Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
149
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 20:29:00 -
[91] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:I don't buy that proto-tank argument. You'd have 2 squads going AV just to take down one if the tank has Infantry support, while the rest of the team is swarmed because of superior numbers. It would just be Chrome-Ambush 2.0. So whats your point proto tanks will be hard to kill ... cos guess what there supposed to be hard to kill. Allot of sp and isk will be invested in true proto tanks so you better bet your ass theyd be hard to kill.
Which wouldn't be a problem, if tanks had a weakness outside of AV. But they dont. It would take multiple dedicated proto-AV users to take down one proto-tank, especially with infantry support. And forget anything under proto-gear doing anything significant to them, while the tanker proceeds to mow down anyone who isn't a threat to them. Dedicated AV users are nearly useless against Infantry, while tankers are effective against everything in the game.
And even then, it still may not be a problem if the game wasn't a total SP sink. I'm closing in on 8 mill, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, it would take at least 10 Mill to get to dedicated AV range right now. What we would have if proto-tanks were in the game is vets and only vets being able to take down vets, and that's a path the Dust cannot go through if it wants to survive. Currently a squad of standard AV users will at least be able to make a tank without Infantry support retreat, a squad of advanced AV users will be able to take down a tank without Infantry support, and a squad of proto AV users will be able to take down a tank even if it does have Infantry support, which is the way it should be. Tanks should not be a KDR tool. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
306
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 20:34:00 -
[92] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:I don't buy that proto-tank argument. You'd have 2 squads going AV just to take down one if the tank has Infantry support, while the rest of the team is swarmed because of superior numbers. It would just be Chrome-Ambush 2.0. So whats your point proto tanks will be hard to kill ... cos guess what there supposed to be hard to kill. Allot of sp and isk will be invested in true proto tanks so you better bet your ass theyd be hard to kill. Which wouldn't be a problem, if tanks had a weakness outside of AV. But they dont. It would take multiple dedicated proto-AV users to take down one proto-tank, especially with infantry support. And forget anything under proto-gear doing anything significant to them, while the tanker proceeds to mow down anyone who isn't a threat to them. Dedicated AV users are useless against Infantry, while tankers are effective against everything in the game. And even then, it still may not be a problem if the game wasn't a total SP sink. I'm closing in on 8 mill, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, it would take at least 10 Mill to get to dedicated AV range right now. What we would have if proto-tanks were in the game is vets and only vets being able to take down vets, and that's a path the Dust cannot go through if it wants to survive. Currently a squad of standard AV users will at least be able to make a tank without Infantry support retreat, a squad of advanced AV users will be able to take down a tank without Infantry support, and a squad of proto AV users will be able to take down a tank even if it does have Infantry support, which is the way it should be. Tanks should not be a KDR tool.
Ok wow I stopped reading when you said tanks weakness outside av . Your obviously someone who wants to solo tanks with his assault rifle. Wow again . Just wow. You sirr have balls tanks weakness outside of av. A wise professor once said "I dont want to live on this planet any more" and thats hiw I feel after the first few words of your post. |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
149
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 20:40:00 -
[93] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:I don't buy that proto-tank argument. You'd have 2 squads going AV just to take down one if the tank has Infantry support, while the rest of the team is swarmed because of superior numbers. It would just be Chrome-Ambush 2.0. So whats your point proto tanks will be hard to kill ... cos guess what there supposed to be hard to kill. Allot of sp and isk will be invested in true proto tanks so you better bet your ass theyd be hard to kill. Which wouldn't be a problem, if tanks had a weakness outside of AV. But they dont. It would take multiple dedicated proto-AV users to take down one proto-tank, especially with infantry support. And forget anything under proto-gear doing anything significant to them, while the tanker proceeds to mow down anyone who isn't a threat to them. Dedicated AV users are useless against Infantry, while tankers are effective against everything in the game. And even then, it still may not be a problem if the game wasn't a total SP sink. I'm closing in on 8 mill, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, it would take at least 10 Mill to get to dedicated AV range right now. What we would have if proto-tanks were in the game is vets and only vets being able to take down vets, and that's a path the Dust cannot go through if it wants to survive. Currently a squad of standard AV users will at least be able to make a tank without Infantry support retreat, a squad of advanced AV users will be able to take down a tank without Infantry support, and a squad of proto AV users will be able to take down a tank even if it does have Infantry support, which is the way it should be. Tanks should not be a KDR tool. Ok wow I stopped reading when you said tanks weakness outside av . Your obviously someone who wants to solo tanks with his assault rifle. Wow again . Just wow. You sirr have balls tanks weakness outside of av. A wise professor once said "I dont want to live on this planet any more" and thats hiw I feel after the first few words of your post.
Fine. I can't discuss this with people who can't be bothered read a paragraph anyway. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
306
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 21:39:00 -
[94] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:I don't buy that proto-tank argument. You'd have 2 squads going AV just to take down one if the tank has Infantry support, while the rest of the team is swarmed because of superior numbers. It would just be Chrome-Ambush 2.0. So whats your point proto tanks will be hard to kill ... cos guess what there supposed to be hard to kill. Allot of sp and isk will be invested in true proto tanks so you better bet your ass theyd be hard to kill. Which wouldn't be a problem, if tanks had a weakness outside of AV. But they dont. It would take multiple dedicated proto-AV users to take down one proto-tank, especially with infantry support. And forget anything under proto-gear doing anything significant to them, while the tanker proceeds to mow down anyone who isn't a threat to them. Dedicated AV users are useless against Infantry, while tankers are effective against everything in the game. And even then, it still may not be a problem if the game wasn't a total SP sink. I'm closing in on 8 mill, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, it would take at least 10 Mill to get to dedicated AV range right now. What we would have if proto-tanks were in the game is vets and only vets being able to take down vets, and that's a path the Dust cannot go through if it wants to survive. Currently a squad of standard AV users will at least be able to make a tank without Infantry support retreat, a squad of advanced AV users will be able to take down a tank without Infantry support, and a squad of proto AV users will be able to take down a tank even if it does have Infantry support, which is the way it should be. Tanks should not be a KDR tool. Ok wow I stopped reading when you said tanks weakness outside av . Your obviously someone who wants to solo tanks with his assault rifle. Wow again . Just wow. You sirr have balls tanks weakness outside of av. A wise professor once said "I dont want to live on this planet any more" and thats hiw I feel after the first few words of your post. Fine. I can't discuss this with people who can't be bothered read a paragraph anyway.
Lol I dont think you get the point. if you want to go one shot everything with an ar then thete is allways cod . I hear they have about 30 different ways to one shot and twich kill one another. |
Benari Kalidima
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
62
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 21:42:00 -
[95] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:I don't buy that proto-tank argument. You'd have 2 squads going AV just to take down one if the tank has Infantry support, while the rest of the team is swarmed because of superior numbers. It would just be Chrome-Ambush 2.0. So whats your point proto tanks will be hard to kill ... cos guess what there supposed to be hard to kill. Allot of sp and isk will be invested in true proto tanks so you better bet your ass theyd be hard to kill. Which wouldn't be a problem, if tanks had a weakness outside of AV. But they dont. It would take multiple dedicated proto-AV users to take down one proto-tank, especially with infantry support. And forget anything under proto-gear doing anything significant to them, while the tanker proceeds to mow down anyone who isn't a threat to them. Dedicated AV users are nearly useless against Infantry, while tankers are effective against everything in the game. And even then, it still may not be a problem if the game wasn't a total SP sink. I'm closing in on 8 mill, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, it would take at least 10 Mill to get to dedicated AV range right now. What we would have if proto-tanks were in the game is vets and only vets being able to take down vets, and that's a path the Dust cannot go through if it wants to survive. Currently a squad of standard AV users will at least be able to make a tank without Infantry support retreat, a squad of advanced AV users will be able to take down a tank without Infantry support, and a squad of proto AV users will be able to take down a tank even if it does have Infantry support, which is the way it should be. Tanks should not be a KDR tool. Yeah, this is pretty much what i was trying to say, my original post might have been a little to cluttered.
pegasis prime wrote:Lol I dont think you get the point. if you want to go one shot everything with an ar then thete is allways cod . I hear they have about 30 different ways to one shot and twich kill one another.
That's not what he was saying at all. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
306
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 22:10:00 -
[96] - Quote
Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window. |
IamI3rian
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
223
|
Posted - 2013.06.20 23:44:00 -
[97] - Quote
Benari Kalidima wrote:...it's impossible to even get a single AV grenade out.
You realize that AV nades aren't exactly going to melt a tank, especially a shield tanker, right? And no, you shouldn't be able to solo a 6mil+ sp 1.5mil+ I$K Tank... with a std grenade. Do you even realize what you're suggesting.
Benari Kalidima wrote: Do I really have to spec up in AV to take out a tank? I don't have to spec up in anything to take out a protosuit.
Yes. You do. Tanks aren't LAV's (or dropships, sadly). They are tanks.
Also, I'd wager you didn't solo the proto suit, and if you did he was terrible.
I've solo'd tanks before (blaster tanks even) with a flaylock, some flux nades and two nanohives. Are you going to tell me that tanker was world class gamer material?
This thread is ridiculous. Spec into a tank please. I'm certain someone would donate a 1mil+ sp alt to you, just so you realize what goes into actually doing it.
--- Remember: IamI3rian told ya Kinda like this game but there's something you should know... I just came to say hello |
Harry Hendersons
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 00:35:00 -
[98] - Quote
HAV is underpowered. |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
151
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 02:00:00 -
[99] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window.
I call this bull, a good well-fit tanker will not be solo'd by a lone AV, especially in advanced gear. But that aside, my gripe with proto-tanks is that it will make standard AV useless against them. Currently the only thing way people can put up with SP sinks is that while protos will always have an advantage, your standard gear has the ability to take out proto-gear. If you work together you can theoretically kill anything with Militia gear. If proto-tanks were to come into play this will mess this up entirely. You will be REQUIRED to skill up in AV in order to get them to at least notice you. And even if you could eventually kill it with standard gear it will require too many Infantry units focused on AV, allowing the enemy to take advantage and swarm in. And get out of here with the side-arm argument, you will be raped outside of 10 meters, and they have side-arms too. |
Void Echo
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
246
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 02:04:00 -
[100] - Quote
this thread is still alive????? |
|
Skipper Jones
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
164
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 03:05:00 -
[101] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Cosgar wrote:HAV are a joke right now. No standard tanks but advanced and prototype AV available should sum things up. If not, look at the price tag on enforcer tanks for what they do. Oh, and that zoom doesn't do anything when the game's rendering can't keep up with it. But it never ******* mattters. If it doesn't die to a single guy with ****** AV gear, it's overpowered. If we ever get HAVs worth driving, GD will be drowning in TANKS514 threads again overnight.
You sir, don't know anything about balance. If just some one guy with some cheap AV gear should take out a TANK, of any kind, Then AV would be wayyy OP. You can't expect to take out a well fitted tank with a good driver inside with militia forge guns and regular av grenades. They aren't invincible. There is a reason the can be fitted better and cost more, because they have more survivability. |
Princeps Marcellus
Expert Intervention Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 03:51:00 -
[102] - Quote
Benari Kalidima wrote:St Evilsbitch wrote:Benari Kalidima wrote:No you're not being sarcastic. Stop doing personal attacks and actually argue against me.
And. "But people don't want to have to level up in anti-tank, just to be able to have the slightest chance against a HAV. There is no actual argument as you have failed to understand the game mechanics. He doesn't have to hold your hand or give you a history lesson. Your argument is this: I want to solo a tank ( that possibly has three people in it), without any investment into how I try to take it down. My answer is this: get into a rail gun turret on the map. This is your only solution. TBH you deserve the sarcasm/personal attacks. Most of the time it takes a full squad to keep 1 tank alive. No, I don't misunderstand the game mechanics. In other games, like Halo, or Planetside 2, it isn't impossible for anti-vehicle infantry to take out tanks solo, so why should it in Dust?
In Halo, your tanks spawn for free. The only "cost" involved in driving a tank in Halo is the time it takes to run over to the freely spawning tanks.
In Planetside 2, you can take a tank down by yourself, yes, but the thing is... PS2 doesn't operate the same way. It costs you 450 Mech Points to buy your unupgraded piece of crap Prowler (which you can get back easily as long as you've certed into the cooldown reduction and your team's doing decently) as it does to buy your Prowler with anchored mode, fully upgraded main AP gun and mine guard, etc. etc.
Here, your tanks, depending on the fitting, can cost anywhere from 650K to 2.5 mil. These are Good fittings, of course. There are also those bad fittings (Somas & Sicas) which you CAN easily destroy with militia swarms, forges, and standard grenades. I'm fairly sure that the militia tanks aren't the ones that you're talking about, though.
|
Straum Arjn
Scholae Evocati
23
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 05:13:00 -
[103] - Quote
AV is good, and tanks need the rest of their gear, being new to this game is FRIGGIN TOUGH so you'll have growing pains. Granted the vets could be a bit more nice about it, but a lot of the people on these forums are really frustrated with CCP right now and they're taking it out on anyone they can wherever they can. Not an excuse and not a justification. I run a Forge Gun and I love seeing tanks, problem is, everytime I see a tank I think to myself (what a wonderful world) "crap, someone is gonna kill that before me" because most tankers go LOLBLASTERTURRETS and then everyone on my team is like "Yay free +140(ish) WP." So me being a dedicated AV guy rarely even gets the AV kills. XD |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
311
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 06:19:00 -
[104] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window. I call this bull, a good well-fit tanker will not be solo'd by a lone AV, especially in advanced gear. But that aside, my gripe with proto-tanks is that it will make standard AV useless against them. Currently the only thing way people can put up with SP sinks is that while protos will always have an advantage, your standard gear has the ability to take out proto-gear. If you work together you can theoretically kill anything with Militia gear. If proto-tanks were to come into play this will mess this up entirely. You will be REQUIRED to skill up in AV in order to get them to at least notice you. And even if you could eventually kill it with standard gear it will require too many Infantry units focused on AV, allowing the enemy to take advantage and swarm in. And get out of here with the side-arm argument, you will be raped outside of 10 meters, and they have side-arms too.
Call bs all you want bro . First questuon who arw you and seco dly do yiu have any sp in av or tanks if not then sir the door is that way dont let it hit you on the ass in the way
You also now look like a tool having problems with proto tanks because a std wepon cat or wont solo them wow go back to cod. |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
163
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 06:26:00 -
[105] - Quote
I've been watching this thread during my banishment, and I can seriously say, Just no. You seriously said that you would rather not get the counter that is VERY cheap. Like At the most 1m SP, and Your a HAV buster. I can do it on my main, and 95% of my SP is in HAV's and LAV's. Just stop bro. You lost. Nobody who knows better will ever take you seriously anymore, so you might as well just stop. And no, you don't need PROTO AV to kill a STD HAV. ADV. shreds them, and the OP AV nades is good enough on their own. Hit me up ingame if you want to give you a detailed explanation of why your thread is a complete failure, and what you should do to realize that you're wrong, and what you should do to not keep on thinking this way and making yourself look.... foolish.
Peace, Godin |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
311
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 06:33:00 -
[106] - Quote
Did they ban you godin ? I kinda wonderd why you didnt make an apperenc in thi tards thread. |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
163
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 06:37:00 -
[107] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Did they ban you godin ? I kinda wonderd why you didnt make an apperenc in thi tards thread.
Hell yea lol Seriously though. You guys are sorta doing it wrong. You CTFO of somebody, then you calmly show them the way. All you guys are doing is CTFOing of this poor bastard, and that makes me slightly sad
Peace, Godin |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
311
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 06:39:00 -
[108] - Quote
Nothing wrong with a bit of bear bateing. Hes an easy target.
Op- waaa tanks op cant kill it with my ar waaaa...... waaaaaa |
Ferren Devarri
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 07:32:00 -
[109] - Quote
One basic HAV is worth more than the payout I see on any skirmish match. That's not even accounting for any other times I may wind up getting smeared by slumming corps.
If I call one in, I sure as hell want it to be tough enough to be worth an entire match. |
demonkiller 12
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 08:07:00 -
[110] - Quote
Wojciak wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Here's what I'm getting:
HAVs in short-range engagements- UP HAVs in long-range engagements- OP That is what people seem to think and i am betting the OP mostly plays ambush. Milt and regular AV should be able to scare off any type of vehicle. To all the people who thinks tanks should be hard to kill that is wrong, tanks are ez to take out in real life and all i want in this game is to take the treads/tiers/engines or people in side the vehicle out( aka disable but not destroy a tank). most of the time i see vehicles dominating a match or being taken out the cheapest way they can be taken out, swarms and forge guns on high building or from the mcc. one last thing is that when someone compares this game to an other game it is fine unless it is from another genera all to gather.Dust is the only MMO RPG FPS that i know is still around if ever was.
Modern tanks are by no means easy to kill, they are very fast and could easily **** over a company Tanks are OP in real life and people should stop bitching that they are in games ITS A ******* TANK ITS MEANT TO RAIN DEATH AND LAUGH AT YOUR PATHETIC EXCUSE OF AN EXISTENCE
Also, invisible swarms, that is all. Also, this wasnt aimed at your personaly, i just didnt want to do 20billion replies |
|
demonkiller 12
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
33
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 09:45:00 -
[111] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window. I call this bull, a good well-fit tanker will not be solo'd by a lone AV, especially in advanced gear. But that aside, my gripe with proto-tanks is that it will make standard AV useless against them. Currently the only thing way people can put up with SP sinks is that while protos will always have an advantage, your standard gear has the ability to take out proto-gear. If you work together you can theoretically kill anything with Militia gear. If proto-tanks were to come into play this will mess this up entirely. You will be REQUIRED to skill up in AV in order to get them to at least notice you. And even if you could eventually kill it with standard gear it will require too many Infantry units focused on AV, allowing the enemy to take advantage and swarm in. And get out of here with the side-arm argument, you will be raped outside of 10 meters, and they have side-arms too.
GOOD if i spend ******* 5-6 months speccing into a tank i expect to be damn near invincible, but oh dont worry you can get proto AV gear in 2 weeks! this game is not meant to be ******* kind, its here to be brutal |
Benari Kalidima
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 13:31:00 -
[112] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:GOOD if i spend ******* 5-6 months speccing into a tank i expect to be damn near invincible, but oh dont worry you can get proto AV gear in 2 weeks! this game is not meant to be ******* kind, its here to be brutal Ehm, no? When did the dev's tell you this? If you want more people to play this game, maybe you should make it easier for new players. |
Benari Kalidima
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
64
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 13:43:00 -
[113] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Call bs all you want bro . First questuon who arw you and seco dly do yiu have any sp in av or tanks if not then sir the door is that way dont let it hit you on the ass in the way
You also now look like a tool having problems with proto tanks because a std wepon cat or wont solo them wow go back to cod. First of all, better spelling would make it easier to understand what you are saying. Secondly, stop telling people sound like a tool, when you can't spell yourself. Telling people to go back to CoD is also stupid. If anything it's the CoD like mechanics that break this game, such as orbital bombardment in public matches. |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
153
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 13:53:00 -
[114] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window. I call this bull, a good well-fit tanker will not be solo'd by a lone AV, especially in advanced gear. But that aside, my gripe with proto-tanks is that it will make standard AV useless against them. Currently the only thing way people can put up with SP sinks is that while protos will always have an advantage, your standard gear has the ability to take out proto-gear. If you work together you can theoretically kill anything with Militia gear. If proto-tanks were to come into play this will mess this up entirely. You will be REQUIRED to skill up in AV in order to get them to at least notice you. And even if you could eventually kill it with standard gear it will require too many Infantry units focused on AV, allowing the enemy to take advantage and swarm in. And get out of here with the side-arm argument, you will be raped outside of 10 meters, and they have side-arms too. GOOD if i spend ******* 5-6 months speccing into a tank i expect to be damn near invincible, but oh dont worry you can get proto AV gear in 2 weeks! this game is not meant to be ******* kind, its here to be brutal
Are you seriously justifying being unaffected by standard gear while you're in proto just because you Spent X amount of time getting to that point? That's a horrible place for the game to go. I've been playing this game for pretty much that amount of time, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, but I'm not going to sit here and say standard ARs should have no effect on my proto Logibro suit. |
demonkiller 12
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
34
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:18:00 -
[115] - Quote
Justin Tymes wrote:demonkiller 12 wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Well if you take his side we shall never see proto tanks whichcare baddly needed to stand up against proto av he seems to have a problem with proto tanks on the basis that ot will take more tan one or two proto av specilists to take down . At the moment we have malitia and std tanks (enforcers are a branch of std or poor adv at best) so currently 1 advanced av and above specilist can solo a tank this is wrong on many levles . (See the many apropriate threads) but if we had adv or pro tanks then it woukd be a different ball game . It would also encourage more av players . I know many good av specilists who arw pretty good with their side arms so the whole av player cant fight against infantry argument is out the window. I call this bull, a good well-fit tanker will not be solo'd by a lone AV, especially in advanced gear. But that aside, my gripe with proto-tanks is that it will make standard AV useless against them. Currently the only thing way people can put up with SP sinks is that while protos will always have an advantage, your standard gear has the ability to take out proto-gear. If you work together you can theoretically kill anything with Militia gear. If proto-tanks were to come into play this will mess this up entirely. You will be REQUIRED to skill up in AV in order to get them to at least notice you. And even if you could eventually kill it with standard gear it will require too many Infantry units focused on AV, allowing the enemy to take advantage and swarm in. And get out of here with the side-arm argument, you will be raped outside of 10 meters, and they have side-arms too. GOOD if i spend ******* 5-6 months speccing into a tank i expect to be damn near invincible, but oh dont worry you can get proto AV gear in 2 weeks! this game is not meant to be ******* kind, its here to be brutal Are you seriously justifying being unaffected by standard gear while you're in proto just because you Spent X amount of time getting to that point? That's a horrible place for the game to go. I've been playing this game for pretty much that amount of time, and I still don't have enough SP to be a dedicated Logibro, but I'm not going to sit here and say standard ARs should have no effect on my proto Logibro suit.
In the short amount of time id be vulnerable to AV i dont see standard gear or possibly even advanced as a serious threat where as proto would be able to actually kill me very quickly, on another note ive found very few proto AV users, the only 1 i know of is Taz from my own corp and if i gave him 5-10 seconds he could kill me on his own.
Anyway my point was that it takes half a year to get to a prototank and only 2 weeks (at most) to get proto AV |
Ferren Devarri
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:39:00 -
[116] - Quote
You better put on your gambling face before whipping out a prototank in an instant match.
Only CCP would price a full loadout higher than winning payouts. If you win, you get some money. If you lose, your ass winds up in the strip club. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
315
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:43:00 -
[117] - Quote
Benari Kalidima wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Call bs all you want bro . First questuon who arw you and seco dly do yiu have any sp in av or tanks if not then sir the door is that way dont lem it hit you on the ass in the way
You also now look like a tool having problems with proto tanks because a std wepon cat or wont solo them wow go back to cod. First of all, better spelling would make it easier to understand what you are saying. Secondly, stop telling people sound like a tool, when you can't spell yourself. Telling people to go back to CoD is also stupid. If anything it's the CoD like mechanics that break this game, such as orbital bombardment in public matches.
Lol iv mentiond this before in another thread when someone who couldent reason back made a lame attempt to respond with an attack at typing skill. Firsrly 87% of the population can understand mistyped text the other 13% are what is known as special ed.
Now unless you have a valid argument and have more than 10mill sp dedicated to tanks or destroying tanks then no one cares about your oppinion (I have 13.6 mill in tanks only) so I think im qualified to comment on vehicle balance hiw about you? |
Justin Tymes
Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation
154
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 14:54:00 -
[118] - Quote
pegasis prime wrote:Benari Kalidima wrote:pegasis prime wrote:Call bs all you want bro . First questuon who arw you and seco dly do yiu have any sp in av or tanks if not then sir the door is that way dont lem it hit you on the ass in the way
You also now look like a tool having problems with proto tanks because a std wepon cat or wont solo them wow go back to cod. First of all, better spelling would make it easier to understand what you are saying. Secondly, stop telling people sound like a tool, when you can't spell yourself. Telling people to go back to CoD is also stupid. If anything it's the CoD like mechanics that break this game, such as orbital bombardment in public matches. Lol iv mentiond this before in another thread when someone who couldent reason back made a lame attempt to respond with an attack at typing skill. Firsrly 87% of the population can understand mistyped text the other 13% are what is known as special ed. Now unless you have a valid argument and have more than 10mill sp dedicated to tanks or destroying tanks then no one cares about your oppinion (I have 13.6 mill in tanks only) so I think im qualified to comment on vehicle balance hiw about you?
Ah I see, you want the game to become just vets vs vets, who make up less than 10% of Dust's population, which is already alarming low as it is. Unfortunately, the game doesn't work that way, standard gear is suppose to be effective against everything in the game, thus skill being more important than gear. You can't break the game's fundamentals just because tankers want to be able to survive against proto AV. |
pegasis prime
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
315
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 16:42:00 -
[119] - Quote
No I dont want to break the game. Now if you want to kill tsnks then ccp has provided appropriatly overpowered av for you to skill into . If you chose to only half specilise tgen you will only half kill a tank. As it stands it rake about 4+ malitia av rambos to take down my gunlogi if they get the drop on me and co ordinate . It takes 3+ standard av specilists to take on my gunlogi . It takes 1 adv or proto to tackle my gunlogi . If we had proto tanks it would take 3+ proto avers to tacke me tgats balance.
I will say this in capitals so you can see it and hopfully understand it better.
IF YOU WANT TO KILL VEHICLES THEN SKILL UP INTO AV . IF YOU IGNORE A PROVIDED COUNTERMESURE AND COME ON HERE WHINING AND CRYING LIKE A LITTLE GIRL BECAUSE YOUR MALITIA GEAR DOSENT WORK ON STD AND ABOVE VEHICLES THEN ALL YOU DO IS MARK YOURSELF AS A LITTLE COD BOY THAT WANTS TO SOLO TANKS WITH HIS MALITIA GEAR. |
Straum Arjn
Scholae Evocati
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.21 18:10:00 -
[120] - Quote
Why do people think that you can just waltz around with a lower tiered weapon and expect to do well with it against higher tiered stuff. Then what's the point of tiers? What's the point of the grind if you do not get any measurable benefit for it? STD av is good against STD HAV. They're the same tier of weapon, like PRO AV is really good against STD HAV because it is a better tier of weapon. The tiers of gear is, arguably the only reason to play this game. It's the only reason to play any MMO really. Yes, new players CANNOT catch up but that has everything to do with a weekly sp cap that means that new players will never bridge the gap. That has nothing to do with the gear so don't blame the gear. Also, guys, I understand you're all super frustrated and stuff, but quit with the all caps and personal attacks and stuff. No one is going to read your post and take you seriously, even if you have good information. Don't be a canoe about it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |