| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
3181. Petition/request/feedback The tank "problem" - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As long as they remain as they are, go ahead and bump the price back up. Tankers will still be able to go positive. Also, bring dropship price down just for me.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 15:55:00
|
3182. its time to make swarms equipment - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
MAke an AT-4 type weapon for equipment. Single shot, then disposed of Dumb fire, like the plasma cannon AT-4 rocket moves at 950 feet per second, about 200m per second and change. so this rocket will move really fast. Can carry 2 Does significant...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 15:53:00
|
3183. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Considering that tanks are VERY expensive (6 million dollars for an M1), 200K to kill one is not too much. It's 30 times cheaper. That means our current AV is very overpriced or tanks are very underpriced AND tanks are OP. ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 15:44:00
|
3184. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jastad wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Then according to your model, AV should not have sidearms, tanks shouldn't be allowed to shoot them, and infantry already can't hurt tanks. That's true rock paper scissors. And that model is asinine. ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:48:00
|
3185. [Feedback] HAVs too strong against infantry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: CLONE117 wrote: to all the dumb ppl who say tanks are 2 powerful. think of the battlefield tanks and the best way to kill then. c4 stuck to a fast vehicle. and since remote explosives stick to stuff now.. heres a...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:30:00
|
3186. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Remnant wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: 1: 10-15%speed or 20% acceleration nerf. 2: hardeners are fine. 2 hardener settups can't perma run it, and 3 has no repps. (Not sure if 3 can even perma run...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:26:00
|
3187. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jastad wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: CUT. Try a Side Arm in PC, let's see your score. Then you can come out and Say such thing. I was a Ground forger till Beta, I know what am i saying. As long as Tank are moved by ONE people, ONE peopl...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:25:00
|
3188. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tch Tch wrote: I would like to see an escalation value in the game. Maximum of x tanks. You can only field 2 more HAVs then your opponent has fielded at one time in the game. So one side could field none the entire game and the other side is...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:20:00
|
3189. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thorn Badblood wrote: It takes 1 guy to kill a tank, want proof? Here you go... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3xsMqHu56g What do you think the price difference is between the weapon and the tank? The M136 AT4 is the Army's primary light ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:17:00
|
3190. NIce work CCP with the sneaky Sniping nerf! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Godin forbid you have to actually get closer to the action as a sniper. As someone who likes the change (woo, no rooftop forge guns!) I have to point out Snipers are supposed to be away from the action. That's kind of th...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:11:00
|
3191. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantr...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 11:09:00
|
3192. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them t...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 10:12:00
|
3193. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... inf...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 10:05:00
|
3194. Sighting Lasers for the Forge Gun - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ooh! What if forge guns could only charge if the laser was on an acceptable target? Which then means the vehicles can pick up their signals! Then they can be shown on the minimap!
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 09:46:00
|
3195. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Text Grant wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily coor...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:50:00
|
3196. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily co...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:42:00
|
3197. Tanks are OP dont listen to tanks post threads ' Tanks are not OP' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Limit the amount of HAVs that can be deployed. Bam, balance. Tanks should take more than one infantry to destroy. Its a freaking TANK. But limit them to one oer side, and suddenly, AV can easily coordinate to kill that tank, because they aren't be...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:39:00
|
3198. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shokhann Echo wrote: Jastad wrote: The cost is not the problem, the problem is the balance. 2/3 guy needed to take down 1 guys with a Tank is not good. its a ******* vehicle dumbass, in the future too... infantry cannot be god, you ca...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:36:00
|
3199. to AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
To clarify, I was directing this only at the AV players who dismissed tankers objection about price differences and are now using the same excuse to complain about the new update. I know not all AV did it, but I couldn't miss adding insult to inju...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:30:00
|
3200. To stop tank spam (as a tanker/dropship pilot) - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheBLAZZED wrote: the number of vehicles on the field should be specific to the vehicle types. Ie:"Team HAV quota has been reached" "team dropship quota has been reached"ect... Exactly what I was thinking.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.14 08:24:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |