| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
2601. Rail rifle = Full auto Duvolle tactical - in General Discussions [original thread]
I just noticed that the Rail rifle is extremely similar to the Duvolle tactical rifle before it had its ROF nerfed. Extremely accurate, good at CQC, and high clip; with a scope to boot. Aside from the negligible spool time this weapon is a monster...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 15:51:00
|
2602. AV still too strong - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alcohol consumption can lead to brain damage.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 15:08:00
|
2603. SOOOOOOOOOOOO AMBUSH OMS FF? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I was playing Ambush OMS and I ran through a friendly warbarge and my HP went from full to 94. Either there was a extremely powerful sniper combo or that warbarge hurt me :<
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 15:06:00
|
2604. Was looking at the dropsuits recently... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Don't you think is stupid how a Caldari has 210/120 and a Gallente has 120/210 when shields =/= armor. The Gallente should have a higher base armor HP.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 14:40:00
|
2605. PS4 Port - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lord Gisbourne wrote: Lonegnr wrote: Lord Gisbourne wrote: THE PS3 SUCKS IT SUCKS......they ruined dust 514 because of a PS3 release instead of wait a bit and bring it to the PS4, CCP went for NOW NOW NOW GREEEED and its cost them. S...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 02:07:00
|
2606. What pilots and AV/infantry should be crying about (Not a QQ thread) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Vehicles: -Tanks still need a proper purpose on the battlefield Tanks should hold objectives i.e disposable for squad defense and squad support and proximity to supply depots, not ride around obliterating the map, well they can'...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 01:54:00
|
2607. (Petition/Request) Give us a Full Respec Option like we've asked for during ... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I expected an optional this month so infantry could spec into vehicles (I was wrong) and I expected one next month since I figured after vehicles CCP would do dropsuit/weapon balancing for 1.8 but it looks like CCP will spend 1.8 doing hot fixes, ...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 00:50:00
|
2608. Dropsuit pricings - in General Discussions [original thread]
The way things are going everything is overpriced.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.14 00:44:00
|
2609. PS4 Port - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
One year before the PS5 releases.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 12:21:00
|
2610. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
ANON Cerberus wrote: My tank cares little about your puny devices. That's another problem for another thread.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 12:08:00
|
2611. Heavy no longer a viable role. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Yep. People cried about getting killed by the HMG. It got nerfed to less than airsoft minigun range and accuracy. Vehicle pilots, particularly HAV pilots, complained that their vehicles were getting killed by anything ...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 12:05:00
|
2612. The active scanner - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bump for victory
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:53:00
|
2613. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: One ADV/PRO profile dampener with skills does not counter a ADV/PRO scanner. That is a problem for med suits (assaults) since our job is to flank. Lower base profile for all assaults from 50 to something that makes scanne...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:52:00
|
2614. Active scanner must die - in General Discussions [original thread]
My thoughts on fixing the scanner.
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:40:00
|
2615. CCP good job on 1.7 but... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: Before I could go ISK positive with any suit, I could even do it before armor was buffed IN an armor suit. Now the best I can use is advanced because militia is far too weak, and proto is far to e...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:36:00
|
2616. CCP good job on 1.7 but... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1598739#post1598739 gj with getting that mess up in your own post. It's weird how the quoting system works. I didn't even mean to post that he...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:28:00
|
2617. CCP good job on 1.7 but... - in General Discussions [original thread]
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.13 11:26:00
|
2618. The active scanner - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I am all in favor of Gallente tech but the scanners have gotten a bit out of hand. Firstly they are difficult to counter without heavy investing and even then investing into counter scanning leaves extremely vulnerable to the low TTK. Most forms o...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.12 12:38:00
|
2619. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank pointless. The problem isn't the tank being OP. The problem is you bei...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.12 11:44:00
|
2620. CCP good job on 1.7 but... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Before I could go ISK positive with any suit, I could even do it before armor was buffed IN an armor suit. Now the best I can use is advanced because militia is far too weak, and proto is far to expensive. I can only imagine the pain newberries fe...
- by BL4CKST4R - at 2013.12.12 11:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |