Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
83
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
YOU VOTED FOR IT.
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
Care to explain?
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
lol.. yes totally |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
327
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
|
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
328
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
I'd like to add, that we should simply remove the floor in the MCC. Start clamped to the ceiling of the MCC. Then, the player pushes X to drop, or is forcibly dropped after 30 seconds of inactivity. This wouldn't be a perfect solution, but would be easyish to implement and would stop the most common form of AFKing.
|
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders Red Rock Consortium
531
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
OK, thanks. I don't remember "improve ability to AFK farm" being part of that vote so I was confused by his statement.
|
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1135
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
LOL. Before the vote was casted and even before they thought about the system I warned everyone about the AFK mechanism. I told everyone that all a person has to do is sit in the MCC and they can cap out. And this was when there was the daily resets.
Don't hate the player, hate the game |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
328
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:13:00 -
[8] - Quote
Reav Hannari wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
OK, thanks. I don't remember "improve ability to AFK farm" being part of that vote so I was confused by his statement.
Again, douches like the OP, believe that we should have no cap, and some of them think we should have no SP/min awarded, instead we should get SP based on WP alone. The problem with this is that is punishes new players. So, these malcontents, believe that their AFKing is justified because of the way SP is handed out, i.e. primarily by time in game.
|
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
94
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Troll OP, 1/10 |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
791
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:18:00 -
[10] - Quote
OP is confuse. Carebears are those players that never leave the safety of the MCC.
Also, I don't think we voted on how SP per match was awarded. Only on how SP rewards after cap would be rewarded. Here I could be confused but AFK farming would still be possible no matter what option we had voted for. In the one vote we had here on the forums. |
|
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Aighun wrote:OP is confuse. Carebears are those players that never leave the safety of the MCC.
Also, I don't think we voted on how SP per match was awarded. Only on how SP rewards after cap would be rewarded. Here I could be confused but AFK farming would still be possible no matter what option we had voted for. In the one vote we had here on the forums.
Guarding the MCC is serious business. You don't want the enemy boarding the MCC and stealing it. Its worth a lot of ISK. We are proud guardians of the MCC. |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
328
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Aighun wrote:OP is confuse. Carebears are those players that never leave the safety of the MCC.
Also, I don't think we voted on how SP per match was awarded. Only on how SP rewards after cap would be rewarded. Here I could be confused but AFK farming would still be possible no matter what option we had voted for. In the one vote we had here on the forums.
100% true |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
1107
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Aighun wrote:OP is confuse. Carebears are those players that never leave the safety of the MCC.
Also, I don't think we voted on how SP per match was awarded. Only on how SP rewards after cap would be rewarded. Here I could be confused but AFK farming would still be possible no matter what option we had voted for. In the one vote we had here on the forums.
The truth is stromg in this one, Obi Wan |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3798
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
I don't get it...
I thought the AFKers where care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'.
I mean the arguments sounds similar to eve's pirates asking to get rid of high sec and concord for obvious reasons. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:26:00 -
[15] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't get it,
I thought the AFKers were care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'.
Such talk from the CPM ! You do reliaze that more than half of Betamax AFKs right. You just called more than half the members in your corp chicken. Good show ole chap!!!
And its "were" not "where" IWS! |
Delirium Inferno
Chernova Industries
121
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:26:00 -
[16] - Quote
I don't get what the big fuss is. We all know CCP is against AFK farming and is going to get a system in to prevent it soon enough. Let them AFK farm while they can, it won't be sustainable. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3798
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:27:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't get it,
I thought the AFKers were care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'. Such talk from the CPM ! You do reliaze that more than half of Betamax AFKs right. You just called more than half the members in your corp chicken. Good show ole chap!!! And its "were" not "where" IWS!
1. dont correct the quote itself without any embolding :P
2. further proves I am just a guest in betamax, Ill be parting ways soon as I get the isk to leave. |
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
368
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:33:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
LOL. Before the vote was casted and even before they thought about the system I warned everyone about the AFK mechanism. I told everyone that all a person has to do is sit in the MCC and they can cap out. And this was when there was the daily resets. Don't hate the player, hate the game You have the worst logic. Example.
Dont hate the murderer, hate the gun. I mean after all it not my responsibility to not kill, its your responsibility to make it impossible to murder.
The choice is yours, you chose to be a griefer.
I have seen soap bubbles stronger than your logic. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't get it,
I thought the AFKers were care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'. Such talk from the CPM ! You do reliaze that more than half of Betamax AFKs right. You just called more than half the members in your corp chicken. Good show ole chap!!! And its "were" not "where" IWS! 1. dont correct the quote itself without any embolding :P 2. further proves I am just a guest in betamax, Ill be parting ways soon as I get the isk to leave.
Back to Novafox shipyards huh ! It must be lonely in that corp ! |
Salazar Skye-fire
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
102
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
every farmer is just as pathetic as the last, keep giving my nades some work though while you watch over your crops!! |
|
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
LOL. Before the vote was casted and even before they thought about the system I warned everyone about the AFK mechanism. I told everyone that all a person has to do is sit in the MCC and they can cap out. And this was when there was the daily resets. Don't hate the player, hate the game You have the worst logic. Example. Dont hate the murderer, hate the gun. I mean after all it not my responsibility to not kill, its your responsibility to make it impossible to murder. The choice is yours, you chose to be a griefer. I have seen soap bubbles stronger than your logic.
You got me all wrong;- I AFK because I can! Im not making excuses why I AFK! Try to stop me! I dare ya! |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3798
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't get it,
I thought the AFKers were care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'. Such talk from the CPM ! You do reliaze that more than half of Betamax AFKs right. You just called more than half the members in your corp chicken. Good show ole chap!!! And its "were" not "where" IWS! 1. dont correct the quote itself without any embolding :P 2. further proves I am just a guest in betamax, Ill be parting ways soon as I get the isk to leave. Back to Novafox shipyards huh ! It must be lonely in that corp !
More like I don't have to deal with internal corp drama.
Eve does have public channel support I joined enough of them to be sociable. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
Salazar Skye-fire wrote:every farmer is just as pathetic as the last, keep giving my nades some work though while you watch over your crops!!
Go for it. I will give you a chance to use your nades on me. Wanna squad up sometime and try and blow me up? |
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
368
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:37:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
LOL. Before the vote was casted and even before they thought about the system I warned everyone about the AFK mechanism. I told everyone that all a person has to do is sit in the MCC and they can cap out. And this was when there was the daily resets. Don't hate the player, hate the game You have the worst logic. Example. Dont hate the murderer, hate the gun. I mean after all it not my responsibility to not kill, its your responsibility to make it impossible to murder. The choice is yours, you chose to be a griefer. I have seen soap bubbles stronger than your logic. You got me all wrong;- I AFK because I can! Im not making excuses why I AFK! Try to stop me! I dare ya! Why would I want to interact with ppl like you more than I already do. I dont have time for weak ppl. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
LOL. Before the vote was casted and even before they thought about the system I warned everyone about the AFK mechanism. I told everyone that all a person has to do is sit in the MCC and they can cap out. And this was when there was the daily resets. Don't hate the player, hate the game You have the worst logic. Example. Dont hate the murderer, hate the gun. I mean after all it not my responsibility to not kill, its your responsibility to make it impossible to murder. The choice is yours, you chose to be a griefer. I have seen soap bubbles stronger than your logic. You got me all wrong;- I AFK because I can! Im not making excuses why I AFK! Try to stop me! I dare ya! oh I will now while I AFK.. im coming for you and any other funny bluedots on buildings with my MTL dropship, that one was actually funny. I pushed a whole squad over the side. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: More like I don't have to deal with internal corp drama.
Eve does have public channel support I joined enough of them to be sociable.
How can you effectively help the community as CPM when you cant deal with internal drama? Every corp I know has some drama or the other. Heck if you are in an alliance its even worse.
Put on your ******* big boy pants and learn to deal with it. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:
Why would I want to interact with ppl like you more than I already do. I dont have time for weak ppl.
You are nothing but a forum warrior. I will see you on the field. I am done with you out here. |
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
368
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Jin Robot wrote:You got me all wrong;- I AFK because I can! Im not making excuses why I AFK! Try to stop me! I dare ya! Why would I want to interact with ppl like you more than I already do. I dont have time for weak ppl.
Quote:You are nothing but a forum warrior. I will see you on the field. I am done with you out here. you can see that good from the MCC? |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1255
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1137
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game.
No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door.
I just enjoy trolling these dimwits |
|
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
368
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:56:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door. I just enjoy trolling these dimwits Crowd control productions, joke of a name. Most forums a foul statement such as that would provoke a ban. You just said you are trying to shrink the community by being a jerk, you disgust me and others I m sure. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:56:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. take any post I said about changing the in match reward system... im not joking its just horrible and there is a reason why FPS even the ones on the fringe of FPS genre don't use this mechanic and ones that had an ever remotely similar idea had that mechanic change and/or removed as it was easy to abuse and easy for the general player base to see the way to abuse it. |
Belzeebub Santana
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
471
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 17:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
I mostly blame ccp for this practice. Not because you get more sp for just being in the match than doing stuff in it but for these events that make people afk if they want to get every last sp they can.
On top of that the do it, either on purpose or out of poor planning, for a single day. AFKing is at its worse when there is so much sp at stake. During the normal sp amount there is 1 maybe 2 afkers in some skirmishes which isn't that game breaking as much as there are other things that should be looked at first.
Also the.same maps for about a year doesn't give you the greatest incentive to play after the first few games. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1138
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door. I just enjoy trolling these dimwits Crowd control productions, joke of a name. Most forums a foul statement such as that would provoke a ban. You just said you are trying to shrink the community by being a jerk, you disgust me and others I m sure.
Gawd! You are stupid aren't you! Cant you see I am trying to get banned!
I am planning to make a movie callet the Lord of the Dimwits (LOTD for short) and you sir are my superstar! |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
278
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:16:00 -
[35] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door. I just enjoy trolling these dimwits Crowd control productions, joke of a name. Most forums a foul statement such as that would provoke a ban. You just said you are trying to shrink the community by being a jerk, you disgust me and others I m sure. Gawd! You are stupid aren't you! Cant you see I am trying to get banned! I am planning to make a movie callet the Lord of the Dimwits (LOTD for short) and you sir are my superstar! oh you'll never get banned, you should know better. |
Jin Robot
Polar Gooks
368
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
I challenge anyone to read our argument and decide whose statements come from a dimwit. |
Nstomper
Disqualified
254
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:17:00 -
[37] - Quote
i didnt vote |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:20:00 -
[38] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:I challenge anyone to read our argument and decide whose statements come from a dimwit.
LOL! Anti AFK carebares are so easily trolled ! You know I am really really enjoying this right?
Feelings hurt much? |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:20:00 -
[39] - Quote
ladwar wrote:oh you'll never get banned, you should know better.
I have been banned before ! |
Onesimus Tarsus
Planetary Response Organization
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:22:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP should offer a game mode called ambush afk. Select it, and your account freezes for 18 minutes. When it thaws, you get a healthy dose of SP and ISK. Farmers aren't in games, taking up space, but they still get points for their time. Everyone is somewhat happy.
You're welcome. |
|
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door. I just enjoy trolling these dimwits Crowd control productions, joke of a name. Most forums a foul statement such as that would provoke a ban. You just said you are trying to shrink the community by being a jerk, you disgust me and others I m sure.
Hook, line, and sinker.
You people keep falling for it haha |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
1139
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 18:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
Onesimus Tarsus wrote:CCP should offer a game mode called ambush afk. Select it, and your account freezes for 18 minutes. When it thaws, you get a healthy dose of SP and ISK. Farmers aren't in games, taking up space, but they still get points for their time. Everyone is somewhat happy.
You're welcome.
Nice idea +1
|
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
85
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
"Active SP" isn't really ACTIVE SP. In the current system, "active SP" is based upon passively participating in battle. It really has nothing to do with how you perform is a player. Most of you carebears voted for the current SP system, because your actually worthless in your matches, and wouldn't end up progressing at the same pace as the players who are actually good. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
495
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:18:00 -
[44] - Quote
Aighun wrote:OP is confuse. Carebears are those players that never leave the safety of the MCC.
Also, I don't think we voted on how SP per match was awarded. Only on how SP rewards after cap would be rewarded. Here I could be confused but AFK farming would still be possible no matter what option we had voted for. In the one vote we had here on the forums. +1 but you deserve more, Aighun.
Great analysis, great response.
It was CCP's inclusion, unvoted for(and perhaps unasked for), of passive sp and their respective mechanics that allows afk farming.
|
Bones McGavins
TacoCat Industries
114
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Heres the problem with a WP system. It becomes easier to get more WP the more SP you have. So you have a system that increases the gap quite a bit.
The only fix to that would be a scaled system where you get a modifier for your WP based on your SP.
If I have 1 mil SP, and the average SP in the match is 4mil, i get 4X SP for all my WP earned. A player with 8mil would get .5X SP for every WP earned.
Thus, its still based on performance, but skewed so that new players arent left behind because they cant compete. |
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
85
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Bones McGavins wrote:Heres the problem with a WP system. It becomes easier to get more WP the more SP you have. So you have a system that increases the gap quite a bit.
The only fix to that would be a scaled system where you get a modifier for your WP based on your SP.
If I have 1 mil SP, and the average SP in the match is 4mil, i get 4X SP for all my WP earned. A player with 8mil would get .5X SP for every WP earned.
Thus, its still based on performance, but skewed so that new players arent left behind because they cant compete.
MMO's aren't supposed to be fair. The more time a player puts into the game the better they become. |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
95
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:57:00 -
[47] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote: MMO's aren't supposed to be fair. The more time a player puts into the game the better they become.
Seriously?
Is this game the home of nothing but pedantic misfits with crappy arguments? |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1341
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
OK, thanks. I don't remember "improve ability to AFK farm" being part of that vote so I was confused by his statement. Again, douches like the OP, believe that we should have no cap, and some of them think we should have no SP/min awarded, instead we should get SP based on WP alone. The problem with this is that is punishes new players. So, these malcontents, believe that their AFKing is justified because of the way SP is handed out, i.e. primarily by time in game.
They should buy boosters if they can't earn enough WPs to meet their needs. Unfortunately right now boosters just help those with the skills (not SP) get ahead faster. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:41:00 -
[49] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote: Again, douches like the OP, believe that we should have no cap, and some of them think we should have no SP/min awarded, instead we should get SP based on WP alone. The problem with this is that is punishes new players.
Making pub matches where only starter gear is allowed and the only place where SP can be earned would fix this pretty quick.
In fact the AFK whines are pretty funny when there are much larger flaws with easier fixes then the AFK "problem"
Note: i am a new player. I know what discourages new players and what does not. AFKers are amusing not discouraging, earning skill points when you actually do something rather then nothing is educational and helps you learn the game not discouraging....discouraging is when you are a better player then a guy in proto gear who has wasted 6 months not learning how to play an FPS yet you still lose the firefight. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:53:00 -
[50] - Quote
Who is the worse AFKer..
A) The one sitting there AFKing.
or
B) The inadvertent AFKer sitting there the whole match shooting me futilely and giving me WPs as he reloads (+10s ding ding ding ding), killing themselves without killing me with the suicide nade and then respawning into the MCC through my drop uplink (another +25) to rinse and repeat?
It cracks me up the people who hate it the most not only end up doing it, but doing it totally wrong. I like all the WPs tho. Don't get me wrong :)
Me: 0/0/100-500ish WPs
Them: 0/10+/0WPs.
|
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:07:00 -
[51] - Quote
mollerz wrote:Who is the worse AFKer..
A) The one sitting there AFKing.
or
B) The inadvertent AFKer sitting there the whole match shooting me futilely and giving me WPs as he reloads (+10s ding ding ding ding), killing themselves without killing me with the suicide nade and then respawning into the MCC through my drop uplink (another +25) to rinse and repeat?
It cracks me up the people who hate it the most not only end up doing it, but doing it totally wrong. I like all the WPs tho. Don't get me wrong :)
Me: 0/0/100-500ish WPs
Them: 0/10+/0WPs.
I like shooting afkers in the MCC when blue team gets red-lined simply for the fun of shooting people....I could careless if I give you WP or not.
Thanks for the ammo, excuse me while I unload 400 rounds into this imperfect. |
DeadlyAztec11
One-Armed Bandits Atrocitas
143
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sentient Archon wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I don't get it,
I thought the AFKers were care bears because they're too chicken to lose 'anything'. Such talk from the CPM ! You do reliaze that more than half of Betamax AFKs right. You just called more than half the members in your corp chicken. Good show ole chap!!! And its "were" not "where" IWS!
It's 'realize' not 'reliaze'
Also, I applaud the guy for sticking by his morals. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
168
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:13:00 -
[53] - Quote
hooc order wrote:mollerz wrote:Who is the worse AFKer..
A) The one sitting there AFKing.
or
B) The inadvertent AFKer sitting there the whole match shooting me futilely and giving me WPs as he reloads (+10s ding ding ding ding), killing themselves without killing me with the suicide nade and then respawning into the MCC through my drop uplink (another +25) to rinse and repeat?
It cracks me up the people who hate it the most not only end up doing it, but doing it totally wrong. I like all the WPs tho. Don't get me wrong :)
Me: 0/0/100-500ish WPs
Them: 0/10+/0WPs.
I like shooting afkers in the MCC when blue team gets red-lined simply for the fun of shooting people....I could careless if I give you WP or not. Thanks for the ammo, excuse me while I unload 400 rounds into this imperfect.
Aaand thank you for boosting the **** out of my AFK return. You sure showed me :D!
|
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 21:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
mollerz wrote:. You sure showed me :D!
Showed you what?
I think you need to go back and read what i wrote....
You know the parts about me not caring if you get WP or not and the part about how i do it cuz it is fun to shoot people. |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
797
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:"Active SP" isn't really ACTIVE SP. In the current system, "active SP" is based upon passively participating in battle.
I would agree here. I would go so far as to say it has nothing to do with participation. It is merely a measure of time spent between start of a battle you have joined and the end of that battle.
With a set cap on SP earnings it doesn't even matter if you try to get the few extra points of SP you could earn from participating because it is just as easy to load another instant battle and AFK farm.
Protoman Is God wrote: MMO's aren't supposed to be fair. The more time a player puts into the game the better they become.
I also agree here. This is what I wanted Dust to be like. That is what I felt like I had to offer more than anything else. Time. I was all set to do some mindless grinding.
This kind of character progression works well in MMOs where the goal of the game is progress to ever higher levels for your character's particular class. You know you have really achieved something when you can play a level 78 Dwarf Mage.
But I started to pay some attention to EVE. EVE has passive skilling because the goal of the game is to play the game. It seems like the antithesis of a leveling MMO. Some players will build a battle ship because they want to fly a battle ship. Other players with more skill points might never build or fly a battleship. You don't fly a battleship because you have leveled your character to Level 23 Space Pilot, and therefore fly a battleship, and are therefore more powerful than all the Space pilots level 1 to 22 but less powerful than all space pilots level 24 and up.
Seems like we spent so much time dicking around in Dust freaking out about whatever flavor of the week freakout was all about that we kind of took the active skilling for granted. But as OP pointed out, we don't have active skilling. Not really. We have 2 flavors of passive skilling.
And a game that has all the hallmarks of a leveling MMO. Where the only reason players are logging in is to skill up. And if you can do it AFK then that is what you do. Jerks.
And now we have a game that is going to launch in less than 2 weeks. With a finalized skill progression system that no one really knows anything about.
I would like to see "active skilling" replaced by an entirely new system that was not in any way based on time spent in battle. It should be based entirely on war points. I would like to see a progressive SP earnings per warpoint system with a ladder bonus.
A progressive system would give every action a weight. Take hacking for example. In Instant Battle all hackable installations, objectives, supply depots, and so on would be "Militia" variants and you would get (just to throw out a random number) 2 skill points for every warpoint.
In Faction warfare NPC assets would be "Basic" variants and you would get 4 skill points for every war point.
6 skill points for war point in Planetary conquest.
and so on.
Same thing for players and their gear.
The higher the total SP of the enemy killed, the higher the meta level of their gear, the more SP you would earn. CCP have enough data available so that they could set this rate at the level they thought best in order to meet their target for the amount of time they want character progression to take. They could keep the cap, or they could remove it. I really have no problem with no lifers grinding through all the content as quickly as they can. Because the SP and the gear isn't really the content. All you have to do is set the SP per WP earnings so passive skilling, and I mean true passive skilling, is competitive and offers players like me that have to go to work some SP to play around with at the end of the week.
So what about the ladder bonus? Basically, if you kill a 15 million SP character in all protogear with a 550,000 SP character in militia gear you get a bonus. (edit* So your payout for that kill could be as high as 8 or 9 sp per warpoint in this hypothetical example.) The greater the gap, the more SP you get. If you bring your low SP character to Faction warfare you will get slightly better SP payouts for participating in that more advanced form of gameplay. Even for just hacking stuff. If you have a high SP level character you get the base progressive SP reward for killing players at your same level, you get a bonus for killing players with more SP, and you get slightly less that the base progressive SP per WP earning for hacking lower level objectives or killing low level players.
So, big tuff 18 million SP character kills free fit new guy? They get only 1 or maybe even .75 SP per war points.
This should solve the whole, "But what about the poor noobs?" problem. Should solve the AFK MCC farming problem. Should make participating in planetary conquest much more appealing.
Big problem with this is it would only really work well if there was PVE available for all players along with the PVP we already have.
I'll even do a TL;DR: Now that the game is launching it looks like we should have spent more time worrying about the whole skill progression thing. Boy I sure hope the new system doesn't suck. The two kinds of passive skilling we have now are not great. We should get active SP for actually, you know, doing stuff. |
Gunmouse
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
51
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:34:00 -
[56] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:I challenge anyone to read our argument and decide whose statements come from a dimwit. I have it it is you sir. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
24
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:43:00 -
[57] - Quote
Jin Robot wrote:Sentient Archon wrote:Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game. No one is arguing about the direction about where the AFK mechanism should go. There is only one place for it and that's out the door. I just enjoy trolling these dimwits Crowd control productions, joke of a name. Most forums a foul statement such as that would provoke a ban. You just said you are trying to shrink the community by being a jerk, you disgust me and others I m sure. Reading comprehension fail.
|
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
798
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:53:00 -
[58] - Quote
Bones McGavins wrote:Heres the problem with a WP system. It becomes easier to get more WP the more SP you have. So you have a system that increases the gap quite a bit.
The only fix to that would be a scaled system where you get a modifier for your WP based on your SP.
If I have 1 mil SP, and the average SP in the match is 4mil, i get 4X SP for all my WP earned. A player with 8mil would get .5X SP for every WP earned.
Thus, its still based on performance, but skewed so that new players arent left behind because they cant compete.
This is bad as it punishes people for progressing their characters. Players should be rewarded for advancing their characters and spending time in game doing stuff. |
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
190
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:10:00 -
[59] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was allocated.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
Actually we gave feedback on it too, but noone wanted to press for a different option and was content in choosing one of the 5 given because at that point anything was better than daily cap.
After all this thing is temporary until a rollover system is implemented, or did everyone forget that. Also i totally forgot about this but to everyone who told me to HTFU this is how MMO's work.
/me glares at Cosgar before he enters.
Remember the predecessor to the vote and the outcry that prompted it https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=483247#post483247
So yea in essence Protoman did call it right carebears voted for it by demanding that CCP not cut the Gordian knot. Yea so for everyone these last few days that wanted to shout me down that the Cap was CCP's brainchild and they would never entertain the idea of removing it since this game is an MMO and MMO is long and ardous please feel free to eat crow.
So can we finally have this conversation again cause lets face it. All the people who say power grinding ruins the game still haven't come up with any reason other than it kills game numbers(they dont) and people stop playing(not if ccp continually adds new content, free expansions, and more items) and it creates an SP gap(characters grow wider not taller remember, and everyone ends up at the same destination anyway right? so what does it matter) or are we conceding SP matters and those who want to compete will grind for every last ounce of it?
/all these discussion, bullet to the head I win.
Takes a bow |
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:29:00 -
[60] - Quote
childish sh!t to be honest.
ill probably gain haters for it but fuq you your mother and whoever else feels anyway about me. why even play the game if ur going to do nothing? whats so fun about it? i didnt vote for anything as i hardly even look at any imperfect ei or imp swarm post because to me they are to involved with their ego's for me to give a sh!t about any of them. to be honest man this is just bs but can we stop it? no will it stop? probly not. the same way this thread was started is the same way it could be ended. by not playing the game with people who do it. if you see them in the game back out. otherwise deal with this **** focus on what could fix the game and its errors instead of exploiting them. with this being said goodnight all and go Fuq yourselves. |
|
ANON Illuminati
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
19
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:36:00 -
[61] - Quote
ANON Illuminati wrote:childish sh!t to be honest.
ill probably gain haters for it but fuq you your mother and whoever else feels anyway about me. why even play the game if ur going to do nothing? whats so fun about it? i didnt vote for anything as i hardly even look at any imperfect ei or imp swarm post because to me they are to involved with their ego's for me to give a sh!t about any of them. to be honest man this is just bs but can we stop it? no will it stop? probly not. the same way this thread was started is the same way it could be ended. by not playing the game with people who do it. if you see them in the game back out. otherwise deal with this **** focus on what could fix the game and its errors instead of exploiting them. with this being said goodnight all and go Fuq yourselves.
that is if ccp doesnt do **** about it. im not in agreeance with it but if you cant stop it theres no reason you should hatemail someone for it because to them your the joke. so either play your game or sit in the mcc but please stop with these threads cuz they are getting old and nothing will be done to stop it so be a troll or be trolled. |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
798
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 03:59:00 -
[62] - Quote
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was allocated.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not. Actually we gave feedback on it too, but noone wanted to press for a different option and was content in choosing one of the 5 given because at that point anything was better than daily cap. After all this thing is temporary until a rollover system is implemented, or did everyone forget that. Also i totally forgot about this but to everyone who told me to HTFU this is how MMO's work. /me glares at Cosgar before he enters. Remember the predecessor to the vote and the outcry that prompted it https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=483247#post483247So yea in essence Protoman did call it right carebears voted for it by demanding that CCP not cut the Gordian knot. Yea so for everyone these last few days that wanted to shout me down that the Cap was CCP's brainchild and they would never entertain the idea of removing it since this game is an MMO and MMO is long and ardous please feel free to eat crow.
In New Eden, time is money. So I have heard.
The drama surrounding the SP earnings cap obscured a deeper, underlying problem. Active skilling isn't.
But after revisiting that thread: There was a horrible, terrible daily cap. What CCP proposed was removal of the SP earnings cap completely. They were like, screw it. we'll just get rid of the damn thing. There was a great crying of, Noooo what are you thinking? Do not do this thing! SoTa PoP was like, guys, maybe we should have a vote? And Maken Tosch was like, I made a vote thread to prove a point. And a vote was had.
Want to blame anyone blame SoTa. And Maken.
But the whole argument was about how much SP you could gain, and how much time you had to spend to gain that SP. It was all about how removal of the cap would create greater and greater disparity between players. There was very little mention of what you might actually be doing in game while spending time earning SP.
If CCP had gone ahead and cut the knot, as they described, that would have allowed players to endlessly AFK farm. There never would have been a time when they would not be able to AFK farm. It would have compounded the problem exponentially. Because it is a lot easier to AFK farm 24/7 than it is to grind 24/7. So basically the exact opposite of your claim, and the OP's original claim are true. Removal of the cap would have led to non-stop AFK.
Also of note, a few Imperfects came out in favor of a weekly cap in that threadnought.
And yeah, I did skim back through all 26 pages. |
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
802
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 04:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:Can you carebears stop complaining about AFK farming?
Yes. Just as soon as the AFK farming stops.
Next question. |
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
170
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 04:11:00 -
[64] - Quote
I just wish they'd jump in and make the matches more interesting. These days I feel like I'm on autopilot. |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
495
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 04:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Vets forgive me, this is for the benefit of the new peeps.
Everybody keep in mind that we're talking about 2 separate things here: passive skilling in matches and the skillpoint cap.
CCP stealth-added the passive component of match sp rewards all on their own. The more i think about it the more i'm sure this was never part of the conversation in the sp cap threadnought, and it was never brought up by CCP before the changes were made. It had absolutely nothing to do with the vote. If they had presented their misguided plans for passive match sp to the community we would have squashed it pronto.
The threadnought was about how to balance playstyles, no-life grinders vs. peeps with RL commitments. CCP still hasn't addressed this because the vote was for a temporary stop-gap sp mechanism, which is where we got our soft cap from.
The best proposal in the entire thread for a permanent sp reward/cap mechanism came from Rasatsu. His approach is in all likelihood the optimal solution for balancing playstyles while still maintaining a cap.
Rasatsu's post: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=433498#post433498
My argument in favor of: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=435873#post435873
But for the conversation we're having here the punchline is passive sp rewards from matches has gotta go. |
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
194
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 04:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Anything that encourages players to not fight, whether it is PC, ducking corp battles, or AFKing in a match needs to be fixed. I don't condemn players for using a option that rewards them for little to know risk, but it doesn't mean it should remain in the game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q
Nah i agree but we all know the solution to it, just the real carebears keep cockblocking it, like they did ReGnum at FF.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71833&find=unread Thats all that needs to happen and
Or well some derivation of these ideas discussed here.
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=71797&find=unread
And its done for, However i still maintain that CEO and directors are too busy playing the "metagame" to be bother actually playing the game and AFKing lets you do both so why are we punishing multi-taskers?
|
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
194
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:01:00 -
[67] - Quote
Bones McGavins wrote:Heres the problem with a WP system. It becomes easier to get more WP the more SP you have. So you have a system that increases the gap quite a bit.
The only fix to that would be a scaled system where you get a modifier for your WP based on your SP.
If I have 1 mil SP, and the average SP in the match is 4mil, i get 4X SP for all my WP earned. A player with 8mil would get .5X SP for every WP earned.
Thus, its still based on performance, but skewed so that new players arent left behind because they cant compete.
Thats what pubs are for while vets stick to FW, and you keep pubs safe by gear restricting them.
/solved |
Zatara Rought
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
128
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:05:00 -
[68] - Quote
Cmon ccp if the imps see the light on this one how the hell are you still in the dark? |
Keyser Soze VerbalKint
IMPSwarm Negative-Feedback
194
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:16:00 -
[69] - Quote
Zatara Rought wrote:Cmon ccp if the imps see the light on this one how the hell are you still in the dark?
We've always been against AFK, but while we were burnt out from the game, couldnt find a challenge cause noone wants to fight us in CB, everyone has ducked every challenge ive laid out in threads and we had an easy mechanism to get the maxmimum amount of SP while avoiding the utterly noobtastic players that would often be paired with us on our teams in game and the carebears that whined on the forums when we got decent support and stompled them,
we decided eff it kill blues so to speak
and/or AFK farm while we bullshitted with each other on comms or went off and did RL stuff. Point is we always wanted the passive component gone because we knew it would create AFK and we know how to earn our WP so it wasnt an issue for us. We said as much in the voting thread when it happend despite what we wanted was what CMDR WANG was about to give to us but again the carebears came in and whined their behinds off cause they knew they could never keep up with skilled players.
CCP listened to carebears instead because they needed to cushion the egos of players who simply were terrible at this game.
In this instance we are and have been the hardcore of Dust. We dont want easy, but if you give it to us of course we'll take it, its about getting the most result for least effort(that not lazy thats efficiency).
|
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:29:00 -
[70] - Quote
How much SP do you guys usually get from a typical AFK match? |
|
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
98
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:40:00 -
[71] - Quote
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:Cmon ccp if the imps see the light on this one how the hell are you still in the dark? We've always been against AFK, but while we were burnt out from the game, couldnt find a challenge cause noone wants to fight us in CB, everyone has ducked every challenge ive laid out in threads and we had an easy mechanism to get the maxmimum amount of SP while avoiding the utterly noobtastic players that would often be paired with us on our teams in game and the carebears that whined on the forums when we got decent support and stompled them, we decided eff it kill blues so to speak and/or AFK farm while we bullshitted with each other on comms or went off and did RL stuff. Point is we always wanted the passive component gone because we knew it would create AFK and we know how to earn our WP so it wasnt an issue for us. We said as much in the voting thread when it happend despite what we wanted was what CMDR WANG was about to give to us but again the carebears came in and whined their behinds off cause they knew they could never keep up with skilled players. CCP listened to carebears instead because they felt they needed to cushion the egos of players who simply were terrible at this game, when really they should have turned around to their EVE carebears coming into an FPS and stating to them HTFU. In this instance we are and have been the hardcore of Dust. We dont want easy, but if you give it to us of course we'll take it, its about getting the most result for least effort(that not lazy thats efficiency).
All I'm seeing here is a bunch of rationalizations for unchecked ego and pretending aurum protosuits are 'skill'.
1/10 troll. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
DigiOps wrote:How much SP do you guys usually get from a typical AFK match? About 5,000. It varies depending on how much of a stomp it is. |
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:47:00 -
[73] - Quote
Interesting. Is that including any boosters or no? |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:51:00 -
[74] - Quote
DigiOps wrote:Interesting. Is that including any boosters or no? no boosters. |
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:54:00 -
[75] - Quote
I need to see for myself. That's it! I'm joining the AFKers who protest AFKing by going AFK! |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:56:00 -
[76] - Quote
Whatever helps you sleep at night |
DigiOps
DUST University Ivy League
171
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:57:00 -
[77] - Quote
Oh, it won't I'm sure, but that issue has nothing to do with dust. |
ReGnUM Public Relations
Imperfects Public Relations
179
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 05:59:00 -
[78] - Quote
@ Jump
-Bravo beautiful thread
@Sentient Archon
- We get it dude. You AFK and you brag about it. No one is doubting your AFKing prowess. I would say you need some new material, but after reading this thread. I have come to question that.
Anyways, thank you to all other contributors this thread is really shaping up. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
387
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 06:07:00 -
[79] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
You trying to tell us that if there was absolutely no cap at all, players wouldn't be AFK farming? LOL
Give me a break. If we voted on a infinite cap, instead of players AFKing for the first 1-3 days after weekly cap reset, they would be doing it 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
At which point, CCP would decide that passive SP 100% of the time would be the best choice. And all your worst nightmares would come true
|
Protoman Is God
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
105
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:23:00 -
[80] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
You trying to tell us that if there was absolutely no cap at all, players wouldn't be AFK farming? LOL Give me a break. If we voted on a infinite cap, instead of players AFKing for the first 1-3 days after weekly cap reset, they would be doing it 7 days a week, 365 days a year. At which point, CCP would decide that passive SP 100% of the time would be the best choice. And all your worst nightmares would come true
CCP originally proposed an uncapped system where 1 WP = 1 SP. SP would have been completely performance based. Meaning players would have been forced to play well in order to actually be rewarded in terms of SP. However though the carebears began to cry that this would create a "gap" and was somehow "unfair" to them.
The community voted for AFK farming after being warned that this very problem would have developed as a result of the current SP system we have now.
|
|
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
802
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:45:00 -
[81] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
You trying to tell us that if there was absolutely no cap at all, players wouldn't be AFK farming? LOL Give me a break. If we voted on a infinite cap, instead of players AFKing for the first 1-3 days after weekly cap reset, they would be doing it 7 days a week, 365 days a year. At which point, CCP would decide that passive SP 100% of the time would be the best choice. And all your worst nightmares would come true CCP originally proposed an uncapped system where 1 WP = 1 SP. SP would have been completely performance based. Meaning players would have been forced to play well in order to actually be rewarded in terms of SP. However though the carebears began to cry that this would create a "gap" and was somehow "unfair" to them. The community voted for AFK farming after being warned that this very problem would have developed as a result of the current SP system we have now.
Their original proposal still had SP gain just for time in match. They were going to tweak the numbers to account for all day grinding with no cap, but they never indicated that they were going to make it entirely based on WP.
CCP's proposal would have made AFK farming an even more tempting way to gain lots of SP.
I skimmed through the entire threadnought and there really wasn't any discussion of making active skilling truly active. Never discussed. There were no warnings.
May have come up in the vote thread but all of those arguments that I remember were about SP gain after cap. I could be totally wrong but I don't think anyone ever said that active skilling was a lie. And that the whole system needed to be changed from the ground up. We all just took it for granted.
If there were wranings or suggestions to change the entire active skilling system from the ground up provide links. Or quotes. With links.
I agree with you that active skilling should be active. Never really thought that much about it before. Just accepted the system as is.
There would need to be PVE and better rewards for support roles for it to really work well. And we would still have to argue about whether or not we should have a cap, even then. |
Aighun
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
802
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 12:58:00 -
[82] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:
CCP stealth-added the passive component of match sp rewards all on their own. The more i think about it the more i'm sure this was never part of the conversation in the sp cap threadnought, and it was never brought up by CCP before the changes were made. It had absolutely nothing to do with the vote. If they had presented their misguided plans for passive match sp to the community we would have squashed it pronto.
But for the conversation we're having here the punchline is passive sp rewards from matches has gotta go.
I think it was there all along and nobody noticed. We just got some SP at the end of a match and everyone was like, yippy, got some SP, give me more!
|
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
496
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
You trying to tell us that if there was absolutely no cap at all, players wouldn't be AFK farming? LOL Give me a break. If we voted on a infinite cap, instead of players AFKing for the first 1-3 days after weekly cap reset, they would be doing it 7 days a week, 365 days a year. At which point, CCP would decide that passive SP 100% of the time would be the best choice. And all your worst nightmares would come true CCP originally proposed an uncapped system where 1 WP = 1 SP. SP would have been completely performance based. Meaning players would have been forced to play well in order to actually be rewarded in terms of SP. However though the carebears began to cry that this would create a "gap" and was somehow "unfair" to them. The community voted for AFK farming after being warned that this very problem would have developed as a result of the current SP system we have now.
I've underlined your bait-and-switch. You want no cap but are trying to sell the community on an anti-AFK platform. Obvious is obvious bro.
The community rejected a capless sp system. The community would have regected a passive AFK-farmable system if that had been on the table. But it wasn't on the table, CCP added it without telegraphing their intentions to the community. What you're doing here is engaging in revisionist history and trying to swindle the community into supporting your no-cap agenda.
There is no logical connection between a cap and passive sp rewards for matches, one does not require or imply the other.
The good thing that can come out of the MCCAFK protest is the removal of passive sp(or an algorithm that indexes passive sp to active sp) match rewards. The awful thing that could come out of the MCCAFK protest is the mis-guided removal of the sp cap. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
389
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:14:00 -
[84] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
You trying to tell us that if there was absolutely no cap at all, players wouldn't be AFK farming? LOL Give me a break. If we voted on a infinite cap, instead of players AFKing for the first 1-3 days after weekly cap reset, they would be doing it 7 days a week, 365 days a year. At which point, CCP would decide that passive SP 100% of the time would be the best choice. And all your worst nightmares would come true CCP originally proposed an uncapped system where 1 WP = 1 SP. SP would have been completely performance based. Meaning players would have been forced to play well in order to actually be rewarded in terms of SP. However though the carebears began to cry that this would create a "gap" and was somehow "unfair" to them. The community voted for AFK farming after being warned that this very problem would have developed as a result of the current SP system we have now.
I don't think any of us voted on one SP per second. That was 100% CCP's decision.
The vote was to keep SP contained and restricted by week, so 24/7 players wouldn't have 300,000,000,000,000,000 SP by now.
Nobody voted for AFKers to do nothing and get SP at the same time.
|
Vaerana Myshtana
Bojo's School of the Trades
807
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 13:28:00 -
[85] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote: CCP originally proposed an uncapped system where 1 WP = 1 SP. SP would have been completely performance based. Meaning players would have been forced to play well in order to actually be rewarded in terms of SP. However though the carebears began to cry that this would create a "gap" and was somehow "unfair" to them.
Protobear vs. Newbie = 3000 SP for Protobear & 0 WP for Newbie.
In a game that was intended to be open to casual players, this is untenable.
Fair has nothing to do with it.
Making money does.
If CCP wants to make money, they are going to have to spank the AFKids hard enough that the carebears can feel it.
Otherwise, nobody will "Pay2Win" while still getting pubstomped by Protobears. As the casual players figure out that the AFKids are exploiting a game mechanic to get an unfair advantage (instead of just being good), they have no reason to buy AUR because they have realized that there is no hope of competing. |
steadyhand amarr
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
440
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 14:58:00 -
[86] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
NO your dilabarity ******* up the game for the rest of us. U guys were afking long before the voted change. Your simpley knowningly exploting a system which is in effect cheating no window dressing can change that. I simpley hope the afkers get punished for it |
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2232
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:03:00 -
[87] - Quote
Sooo why are we mad about people AFKing? |
steadyhand amarr
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
440
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:06:00 -
[88] - Quote
Mostly due to losing 4 people out of a team is a guaranteed loss but I'm sure youre trolling lol :-P:-P |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1349
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:06:00 -
[89] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
NO your dilabarity ******* up the game for the rest of us. U guys were afking long before the voted change. Your simpley knowningly exploting a system which is in effect cheating no window dressing can change that. I simpley hope the afkers get punished for it
AFKing didn't even exist before the SP change. At least make your lies believable. |
KatanaPT
Tech Guard General Tso's Alliance
82
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:09:00 -
[90] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Reav Hannari wrote:Buster Friently wrote:He's referring to the forum vote that took place to determine how SP was determined.
However, what he, and douches like him, fail to realize is that what was voted on was a system. Like a line at the grocery store, those who cut in line are still douches. It doesn't matter if the line is long or not.
OK, thanks. I don't remember "improve ability to AFK farm" being part of that vote so I was confused by his statement. Again, douches like the OP, believe that we should have no cap, and some of them think we should have no SP/min awarded, instead we should get SP based on WP alone. The problem with this is that is punishes new players. So, these malcontents, believe that their AFKing is justified because of the way SP is handed out, i.e. primarily by time in game.
clap clap. exactly.
|
|
Sleepy Zan
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
2232
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:17:00 -
[91] - Quote
steadyhand amarr wrote:Mostly due to losing 4 people out of a team is a guaranteed loss but I'm sure youre trolling lol :-P:-P btw why are you solo |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Unclaimed.
497
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:35:00 -
[92] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:Sooo why are we mad about people AFKing? Personally speaking, i have no problem with AFKing and i'm thinking of it as a community service that wiil hopefully get rid of a bad mechanic. And when that happens all the peeps who faced the hatred on the forums will be owed a thank you by the community.
What i do have is a problem with is the destructive kittenpoop your crew is engaging in to get the cap removed. It would destroy the game beyond a doubt. What the hell's your agenda anyway? |
charlesnette dalari
Creative Killers
195
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:37:00 -
[93] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
Seems you don't know what the definition of a carebear is (I am not surprised with how stupid you are). A care bear is someone who plays the game without risking death. So the care bears are really you AFK morons. I actually think of you as new Eden welfare recipients. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
155
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:40:00 -
[94] - Quote
I remember when there wasn't a cap and you could get 2-500k sp per match..ahh good times every one had proto and it wasn't hard to get caught up in sp |
Rogatien Merc
Ill Omens EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:57:00 -
[95] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:I'd like to add, that we should simply remove the floor in the MCC. Start clamped to the ceiling of the MCC. Then, the player pushes X to drop, or is forcibly dropped after 30 seconds of inactivity. This wouldn't be a perfect solution, but would be easyish to implement and would stop the most common form of AFKing.
That's actually one of the cooler ideas I've heard. +1 |
semperfi1999
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
419
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 15:59:00 -
[96] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:I remember when there wasn't a cap and you could get 2-500k sp per match..ahh good times every one had proto and it wasn't hard to get caught up in sp
Pretty sure it should be 50K right now 500K....LOL
I do think this needs to be changed. Oh and if CCP has made such a huge SP sink with the suits now they should up our SP gain lvl. Our normal SP gain should be the 3x SP that we were getting last week if they want to keep the current massive SP sinks.
You should get 1 SP per second and 5 SP per WP........
Or if thats not enough for you guys who cant deal with getting enough WP. Change it so that as you get more SP your SP gain becomes more dependent on WP than time in game. (or can you all not hang with us if this is implemented?) |
Rogatien Merc
Ill Omens EoN.
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:00:00 -
[97] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:steadyhand amarr wrote:Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
NO your dilabarity ******* up the game for the rest of us. U guys were afking long before the voted change. Your simpley knowningly exploting a system which is in effect cheating no window dressing can change that. I simpley hope the afkers get punished for it AFKing didn't even exist before the SP change. At least make your lies believable.
Pssst.... some of 'us' haven't been playing long enough to know that. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
155
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:09:00 -
[98] - Quote
semperfi1999 wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:I remember when there wasn't a cap and you could get 2-500k sp per match..ahh good times every one had proto and it wasn't hard to get caught up in sp Pretty sure it should be 50K right now 500K....LOL I do think this needs to be changed. Oh and if CCP has made such a huge SP sink with the suits now they should up our SP gain lvl. Our normal SP gain should be the 3x SP that we were getting last week if they want to keep the current massive SP sinks. You should get 1 SP per second and 5 SP per WP........ Or if thats not enough for you guys who cant deal with getting enough WP. Change it so that as you get more SP your SP gain becomes more dependent on WP than time in game. (or can you all not hang with us if this is implemented?) I agree but I was saying when I first started like a year or longer ago it felt great getting that much sp now its like yeah watev everyone gets that much sp |
steadyhand amarr
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
441
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:11:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sleepy Zan wrote:steadyhand amarr wrote:Mostly due to losing 4 people out of a team is a guaranteed loss but I'm sure youre trolling lol :-P:-P btw why are you solo And I don't care if you are pissed about it or not I'm still going to be making my sandwich in the other room and watching the last season of Breaking Bad til the match is over.
Tbh I'm not all that pissed about my new job is very very boring and the only way to get ur guys attention is to make widely over the top statements :-):-) and I'm solo cuz I wanted a break from corps in general and toyed around with starting my own. @noc afking has always been their just because u never noticed didn't mean it wasn't their. So uh take ya blinkers off :-) afking in the mcc has been an issue since we could spawn their it's just now its hit critical mass.
|
Matticus Monk
Ordus Trismegistus
28
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:21:00 -
[100] - Quote
Protoman Is God wrote:YOU VOTED FOR IT.
Why do you care? Just don't read the posts genius... I mean I know you have plenty of time on your hands while you AFK but seriuosly. Move along..... |
|
Osiris Ausare
TeamPlayers EoN.
55
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 16:58:00 -
[101] - Quote
I haven't played skirmish that much over the last month and a half so I really have not seen the impact AFKing has had (or lack of impact) on it. Skirmish in it's current state is a waste of time (yes you can work on team tactics, but you can do that just as easily in ambush or OMS) as you can make more SP and isk playing ambush (in the time it takes to play one skirmish match, you can easily make at least 600,000isk as well as exponentially more SP, depending on how well you play).
So if people want to waste time and AFK farm then that is their business. It's not like they are going around TKing everyone (yes they are essentially dead weight on a skirmish team) and causing utter mayhem. Furthermore, as a lot of AFKers have pointed out they are usually doing other things while they AFK.
And the constant complaining that AFKing is ruining the game is laughable, as skirmish was already broken before they started to farm. Only time will tell if this changes and hopefully with the new build everyone will start playing again.
So keep on farming and to everyone else stop complaining about how unfair AFKing is and go back to QQing about how overpowered every weapon and item is in this game.
Osiris. |
Zyrus Amalomyn
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
99
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 17:13:00 -
[102] - Quote
Osiris Ausare wrote:And the constant complaining that AFKing is ruining the game is laughable, as skirmish was already broken before they started to farm.
I'm not touching the 'it was broken already' bit.
But telling people to break a game even more simply because you don't like it? Awesome, awesome logic there. |
Osiris Ausare
TeamPlayers EoN.
55
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 17:55:00 -
[103] - Quote
Zyrus Amalomyn wrote:Osiris Ausare wrote:And the constant complaining that AFKing is ruining the game is laughable, as skirmish was already broken before they started to farm. I'm not touching the 'it was broken already' bit. But telling people to break a game even more simply because you don't like it? Awesome, awesome logic there.
I'm not saying it will break the game even more, just that it was already broken. I don't see how this is going to further create destruction as it's not providing them with an unfair advantage. It would be different if they were getting officer weapons every game, or 3x exp for their efforts. In fact, as I pointed out you can still make more SP and Isk by playing the game.
The fact is this is a contentious issue (very similar to a moral debate) with both sides not wanting to budge. Because of this you have both sides flaming and constantly claiming their side is better.
Maybe it will be changed in the next build and maybe it won't. All I care about is that they change the matchmaking system and the spawns. If that is done, then a lot of the AFKers will start playing again (even more people will start playing if the skirmish stat problem is fixed). |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |