Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
181. Not very new player friendly.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Another plug for the Learning Coalition. You don't need to be running proto anything to do well in this game, and it's not mandatory to be part of a corp to survive or be effective. It helps, but you can usually find randoms to squad with and ev...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.02.03 06:29:00
|
182. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
For the record I would like to say that I am not trying to split the roles of a tank to require 2 operators minimum. I want an open dialogue where both tankers and AV infantry alike can discuss options to direct future gameplay in a harmonious way...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.02.03 06:11:00
|
183. How a respec would effect the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
My 2 cents is that I'm for a respec, but only to put those points into my racial suit counterparts. I just want my Gal Sentinel instead of the Amarr suit that I have to use.
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.02.01 01:16:00
|
184. 1 Man Tanks; 2 Man Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Interesting idea, but I do not like. I'd rather tanks were only good at killing vehicles, and neeed small turrets to combat infantry with any effectiveness. I think Tebu Gan's threads Tanks - A real balance thread a...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.02.01 00:28:00
|
185. 1 Man Tanks; 2 Man Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Yes. This and MAVs with driver-operated small turrets. I'd think that the MAV would be the single operator/single hull version while the HAV then becomes the multi role/multi operator option. Isk wise the LAV would be ...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.02.01 00:08:00
|
186. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: I don't think you currently understand the advantage infantry have by lone-operated HAVs. Currently, to see where you are driving, an HAV must have their turret pointed in the general direction. This allows people to sne...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 23:56:00
|
187. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Tanks are for killing tanks, or at least I think they should be AV focused, not infantry focused. Tankers should SUPPORT infantry, or in other words "SUPPLEMENT" not outright own them. Small turrets are t...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 23:52:00
|
188. Tanks - A real balance thread (Long Posting) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I really appreciate seeing well thought out means of "balancing" gameplay through ideas that affect the mechanics of game play and not simply buffing and nerfing numbers. I have an idea that I believe would compliment the infantry "dedicated" tu...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 07:15:00
|
189. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Seriously terrible idea, terible, wish i can -1, that would make havs completely useless Unless of course you make it so it takes 2 peopleto move and shoot a ar Nice try, but that would hardly make a HAV useless: HAVs have a...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 06:53:00
|
190. Well this is sad.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
What we need is to support the solid group of dedicated players who offer constructive ideas. There is too much bickering about buffs and nerfs when I think we need to focus on coming up with different ideas and unique solutions. I propose HERE...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 06:19:00
|
191. HAV limits on all gamemodes - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think a tweak to the HAV mechanic for solo operation should make it operate more like the LAV. You can read my proposition in the Request forum at https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=139341&find=unread Short version is t...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 05:56:00
|
192. Im tired of playing hungry hungry hippo's - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: Tanks are getting old. Get out your crutch you scrubs. Drop you RR or CR crutch. But yeah something about tanks and AV has to ******* change and soon. I've got a proposed addition HERE that...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 05:39:00
|
193. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ralden Caster wrote: I think the main problem tankers would have with cooperative tanking is blueberries hopping in and driving tanks off cliffs. Thanks for the feedback. That's the only downside I can think of with the situation, but you...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 05:17:00
|
194. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The idea is not to diminish the functionality of the HAV in a combat role. Nothing changes how lethal or well defended the HAV is, or how modules would be activated. The only change is that the driver of a HAV doesn't have the ability to fire whil...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 04:43:00
|
195. Who still rocks the AR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AR FTW...although I admit i'm plaing with the RR as a replacement for my TacAR. Still undecided
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 03:27:00
|
196. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
dogmanpig wrote: name one game that does that....name me one, go ahead. there is a reason why they don't. DUST isn't like like other games out there and CCP is trying to do something unique. This is a valid option that works for the LAV a...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.31 03:14:00
|
197. HAV Operation Like a LAV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Why does the HAV allow the driver to operate and fire the main cannon at the same time? Perhaps an addition to satisfy both HAV operators and those who feel HAV operation should be a team effort would be to have a driver seat like the LAV. A sin...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.30 23:14:00
|
198. [BUG] character select screen - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Same issue
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.30 22:54:00
|
199. Tanks Solution - in General Discussions [original thread]
I always thought that the hardener system should be a single run with a single cool down. Has the concept of HAV drivers switching seats, like in the LAV, been suggested? One driving seat with no weapon capability where a single pilot would have...
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.30 22:52:00
|
200. Dust 2.0 =Pseudo Streaming= - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm getting giddy reading your stuff. Fantastic design! Can't wait to see more of this grow! ^_^
- by Chesyre Armundsen - at 2014.01.30 22:25:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |