DUST Search - How many nerf does it take to buff vehicles?

All Channels

General Discussions

How many nerf does it take to buff vehicles?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Xender17 Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN. 715	Posted - 2013.10.03 01:40:00 - [1] - Quote uh 1 uh 2 uh 3 announces vehicle update uh 4 we wood like to announce that all vehicles are receiving a nerf uh 5 post-pones VU to 6 uh 6 post-pones VU to 7 uh 7
CharCharOdell Shining Flame Amarr Empire 1059	Posted - 2013.10.03 06:22:00 - [2] - Quote i havent logged on in a couple days. considered it, today, but then read the stats on vehicle changes and it's just another tank nerf so i dont think we will ever get a buff. i might get on this weekend for a game or two but that's it.
Aaroniero d'Lioncourt The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 148	Posted - 2013.10.03 06:54:00 - [3] - Quote It takes a couple of push backs
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1806	Posted - 2013.10.03 06:56:00 - [4] - Quote all of them?
General John Ripper TeamPlayers EoN. 2856	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:10:00 - [5] - Quote 2 nerfs != a buff. 8 nerfs == a buff.
Ignoble Son 3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance 312	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:30:00 - [6] - Quote Xender17 wrote: How many nerf does it take to buff vehicles? Probably About as many licks as it takes to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ0epRjfGLw&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 497	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:30:00 - [7] - Quote Standard vehicles are OP ... they need to be nerfed so you can have the advanced and proto ones back. There's a bigger picture ... open your eyes people.
The Eristic Dust 90210 29	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:47:00 - [8] - Quote One, two, three. The world may never know.
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 383	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:53:00 - [9] - Quote Needless Sacermendor wrote: Standard vehicles are OP ... they need to be nerfed so you can have the advanced and proto ones back. There's a bigger picture ... open your eyes people. this guy right here see's whats actually going on
XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO Storm Wind Strikeforce Caldari State 385	Posted - 2013.10.03 08:59:00 - [10] - Quote #1Posted: 2013.08.27 15:09 \| Report \| Edited by: Iron Wolf Saber Like 6 And before you argue otherwise check the chart below. Madrugar Standard - 3 High 5 Lows Madrugar Advanced - 4 High 5 Lows Madrugar Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Gunnlogi Standard- 5 High 3 Lows Gunnlogi Advanced - 5 HIgh 4 Lows Gunnlogi Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Hypothetical Amarr HAV Standard - 4 High 4 Lows. Amarr HAV Advanced - 4 High 5 Lows Amarr HAV Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Minmatar HAV Standard - 4 High 4 Lows Minmatar HAV Advanced - 5 HIgh 4 Lows Minmatar HAV Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Max Rack Size in Dust is 5. Now you're all smart people; tell me, why this up here is bad overall for the game? Also explain the chicken of the enforcer/marauders fitting into this as both of those classes already had a +1 slot from regular HAVs.

Void Echo Morsus Mihi Aperuitque Imperium 1607	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:26:00 - [11] - Quote Needless Sacermendor wrote: Standard vehicles are OP ... they need to be nerfed so you can have the advanced and proto ones back. There's a bigger picture ... open your eyes people. while I understand that part, AV needs to be nerfed as well so that there can actually be balance and not just any ***** **** can solo the proto tanks.
Purona The Vanguardians 67	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:38:00 - [12] - Quote Needless Sacermendor wrote: Standard vehicles are OP ... they need to be nerfed so you can have the advanced and proto ones back. There's a bigger picture ... open your eyes people. so the advanced tanks will just be more expensive versions of tanks we already say cant deal with the climate of AV
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 1960	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:39:00 - [13] - Quote XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO XOXOXOXOXOXO wrote: #1Posted: 2013.08.27 15:09 \| Report \| Edited by: Iron Wolf Saber Like 6 And before you argue otherwise check the chart below. Madrugar Standard - 3 High 5 Lows Madrugar Advanced - 4 High 5 Lows Madrugar Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Gunnlogi Standard- 5 High 3 Lows Gunnlogi Advanced - 5 HIgh 4 Lows Gunnlogi Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Hypothetical Amarr HAV Standard - 4 High 4 Lows. Amarr HAV Advanced - 4 High 5 Lows Amarr HAV Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Minmatar HAV Standard - 4 High 4 Lows Minmatar HAV Advanced - 5 HIgh 4 Lows Minmatar HAV Prototype - 5 High 5 Lows Max Rack Size in Dust is 5. Now you're all smart people; tell me, why this up here is bad overall for the game? Also explain the chicken of the enforcer/marauders fitting into this as both of those classes already had a +1 slot from regular HAVs. well they could have perhaps increased rack size. This ONLY works if the efficacy of modules has gone up by a pretty good percent. But fitting choices are diminished greatly :( (Speaking DS perspective, and future air vehicles) I never bought a tank.
ChromeBreaker SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1350	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:44:00 - [14] - Quote What is see... militia - 2/2 Basic - 3/2 Adv - 4/2 Pro - 5-2 This doesnt take into account racial variance... Mod changes aside i "guess" this works... too many slots would be OP, more makes sense for the specialist types (Enforcer, Marauder, Black Ops)
Banning Hammer Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire 1563	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:48:00 - [15] - Quote As many as needed. Vehicles are a tricky thing in "every" game, but is much, much worst in Dust 514. Tiers, Modules, Core Skills, racial variations... is just to many factors to take into account. You guys just want your "God Mode" titan, or what ever the **** you use in EvE. But in a FPS, overpowered vehicles are game breaking. It needs to be a comprise between power and durability.
Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 499	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:48:00 - [16] - Quote Purona wrote: Needless Sacermendor wrote: Standard vehicles are OP ... they need to be nerfed so you can have the advanced and proto ones back. There's a bigger picture ... open your eyes people. so the advanced tanks will just be more expensive versions of tanks we already say cant deal with the climate of AV I didn't know prices for these new standard vehicles had been confirmed yet, never mind prices for the advanced versions. Care to reveal your sources for such a statement ! Also it's been stated by CCP that AV will also need to be "looked at" during this vehicle overhaul. Complain when you have the complete picture AND you've tried it, for now be grateful you've been given an update on the way they are heading with things.
Purona The Vanguardians 67	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:54:00 - [17] - Quote thats stupid if anything it will be galente madrugar 2-3, 3-3, 3-4 caldari gunllogi 3-2, 4-2, 5-3 amarr 2-3, 2-4, 3-5 minmatar 2-2 3-3 4-4 lower base health higher hp than other tanks
Nguruthos IX PEN 15 CLUB 1961	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:56:00 - [18] - Quote Is it a nerf? one plausible situation is that (everyone knew DS needed big HP buff) DS kept fitting slots. Tank lost a couple. IF fitting modules are now 20% better --> DS are fine with current slots, tanks would be OP with previous slots. Then perhaps higher level tanks and dropships will gain more slots leaving the more 'interesting' fitting choices to exist beyond 'standard' vehicles. It's plausible. Of course history has me concerned .
Needless Sacermendor Red Fox Brigade 499	Posted - 2013.10.03 09:57:00 - [19] - Quote ChromeBreaker wrote: What is see... militia - 2/2 Basic - 3/2 Adv - 4/2 Pro - 5-2 This doesnt take into account racial variance... Mod changes aside i "guess" this works... too many slots would be OP, more makes sense for the specialist types (Enforcer, Marauder, Black Ops) It might even go to 3/3 at advanced and 4/3 or 3/4 at proto leaving room for specialisations to take a 5th ... or even 4/2 to 4/3 at proto with a breach proto having 5/3 and an assault proto having 4/4. Either way there's still scope to make further racial variations and specialisations.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.