| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
21. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
ANON Cerberus wrote: Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Yes lets make it so when you're playing a stealth role, you're not stealthy at all. ::face palm:: I know man. Sometimes this community makes me facepalm. Clearly adding one complex dampener t...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 20:48:00
|
22. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Master Smurf wrote: Well that line was for medium frames trying to be super dampened - not Lv5 scouts. It was CCP who chose to give all scouts the base and only have the Gallente increase per level. Lol. But yah. Cloak shouldn't be a ca...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 19:53:00
|
23. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Master Smurf wrote: So you are saying that someone who is running a Proto cloak (stil dont know skill multiplier) plus the necessary amount of dampening shouldnt be electronically invisible for 80 secs ? I wouldnt go that far. There is sti...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 19:21:00
|
24. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Master Smurf wrote: Driftward - would you be happy then if 25% was the profile bonus on the Proto cloak and lesser reductions on the Advanced and Standard ? I think that the 25% is too much even for the proto. However, I think that at the VE...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 19:11:00
|
25. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Yes lets make it so when you're playing a stealth role, you're not stealthy at all. ::face palm:: Electronic stealth and visible stealth are two different things. I'm not saying make the scout show up on everyones tacn...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 18:45:00
|
26. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: I'll just post this here as well: Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Driftward wrote: ...snip.... I get what you're saying but personally I'm not a fan of having to completely gimp my suit because one guy brings out a focus...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 18:22:00
|
27. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote: Krom Ganesh wrote: A proto caldari scout (I'm assuming it has a role of anti-scout scout) can pick up other scouts passively. Add 1 complex precision module to cancel out 1 enhanced dampener. 2 precision to pick up...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 17:34:00
|
28. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sana Rayya wrote: I don't see the extra 25% of dampening from the cloak as a big deal. It's basically like throwing a complex profile dampener on your suit, at the huge cost that the cloaks come with, and a dampener that is only working when yo...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.23 17:26:00
|
29. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just to make this clear since my other post rambled a bit. I would hope that CCP takes a second look at the dampening bonus while cloaked. In my opinion it is too much to give to an already stealthy scout profile and is preventing some counters...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.22 23:50:00
|
30. [Suggestion] - Cloaking Stats and Mechanics - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I think that the fitting is not terrible. could be tweaked just a bit lower for the standard level cloak. However, I think that a problem for cloaks is going to be in the profile reduction bonus that they are giving. It's too much to give on top ...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.22 23:43:00
|
31. Announcement:Feedback Request: Equipment Stats! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Quil Evrything wrote: Ghermard-ol Dizeriois wrote: Quil Evrything wrote: Thing is, they have fitting capability to burn. Lesseee.. amarr proto logi. (details snipped...) Total tank: 812 Nice little CLOAKED mini-heavy you have there. ...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.22 23:27:00
|
32. [Feedback] Scout bonuses gleaned off of SiSi - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: To be fair, that's kinda what the preliminary logi bonuses look like, in that each race gets functional bonuses to only a specific equipment type. The fitting bonus for the cloak is interesting though. Fitting in-game has t...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.09 21:39:00
|
33. [Feedback] Scout bonuses gleaned off of SiSi - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
To be clear. I'm am comparing the bonuses with the assumption that we won't be getting more than 1 equipment slot and that the majority of fitting and slot profiles won't be changing. With that in mind, I'm looking at the bonuses and seeing some t...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.09 17:31:00
|
34. [Feedback] Scout bonuses gleaned off of SiSi - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Young padawan, wait until slots and stats are released. I am sure CCP is going to fix suit dB vs scanner dB. They should apply the level 5 bonus to all scout suits as a normal stat If those are released as they have been in...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.08 23:38:00
|
35. [Feedback] Scout bonuses gleaned off of SiSi - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
jordy mack wrote: Cool rumor bro. The bonuses I referenced were taken from Sisi just like everything else. Look at the links I provided at the top of the post.
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.08 20:26:00
|
36. [Feedback] Scout bonuses gleaned off of SiSi - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
To start with, this is what I'm referencing: Scout Suit Bonus: +10% bonus to PG/CPU cost of cloak field per level. Amarr Scout Bonus: 5% reduction to cloak field cooldown per level. Caldari Scout Bonus: 5% reduction to firing cloak cost per leve...
- by Driftward - at 2014.01.08 19:24:00
|
37. [Feedback] Rational discussion of LP payouts and standings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: I present this: http://i.imgur.com/2XSN8ZD.png That's actually a very nice analysis. I hadn't thought of the implications to aurum gear. However, it still raises the issue of an unsustainable match type without really a g...
- by Driftward - at 2013.12.14 02:43:00
|
38. [Feedback] Rational discussion of LP payouts and standings - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There seems to be a disconnect with the amount of effort put forth to participate in FW and the compensation (in the form of LP) given for that effort. I'm going to talk about some numbers here. Let's examine the LP costs for a single proto suit...
- by Driftward - at 2013.12.14 02:25:00
|
39. [Feedback] Time-To-Kill (TTK) is still much too short. Fix it. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
From a scout perspective. The low TTK is destroying our play style. Any of our potential playstyles (except perhaps as snipers, which are played better as assaults or logis anyways). If I sneak up behind someone I should be able to drop them. The ...
- by Driftward - at 2013.11.06 21:37:00
|
40. Number the Drop Uplinks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I posted about this in requests at somepoint last week, I'll toss a link here. The labeling of uplinks is of course a good standalone feature. But if we have to find the identifying label amidst the current sea of uplinks....might be harder to d...
- by Driftward - at 2013.08.19 14:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |