Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive.
At the very least I think it should damage the vehicle and reduce it's speed to near zero. I'm wearing armour that can stop lasers, rockets, grenades and bullets travelling CONSIDERABLY faster than a car.
It makes NO SENSE that such powerful armour would be utterly ruined by the graze from a car. I mean a guy in modern day wearing some leather pants and a plastic hat can survive falling off a speeding motorbike.
Please fix CCP? It's blatantly a problem. |
Kazio De Vihura
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
nahhh love to blow up them with AV...free kills |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
280
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
lol Ive been saying this for months.... scrubs cant get a kill using their weapon so they just try to create roadkill the whole time.
and now that LAVs are 'fun' to drive around in and teleport all over the map cause framerate cant even keep up with the speed of the cars, this is becoming even more prevalent.
had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
|
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
Actually its only how hard they hit u, I survive alot when they barely swipe me or if there not full speed. Also easy counter measure level up your AV or just dont fight in the open field hide in cover or higher ground. Also if they took out not dying when u get ran over this game would make even less sense then it alredy does with the rest of its physics. |
Reign Omega
Hot Messy
5
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
I personally think there should be no infinite militia LAV. I think there should be at least SOME ISK penalty for spamming LAV, even if it wouldn't drastically impact people with major banks, OR some sort of limit as to how many LAV can even be called per match/at one time. The need for LAV on a battlefield is not so high that there should be an infinite model and it definitely encourages DeathRace 2000 for people on the field. This combined with the higher HP for LAV, making them harder to deal with in a pinch if you dont have at LEAST AV grenades on you (the new model takes 2). Hear hear to the OP |
Aqua Hell
Isuuaya Tactical Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
signed |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
EverNub wrote:Actually its only how hard they hit u, I survive alot when they barely swipe me or if there not full speed. Also easy counter measure level up your AV or just dont fight in the open field hide in cover or higher ground. Also if they took out not dying when u get ran over this game would make even less sense then it alredy does with the rest of its physics.
So why are we wearing Armour again? You're telling me my sheilded suit can stop a bullet, my armour can stop rockets fired from drop ships. My armour can soak a single volly of fire fired from an orbiting warbarge, but a car travelling at 20-30kpm nudges me and I should die? No that makes LESS sense than my character surviving. |
Panther Alpha
WarRavens
201
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
I said this at the beginning of the open beta... multiple times...then i give up trying .... |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
102
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
They aren't that hard to dodge tho. then again I'm a scout, and ninja cowboy. If your a heavy then I see a problem. But maybe you could make the lav like american cars and have them blow up when they hit a rabbit. |
|
Herli Pascal
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
But... but... it's fun to run people over |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
EverNub wrote:Actually its only how hard they hit u, I survive alot when they barely swipe me or if there not full speed. Also easy counter measure level up your AV or just dont fight in the open field hide in cover or higher ground. Also if they took out not dying when u get ran over this game would make even less sense then it alredy does with the rest of its physics. And how do you justify "friendly" runovers leaving teammates completely unscathed.
It was terrible playing Domination last night. Huge gunfight happening at A on the bridge. Red dot then piles his LAV straight through to see how many skittles he could knock over and presto about 5 kills and only red dots surviving.
I dont play the game to hide or camp on a hilltop, I'm frontline all them way.. Roadkill just seems to be easymode for tryhards. |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
230
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:28:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive.
No.
If I hit you with a Ton of car at 60 mph, I don't care what kind of suit you got on, you should die. *"period" for emphasis*
You don't like getting squashed by LAV's, develop better situational awareness.
Starter LAV's are very easy to kill. Skill into AV and watch them go pop. Also see the sentence above.
*Hops is his caldari logistics LAV, revs the gass a few times, looks at you sideways, then speeds away, laughing loudly/manically.* |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win
So damn the game, damn it's future, damn good first impressions and let's just fu*k any kind of first impression for newbies because you won a match in video game?
Short sighted much? |
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. No. If I hit you with a Ton of car at 60 mph, I don't care what kind of suit you got on, you should die. *"period" for emphasis* You don't like getting squashed by LAV's, develop better situational awareness. Starter LAV's are very easy to kill. Skill into AV and watch them go pop. Also see the sentence above. *Hops is his caldari logistics LAV, revs the gass a few times, looks at you sideways, then speeds away, laughing loudly/manically.*
Scroll up and read my posts. You think it makes sense you can survive a rocket to the face and 3 magazines of bullets traveling in excess of 800 Feet Per Second, but one graze of a car that seems to bearly keep it's OWN WEIGHT on the ground should kill someone?
A ton? Please. The thing pretty much floats away when it crosses it hill. It looks like it weighs about 2Kg and is full of hellium.
Consistency is needed. It lacks. |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:EverNub wrote:Actually its only how hard they hit u, I survive alot when they barely swipe me or if there not full speed. Also easy counter measure level up your AV or just dont fight in the open field hide in cover or higher ground. Also if they took out not dying when u get ran over this game would make even less sense then it alredy does with the rest of its physics. And how do you justify "friendly" runovers leaving teammates completely unscathed. It was terrible playing Domination last night. Huge gunfight happening at A on the bridge. Red dot then piles his LAV straight through to see how many skittles he could knock over and presto about 5 kills and only red dots surviving. I dont play the game to hide or camp on a hilltop, I'm frontline all them way.. Roadkill just seems to be easymode for tryhards.
I agree but friendly fire is off derps. If not newb berrys would be shooting u more then ud be worried bout lav. But either way cover is ur friend, even heavies use cover if they are smart if u stand in the open all the time u must lose alot of suits. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2110
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
When jeeps take 5 packed AV grenades, you know there's a problem. It's a LIGHT armoured vehicle. Not the grim reapers combine harvester. I quit after a game vs some scrub in my corp, because after the game I went to the forums, and saw the vehicle buff...
CCP just don't know wtf they're doing. |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win So damn the game, damn it's future, damn good first impressions and let's just fu*k any kind of first impression for newbies because you won a match in video game? Short sighted much?
Your just jelly of my 4k hp super logi lav :P |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
3053
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
Free LAVs need to go. |
|
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
EverNub wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:EverNub wrote:Actually its only how hard they hit u, I survive alot when they barely swipe me or if there not full speed. Also easy counter measure level up your AV or just dont fight in the open field hide in cover or higher ground. Also if they took out not dying when u get ran over this game would make even less sense then it alredy does with the rest of its physics. And how do you justify "friendly" runovers leaving teammates completely unscathed. It was terrible playing Domination last night. Huge gunfight happening at A on the bridge. Red dot then piles his LAV straight through to see how many skittles he could knock over and presto about 5 kills and only red dots surviving. I dont play the game to hide or camp on a hilltop, I'm frontline all them way.. Roadkill just seems to be easymode for tryhards. I agree but friendly fire is off derps. If not newb berrys would be shooting u more then ud be worried bout lav. But either way cover is ur friend, even heavies use cover if they are smart if u stand in the open all the time u must lose alot of suits. Nope I just PTFO and with LAVs having magical jumping powers and acrobatic skills the onle "safe" cover is hiding up a ladder or a mountain like a little girl (or hiding in a vehicle the whole game). And yeah I lose a lot of suits that way, however free easymode LAV's is a broken mechanic. You wanna play a driving game, head off to your local store... they have plenty I'm sure |
boba's fetta
Thukker Tribe Holdings Inc. Gathering Of Nomadic Explorers
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:44:00 -
[22] - Quote
if you are hit by a car moving 30 miles an hour you will survive. get hit by a bus travling at the same speed and you will die. why is this? because of something called mass.
i gree the lav should take some damage but i also belive the lav should kill you. |
Knarf Black
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
740
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
Most free LAVs can't even survive a single standard AV grenade. If you're getting run over by one of these wheeled coffins more than once per match, the problem is you. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
281
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:50:00 -
[24] - Quote
EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win
im not arguing something getting 1 shot or 2 shot etc.
Im saying I have you dead in my sights, and do ZERO damage...
ok u are right in front of me, I forge you, your call surives but is low on HP and then I get run over... no complaint aside from the driver being a $%#^ for driving...
im saying the framerate (or something else going on) doesn't even register the fact that I made contact and did damage to your vehicle. This isn't an isolated scenario as pretty much any LAV that is in motion I have this issue with.
I'm not complaining about the HP buff, increased survivability or anything, just the fact that 2k+ dmg on a direct hit and it doesn't affect the health bar of the target.
and yes im sure there is a nice contingent that enjoys 'running me over' and just killing me in general. I don't think you can grasp the amount of mails I get when someone kills me.. they often feel inclined to inform me lol.
I understand that and am fine with it, I just want this issue addressed. At distance all LAVs teleport... no smooth framerate at all |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Still doesnt stop free LAV roadkills being a broken mechanic does it. Often I play logi and forego a grenade entirely in favour of equipment. And one match last night there must have been 4-5 at any one time doing donuts and killing anything in there path. |
Full Metal Kitten
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
295
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:When jeeps take 5 packed AV grenades, you know there's a problem. It's a LIGHT armoured vehicle. Not the grim reapers combine harvester. I quit after a game vs some scrub in my corp, because after the game I went to the forums, and saw the vehicle buff...
CCP just don't know wtf they're doing. Tony, Tony, Tony. You said you deleted DUST from your PS3 several days ago. I'm beginning to think you lied to us on the Internet. For shame!
Free LAVs don't take 5 grenades to kill. For starters, everyone who doesn't run with a squad at all times should have Grenadier 3 trained and carry advanced EX-0 AV nades at a minimum. They have better splash damage, can be thrown farther, and home in better than packed AV. I carry Locus only when I am spawning into CQC areas. LAVs that take multiple advanced AV to the face typically are skilled up and properly fit. Some tanks can be taken out with fewer than 5 AV grenades.
LAV stunt drivers are not hard to counter. That said, I can't imagine Cub's forge not decimating an LAV as OHK. That must have been wonky hit detection or lag. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
281
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 14:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Full Metal Kitten wrote:Tony Calif wrote:When jeeps take 5 packed AV grenades, you know there's a problem. It's a LIGHT armoured vehicle. Not the grim reapers combine harvester. I quit after a game vs some scrub in my corp, because after the game I went to the forums, and saw the vehicle buff...
CCP just don't know wtf they're doing. Tony, Tony, Tony. You said you deleted DUST from your PS3 several days ago. I'm beginning to think you lied to us on the Internet. For shame! Free LAVs don't take 5 grenades to kill. For starters, everyone who doesn't run with a squad at all times should have Grenadier 3 trained and carry advanced EX-0 AV nades at a minimum. They have better splash damage, can be thrown farther, and home in better than packed AV. I carry Locus only when I am spawning into CQC areas. LAVs that take multiple advanced AV to the face typically are skilled up and properly fit. Some tanks can be taken out with fewer than 5 AV grenades. LAV stunt drivers are not hard to counter. That said, I can't imagine Cub's forge not decimating an LAV as OHK. That must have been wonky hit detection or lag.
yea it has to be 1 or the other... hit detection/framerate
1 bonus of this build is I have not seen the frequent framerate drops like before, or super lag (for the most part at least)
and yes you have a 'SUPER LAV' built that can withstand more damage and whatnot, awesome. I like the challenge, but I'm helpless when my weapon of doom shoots blanks. I know when I hit something and when I miss, and when I hit and no damage is taken... well I can only shake my head so much before I have to turn the game off and twiddle my thumbs waiting for it to be fixed. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2112
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Well done kitten, FREE LAVs don't take that much. Logi LAVs take more than most HAVS.. And it's ok, I haven't played since. Yiu can ask around... no trace of a Tony. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
230
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. No. If I hit you with a Ton of car at 60 mph, I don't care what kind of suit you got on, you should die. *"period" for emphasis* You don't like getting squashed by LAV's, develop better situational awareness. Starter LAV's are very easy to kill. Skill into AV and watch them go pop. Also see the sentence above. *Hops is his caldari logistics LAV, revs the gass a few times, looks at you sideways, then speeds away, laughing loudly/manically.* Scroll up and read my posts. You think it makes sense you can survive a rocket to the face and 3 magazines of bullets traveling in excess of 800 Feet Per Second, but one graze of a car that seems to bearly keep it's OWN WEIGHT on the ground should kill someone? A ton? Please. The thing pretty much floats away when it crosses it hill. It looks like it weighs about 2Kg and is full of hellium. Consistency is needed. It lacks.
How's this for consistency? The human body has parts that bend, and, as a consequence, can also be hyper extended as well, now if I hit you in the back at 60 mph how many of your bones do you think are going to hyper extend far beyond the point of braking?
As far as explosions go, explosions don't have a ton of wait barring down on you at hard focal points. Your shields should stop enough of the, equally distributed, in coming force, to at best knock you back or down. Now if you we advocating a knock down mechanic, I would be supporting you, but your not. Your just trying to justify the changes YOU want.
As for bullets, they as well have very little kenetic force, most of the weapons in this game are energy based. A laser for instance has no kenetic force, it is just photons stacked on top of photons inside a single wave length. Similarly the blasters (the AR) are plasma based, and also carry very little kenetic force.
Dude we can do this all day long man, my major in college was science, but I'd rather not.
Now HTFU.
|
Vallud Eadesso
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Now HTFU.
Get out of the car and learn to play, son. Stop advocating a play style that hurts the game.
You can throw your science around all day... but in game you can survive a single metal slug that weighs the same as a truck dropped directly on your head from orbit (At least once. Those orbital barrages don't insta-splat)
A car moving considerably slower nudging me shouldn't kill me. |
|
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
376
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Just going to leave this here. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
230
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Now HTFU.
Get out of the car and learn to play, son. Stop advocating a play style that hurts the game. You can throw your science around all day... but in game you can survive a single metal slug that weighs the same as a truck dropped directly on your head from orbit (At least once. Those orbital barrages don't insta-splat)
You don't get "hit in the head buy metal slugs". As it functions right now, OB are an AOE bombardment. The only way you can currently survive an orbital is to be on the extreme edge of the AOE.
A car moving considerably slower nudging me shouldn't kill me.[/quote]
The way I look at it is, since there is no kind of knock down mechanics in this game, if I hit you at slow speed and you that means I ran over top of you with my car. If you are under the impression that you are able to just instkill people at these speeds you are wrong. LAVs do varying levels of damage at low speed unless the person is directly in front of your car or you crush the into any solid surface.
Look man, there is nothing wrong with this mechanic. The thing that you should be upset about is free LAV spam. If people had to skill up to use LAVs there wouldn't be such a problem. And if you had a little better situational awareness and some AV it wouldn't be much of a problem in the first place. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
416
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:33:00 -
[33] - Quote
I think the main problem here is that there is no penalty for running someone over.
While I do not think the LAV needs to come to an abrupt stop, it would make sense to roll or bounce the vehicle over the target potentially giving that targets teammates a better window to destroy the vehicle. This of course should be scaled to reflect the size of the victims suit;
scouts have no penalty, medium frames will 'bounce' or sometimes roll the vehicle with a speed penalty, heavy frames cause a significant speed penalty and high chance to roll
I think LAVs should be remain capable of OHK'ing everyone when at high speed except a well fit heavy. It would be nice if there was some sort of animation for being knocked down. |
Panoscape
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
133
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
We need cows added to the game, they where so fun to hunt in carmegeddon. But, heavy's will do for now.
I'll be buying the veteran pack just to get the free SAGA and start rolling that.
Yes, I'm enjoying carmageddon 514, plus with the added heavy pop and drop, this game rules.
Especially since they took out clones getting stuck in the grill and sparking, which slowed down my road rage kdr. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
I think I was killed 10 times yesterday by the same dude in 2 matches in his Blood Raider buggy. It was absolutely hilarious. He was a freaking madman behind the wheel. I was actually disappointed to get killed by bullets afterwards.
Props to you, dude, wherever you are.
In all honesty, though: I think smashing into a heavy with an LAV should seriously **** your **** up, a Medium less so, and scouts should be more or less a speed bump. |
Immovable 0bject
DIOS EX. Gentlemen's Agreement
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win So damn the game, damn it's future, damn good first impressions and let's just fu*k any kind of first impression for newbies because you won a match in video game? Short sighted much?
How is getting ran over by a LAV a bad first impression. I would think they would just start to watch for the LAVs more. I'm a heavy and I know the pain of getting hit by a LAV, but its not nearly as bad as you all are making it out to be. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
232
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:43:00 -
[37] - Quote
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote:I think the main problem here is that there is no penalty for running someone over.
While I do not think the LAV needs to come to an abrupt stop, it would make sense to roll or bounce the vehicle over the target potentially giving that targets teammates a better window to destroy the vehicle. This of course should be scaled to reflect the size of the victims suit;
scouts have no penalty, medium frames will 'bounce' or sometimes roll the vehicle with a speed penalty, heavy frames cause a significant speed penalty and high chance to roll
I think LAVs should be remain capable of OHK'ing everyone when at high speed except a well fit heavy. It would be nice if there was some sort of animation for being knocked down.
There is a bounce effect. It only occurs a percentage of the time though, but it happens quite often. Some times it even brings you to a dead stop, or flips you end over end if you are going fast enough. |
Canari Elphus
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
94
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
Its not just one thing.. its multiple
1 - Hit detection is just funny. Anywhere near the LAV will killyou 2 - AV grenades are feather dusters now 3 - Vehicles are ninjas so you cant see them coming |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Its not just one thing.. its multiple
1 - Hit detection is just funny. Anywhere near the LAV will killyou 2 - AV grenades are feather dusters now 3 - Vehicles are ninjas so you cant see them coming What he said |
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
167
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
Impact damage needs to be lower and much more consistent. you can hit someone goign slow and it kills them.
No reason a free LAV shouldnt a OHK with even the first AV nade. u want something better upgrade your own. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4113
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bullet Proof Vests are not Car Proof, Nor are they knife proof. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2112
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:07:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:Impact damage needs to be lower and much more consistent. you can hit someone goign slow and it kills them.
No reason a free LAV shouldnt a OHK with even the first AV nade. u want something better upgrade your own.
LogiLav took 6 packed AV before their buff. That's still totally not cool. It's an LAV ffs. |
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to no just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:26:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
408
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
HTFU. sure the starter LAV is dumb and should go everything else is you not paying attention and should die from because it is your fault. btw armor that is bullet proof is not high impact proof, AKA LAV running you over does full damage that it should. its like you saying you should live past a rail turret to the face. and the free LAV do not take more than 3 av nades. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4114
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Fusion plants are much heavier than our gasoline engines too. These things are probably just has heavy as some modern APC vehicles and the sheer weight of those things can crush a Humvee. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that.
Your talking about an inertial dampener. Sounds good to me. One problem for you though, you have to activate it, and it isn't going to do a world of good for you when I plow you from behind because you weren't looking, and it can't last for ever in face to face confrontations. |
Shady IceCream Truck
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:When jeeps take 5 packed AV grenades, you know there's a problem. It's a LIGHT armoured vehicle. Not the grim reapers combine harvester. I quit after a game vs some scrub in my corp, because after the game I went to the forums, and saw the vehicle buff...
CCP just don't know wtf they're doing.
Jeeps take 1 AV grenade you tosser.. As well as 1 swarm launcher..
Sounds like another "I lost my free HAcked AV" cry post...
Ill say it again.. All this senseless killing can end.. just rollback the nerfs.. Ill be happy to retire my wheels.. Until then ..expect your proto AR's to fall at the rate of 20 per game.. lol bishs |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:36:00 -
[49] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:I personally think there should be no infinite militia LAV. I think there should be at least SOME ISK penalty for spamming LAV, even if it wouldn't drastically impact people with major banks, OR some sort of limit as to how many LAV can even be called per match/at one time. The need for LAV on a battlefield is not so high that there should be an infinite model and it definitely encourages DeathRace 2000 for people on the field. This combined with the higher HP for LAV, making them harder to deal with in a pinch if you dont have at LEAST AV grenades on you (the new model takes 2). Hear hear to the OP This ^
You folks are all basing your assumptions that all LAVs are Free LAVs. When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me. If Free LAVs are the culprit then get rid of them! Y'all sitting here trying to nerf LAVs in general when you've gotten all upset that people got driver's license and you're still a student driver.
All the people using real LAVs or even purchased their Militia LAV deserve the right to run you over. It's not like we can operate massive turrets that can snipe you from across the map .
Also, this is the future. You have your fancy shmancy armor. Well I have my fancy shmancy car too. My car is just as futuristic as your armor. I have a diamond-steel alloy grill.
PS: Ever heard of Free Swarm Launchers? |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:37:00 -
[50] - Quote
No one cares what kind of suit your wearing, your internal organs would get crushed. |
|
Byozuma Kegawa
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:37:00 -
[51] - Quote
I saw this thread and thought it had something to do with the rash of mass LAV racing lately... shame, I'd like to have heard more on that. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Free LAVs need to go. With STD BPO LAVs on their way, it's not going to happen, at least not until we get speeders, then we can spam those |
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that.
I like to play a game where sometimes, I see how close I can get to the ground before activating the damper in order to negate the impact force. Once, I missed, and trust me, it was very similar to getting hit by a tank. You can "brush off and walk away from that" because that's what dampers are for.
I don't know how you lot are managing to get hit by LAVs in the first place. It's not like if you're running across open ground, you don't check your surroundings. Or maybe it is... who knows. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4115
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
I have never seen any LAVs ever EAT 5 AV nades. Now dodging them is another question for a later day but 5 direct hits usually would kill most tanks even. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4115
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. I like to play a game where sometimes, I see how close I can get to the ground before activating the damper in order to negate the impact force. Once, I missed, and trust me, it was very similar to getting hit by a tank. You can "brush off and walk away from that" because that's what dampers are for. I don't know how you lot are managing to get hit by LAVs in the first place. It's not like if you're running across open ground, you don't check your surroundings. Or maybe it is... who knows.
I had a heavy suit walk away from it, limping, but walking none the less. |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
Byozuma Kegawa wrote:I saw this thread and thought it had something to do with the rash of mass LAV racing lately... shame, I'd like to have heard more on that. You can expect the Grand Prix to occur some time next month courtesy of Bojo's Grand Bazaar. Betting will occur and tracks are being mapped out right now. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. Your talking about an inertial dampener. Sounds good to me. One problem for you though, you have to activate it, and it isn't going to do a world of good for you when I plow you from behind because you weren't looking, and it can't last for ever in face to face confrontations. I'll give you a like on that one... Yeah you have to activate and wouldn't save you from a behind attack.. Sometimes ther are the "oh ****" moments where you know you are going to get splattered and there is no way of avoidinig it. It would help then if your reflexes are fast enough to activate.
Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern. Who knows, when the aiming is fixed perhaps it will die down a bit. I can cope with that ok same as in battlefield... I was just trying to make a point that at the moment it is rediculous with the amount of spam to the point it severly affects gameplay. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote: it should damage the vehicle and reduce it's speed to near zero. . it does... for both of those.
Though they should probably adjust their little formula which calculates damage, it doesn't require enough speed for it to be a 1HKO. |
Jikt Terlen
Certificate of Participation
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
I would drive a LAV more often if the controls weren't so wonky. Basically 20 degrees of the 360 are usable, the rest make you spin out. Have these guys never played a driving game or cart game before (let's be honest, it's more Mario Cart than Forza)?
Anyway, the LAV menace is annoying, but no more so than snipers, and LAVs can be easily killed. They add variety to the game, at least, and as long as you're paying some attention they aren't really that dangerous (the driver can't even shoot, and a gunner is vulnerable to infantry fire).
My biggest gripe with vehicles in general is that they often fail to show up on the TACNET until they are on top of you, while infantry are visible far away. A tank is the biggest thing on the battlefield, everyone sees it, so it makes no sense that its radar blip disappears when it isn't right next to you. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs |
|
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:44:00 -
[61] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
I had a heavy suit walk away from it, limping, but walking none the less.
You know what I reckon would be cool? Little impact craters under the MCV where people forgot to damp their drop |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:45:00 -
[62] - Quote
NeoWraith Acedia wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs I fear you are right |
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:46:00 -
[63] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:NeoWraith Acedia wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs I fear you are right
Here's an idea. Just a thought, really. If they can spam free LAVs, then why can't you? |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:48:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:NeoWraith Acedia wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs I fear you are right Here's an idea. Just a thought, really. If they can spam free LAVs, then why can't you? Heres why............................
I dont like driving games... If i did i would be playing GTA, this is an FPS
|
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:NeoWraith Acedia wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs I fear you are right Here's an idea. Just a thought, really. If they can spam free LAVs, then why can't you? Heres why............................ I dont like driving games... If i did i would be playing GTA, this is an FPS
That would be relevant if it was to be expected that an FPS would not include some kind of vehicle. Sadly, that is not the case, and this is still an FPS, vehicles and all. Which makes your problem entirely a matter of personal preference, and I would suggest.... nah, I won't actually. You can figure out the rest on your own or qq for all I care. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:52:00 -
[66] - Quote
ok cheers for your input.... see ya
|
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:56:00 -
[67] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. I like to play a game where sometimes, I see how close I can get to the ground before activating the damper in order to negate the impact force. Once, I missed, and trust me, it was very similar to getting hit by a tank. You can "brush off and walk away from that" because that's what dampers are for. I don't know how you lot are managing to get hit by LAVs in the first place. It's not like if you're running across open ground, you don't check your surroundings. Or maybe it is... who knows. I had a heavy suit walk away from it, limping, but walking none the less.
I think that if you plow into a heavy it should do some damage, it should definitely have some kind of bounce effect/slow down.
And what ever happend to dudes getting stuck in your wheel well a percentage of the time, and slowing you down for short period? I thought that that was a fair mechanic. |
EnglishSnake
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
1056
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:00:00 -
[68] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. At the very least I think it should damage the vehicle and reduce it's speed to near zero. I'm wearing armour that can stop lasers, rockets, grenades and bullets travelling CONSIDERABLY faster than a car. It makes NO SENSE that such powerful armour would be utterly ruined by the graze from a car. I mean a guy in modern day wearing some leather pants and a plastic hat can survive falling off a speeding motorbike.Please fix CCP? It's blatantly a problem.
Falling off a speeding bike is not the same as getting hit by a 1ton car
Sure you have dropsuits that are stronger and are more advanced to stop bullets/lasers and to protect you against explosions but they are not made for stopping a 1ton LAV speeding at 40mph at you |
Byozuma Kegawa
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 17:25:00 -
[69] - Quote
Bojo The Mighty wrote:Byozuma Kegawa wrote:I saw this thread and thought it had something to do with the rash of mass LAV racing lately... shame, I'd like to have heard more on that. You can expect the Grand Prix to occur some time next month courtesy of Bojo's Grand Bazaar. Betting will occur and tracks are being mapped out right now. Could you send me a link to the maps when you're done? PSN is Byozuma |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
68
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive.
I just want to stop running over myself when i jump out of em....i can dodge bullets...i think i can handle jumping out a car and not running myself over. |
|
Yeva Kalsani
Reckoners
70
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:13:00 -
[71] - Quote
Me and my Forge Gun collection are lovin' it. |
Dust Evo 514
Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
NO the cars are just fine for the damage they do.
Free LAVs should be removed.
The speed of a basic LAV should be reduced and increases with upper tier models.
Stop complaining about getting ran over because you don't know how to stay in cover.
That's why AV grenades exsist! Use them! They are usually instant kills! |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp Orion Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
As a heavy I have been ran down like a squirrel plenty of times.
Sometimes I die but stop them dead in their tracks.
Sometimes I slow them down.
Sometimes I roll them.
Sometimes I start ripping into them and they blow up in my face and the explosion kills me.
Sometimes I do this^ and survive.
I always use my free LAV to haul my Fat Azz around so do not get rid of free LAVs.
What annoys me more than getting ran over is when I call in an LAV and some blue berry jumps in and steals it! Granted it is free but everyone has them call in your own ride!
|
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2121
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:46:00 -
[74] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I have never seen any LAVs ever EAT 5 AV nades. Now dodging them is another question for a later day but 5 direct hits usually would kill most tanks even.
Ask Jason Pearson of SI. He's been going 20-0 all day. It's not a free LAV as I've pointed out several times, but people seem to ignore that. |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
317
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:50:00 -
[75] - Quote
Not only do I not want LAV damage to be decreased but I want Ragdoll physics. If you get hit by a LAV I want to see some bodies go flying!
Also, add modules we can fit onto our LAV, like Chainsaws and Lazerblades on the front ! I want Red and Blueberries pieces flying everywhere. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4117
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 18:50:00 -
[76] - Quote
Well I rarely see the scout or the logistics one, usual problem with most LAVs is that they're able to evade some attacks easily. its more possible for an lav to dodge a swarm launch these days. But overall a tank can chew though a poorly driven lav of any stature pretty quickly. |
eKona vinDar
WarRavens
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:09:00 -
[77] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. At the very least I think it should damage the vehicle and reduce it's speed to near zero. I'm wearing armour that can stop lasers, rockets, grenades and bullets travelling CONSIDERABLY faster than a car. It makes NO SENSE that such powerful armour would be utterly ruined by the graze from a car. I mean a guy in modern day wearing some leather pants and a plastic hat can survive falling off a speeding motorbike. Please fix CCP? It's blatantly a problem.
Stupidest idea ever....
You get hit by a car, you die. The car does not stop or take damage... maybe a little dent... but nothing noticable.
Your armor can take a hit from something going fast, but not something BIG. It's not about speed it's about MASSSSSSSS
MASSSSSS
MASSSSS
I'll say it one more time MASS
A rocket has literally like one one millionth the mass of an LAV. This is why you can get hit by it and not die. An LAV should ALWAYS kill ALL infantry upon impact no matter what your wearing.
If you don't like getting run over then get the hell out of the way. If you die by LAV enough to complain you just suck at this game, period.
I love running over noobs in my LAV.. TAKE COVER YOU STUPID NOOB!! OR ILL RUN YOUR ASS OVER!!
I've had many people TRY and run me over with an LAV. I think it's fun to mess around with them and stand still till the last second then jump out the way. Oh, your wearing a slow ass heavy suit? Well too bad, that's the trade off for your tanking ability. Don't expect to be able to dodge a vehicle, and don't complain when your ass gets ran over because you were not paying attention.
USE YOUR COVER!! Run from cover to cover, or just be smart about it.
STUPIDITY is not a valid reason to nerf something. Exspecially when it makes no sense.... why would someone survive being hit by two tons of steel at 100 MPH? They wouldn't....
And why would that two tons of steel traveling at 100MPH reach a near stop when hitting a sack of meat? It wouldnt.
If you don't like being killed by something, then become a better player, stop whining about how much you suck. |
eKona vinDar
WarRavens
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:12:00 -
[78] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:
What annoys me more than getting ran over is when I call in an LAV and some blue berry jumps in and steals it! Granted it is free but everyone has them call in your own ride!
Create a squad and it will be locked for your squad for a few seconds.... wait for it.... wait for it.... RTFM!
Ok so there is no manual but how could you not know this already? |
eKona vinDar
WarRavens
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:17:00 -
[79] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Not only do I not want LAV damage to be decreased but I want Ragdoll physics. If you get hit by a LAV I want to see some bodies go flying!
Also, add modules we can fit onto our LAV, like Chainsaws and Lazerblades on the front ! I want Red and Blueberries pieces flying everywhere.
100% agree!
Carmageddon was one of my most favorite games. |
Novas The Second
Rising Sun Mercenaries
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:19:00 -
[80] - Quote
free LAV's need to go, there should DEFINITELY be a cost in isk, so that you can buy a couple of basic ones before a game starts but as soon as someones blown you up with some well placed AV?
Then you're all out of LAV's.
(and also,you shouldn't be able to buy more during the match) |
|
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp Orion Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:23:00 -
[81] - Quote
eKona vinDar wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:
What annoys me more than getting ran over is when I call in an LAV and some blue berry jumps in and steals it! Granted it is free but everyone has them call in your own ride!
Create a squad and it will be locked for your squad for a few seconds.... wait for it.... wait for it.... RTFM! Ok so there is no manual but how could you not know this already?
I did know this. Usually when mine get stolen it is because I'm somewhere near it killing a Rambo Scout or Assault trying to ninja hack, then return to get in my LAV and go on about my merry way only to find it quickly traveling away from me. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4117
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:26:00 -
[82] - Quote
a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets. |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp Orion Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:29:00 -
[83] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets.
I don't see this blowing over very well...although it wouldn't bother me. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Gentlemen's Agreement
68
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:35:00 -
[84] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets.
How do I petition a council member to resign from the council? |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:49:00 -
[85] - Quote
I've never had trouble with vehicles until recently but now it's getting out of hand.
The game I just finished you couldn't go more than a minute before someone in a car peeled around the corner, flipped over twice and then righted itself perfectly fine and mowed you down.
If you're going to have instant kill death machines on wheels at least balance them with realistic mechanics. You flip your car over? It stays flipped over unless you get people help flip it upright, no more of this automatic righting stuff. You smash into a wall to nail someone? You take damage equal to just ramming your vehicle's engine into a solid wall. |
Byozuma Kegawa
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
27
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 19:56:00 -
[86] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets. I can get behind this. Just need to be able to field them without having to fit a turret. Not saying I wouldn't buy turrets, just that there are some things where... don't really need a turret. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:01:00 -
[87] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets. The sounds like a buff bro, those turrets are useless |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp Orion Empire
48
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:12:00 -
[88] - Quote
Byozuma Kegawa wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets. I can get behind this. Just need to be able to field them without having to fit a turret. Not saying I wouldn't buy turrets, just that there are some things where... don't really need a turret.
This.
By "some things" you wouldn't happen to mean hit and runs would you? |
Failonius
Quantum Degeneracy
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:47:00 -
[89] - Quote
No vehicles should be free. Period. |
sammus420
Goonfeet
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:50:00 -
[90] - Quote
Mike Poole wrote:I've never had trouble with vehicles until recently but now it's getting out of hand.
The game I just finished you couldn't go more than a minute before someone in a car peeled around the corner, flipped over twice and then righted itself perfectly fine and mowed you down.
If you're going to have instant kill death machines on wheels at least balance them with realistic mechanics. You flip your car over? It stays flipped over unless you get people help flip it upright, no more of this automatic righting stuff. You smash into a wall to nail someone? You take damage equal to just ramming your vehicle's engine into a solid wall.
LAVs have very, very low centers of gravity, which is why they're almost always self-righting. However, i've seen LAVs stuck on their sides and stuck upside down, so it can happen.
Also, remove the free LAVS! |
|
Byozuma Kegawa
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 20:56:00 -
[91] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:Byozuma Kegawa wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:a solution would be to make sure they're not prefitted with turrets. I can get behind this. Just need to be able to field them without having to fit a turret. Not saying I wouldn't buy turrets, just that there are some things where... don't really need a turret. This. By "some things" you wouldn't happen to mean hit and runs would you? Actually... no. I'm not sure how popular it'd be here but in Warhawk there'd be the occasional sponsored race where players would hop into the ubiquitous warhawks and fly around the map in laps. Recently I've seen people doing this with LAVs in Ambushes. A squad of LAVs just driving around the map in predictable patterns you could orbital on. No need for a turret there, I'd think. |
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
170
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 22:40:00 -
[92] - Quote
Supporting the opinion of no more free LAV's in game anymore. What is the point really.? Having them just reduces incentive to Skill into them anyway. Make it a viable vocation to be an LAV driver...with purpose. Other than some scrub who just wants to run around and taking people out with what is arguably the cheapest one hit kill weapon in the game that doesn't cost a single ISK.
Militia LAV's are in the Market. Let players start paying for them. Between those and all the BPO LAV's out there I doubt they will just "disappear" from the battlefield..
Militia LAV......too much reward with ZERO risk. Sounds out of place to me. |
Dusty Nelson
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
3
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:50:00 -
[93] - Quote
+1
Support the removal of the Free LAV! |
Polish Hammer
Conspiratus Immortalis League of Infamy
406
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 23:58:00 -
[94] - Quote
Free forge kills |
flesth
Red Star. EoN.
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:05:00 -
[95] - Quote
i love driving around and running people over, hey there a red dot out in the open , foot down boom ,
btw, 1st rule on ground , Look left and right and you be fine , always armed with AV nades lav drivers look out for forge gun , av nades, tankers so there is a risk too for drivers ,
|
Akhi Rhise
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 00:10:00 -
[96] - Quote
We're these goddamned armored suits that can withstand two sniper bullets at the very least, but can't handle ONE hit by a vehicle going CONSIDERABLY SLOWER.
Doesn't make sense at all. Someone at CCP isn't doing their math. |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:24:00 -
[97] - Quote
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win im not arguing something getting 1 shot or 2 shot etc. Im saying I have you dead in my sights, and do ZERO damage... ok u are right in front of me, I forge you, your call surives but is low on HP and then I get run over... no complaint aside from the driver being a $%#^ for driving... im saying the framerate (or something else going on) doesn't even register the fact that I made contact and did damage to your vehicle. This isn't an isolated scenario as pretty much any LAV that is in motion I have this issue with. I'm not complaining about the HP buff, increased survivability or anything, just the fact that 2k+ dmg on a direct hit and it doesn't affect the health bar of the target. and yes im sure there is a nice contingent that enjoys 'running me over' and just killing me in general. I don't think you can grasp the amount of mails I get when someone kills me.. they often feel inclined to inform me lol. I understand that and am fine with it, I just want this issue addressed. At distance all LAVs teleport... no smooth framerate at all
Yah unfortunately ccp cant figure out basic stuff like framerate or hit detection I agree. But damn did they fix me going behind the score board....game changer I know! |
Aisha Ctarl
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:41:00 -
[98] - Quote
We need armor lock. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
457
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 01:57:00 -
[99] - Quote
You people are dumb, they shouldn't remove free LAVs because there's going to be STD BPOs. So you're all saying it's okay if you spam zero risk LAVS as long as you pay for the ability to spam them indefinitely right? Your "no risk" argument goes out the window the instant you bring BPOs into this.
They will never remove the free starter vehicle, they might change it, but not remove it. Get over it. |
RINON114
B.S.A.A.
158
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 10:03:00 -
[100] - Quote
How about we have to pay to move the vehicles into a battlezone much like we do with clones to a district? |
|
Corpse Raider
The Shadow Cavalry Mercenaries DARKSTAR ARMY
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:01:00 -
[101] - Quote
I have fun running people over (or at least trying to, I'm a terrible driver), and I have fun dodging vehicles. In my Dragonfly with KC, I can jump right over a LAV and had a 2-minute "dodge war" with an LAV a few days ago that was fun. :)
I have just one complaint with the carmageddon mechanic... I can try to jump out of the way, spin round to see the LAV below me and impact where my foot is at 30mph. Currently this is an instant kill.
Much of the QQing could be reduced by scaling the damage based on how the victim is evading. If jumping then the damage should be scaled depending how far off the ground the player is. If on the ground, the victim should be paste (except maybe well-tanked heavies), but if actively evading then the evasion should be rewarded with reduced damage based on the level of success (ie. the height of the jump at the time of impact).
If a victim is dumb enough to ignore the engine sound of a LAV when no friendly LAV is on the scanner then they deserve to be paste, if they are squashed into a wall they should be paste, if they evade then they should be rewarded based on the success of their evasion. They should not be insta-killed by having an LAV hit their foot at 30mph.
There is no need to nerf LAVs, please stop calling for the nerfhammer to be brought down on everything folks. If the impact mechanic is broken then that should be fixed, not some random other part of vehicle mechanics.
|
Cosgar
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
967
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:24:00 -
[102] - Quote
I don't know why you guys are crying about LAVs, they still pop like zits if you hit em' with a swarm launcher. Everyone is practically making the same mistake we did at the beginning of chrome and neglecting AV. FYI in case if you didn't know, the LAV skills are linked to the HAV and derpship ones, so they can make some pretty beefy LAVs that don't go down to AV nades that easily. If you want to kill vehicles, you better give up your light slot and spec into something to blow them up. CCP swung the nerf bat once, and last time I checked, LAVs aren't heavies, so I doubt they'll swing it again.
Edit: Not sure if proxy mines got buffed since I don't have enough SP to get them back again. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1100
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:52:00 -
[103] - Quote
Adding my Input as I feel bad for Tony.
LAVs seem to have been overbuffed. It's very easy for me to soak up damage in a LLAV, to the point where I'm actually more tanky than a Tank (I prefer using the LAV to assault infantry over my Gunnlogi)
Iron Wolf, I want you to squad up with me sometime, I will show you how I eat around 5 AV grenades or two forge blasts or w.e whilst continuing to run over the AVers. It's at the point now where I take about 100 damage per swarm missile (so about 400 or so).
The Free LAVs are not a massive problem, they are too strong for what they are though. I have a very simple solution, tweak the HP buffs on the LAVs slightly, work with the LLAVs resists. Remove the free fits we have. You cannot demand the Free LAV to be removed but be okay with the free AV weapons. Instead, give players one suit depending on their race, with their races Militia Assault Rifle. No module slots or equipment, meaning they can shoot but aren't useful till they work out the market system and get involved. Then remove the free LAV. It's fair.
Edit: Also CCP needs to work on hit detection, I managed to get a 4m kill using just an LAV, explain that. |
ImpureMort
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:54:00 -
[104] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Adding my Input as I feel bad for Tony.
LAVs seem to have been overbuffed. It's very easy for me to soak up damage in a LLAV, to the point where I'm actually more tanky than a Tank (I prefer using the LAV to assault infantry over my Gunnlogi)
Iron Wolf, I want you to squad up with me sometime, I will show you how I eat around 5 AV grenades or two forge blasts or w.e whilst continuing to run over the AVers. It's at the point now where I take about 100 damage per swarm missile (so about 400 or so).
The Free LAVs are not a massive problem, they are too strong for what they are though. I have a very simple solution, tweak the HP buffs on the LAVs slightly, work with the LLAVs resists. Remove the free fits we have. You cannot demand the Free LAV to be removed but be okay with the free AV weapons. Instead, give players one suit depending on their race, with their races Militia Assault Rifle. No module slots or equipment, meaning they can shoot but aren't useful till they work out the market system and get involved. Then remove the free LAV. It's fair. i concur jason ...my charybdis eat av wayyyy better than my gunlogi |
ImpureMort
Seykal Expeditionary Group Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:54:00 -
[105] - Quote
its a sad day when us tanker get more kills and higher survivability rate just running people over ina lav |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1100
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 11:56:00 -
[106] - Quote
ImpureMort wrote:its a sad day when us tanker get more kills and higher survivability rate just running people over ina lav
Super easy. 37/0 with 120k damage done in a single domination match, didn't come close to losing it. |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
905
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 12:06:00 -
[107] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. So you think that a 2 ton vehicle should not kill a merc on foot? Lol An easy way around not being killed by lav is to check map before respawn. Don't spawn where there's lav's rushing around. Spawn with swarm launcher and go to their location and take em out. Worked for me this past year. |
Vethosis
BetaMax Beta CRONOS.
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 12:34:00 -
[108] - Quote
Carry AV's around? As a LAV driver, we go through lots of obstacles to run you over. It is very hard to drive LAV's now since the new controls. Good LAV drivers will only stay in one area because the other areas might have turrets.
LAV's make a sound heard miles around, if your volume is up, you should hear one coming.
^ Best tip I have. |
Kekklian Noobatronic
Goonfeet
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 12:42:00 -
[109] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive.
Why don't you go outside and try geting hit by a car - Let me know how well you survive it. And no - body armor is not designed to stop impacts by multi-ton vehicles.
You want to know how not to get run over by a LAV driver? Here's a hint - PAY ATTENTION. Most if not all collisions can be avoided by simply having a heartbeat and stepping out of the way. It's not that hard. For bonus points, combine well-thrown AV grenades with sidestepping. It's super effective!
Stupid post is stupid. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
52
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:04:00 -
[110] - Quote
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. Why don't you go outside and try geting hit by a car - Let me know how well you survive it. And no - body armor is not designed to stop impacts by multi-ton vehicles. You want to know how not to get run over by a LAV driver? Here's a hint - PAY ATTENTION. Most if not all collisions can be avoided by simply having a heartbeat and stepping out of the way. It's not that hard. For bonus points, combine well-thrown AV grenades with sidestepping. It's super effective! Stupid post is stupid. Judging by the likes this post has got (mainly in favour of doing something about the situation) I'm not the only one concerned with how this have become mainly since Uprising and the broker shooter mechanics... And lets get this straight... My main problem is with abuse of LAV's as free kills and interrupting game flow, not smashing the nerf hammer. So pick up your pokeballs and head off... tata....
Lets try and leave real world phsyics out of a game shall we. |
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY
8
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:04:00 -
[111] - Quote
EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win
This. This mentality right here is why allowing a stupid mechanic like easy LAV kills will hurt the game. These ppl like the above poster completely miss the point because they are too busy worrying about the in-game action to pay attention to the product.
I don't recall Dust being promoted as a crash up derby game. I was sold on a combat game. I want my war game back. LAV wars are getting to be far to prevalent. If you put an idiotic mechanic in the game then you attract the idiots.
Protip: Learn to shoot like a white boy or GTFO. |
Operative 1171 Aajli
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY
8
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:07:00 -
[112] - Quote
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. Why don't you go outside and try geting hit by a car - Let me know how well you survive it. And no - body armor is not designed to stop impacts by multi-ton vehicles. You want to know how not to get run over by a LAV driver? Here's a hint - PAY ATTENTION. Most if not all collisions can be avoided by simply having a heartbeat and stepping out of the way. It's not that hard. For bonus points, combine well-thrown AV grenades with sidestepping. It's super effective! Stupid post is stupid.
This one too. Wake up fanboys. Worry about the product and not your own little Lols. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
52
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:53:00 -
[113] - Quote
135 likes and not a single piece of Dev input as yet!!! For shame CCP..... For Shame..... |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:53:00 -
[114] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I have never seen any LAVs ever EAT 5 AV nades. Now dodging them is another question for a later day but 5 direct hits usually would kill most tanks even.
Idk bout that my alt put 4mil SP into ONLY LAVs. It has 4k total hp with hardners and resistance amplifiers...its stronger then half the tanks I see these days. I can take quite a few AVs now if were talking lai dai packs idk the exact amount I might test this actually but even those hacked exo's barely scratch it even without the hardner on. Ive actually killed a few tanks 1v1 when I use my proto missles but I prefer my ion blasters . Also great for running down tanks with a group of 3 AV guys tanks just run hahah so amusing if I dare say.
Now kids using these pintos yah they suck and cant drive anyways just av them enough times and theyll give up, but when I lose 1 car every 5-10 matches why would I not keep stacking money specially when there 255k so cheap compared to tanks ( most of that is the proto turret costs) |
EverNub
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 13:59:00 -
[115] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win This. This mentality right here is why allowing a stupid mechanic like easy LAV kills will hurt the game. These ppl like the above poster completely miss the point because they are too busy worrying about the in-game action to pay attention to the product. I don't recall Dust being promoted as a crash up derby game. I was sold on a combat game. I want my war game back. LAV wars are getting to be far to prevalent. If you put an idiotic mechanic in the game then you attract the idiots. Protip: Learn to shoot like a white boy or GTFO.
Haha ok kid anytime u want a firefight Id be glad to gun u down, if I want to actually take a break from pub stomping and PC and deive in my Lav on an alt character and run fools over for lawls hha dmn right I will. Doesnt mean I cant shoot please test this and find me in a match sometime. Btw my lav is more used then just running kiddies over I actually shuttle my squad from points and use it to road block engagements and funnel points because it doesnt die in 2 av so please just stop whinning and l2p before u hate on people with godly lav builds |
DeathwindRising
ROGUE SPADES EoN.
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:15:00 -
[116] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive.
nope. i think we should all keep spamming them until CCP gets the idea that their system is broken. people wouldnt be using them as much if they simply fixed aiming, nerfed TAR's, and hadnt screwed with lav's by buffing their hp.
CCP's fault, let them fix it. by exploiting broken game mechanics we are sending a message that something is wrong. |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:16:00 -
[117] - Quote
nooo dont mess with it, its great fun racing around in the LAVs , i been upgrading my LAV skills soley so i can run ppl over and kick ass with my turret, i think they should make them louder for the victims to hear and make AV grenades sticky or magnetic tht is where the real problem lies, its easy enough to hit a tank with AVs but not a LAV coming at you at Crazy MPH, dont steal my fun :( |
Mr m4gic
Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:18:00 -
[118] - Quote
and give us tractor beams instead of ladders so we can escape quicker :) |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
52
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:23:00 -
[119] - Quote
DeathwindRising wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. nope. i think we should all keep spamming them until CCP gets the idea that their system is broken. people wouldnt be using them as much if they simply fixed aiming, nerfed TAR's, and hadnt screwed with lav's by buffing their hp. CCP's fault, let them fix it. by exploiting broken game mechanics we are sending a message that something is wrong. I (sort of) agree with you..... Those are exactly the points I've been trying to make... This is a direct response to the broken core mechanics of the game. Not a good response but I can see why people are doing it, I personally don't happen to be a FotM sheep and prefer to play the game as intended. |
Operative 1171 Aajli
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY
10
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 14:50:00 -
[120] - Quote
EverNub wrote:Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win This. This mentality right here is why allowing a stupid mechanic like easy LAV kills will hurt the game. These ppl like the above poster completely miss the point because they are too busy worrying about the in-game action to pay attention to the product. I don't recall Dust being promoted as a crash up derby game. I was sold on a combat game. I want my war game back. LAV wars are getting to be far to prevalent. If you put an idiotic mechanic in the game then you attract the idiots. Protip: Learn to shoot like a white boy or GTFO. Haha ok kid anytime u want a firefight Id be glad to gun u down, if I want to actually take a break from pub stomping and PC and deive in my Lav on an alt character and run fools over for lawls hha dmn right I will. Doesnt mean I cant shoot please test this and find me in a match sometime. Btw my lav is more used then just running kiddies over I actually shuttle my squad from points and use it to road block engagements and funnel points because it doesnt die in 2 av so please just stop whinning and l2p before u hate on people with godly lav builds
My God to be a kid again! Thanks for calling me a kid. I feel so young again!
All kidding aside I think you missed the part that said something about paying more attention to in-game thrills than product. I really don't care how badass your thumb skills are. Forget the damn epeening and worry about the primary intention of the game as product versus your lol wagon. |
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 15:47:00 -
[121] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely....
Lol, I served. I know about humvees. They are cars! Cars with green paint but nonetheless cars. And this is not a car centric game. So, lose the easy car wars mechanic so us shooters can get back to shooting and not gangbanging in a Caddy like Tupac.
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
416
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 16:14:00 -
[122] - Quote
lol.. so many butthurt CoD fan bois that it is just LOL I hate LAVs because it forces me to play better and pay more attention then what im shooting. well adopt or die it not like LAVs are new. |
Operative 1171 Aajli
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE DARKSTAR ARMY
16
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 16:29:00 -
[123] - Quote
ladwar wrote:lol.. so many butthurt CoD fan bois that it is just LOL I hate LAVs because it forces me to play better and pay more attention then what im shooting. well adopt or die it not like LAVs are new.
Translation: I pledge allegiance to CCP and everything they do no matter what. I can't shoot so I will ride around in a car and ignore what the game is supposed to be. Without my easy mode game mechanic I would not get any kills. Therefore I shall dismiss a problem as it makes me look leet.
There *fixed. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
470
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 17:04:00 -
[124] - Quote
lol, go ahead and get rid of the free LAVs, you'll just QQ once people start buying the BPOs |
Full Metal Kitten
Sinq Laison Gendarmes Gallente Federation
322
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 17:23:00 -
[125] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:I don't know why you guys are crying about LAVs, they still pop like zits if you hit em' with a swarm launcher. Everyone is practically making the same mistake we did at the beginning of chrome and neglecting AV. With all due respect your are wrong. I roll in advanced AV gear. Tons of people do. My only fits without advanced AV nades are for CQC. Starter LAVs were prevented from being abused by folks like me that could OHK your weak ride that had no invested skill or mods. This is no longer true. It needs to be fixed.
I'm a fanboy, for the record. Love the TAR, love hunting tanks that rightfully got buffed, want to see drop ships buffed too. But free LAVs? Um, no.
Lastly, I owe Tony C an apology for essentially saying HTFU when he pointed out the LAV problem. Having been playing with new update I see he is absolutely correct. |
Oprahs Evil Twin
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 18:33:00 -
[126] - Quote
So when are they adding explosive items that make my cars explosion bigger when it dies? |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
71
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 18:37:00 -
[127] - Quote
NeoWraith Acedia wrote:lol, go ahead and get rid of the free LAVs, you'll just QQ once people start buying the BPOs Hey another revenue stream for CCP! Still it would cut down on the dumb@asses out there.
On a similar note I've often felt that even if the free AV were removed the calls to nerf the rest would continue. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
418
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 18:38:00 -
[128] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:ladwar wrote:lol.. so many butthurt CoD fan bois that it is just LOL I hate LAVs because it forces me to play better and pay more attention then what im shooting. well adopt or die it not like LAVs are new. Translation: I pledge allegiance to CCP and everything they do no matter what. I can't shoot so I will ride around in a car and ignore what the game is supposed to be. Without my easy mode game mechanic I would not get any kills. Therefore I shall dismiss a problem as it makes me look leet. There *fixed. all I hear is: I am butthurt and I am trying to make others feel bad because I made mistakes and are blaming others for my mistakes.
|
Kovak Therim
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
249
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 18:41:00 -
[129] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:I personally think there should be no infinite militia LAV. I think there should be at least SOME ISK penalty for spamming LAV, even if it wouldn't drastically impact people with major banks, OR some sort of limit as to how many LAV can even be called per match/at one time. The need for LAV on a battlefield is not so high that there should be an infinite model and it definitely encourages DeathRace 2000 for people on the field. This combined with the higher HP for LAV, making them harder to deal with in a pinch if you dont have at LEAST AV grenades on you (the new model takes 2). Hear hear to the OP
Agreed. Militia vehicles are fine, just don't give them to players. Even players with big bank accounts will eventually bleed that out to the point where they stop playing demolition derby so much. That huge buff to MLT LAVs didn't help, either.
|
Pew-Pew BBQ
DISTRIBUTOR OF PAIN
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:34:00 -
[130] - Quote
The problem with murder taxi LAVs is that I have to pull over constantly to pick all of your smashed dropsuit pieces out of the radiator grille!
There is one thing I know about CCP- they love a good row. In EVE, when people raise hell and fuss over stuff like, um, Hulkageddon for instance, they put it on the front page of interstellar news. Oh the grief, oh the fun, oh the suicide ganks... They ain't gonna stop it. You ain't gonna stop it. I love your grief tears, and so does CCP!
My main doesn't get in LAVs, because the K/D payout isn't very good. But when I get an itch to log in an alt, the first thing I do is call in a free LAV and charge the line. I rip donus on your guts. If you're blue, don't get into my car- it's pointed on the highway of death with a suicidal merc at the helm, chaising after some entertainment. QQ |
|
BRAIN-MATTER-SPLATTERER NEURALGIA
D3LTA FORC3 Orion Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:38:00 -
[131] - Quote
You people are just mad, that no matter how much armor your wearing... No matter how better your guns are.. You're not invincible, die like everyone else & accept your death. Don't spend countless hours whining about how a noob took you out because he had no other way to kill a proto suite. Accept death or die morbid. They have to take it every time you proto armor/weapon guys over powers them. You don't see anyone posting on forums saying we need a complete skill RESET, because it is unfair that people got to take everything from beta & carry it over to the final release of this game!! Which would make the universe a lot more fair in my opinion. You know what I'm going to mention this in my next forum post. Say goodbye to everything you own & a full scale game reset! Like most games do when a new game is fully released! x) |
VLIGHT5
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
114
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:42:00 -
[132] - Quote
BRAIN-MATTER-SPLATTERER NEURALGIA wrote:You people are just mad, that no matter how much armor your wearing... No matter how better your guns are.. You're not invincible, die like everyone else & accept your death. Don't spend countless hours whining about how a noob took you out because he had no other way to kill a proto suite. Accept death or die morbid. They have to take it every time you proto armor/weapon guys over powers them. You don't see anyone posting on forums saying we need a complete skill RESET, because it is unfair that people got to take everything from beta & carry it over to the final release of this game!! Which would make the universe a lot more fair in my opinion. You know what I'm going to mention this in my next forum post. Say goodbye to everything you own & a full scale game reset! Like most games do when a new game is fully released! x)
You're dumb |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS
1345
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 21:43:00 -
[133] - Quote
VLIGHT5 wrote:BRAIN-MATTER-SPLATTERER NEURALGIA wrote:You people are just mad, that no matter how much armor your wearing... No matter how better your guns are.. You're not invincible, die like everyone else & accept your death. Don't spend countless hours whining about how a noob took you out because he had no other way to kill a proto suite. Accept death or die morbid. They have to take it every time you proto armor/weapon guys over powers them. You don't see anyone posting on forums saying we need a complete skill RESET, because it is unfair that people got to take everything from beta & carry it over to the final release of this game!! Which would make the universe a lot more fair in my opinion. You know what I'm going to mention this in my next forum post. Say goodbye to everything you own & a full scale game reset! Like most games do when a new game is fully released! x) You're dumb ^ You mad |
Mike Poole
Kirkinen Risk Control Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 22:10:00 -
[134] - Quote
Has there been any rationalization as to why vehicles have almost zero profile on the radar?
It's bad enough getting constantly run down by someone over and over again but it's worse when all the warning you have is the sound of an engine and an empty radar before you're road kill. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
420
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 22:12:00 -
[135] - Quote
because you can see them from tacnet pretty easy. |
Somin Krais
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
2
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 22:58:00 -
[136] - Quote
I'd like to see a LAV explode when it runs over a heavy. It's basically like plowing into a brick wall, right? |
Johnny Guilt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
89
|
Posted - 2013.05.16 23:07:00 -
[137] - Quote
and i think when i hit a someone dendpeing on the suits frame and weight determines how much i actually stop while drive the LAV,IF i hit a scout with a LAV i should probably keep going,not like i hit a heavy. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
64
|
Posted - 2013.05.30 12:47:00 -
[138] - Quote
Now CCP are addressing the TAR...
Time for a BUMP!!! |
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax. CRONOS.
1665
|
Posted - 2013.05.30 12:49:00 -
[139] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. I would say require the LAV to be moving at far higher speed to achieve a one-hit-kill, and make the LAV take a large fraction of the damage they cause to the suit they hit.
If you think about it, smacking your vehicle repeatedly into heavily armored and shielded infantry should start tearing it up. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
65
|
Posted - 2013.05.30 13:20:00 -
[140] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:I think the damage the vehicles do to Mercs on foot should be drastically reduced.
Seems like since the aiming is broken people have resorted to spamming free LAVs and driving round running people over like its Carmageddon(For the oldies) or GTA(For the younger crowd)..
Please just make it so you can survive a single hit from an LAV (tanks I can understand a OHK but they are not as fast so if you get run over its your own fault).
At least then it would give you a chance to run away or fight back cos theres nothing to stop an LAV driver driving through the middle of a gunfight and killing the enemy but teammates survive. I would say require the LAV to be moving at far higher speed to achieve a one-hit-kill, and make the LAV take a large fraction of the damage they cause to the suit they hit. If you think about it, smacking your vehicle repeatedly into heavily armored and shielded infantry should start tearing it up. YES!!
There currently is no downside to the spam and abuse of the FREE... Yes I said FREE LAVs. I take the point of people who have specced into vehicles and if you pay then feel free to play. However when the reward > risk by a factor of 20 then something is VERY broken.
What I find more concerning is the fact the his thread has been extremely popular on both sides of the argument as can be seen by the replies and likes. BUT there has been no DEV input on the issue whatsoever... Does this mean CCP think the current system is fine OR more worryingly that they haven't got a clue how to deal with it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |