Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Knight SoIaire
Better Hide R Die
376
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Just going to leave this here. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
230
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:Ignoble Son wrote:Now HTFU.
Get out of the car and learn to play, son. Stop advocating a play style that hurts the game. You can throw your science around all day... but in game you can survive a single metal slug that weighs the same as a truck dropped directly on your head from orbit (At least once. Those orbital barrages don't insta-splat)
You don't get "hit in the head buy metal slugs". As it functions right now, OB are an AOE bombardment. The only way you can currently survive an orbital is to be on the extreme edge of the AOE.
A car moving considerably slower nudging me shouldn't kill me.[/quote]
The way I look at it is, since there is no kind of knock down mechanics in this game, if I hit you at slow speed and you that means I ran over top of you with my car. If you are under the impression that you are able to just instkill people at these speeds you are wrong. LAVs do varying levels of damage at low speed unless the person is directly in front of your car or you crush the into any solid surface.
Look man, there is nothing wrong with this mechanic. The thing that you should be upset about is free LAV spam. If people had to skill up to use LAVs there wouldn't be such a problem. And if you had a little better situational awareness and some AV it wouldn't be much of a problem in the first place. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
416
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:33:00 -
[33] - Quote
I think the main problem here is that there is no penalty for running someone over.
While I do not think the LAV needs to come to an abrupt stop, it would make sense to roll or bounce the vehicle over the target potentially giving that targets teammates a better window to destroy the vehicle. This of course should be scaled to reflect the size of the victims suit;
scouts have no penalty, medium frames will 'bounce' or sometimes roll the vehicle with a speed penalty, heavy frames cause a significant speed penalty and high chance to roll
I think LAVs should be remain capable of OHK'ing everyone when at high speed except a well fit heavy. It would be nice if there was some sort of animation for being knocked down. |
Panoscape
BurgezzE.T.F Orion Empire
133
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
We need cows added to the game, they where so fun to hunt in carmegeddon. But, heavy's will do for now.
I'll be buying the veteran pack just to get the free SAGA and start rolling that.
Yes, I'm enjoying carmageddon 514, plus with the added heavy pop and drop, this game rules.
Especially since they took out clones getting stuck in the grill and sparking, which slowed down my road rage kdr. |
BursegSardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
I think I was killed 10 times yesterday by the same dude in 2 matches in his Blood Raider buggy. It was absolutely hilarious. He was a freaking madman behind the wheel. I was actually disappointed to get killed by bullets afterwards.
Props to you, dude, wherever you are.
In all honesty, though: I think smashing into a heavy with an LAV should seriously **** your **** up, a Medium less so, and scouts should be more or less a speed bump. |
Immovable 0bject
DIOS EX. Gentlemen's Agreement
4
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote:EverNub wrote:CHICAGOCUBS4EVER wrote: had an LAV come right at me yesterday while I had my forge. shot it 20m in front of me just for my forge to do ZERO damage and I then get run over...
LoL my Alt loves running u over cubs, granted ur ishikone hurts but 4k hp shouldnt get 1 shot by a forge anyways thatd be rediculas, and if I told u my alts name ud know who he was since I harassed u and maurader for numerous matches and forced u to pull out ur AV = less kills for ur side = I win So damn the game, damn it's future, damn good first impressions and let's just fu*k any kind of first impression for newbies because you won a match in video game? Short sighted much?
How is getting ran over by a LAV a bad first impression. I would think they would just start to watch for the LAVs more. I'm a heavy and I know the pain of getting hit by a LAV, but its not nearly as bad as you all are making it out to be. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
232
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:43:00 -
[37] - Quote
Iskandar Zul Karnain wrote:I think the main problem here is that there is no penalty for running someone over.
While I do not think the LAV needs to come to an abrupt stop, it would make sense to roll or bounce the vehicle over the target potentially giving that targets teammates a better window to destroy the vehicle. This of course should be scaled to reflect the size of the victims suit;
scouts have no penalty, medium frames will 'bounce' or sometimes roll the vehicle with a speed penalty, heavy frames cause a significant speed penalty and high chance to roll
I think LAVs should be remain capable of OHK'ing everyone when at high speed except a well fit heavy. It would be nice if there was some sort of animation for being knocked down.
There is a bounce effect. It only occurs a percentage of the time though, but it happens quite often. Some times it even brings you to a dead stop, or flips you end over end if you are going fast enough. |
Canari Elphus
Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION
94
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 15:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
Its not just one thing.. its multiple
1 - Hit detection is just funny. Anywhere near the LAV will killyou 2 - AV grenades are feather dusters now 3 - Vehicles are ninjas so you cant see them coming |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
17
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Its not just one thing.. its multiple
1 - Hit detection is just funny. Anywhere near the LAV will killyou 2 - AV grenades are feather dusters now 3 - Vehicles are ninjas so you cant see them coming What he said |
Tolen Rosas
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
167
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
Impact damage needs to be lower and much more consistent. you can hit someone goign slow and it kills them.
No reason a free LAV shouldnt a OHK with even the first AV nade. u want something better upgrade your own. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4113
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
Bullet Proof Vests are not Car Proof, Nor are they knife proof. |
Tony Calif
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
2112
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:07:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tolen Rosas wrote:Impact damage needs to be lower and much more consistent. you can hit someone goign slow and it kills them.
No reason a free LAV shouldnt a OHK with even the first AV nade. u want something better upgrade your own.
LogiLav took 6 packed AV before their buff. That's still totally not cool. It's an LAV ffs. |
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to no just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
32
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:26:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
408
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:32:00 -
[45] - Quote
HTFU. sure the starter LAV is dumb and should go everything else is you not paying attention and should die from because it is your fault. btw armor that is bullet proof is not high impact proof, AKA LAV running you over does full damage that it should. its like you saying you should live past a rail turret to the face. and the free LAV do not take more than 3 av nades. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4114
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Fusion plants are much heavier than our gasoline engines too. These things are probably just has heavy as some modern APC vehicles and the sheer weight of those things can crush a Humvee. |
Ignoble Son
3dge of D4rkness SoulWing Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:35:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that.
Your talking about an inertial dampener. Sounds good to me. One problem for you though, you have to activate it, and it isn't going to do a world of good for you when I plow you from behind because you weren't looking, and it can't last for ever in face to face confrontations. |
Shady IceCream Truck
Krullefor Organization Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:When jeeps take 5 packed AV grenades, you know there's a problem. It's a LIGHT armoured vehicle. Not the grim reapers combine harvester. I quit after a game vs some scrub in my corp, because after the game I went to the forums, and saw the vehicle buff...
CCP just don't know wtf they're doing.
Jeeps take 1 AV grenade you tosser.. As well as 1 swarm launcher..
Sounds like another "I lost my free HAcked AV" cry post...
Ill say it again.. All this senseless killing can end.. just rollback the nerfs.. Ill be happy to retire my wheels.. Until then ..expect your proto AR's to fall at the rate of 20 per game.. lol bishs |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:36:00 -
[49] - Quote
Reign Omega wrote:I personally think there should be no infinite militia LAV. I think there should be at least SOME ISK penalty for spamming LAV, even if it wouldn't drastically impact people with major banks, OR some sort of limit as to how many LAV can even be called per match/at one time. The need for LAV on a battlefield is not so high that there should be an infinite model and it definitely encourages DeathRace 2000 for people on the field. This combined with the higher HP for LAV, making them harder to deal with in a pinch if you dont have at LEAST AV grenades on you (the new model takes 2). Hear hear to the OP This ^
You folks are all basing your assumptions that all LAVs are Free LAVs. When you assume, you make an ass out of u and me. If Free LAVs are the culprit then get rid of them! Y'all sitting here trying to nerf LAVs in general when you've gotten all upset that people got driver's license and you're still a student driver.
All the people using real LAVs or even purchased their Militia LAV deserve the right to run you over. It's not like we can operate massive turrets that can snipe you from across the map .
Also, this is the future. You have your fancy shmancy armor. Well I have my fancy shmancy car too. My car is just as futuristic as your armor. I have a diamond-steel alloy grill.
PS: Ever heard of Free Swarm Launchers? |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:37:00 -
[50] - Quote
No one cares what kind of suit your wearing, your internal organs would get crushed. |
|
Byozuma Kegawa
The Tritan Industries RISE of LEGION
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:37:00 -
[51] - Quote
I saw this thread and thought it had something to do with the rash of mass LAV racing lately... shame, I'd like to have heard more on that. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Free LAVs need to go. With STD BPO LAVs on their way, it's not going to happen, at least not until we get speeders, then we can spam those |
Jaron Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that.
I like to play a game where sometimes, I see how close I can get to the ground before activating the damper in order to negate the impact force. Once, I missed, and trust me, it was very similar to getting hit by a tank. You can "brush off and walk away from that" because that's what dampers are for.
I don't know how you lot are managing to get hit by LAVs in the first place. It's not like if you're running across open ground, you don't check your surroundings. Or maybe it is... who knows. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4115
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
I have never seen any LAVs ever EAT 5 AV nades. Now dodging them is another question for a later day but 5 direct hits usually would kill most tanks even. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
4115
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jaron Pollard wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. I like to play a game where sometimes, I see how close I can get to the ground before activating the damper in order to negate the impact force. Once, I missed, and trust me, it was very similar to getting hit by a tank. You can "brush off and walk away from that" because that's what dampers are for. I don't know how you lot are managing to get hit by LAVs in the first place. It's not like if you're running across open ground, you don't check your surroundings. Or maybe it is... who knows.
I had a heavy suit walk away from it, limping, but walking none the less. |
Bojo The Mighty
Bojo's School of the Trades
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
Byozuma Kegawa wrote:I saw this thread and thought it had something to do with the rash of mass LAV racing lately... shame, I'd like to have heard more on that. You can expect the Grand Prix to occur some time next month courtesy of Bojo's Grand Bazaar. Betting will occur and tracks are being mapped out right now. |
Cybus Trama'dol
EYE Security Task Force and Resources Acquisition
35
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ignoble Son wrote:Cybus Trama'dol wrote:Jaron Pollard wrote:Still seeing a lot of use of the word "car" as if this isn't a high-velocity armoured vehicle we're talking about but some standard Honda Civic or something. Let's get one thing clear - LAV's are more comparable to a Humvee, not a "car". And that armour and shield you have? It's nothing like the half-tonne suit that Master Chief wears in Halo.
Now, let's talk some physics. I'll keep it simple. There are a number of forces to consider when taking a hit from a high velocity armoured vehicle, including concussive force, energy transfer, and mass. For those in the know, mass is directly transferably to energy. In fact, for those that know something about how mass works at the subatomic level inside a muon for example, mass is made of energy. So, the energy from the speed of the "car" is not the only energy to consider, but it's mass as well. Now, you are not a heavy guy, and while the shields and armour of your suit may protect you against small arms kinetic impacts and directed energy attacks (to a degree), the LAVs are somewhat more massive than you, and larger than a bullet, so a vehicle of this type is going to be transferring a lot of that energy across a much larger area than a small round travelling at higher speeds might do, which will create a concussive force in your armour that has the potential to not just crush you if the wheels happen to roll over you (which, if the armour's any good, it may actually protect you from direct wheel-crushing, unless it was damaged in the impact, which is probable), but the most likely cause of damage from vehicular impact is going to be that concussive force from the energy transfer that scrambles your internal organs into pulp. In fact, it is not uncommon for victims of vehicular impacts to suffer from ruptured spleens and the like with little to no external visible injury.
So, what have we learned today? That's right. LAVs are not Honda Civics. But in the right circumstances, a Honda Civic could probably kill you too. Like if it was dropped on you by a crane. But that's another physics lesson entirely.... OK, if you are going to drop the "real science" bomb. Then how about being able to activate a hardener very similar to when you drop out of the MCC because i can imagine the forces exerted on your suit would be similar to being hit by a tank. And yet you can brush off and walk away from that. Your talking about an inertial dampener. Sounds good to me. One problem for you though, you have to activate it, and it isn't going to do a world of good for you when I plow you from behind because you weren't looking, and it can't last for ever in face to face confrontations. I'll give you a like on that one... Yeah you have to activate and wouldn't save you from a behind attack.. Sometimes ther are the "oh ****" moments where you know you are going to get splattered and there is no way of avoidinig it. It would help then if your reflexes are fast enough to activate.
Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern. Who knows, when the aiming is fixed perhaps it will die down a bit. I can cope with that ok same as in battlefield... I was just trying to make a point that at the moment it is rediculous with the amount of spam to the point it severly affects gameplay. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:41:00 -
[58] - Quote
Vallud Eadesso wrote: it should damage the vehicle and reduce it's speed to near zero. . it does... for both of those.
Though they should probably adjust their little formula which calculates damage, it doesn't require enough speed for it to be a 1HKO. |
Jikt Terlen
Certificate of Participation
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
I would drive a LAV more often if the controls weren't so wonky. Basically 20 degrees of the 360 are usable, the rest make you spin out. Have these guys never played a driving game or cart game before (let's be honest, it's more Mario Cart than Forza)?
Anyway, the LAV menace is annoying, but no more so than snipers, and LAVs can be easily killed. They add variety to the game, at least, and as long as you're paying some attention they aren't really that dangerous (the driver can't even shoot, and a gunner is vulnerable to infantry fire).
My biggest gripe with vehicles in general is that they often fail to show up on the TACNET until they are on top of you, while infantry are visible far away. A tank is the biggest thing on the battlefield, everyone sees it, so it makes no sense that its radar blip disappears when it isn't right next to you. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
450
|
Posted - 2013.05.15 16:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cybus Trama'dol wrote: Also back on point, its the overuse and spamming of free LAV that is my main concern.
It's only going to get with worse with the STD BPOs |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |