.... but maybe 10 are? that's how matches go now with anywhere from 5 or more tanks on each team on the field.... the real problem is that tank spam jus...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.14 19:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |