| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
1001. Stop complaining about cloaks, there utter sh!t - in General Discussions [original thread]
They need to reduce shimmer when moving slow, but it's fine while moving fast. Perhaps have the cloak skill reduce shimmer by X% per level. Or have crouching give a bonus to shimmer, so crouching reduces shimmer while moving at comparable speeds (...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 21:17:00
|
1002. It is mandatory to put the assets scanners as before! And more with ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
English not your first language? Not sure what you're getting at.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 21:14:00
|
1003. First impression: Cloaking = DUST unplayable unless everyone adjusts - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cloaks are fine. What we need to change, is the ability to see them. When a cloak is up, you get reduced scan signature, right? Simply remove this mechanic. If a scout fits no profile dampeners, then they will get scanned even if cloaked.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 21:12:00
|
1004. TANKOPHOBES! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Atiim wrote: Yeah... If you allow yourself to be killed by REs, your a scrub. I'm not really sure how more Sentinels on the field change the fact that vehicles are broken, in fact the proficency & damage mod...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 21:02:00
|
1005. So you can change heavys on the whim of the CPM but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Logibro wrote: Tanks will also be getting a hot fix, but we haven't nailed down exactly how it will be presented, hence why it's not in the hotfix post yet. Stay turned, and it will get added once we've decided how we want to do it. My s...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 20:50:00
|
1006. the magsec has too much kick - in General Discussions [original thread]
High kick actually makes it only useful at CQC, where most of the rounds will still hit the target despite the kick. In any case, only a slight tone down would be necessary.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 12:57:00
|
1007. The potential heavy nerf: - in General Discussions [original thread]
10% or so less hp would be the sweet spot.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 12:33:00
|
1008. Liking this CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
New tacnet icons are great. Magsec is performing well. LOTS of kick, makes pulsing it worth it, even with the charge. NOVA KNIVES!!! HOOOOOOOO!!! And it's nice to see the total mercs in the fight plus the number of objectives. Also, was there...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 12:07:00
|
1009. So you can change heavys on the whim of the CPM but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or maybe, tanks have a lot more variables than heavies, and therefore take longer to balance. I'm glad that at least CCP is doing something about heavies, even if tanks are still running amok. IT gives me hope that they will fix them soon.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 11:58:00
|
1010. Server is up - in General Discussions [original thread]
What glitches await...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 11:28:00
|
1011. so... during downtime, and waiting on 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Trying not to fall asleep. 6am here, haven't slept. Criminal Minds is helping.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 11:14:00
|
1012. Sticky:Uprising 1.8 Hotfix Information - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Terminator T-1000 wrote: Kasote Denzara wrote: Well then. I assume there will be some very unhappy heavies in the near future. Not me though. WHOOO! GALLENTE COMMANDO! Do you know commando is a heavy? I a hoping, very hard, that the...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:41:00
|
1013. Heavies are broke - in General Discussions [original thread]
They realized it though. Give credit where credit is due.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:40:00
|
1014. Sticky:Uprising 1.8 Hotfix Information - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: Kevall Longstride wrote: Define 'near future'... Aiming for over the next couple of weeks. A timetable! Saberwing, you are my savior! We have a CCP timetable people! WE HAVE BEEN ANSWERED!!! WHOOOOO!!!!
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:36:00
|
1015. 514 MB - in General Discussions [original thread]
Very number. Wow.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:33:00
|
1016. Do passive scans light up reds for your squad/team? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you. Shared field of view Tacnet was removed, and shared passive scans for non-squadmembers, but passive scans are shared with squadmates -...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:23:00
|
1017. It's like the Dust gods WANT me to play 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
BLACKEST GUY wrote: Draxus Prime wrote: Tommorow I have school but on Wednesday we're getting 50 cm of snow with 40km/h winds No school \o/ Time to play 1.8 Pssssh! Please! I got the whole week and then some to play 1.8! Pssssh! Please!...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:13:00
|
1018. Magsec the weapon - in General Discussions [original thread]
CR will have about half again the range of the Magsec.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:12:00
|
1019. Let's make some predictions... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm going with more QQ over tanks, with AV taking a damage nerf. Cloaks will be not as OP as people think, better for escaping than anything. Mass Driver may cause a little QQ, but not as much as tanks will. New name will be Sentinel 514. Call...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:11:00
|
1020. Do passive scans light up reds for your squad/team? - in General Discussions [original thread]
No. Shared tacnet was removed. They only display for you.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.03.25 10:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |