| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
21. A discussion about balance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Tiger wrote: Sorry, I skipped a couple pages, but just getting in, my well fitted tank cost me about 18 000 000 SP to get all the parts. Consider the armor, shields, turrets, large turret, repairers, damage control units, nano shielding, ni...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.13 15:50:00
|
22. A discussion about balance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Omnipotent lilmamaj wrote: I'm glad to know that EvE takes no skill and is simply grind to win. This is not and never will be EvE. Skill>Grind There is no grind in EvE skills are trained passively and no amount of skill points will save yo...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.12 21:05:00
|
23. A discussion about balance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shadoe Wolf wrote: @ Omni, this is the best post I have seen you make. It was well thought out with valid points. I do agre that there is still work to be done. But as far as tanks are concerned, the do appear as OP. but we also don't have all ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.12 17:17:00
|
24. A discussion about balance. - in General Discussions [original thread]
This actually an extremely well thought out and intelligent OP. While I agree that this game still needs some serious love on the gameplay side of the equation. We don't yet have all the possible anti vehicle weapons that we will on release. Ta...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.12 16:43:00
|
25. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can only hope the build lives up to the patch notes. I believe it will but I tend not to believe it until I see it. I cannot wait to see some of that stuff. I was hoping for laser rifles though :-( .
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.10 13:58:00
|
26. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
That was kind of my point the entire time the question was answered and beyond that we are all just guessing. As to your other points. Without the NDA on what grounds would they be able to ban the idiots who breach the NDA so blatantly that it is...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.10 13:38:00
|
27. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
It has been this open since they introduced the merc pack. The recent events changed very little. The NDA still gives them the right prosecute anyone they catch blatantly violating the NDA which I am sure their legal department has fully advised t...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.10 12:56:00
|
28. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
And that is the point they are a part of the beta and have the legal standing to have the info. Perhaps you are forgetting the hundreds of millions of people who don't have a PS3. Some of which may be competitors to CCP. Yes the more people with a...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 23:12:00
|
29. Everyone playing DUST is a console player - in General Discussions [original thread]
Incoming flames. I agree with you but I hope you have a flame proof suit.
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 22:52:00
|
30. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Geirskoegul wrote: Bones1182 wrote: The point of the NDA remains the same,anyone who is publishing info without CCP's consent is liable and can be sued for said.breach. While that will only apply to those who log onto their ps3 and download ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 21:27:00
|
31. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
The point of the NDA remains the same,anyone who is publishing info without CCP's consent is liable and can be sued for said.breach. While that will only apply to those who log onto their ps3 and download it. If it is there it gives CCP recourse d...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 20:48:00
|
32. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Naturi Riclenore wrote: Bones1182 wrote: For the record the singularity server is the EvE test server which while I do not know for certain but I would expect it to be covered under NDA since that is where they test unreleased build of EvE. ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 19:17:00
|
33. NDA and More Eve Players [CCP, please read] - in General Discussions [original thread]
For the record the singularity server is the EvE test server which while I do not know for certain but I would expect it to be covered under NDA since that is where they test unreleased build of EvE. Tranquility is the live EvE server.
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.09 17:43:00
|
34. Next Build? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Albrecht Benoit wrote: Arceus Evoxazon wrote: Albrecht Benoit wrote: I hope the build is introduced before the 19th. I ship out to basic then. Good Luck and congratulations! Just remember, do everything with a sense of urgency! Which br...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.07 05:59:00
|
35. Need a universal anti vechicle weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: DrunkMonk 1 wrote: Zander Rodriguez wrote: Then whats the point of spending money and time grinding up to a sagaris if you can automatically kill it off the bat? I didnt say they should be able ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.06 02:28:00
|
36. orbital bombardment - in General Discussions [original thread]
Destroyers are just barely a step up from frigates the smallest combat ship in EVE. Destroyers can carry seven or eight guns depending on the specific destroyer.
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.05 19:21:00
|
37. For the people who confuse being tactical with slow movement! - in General Discussions [original thread]
More options are always a good thing.
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.05 12:47:00
|
38. For the people who confuse being tactical with slow movement! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would say that I would be fine in either case but this isn't my thread. I think that a little bit more speed wouldn't hurt but I am fine with it at this time. I still think that the current speed may have something to do with the devs trying t...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.05 12:44:00
|
39. For the people who confuse being tactical with slow movement! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Regis Mark V wrote: Bones1182 wrote: Gameplay>Realism that being said something do need to feel real or at least believable. So simply running in circles in the middle of open ground, at least when there is a tank on the field, should be ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.05 11:55:00
|
40. For the people who confuse being tactical with slow movement! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gameplay>Realism that being said something do need to feel real or at least believable. So simply running in circles in the middle of open ground, at least when there is a tank on the field, should be considered at the least a risky decision. ...
- by Bones1182 - at 2012.08.05 11:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |