| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
7341. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ Bayeth Profile and precision values round to the nearest whole number. We've tested this exhaustively. @ Brothers Could we not solve our most glaring problems by implementing the proposed plate/profile penalty and increase cloak's active dampe...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.13 00:22:00
|
7342. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
My thinking is we set max precision to just above 2 complex damps plus advanced cloak:on. Whether it's AM or CA doing the scanning makes no difference to me, but we need to match GA Logi+ Focused to the new baseline. We should take into account ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 21:02:00
|
7343. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
PS The original plan was to have a plan in advance. Lol @ Plans
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 20:17:00
|
7344. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ Scouts Perhaps better to hold off on major changes until efficacy bonuses become an option in Delta? Would give us some time to work up new EWAR tables to fit R's vision. Would give R time to confirm whether or not shared passives can be chang...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 20:09:00
|
7345. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ Appia not_helping.jpg If these numbers won't work, what numbers would? Why?
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 16:11:00
|
7346. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
@ Appia, Haerr, Mathfolks On the road til Sunday. Would you guys mind double checking Rattati's numbers? @ Rattati On Cal, 20% per level seems a bit much. A future efficacy bonus value req'd to match these results would be quite high. Also, pleas...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 15:48:00
|
7347. i cant believe I'm saying this but... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seymour KrelbornX wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: TheEnd762 wrote: Longer delay will make it even more impossible to place more than one on a tank before they run. How will it have any effect on this? The delay wil...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 13:29:00
|
7348. Give Caldari Scouts Scan Precision - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Afterthought Scouts want four balanced frames. Nothing more, and nothing less. We can't get there with a 15dB precision baseline. When good Scouts can't feasibly beat scans, they have little choice other than to tank up. Assault Lite is the resu...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 13:21:00
|
7349. Give Caldari Scouts Scan Precision - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
@ Osborne Ridiculous? I presently run a max skill CalScout with 3 precision enhancers, 2 range extenders, and 2 prototype active scanners. If in squad, I seldom draw fire (until I decide that I want to ); that right thar is called Low Risk. My ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 13:04:00
|
7350. GÿÇGÿÇGÿÇ HOTFIX CHARLIE BALANCE CONCERNS WITH LIGHT WEAPONS GÿÇGÿÇGÿÇ - in General Discussions [original thread]
If shotgun's didn't blow beyond 5 meters or hit far harder than fine rifles up close ... Then I might agree with your SG assessment. Reality is ... If you have more than 500hp, a shotgunner would be better off attacking you from behind with a...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 12:39:00
|
7351. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let's assume we got to set the new baseline precision. What would we want it to be, and what damp/cloak combinations should beat it? I'm of the opinion that any of the four frames should be able to dampen sufficiently to beat scans while cloake...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.12 00:11:00
|
7352. Give Caldari Scouts Scan Precision - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There's nothing wrong with permitting each scout frame the opportunity to dampen effectively. Dampened scouts aren't the problem. The role of if "hunter scouts" should be to encourage dampening over brick, rather than shut out of play all but gal...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 23:54:00
|
7353. Proposed Re-New Change to Amarr Scout! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: P.s. squad share should be abolished Absolutely agreed. That'd change everything. Rattati looked into it already; seems unlikely :-(
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 17:01:00
|
7354. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: Let it be known I approve of very little of the changes to scouts so far. So you know, we're trying. Your input would help. What are thoughts on raising precision baseline via AM / CA bonus swap? What would you do di...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 16:37:00
|
7355. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Vibbia wrote: Giving the Amarr a Scan Precision bonus can work out 1 of 3 ways; We can give it a static bonus that drops the suit's precision to the point they don't need to run modules, We can give it a bonus to module efficacy in which...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 16:33:00
|
7356. Proposed Re-New Change to Amarr Scout! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Stefan Stahl wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Eventually, we hope he'll point these specializations toward their respective EWAR modules as a means of further discouraging FoTM tanky Scouts. In essence, it appears he wishes to do away with Assault...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 16:30:00
|
7357. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Vibbia wrote: Adipem Nothi wrote: Also ... not it! lol, It's sad when the FotM chasers are in the right in these instances Wait ... what!? I thought you've favored all along Scout Hunters being weaker at hunting dampened Scou...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 16:10:00
|
7358. Scout Registry / Killboard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Appia Vibbia wrote: Guys, we have a huge problem. Someone just said they thought that Zatara understood the perspective of Scouts. I expect there will be much more gnashing of teeth by FoTM chasing 'Scouts' as their FoTM status comes under...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 15:53:00
|
7359. Proposed Re-New Change to Amarr Scout! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
sabre prime wrote: Please say it isn't so? Don't change too many variables at the same time! Basic science. Moody's correct. EWAR specialization is currently the realm of CA and GA. Rattati's looking to spread it out over three: AM - Preci...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 15:49:00
|
7360. Proposed Re-New Change to Amarr Scout! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Over the past month, the Scout Community has been working hard to resolve what we consider to be the frame's biggest problems: 1) Under performance of MN and AM Scouts 2) Over performance of GA and CA Scouts 3) FoTM Assault Scouts outperforming ...
- by Adipem Nothi - at 2014.07.11 15:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |