| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. Wouldn't it be cool iff.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lady Killington wrote: Wouldn't it be cool iff ... Our merc quarters were fully customizable? Like, we could change the colors, and furniture, and etc. Sims style lol :p I think there are other things that would also be cool...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.11.02 14:29:00
|
62. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: ... notably the forge gun hasn't been nerfed. Yet...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.25 08:01:00
|
63. Announcement:Weapon stats! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've got to say between this and the vehicle stats CCP seems to have turned a corner in communicating changes. Kudos. I assume that damage profile wise the combat rifle is projectile (better vs armour) and the rail rifle gets the same suit-based...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.25 07:42:00
|
64. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Overall I think the choices made are correct, I won't go into specifics here because there are different threads for this stuff. Unfortunately none of these changes really excite me. No player market? No team queuing or support for corporate level...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.19 01:36:00
|
65. Shield HAV - Nearly 23,000 Pseudo EHP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: True, it does make sense for shield hardeners to have the higher resists - but nobody ever accused CCP of making sense That and I'm not a tanker so there could easily be some other factor I'm not thinking of since res...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.06 14:36:00
|
66. Shield HAV - Nearly 23,000 Pseudo EHP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Thats if the maths are right TBH i have no clue It looks good on paper but in game its different The maths is correct. However, there is still some ambiguity as to what the listed multipli...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.06 14:23:00
|
67. Shield HAV - Nearly 23,000 Pseudo EHP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: However I might think that prehaps armour tanks need a little more ehp per plate to make up for it, just a little! Maybe 2200 at complex 120mm plates? Why would armour tanks need more HP when they make up for the lower res...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.06 14:13:00
|
68. hey CCP is the limit one hundred thousand of an item? - in General Discussions [original thread]
If there's room for 100,000 surely you could represent 999,999?
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.05 10:25:00
|
69. Balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: What is balance? It is something that needs to be defined before you can provide any sort of constructive feedback. Well people have put in a fair bit of time developing increasingly sophisticated principles in the field...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.04 23:05:00
|
70. It's time for a test server - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ideally on PC. For so many reasons.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.10.03 13:41:00
|
71. CCP allows glitchers to win tourney, video proof inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: ...snip... I'm sorry, if the only response you have for me is borderline gibberish then I cannot continue this conversation. Please feel free to believe whatever you like. I'll simply wait quietly for CPM1.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.29 12:29:00
|
72. CCP allows glitchers to win tourney, video proof inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Counter attacking actually. What's the new term people been saying, 'passive aggressive' . Traps are only sprung when stepped on. Most of these Massholes don't get it, they never will get it so the best I can do is burn ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.29 11:15:00
|
73. CCP allows glitchers to win tourney, video proof inside - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber, How do you represent the community when you spend so much time attacking it and acting like it has no valid criticisms of CCP? Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Stop wasting your yelling on stupid issues, save it for real ones, some fol...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.29 07:16:00
|
74. Request: new boarding parties mode and maps - in General Discussions [original thread]
I believe Dagger-Two gives a good description of the situation. If we see any "penetration mode" gameplay I suspect it will be strictly limited to non piloted EVE assets. Tbh I'm more interested in seeing more Dust side control on installations,...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.29 00:41:00
|
75. Community: Give us some planet names - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spheron I
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.28 04:05:00
|
76. Kill this before it reaches 1.5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
As someone who does everything through the neocom I'm not personally bothered by this but I'm not sure how great it is as a feature when the chat window overlaps so badly with so many menus. CCP should probably keep in mind that the way we actual...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.28 00:47:00
|
77. PlansTM and an FW devblog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In regards to the changes that have been delayed from 1.5 to 1.6 Logibro said this. Nearly ten days ago. CCP Logibro, Posted: 2013.09.18 12:30 wrote: However, there is some good news. What this also means is that we'll be posting what we have ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.27 10:54:00
|
78. PlansTM and an FW devblog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big plans, huh? Haven't heard anything like that before. Sounds like a real game changer. It'd be a shame if all that talk just ended up being CCP digging half a hole and filling it back in again and then saying we shouldn't complain because they...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.26 11:32:00
|
79. opinions on the october events - in General Discussions [original thread]
They should just be giving out bonus ISK for wins. It's boring as hell but it's a lot better than what they've got planned.
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.26 10:42:00
|
80. Announcement:Events: October Event Schedule! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Absolute Idiom II wrote: There's no 100 WP minimum for the match to qualify as a win/loss. Is this intended, or did you just forget? IMO it's pretty important to have it so that you don't get penalised for joining a match just before it ends, ...
- by Aqil Aegivan - at 2013.09.25 21:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |