| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
261. [Request] Vehicle damage WP for AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
With this build it's almost the only service an AVer can do for his team
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 09:59:00
|
262. I killed a tank - the vehicle zero-sum game (Honeyed lamb inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
IraqiFriendshipExplosive wrote: I just came out of a match where I killed about 3 tanks by myself. A 4th tank was taken out easily with the help of someone else. Heavy suit , 2 complex heavy damage mods and a militia forge gun. 3 shots and tho...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 09:52:00
|
263. I killed a tank - the vehicle zero-sum game (Honeyed lamb inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bhor Derri wrote: I don't want to add more fuel to the flames right now but the changes have improved dust much more than any other point release to date, if I were to explain this with new eden logic (which I must because some of you are still...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 09:44:00
|
264. [Feedback] HAVs too strong against infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson Cerberes wrote: Ivy Zalinto wrote: Snail Super wrote: 1.7 crisis for infantry players against vehicles. Whenever an enemy tank, let alone two tanks, is deployed in a match, I have nothing NOTHING to counter vehicles. My last mat...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 09:30:00
|
265. vehicles are OP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Ivy Zalinto wrote: Text Grant wrote: AV was nerfed too much and vehicles are running rampant. No counter but other tanks. Paper, rock, scissors is NOT working. There is absolutely no reason t...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 09:08:00
|
266. I killed a tank - the vehicle zero-sum game (Honeyed lamb inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: more fun to drive BROKEN! There is no balance with vehicles at all anymore. I say anymore because with the previous changes to SL you could at least make a tank run for cover with a pair (2) of AVers. Now its an imposs...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.11 08:47:00
|
267. Announcement:Extended Server Downtime 2013-12-10 for Uprising 1.7 Deployment - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
2.4 Gig... I think I need atissue :')
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.10 01:33:00
|
268. Request: East South and West - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The-Errorist wrote: m621 zma wrote: Go to battle finder and look at the top and bottom of your screen - see those curves? The ones with notches? Don't they just beg to be made into a compass? Shh, your letting out CCP secrets. We want ...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.08 02:36:00
|
269. [Request] Official Explanation of Passive Scan - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Stefan Stahl wrote: There's no mystery about how it's supposed to work: If the enemy is closer than your scan range and his scan profile is larger than your scan precision, he appears on your minimap and you see the red chevron above is locatio...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.02 03:09:00
|
270. Request: East South and West - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Compass is probably keyed to the planets geodetic north, which is the north geographic pole and not the magnetic north. Geodetic poles are determined by the axis of rotation and not the magnetic field of the planet. My 2 cents... at least a big...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.01 09:49:00
|
271. [Request] Official Explanation of Passive Scan - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hey CCP, I've been cruising the threads and I can't find any real info that isn't just whispers or conjecture. Could we have an official explanation of Profile Precision, Profile Dampening and Scan Radius. Could you also elaborate on how these n...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.01 09:40:00
|
272. scout balancing petition , please sign SCOUT BROTHERS, ccp please respond and read - in General Discussions [original thread]
Signed
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.12.01 08:56:00
|
273. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: This is how I understand it, the actual Bpos aren't the issue here. I think we can all agree they are pretty useless. The real issue is that ccp has removed these bpos from players inventory. Most people who I have seen posti...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 11:03:00
|
274. Requesting Equipment to Counter Equipment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is a blanket request in lieu of my discussion on Balancing Breaking DUST I appreciate all of the number tweaking the DEV team does, and listening to what is discussed on the forum, for the continued betterment of DUST. I fear tho that the ...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 10:49:00
|
275. Balance is Breaking DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: ^^^ If CCP were comprised of experts at playing this game I would be inclined to agree with you. But they are not the experts at playing this game, it is the players in this community who are the experts. I highly doubt tha...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 10:00:00
|
276. Balance is Breaking DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yet people want it tweaked to be viable for a role it was not meant to fill. This goes back to the square peg for a round hole concept. I wonder if the development has been tainted by too great a response to the demands of the mercs? In the clas...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 08:45:00
|
277. YES, I get to endure another 15 minutes of being stomped. - in General Discussions [original thread]
What I can't figure out is why more randoms don't squad up.
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 05:57:00
|
278. Balance is Breaking DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
New and veteran players alike want DUST to thrive and be rewarding. We feel like we are working in tandem with CCP with every new patch reflecting input for the many varied players who choose to leave comments on this forum. While we all think we ...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 05:52:00
|
279. You do not think that the Plasma Cannon should be improved? - in General Discussions [original thread]
First off (I can't believe I have to keep saying this) the description of a "light" AV weapon is on that is man portable. Nothing to do with the amount of damage it can inflict or which classification of vehicle it should be formidable against. ...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 05:22:00
|
280. From an ignorant perspective...what is happening here...? - in General Discussions [original thread]
What I fail to understand is the passion behind the BPO arguments. This forum's population has been for, and against, changes to all aspects of gameplay since the beginning. "Buff this, nerf that!" I recall player plans for BPO's to: 1. Sup...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2013.11.26 04:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |