Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
881. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: DRaven DeMort wrote: Ghural wrote: So... Um .. Seriously. Assault drop ships are out of the game and "should be returned"? One thing with dropships. Please disable the first person camera. It serves no purpose except t...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 14:56:00
|
882. Immortal Guides - in Corporation Recruitment [original thread]
Might I reccomend you make a class on financial management?
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 14:48:00
|
883. The Learning Coalition (Attention, all new players!!!) - in Rookie Training Grounds [original thread]
VD is an old salt dog. I approve.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 14:47:00
|
884. AV players, would you accept a temporary removal of advance weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nguruthos IX wrote: Vyzion Eyri wrote: I'm hoping (and by the looks of it my hopes are pretty well founded) that they're going to test out a tiercided model for vehicles. I mean, even the WIP stats on these vehicles are pretty damn high, cou...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 13:43:00
|
885. Respects could save the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Kody Cole wrote: Giving a respec in 1.5 or at least 1.6 would save the game for a lot of players Personally I'd only change a few things I'd still be the same class. It's just over time you changed a lot and I don't nee...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 13:40:00
|
886. List of the contradictions of the new dev blog, we need these answered! - in General Discussions [original thread]
i think you're wasting your time telling ccp that tanks are broken bc after a nerf every build, i think they're tryna say they dnt care
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 06:40:00
|
887. Vehicle Respec Imminent - in General Discussions [original thread]
tanks got nerfed again. ill submit my respec ticket and keep my points while collecting passive SP for awhile. I'm really dissapointed with Wolfman. THe answer was simple: give us more PG- then we'd be fine.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 06:24:00
|
888. How many nerf does it take to buff vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
i havent logged on in a couple days. considered it, today, but then read the stats on vehicle changes and it's just another tank nerf so i dont think we will ever get a buff. i might get on this weekend for a game or two but that's it.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 06:22:00
|
889. popular forums people - in General Discussions [original thread]
+The King of QQ
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 06:20:00
|
890. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Theme For A-Jackal wrote: Will you be refunding SP invested in vehicles to go along with the changes? There are a number of new skills that you have introduced. i want a refund. apparently tanks were still UP.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 05:58:00
|
891. Announcement:Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 2 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are we getting a vehicle sp refund?
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.10.03 05:51:00
|
892. An atempt to make a proto tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: Buffing base stats as you progress through tiers is a very bad Idea. 1. It would further widen the rift between vets and noobs. 2. It would make running lower tier items/vehicles completely nonviable. 3. It would push p...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.30 21:44:00
|
893. Since glitching is now allowed, I am ruining FW by suiciding - in General Discussions [original thread]
Want a cookie? You need to get out more if FW means that much to you.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.30 12:34:00
|
894. Sticky:Active Military and Former Military players of DUST514 Called to Muster! :P - in General Discussions [original thread]
DS 10 wrote: MrSneaky1971a wrote: 1989 - U.S. Army MOS 11C 4.2 inch morterman. 1990 - 1995 United States Marine Corps - MOS 0311 Infantryman and some other ones. 1990 - 1992 Philippines 1993 - 1995 Camp Lejeune, NC I have been the Project...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.30 02:11:00
|
895. 200m Scanning distance - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Lt Royal wrote: If that one guy is managing to scan you at 200 meters, good for him considering the only scanner that does 200m is the Prototype Flux Active Scanner meaning theyGÇÖve put a lot of SP into it. As for Pr...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.30 00:24:00
|
896. 200m Scanning distance - in General Discussions [original thread]
Doc Noah wrote: Was I talking about dampeners? well, kind of, yes. it'slike saying tanks are op when u dont have any AV on your team.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.29 23:20:00
|
897. 200m Scanning distance - in General Discussions [original thread]
QQQQQQQQQQQ SCAN514, AR514, LAV514, ETC Htfu. It's something that took an obscene amount of so to use, lots of PG/CPU to fit, and if u invested in dampeners, you would be fine. This is the beginning of ewar- adapt or die.
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.29 14:44:00
|
898. forge gun op? - in General Discussions [original thread]
a wiki swarm can do 15,000 damage to a madrugar in 1 second. ill take my chances with q breach
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.29 07:27:00
|
899. 200m Scanning distance - in General Discussions [original thread]
did it ever occur to u that profile dampeners exist?
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.29 07:23:00
|
900. Blaster Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Still not sure what the purpose of a high damage low rof low range turret would be. it needs to have a job. like, it has the HIGHEST dps of all blasters, but u have to be on top of the enemy to take advantage of it. TO do this, give it an obscene ...
- by CharCharOdell - at 2013.09.29 02:01:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |