Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1992
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Given how often we have had this debate, and after careful thinking this over for the past week or so, I think it is best to give players the option to have a refund via an in-game message box on day of release. None of the SP is reset regardless of choice and those who just feel like contributing to Dust's development (like me) will probably elect to reject the refund while those who want the "commercial release" obligation to be met will get what they paid for. This option should only effect merc packs purchased before open beta and possibly from Gamestop assuming CCP can track those kind of transactions separately.
My statement is based on the literal interpretation of the merc pack description as written before open beta came along and the fact that the wording of said description treats "resets" and "commercial release" as two separate things. Nowhere in the description did/does it mention that commercial release will include a reset on that same day. CCP has also clearly stated that there are no more resets coming barring anything catastrophic. For those claiming that giving a refund while keeping the SP and stuff is catastrophic, the people making such claims don't have the metrics (data accessible only to CCP devs) to back it up and only CCP can make the final decision on that matter.
Although a full reset is out of the question, I want to make it clear that CCP has left the door open for the possibility of a partial reset (or SP cut) for those who acquired SP via boosters. However, keep in mind that this claim is coming only from the players and that CCP made no mention of such a thing happening either. In fact, CCP has been quiet about the whole thing for the past 4 months straight.
EDIT:
Reminder: I sent an email to CCP earlier letting them know that Gamestop is selling the merc packs with the outdated description that includes the "commercial release" clause. CCP said they are trying to address this. Since it's against forum rules to post a copy of the email here, you only have my word on this. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3421
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1992
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
Only when the data CCP has says they should. |
JL3Eleven
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
314
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1992
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level.
If you are talking about a full reset, read my OP again. CCP said that full resets are out of the question barring anything catastrophic.
If you are talking about a partial reset, that is still possible but highly unlikely given that CCP didn't mention that possibility. At least not directly. |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
197
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others.
And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE. |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
241
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
No it's not, not at all. I've generally respected your thoughts, but this is utter rubbish.
Because we expect what we paid for we should be punished by having our SP reset? This will result in a lawsuit just as quickly as denying the return of the AURUM itself. I hate all the QQ, I refuse to grind SP again,, crap that has been tossed around because what happened? Now there won't be a reset on commercial release, when that is exactly what is needed here.
Somehow you and all the people like you are trying to make honest customers (that expect the same honesty from CCP) the bad guys. CCP needs to reset everyone or no one. My preference is clear, but I'm not running around the forums QQ'ing that I won't play if they reset everybody's SP (like many, many people did).
Edit: The catastrophic clause? I think it's time to consider implementing it. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1992
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others. And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE.
Please keep flaming to a minimum. I don't want this thread to go out of control and I don't want to be forced to ask CCP to lock this thread. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1992
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
I just want to make this clear to anyone who missed it.
Maken Tosch wrote:description treats "resets" and "commercial release" as two separate things
I'm not claiming to be an internet lawyer here as that is just silly. But this is just common sense I'm pointing out here because it seems people here keep thinking that a reset will happen if the commercial release obligation is met. |
Sentient Archon
Red Star. EoN.
951
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 15:49:00 -
[10] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
Honestly I don't want an effing refund. I want to keep my SP. TYVM!
#justsaying |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3421
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair. No it's not, not at all. I've generally respected your thoughts, but this is utter rubbish. Because we expect what we paid for we should be punished by having our SP reset? This will result in a lawsuit just as quickly as denying the return of the AURUM itself. I hate all the QQ, I refuse to grind SP again,, crap that has been tossed around because what happened? Now there won't be a reset on commercial release, when that is exactly what is needed here. Somehow you and all the people like you are trying to make honest customers (that expect the same honesty from CCP) the bad guys. CCP needs to reset everyone or no one. My preference is clear, but I'm not running around the forums QQ'ing that I won't play if they reset everybody's SP (like many, many people did). Edit: The catastrophic clause? I think it's time to consider implementing it.
I am rather serious about this, the terms of sale never included getting two (or however many you'd like since the number does for all intents and purposes simply does not exist) for the price of one purchase, it included a statement of insurance of purchase in the event of something catastrophic or intentional.
As I have stated before to sum up the entire scenario if you replace the Merc pack items with a Golden Assault Rifle, come commercial reset do you get a second Golden Gun or do you receive the same gun to replace the first one you had? Terms of Sale indicates the later not the former.
By giving players who have bought the merc pack all the same items again without resetting would turn the game into a pay to play experience scenario fiasco just as bad as the most recent Planetside 2's multiple thousand certificate point issuing as there are now players with over 160,000 cert points running around because of wed's patch.
Also I said for those who want it. This gives the option for the consumer to keep what they have now or clean slate and be given everything back. Now is the opportune time to do so however before exploitative such as using corp armory is made available. Its a fair option, its a level option, and its the best compromise, reset the volunteer characters to day 1 then reissue all awards earned and purchased. |
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
504
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:21:00 -
[12] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
True way to be fair my foot. Really this whole complicitness in being fair junk is utter nonsense. How bout CCP gives us the stuff as a reward for investing in them or for putting up with their failures not a game developer but as a corporation to manage their company effectively and putting up with it.
Why do people who talk about this like we are greedy and use its a beta mentality to justify every bit of noob sauce fail that this fiasco created. I really dont have time to argue this over and over and over again.
CCP manage your corporation better or just stop making games... this is a pr, legal, community management failure for letting this issue stagnate not a dev one so my issue is perfectly valid and at this point its about customer service Iron Wolf you may think people should just grin and bear it and thats why corporations continue down this path because the consumer lets them...
Man my parents' generation is right we dont know how to fight for our rights and properly protest. Go ahead iron Wolf risk another a Jita situation. Please oh please help us all if you are on CPM because if this is the kind of placating we can expect from you or others that think this way on CPM this games future is going to look bleak.
Sorry but i dont just grin and bear it i hold people to high standards. If i didn't think CCP could meet or even exceed them i wouldnt even bother being here. |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
241
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am rather serious about this, the terms of sale never included getting two (or however many you'd like since the number does for all intents and purposes simply does not exist) for the price of one purchase, it included a statement of insurance of purchase in the event of something catastrophic or intentional.
As I have stated before to sum up the entire scenario if you replace the Merc pack items with a golden AR, come commercial reset do you get a second Golden Gun or do you receive the same gun to replace the first one you had? Terms of Sale indicates the later not the former.
Also I said for those who want it. This gives the option for the consumer to keep what they have now or clean slate and be given everything back. Now is the opportune time to do so however before exploitative such as using corp armory is made available.
All it stated, clearly, and succinctly, was that there would be a refund of the merc pack every reset and upon commercial release, none of what you're trying to say about statement of insurance.
Let me state what I see it as owing players that purchased the merc pack when it included the statement.
1. I don't expect a second 'golden gun', one is fine. Therefore the dragonfly BPO suit we got with each merc pack would be removed and then refunded (or simply not removed and not refunded). This would also apply, in my mind, to the 30-day active SP booster. You still have the benefit of that in SP as there will be no SP reset.
2. The AUR was spent on the understanding it would be refunded on commercial release. Anyone attempting to argue that the purchase agreement didn't state this is being willfully ignorant. The pickle lies in the fact that many people spent some (or even all) on SP Boosters (whether active or passive) and that this in turn gives them more SP and the chance to earn even more when they potentially respend any refunded AUR on more SP boosters.
To this I say, so what? Everyone had the opportunity to buy those same boosters. A compromise I would accept, even though it is not what the purchase agreement stated, would be to remove SP gained from those items in conjunction with the AUR refund (but it would have to be optional). A partial refund option of AUR not spent on SP boosters or a full refund of AUR but a removal of any SP gained from boosters purchased from the AUR to be reset.
However, I imagine this would be impossible to implement. Therefore the only option that honors the purchase agreement is to let it go. Everyone had access to those same boosters. There is no unfair advantage to be gained here, except to argue that closed beta gave people access to half priced AURUM.
3. Items liked the fused locus grenades, HK4M shotguns, etc? These are comsumables; you lose them when you use them (meaning when you die with them equipped, obviously). Many people used them frivolously because of the expectation of their return on commercial release. I could care less about them, but the purchase agreement made it clear they would also be refunded on commercial release.
General Statement to the Masses: Ultimately, the problem here isn't the people that bought the closed beta merc packs and want the clause honored, it's the people QQ'ing that they didn't get in on it or of the perceived 'unfair advantage'. Is it going to ruin your game that someone has more AUR than you? If it is, you shouldn't be playing DUST in the first place--AUR is part of DUST. As to the items, read the whole post above. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax. CRONOS.
3423
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause. |
Lord-of-the-Dreadfort
The Lions Guard
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:26:00 -
[15] - Quote
this is quite a popular thing to ***** about.
did CCP screw over a group of people, or is said group a bunch of greedy basterds? |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
241
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause.
Arguably. Would a court rule in favor of CCP if they took that approach? Nope, as they would be resetting the SP of only the people that bought the merc packs and asked for what they paid for. It would be viewed as punishing the consumer for daring to expect what they paid for.
Further, as stated, it is in no way a FAIR option as you attempted to argue. What needs to happen is that everyone should be reset but people would QQ and go play Mario Kart instead of DUST (or at least threaten to). This is not a viable option, and your arguing for it has lost a good deal of respect from me (not that I expect you to care).
CCP screwed the pooch and now the players are at each others throats. Typical. I even try to s[peak in terms of compromise and your stance is reset anyone foolish enough to expect what they paid for. I hate the entire legal process, but I would gladly spend my off hours in court if this is the 'solution'. I'm tired of corporations screwing over their paying customers and if CCP takes this approach that is exactly what they are doing.
|
Gunner Nightingale
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
504
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause.
If they said this and made it crystal clear in january. They didnt they still continued to wait and wait and wait with no response.
This by the way has less to do with me im on the forums but every new player that buys a merc pack from gamestop from today until commercial release.
At this point is just bad customer relations and they know it. Why do you think we still have silence. They have pegged themselves into a corner. They boned up smart move is to do the refund for merc pack users AND SINGLE MERC PACK BONUS TO ALL TESTERS AS A MEA CULPA.
If you're telling me that puts CCP in a bad financial position then ill just pack up and leave now because if they are that hard pressed for money to not be able to absorb that cost then how in the kitten are they ever going to dev this game on a 10 year roadmap? |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
219
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:43:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others. And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE.
Ryder is right
Its the minority which want the AUR reset
If you want AUR reset then reset everything for that person
If they make it an option i wont mind, i will be in the majority which will keep what they have so far and not get an AUR refund |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
241
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 16:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others. And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE. Ryder is right Its the minority which want the AUR reset If you want AUR reset then reset everything for that person If they make it an option i wont mind, i will be in the majority which will keep what they have so far and not get an AUR refund
It doesn't matter if it is a minority or a majority. CCP either is, or is not, contractually obligated by the terms of the purchase agreement. The reason they haven't stepped up and cleared this whole mess up is because they are most likely working out the legal ramifications of options such as this, realize how it won't hold up in court to do so, and are trying to find a compromise (a clearly difficult task as all the forum warrior'ing shows).
|
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
199
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:02:00 -
[20] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause. Arguably. Would a court rule in favor of CCP if they took that approach? Nope, as they would be resetting the SP of only the people that bought the merc packs and asked for what they paid for. It would be viewed as punishing the consumer for daring to expect what they paid for. Further, as stated, it is in no way a FAIR option as you attempted to argue. What needs to happen is that everyone should be reset but people would QQ and go play Mario Kart instead of DUST (or at least threaten to). This is not a viable option, and your arguing for it has lost a good deal of respect from me (not that I expect you to care). CCP screwed the pooch and now the players are at each others throats. Typical. I even try to s[peak in terms of compromise and your stance is reset anyone foolish enough to expect what they paid for. I hate the entire legal process, but I would gladly spend my off hours in court if this is the 'solution'. I'm tired of corporations screwing over their paying customers and if CCP takes this approach that is exactly what they are doing. 1: Your first para is total BS, for two reasons. Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally binding document before signing it ). Secondly, even if CCP is legally obligated to give you your stuff back, they still have the legal right to destroy your existing stuff first, again, gotta love that EULA.
2: If you want to spend hours in court arguing of $20 of virtual stuff, I really hope you live in England, because of EULA (again).
3: Resetting the accounts of people who don't give a damn about your virtual stuff is the opposite of fair, as is giving you the advantage said stuff gives you for free. The only fair way to give you your second batch of stuff is to remove the benefit given by the first. Deal with it. |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
219
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others. And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE. Ryder is right Its the minority which want the AUR reset If you want AUR reset then reset everything for that person If they make it an option i wont mind, i will be in the majority which will keep what they have so far and not get an AUR refund It doesn't matter if it is a minority or a majority. CCP either is, or is not, contractually obligated by the terms of the purchase agreement. The reason they haven't stepped up and cleared this whole mess up is because they are most likely working out the legal ramifications of options such as this, realize how it won't hold up in court to do so, and are trying to find a compromise (a clearly difficult task as all the forum warrior'ing shows).
They could swap whats in the merc packs for 100 golden dildos if they wished and we couldnt do a thing about it
The best option is to let them either a) take the AUR but everything they had gets refunded or b) carry on as normal |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon Plus
63
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Thus resetting the character WILL honor the clause. Arguably. Would a court rule in favor of CCP if they took that approach? Nope, as they would be resetting the SP of only the people that bought the merc packs and asked for what they paid for. It would be viewed as punishing the consumer for daring to expect what they paid for. Further, as stated, it is in no way a FAIR option as you attempted to argue. What needs to happen is that everyone should be reset but people would QQ and go play Mario Kart instead of DUST (or at least threaten to). This is not a viable option, and your arguing for it has lost a good deal of respect from me (not that I expect you to care). CCP screwed the pooch and now the players are at each others throats. Typical. I even try to s[peak in terms of compromise and your stance is reset anyone foolish enough to expect what they paid for. I hate the entire legal process, but I would gladly spend my off hours in court if this is the 'solution'. I'm tired of corporations screwing over their paying customers and if CCP takes this approach that is exactly what they are doing.
If you're going to internet lawyer, you might want to note that you legally agreed not to take CCP to court. |
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
241
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally binding document before signing it ). Secondly, even if CCP is legally obligated to give you your stuff back, they still have the legal right to destroy your existing stuff first, again, gotta love that EULA.
CCP agreed to a purchase agreement that stated the merc pack would be refunded upon commercial release.. However, yes, they could delete anyone's character,.
EULAs attempt to argue you have no rights to any of the 'virtual' property, but plenty of EULA's have had clauses proven unenforceable and voidable in court. The entire virtual property concept is relatively new and its legal implications are still being determined. Would it hold up in court? The at times obnoxious thing about the legal system in many places today is that i the end result is not always what it could or should logically be, especially when dealing with such novel concepts as virtual property with real world value.
Regardless, the damage CCP would do to their image as a corporation that can be trusted and deserve to be supported would not be insignificant if they took the approach you suggest. They would be walking the same path as EA, now synonomous with bad customer service, horrible incomplete games, and screwing over their customer base.
Unlike EA, CCP has a solid reputation that they should and likely will seek to maintain. Deleting characters of paying customers simply for expecting what they paid for would do as much, if not more damage, than any court case. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing these points in the forums except CCP has shown they can sometimes consider all the QQ in these forums far too much and if more sane, less idiotic viewpoints aren't offered then all CCP sees is the idiocy many spew herein. |
Rynoceros
One-Armed Bandits Atrocitas
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:38:00 -
[24] - Quote
If you bought anything at GameStop, you deserve nothing.
What you need is a map, a clue, and the internet. |
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
199
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 17:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally binding document before signing it ). Secondly, even if CCP is legally obligated to give you your stuff back, they still have the legal right to destroy your existing stuff first, again, gotta love that EULA. CCP agreed to a purchase agreement that stated the merc pack would be refunded upon commercial release.. However, yes, they could delete anyone's character,. EULAs attempt to argue you have no rights to any of the 'virtual' property, but plenty of EULA's have had clauses proven unenforceable and voidable in court. The entire virtual property concept is relatively new and its legal implications are still being determined. Would it hold up in court? The at times obnoxious thing about the legal system in many places today is that i the end result is not always what it could or should logically be, especially when dealing with such novel concepts as virtual property with real world value. Regardless, the damage CCP would do to their image as a corporation that can be trusted and deserve to be supported would not be insignificant if they took the approach you suggest. They would be walking the same path as EA, now synonomous with bad customer service, horrible incomplete games, and screwing over their customer base. Unlike EA, CCP has a solid reputation that they should and likely will seek to maintain. Deleting characters of paying customers simply for expecting what they paid for would do as much, if not more damage, than any court case. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing these points in the forums except CCP has shown they can sometimes consider all the QQ in these forums far too much and if more sane, less idiotic viewpoints aren't offered then all CCP sees is the idiocy many spew herein. Putting any legal stuff aside for now, you seem to have conveniently skipped over the part where you you have no Moral right to demand a second, free, merc pack. Basically YOU HAVE ALREADY GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR - YOU PAID FOR A MERC PACK (or whatever) AND YOU GOT A MERC PACK, UNLESS CCP DOES SOMETHING TO REMOVE SAID MERC PACK, YOU SHOULD NOT GET ANOTHER. Caps lock used in an attempt to make it sink in, but alas, some people are simply immune to logic. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1128
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 19:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. You argue for fairness, yet you want CCP to give you and a few other players free stuff you don't deserve. Interesting, I guess some players are more equal than others. And FYI, the optional reset for refund proposal is the fairest deal in the table - for EVERYONE.
It's not "free stuff" if you paid $20 for it. How is this difficult to understand?
I bought a Merc Pack under the specific agreement that I would get all that stuff back at Commercial Release. That's WHAT WE PAID FOR.
Requiring a reset to actually get the stuff you bought is akin to RANSOM. "Yeah, you've already paid for this... but if you actually want to receive it, you have to take a reset". How is that in any way "fair", and how specifically, is it "unfair" to get the rest of the stuff we paid for in the Merc Pack? Who is it "unfair" for? Other players? If that's the case, take it up with CCP, they are the ones that SOLD the thing, we just BOUGHT it. Don't punish the people who bought Merc Packs just because you think CCP sold an "unfair" items, that's ridiculous.
Anyhow, it doesn't matter, looks like CCP agrees with... well, themselves. They have stated that they have a reimbursement program that they will reveal at a later date, I assume they intend to honor the "or items of equal value" part of the agreement. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1128
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 19:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally binding document before signing it ). Secondly, even if CCP is legally obligated to give you your stuff back, they still have the legal right to destroy your existing stuff first, again, gotta love that EULA. CCP agreed to a purchase agreement that stated the merc pack would be refunded upon commercial release.. However, yes, they could delete anyone's character,. EULAs attempt to argue you have no rights to any of the 'virtual' property, but plenty of EULA's have had clauses proven unenforceable and voidable in court. The entire virtual property concept is relatively new and its legal implications are still being determined. Would it hold up in court? The at times obnoxious thing about the legal system in many places today is that i the end result is not always what it could or should logically be, especially when dealing with such novel concepts as virtual property with real world value. Regardless, the damage CCP would do to their image as a corporation that can be trusted and deserve to be supported would not be insignificant if they took the approach you suggest. They would be walking the same path as EA, now synonomous with bad customer service, horrible incomplete games, and screwing over their customer base. Unlike EA, CCP has a solid reputation that they should and likely will seek to maintain. Deleting characters of paying customers simply for expecting what they paid for would do as much, if not more damage, than any court case. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing these points in the forums except CCP has shown they can sometimes consider all the QQ in these forums far too much and if more sane, less idiotic viewpoints aren't offered then all CCP sees is the idiocy many spew herein. Putting any legal stuff aside for now, you seem to have conveniently skipped over the part where you you have no Moral right to demand a second, free, merc pack. Basically YOU HAVE ALREADY GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR - YOU PAID FOR A MERC PACK (or whatever) AND YOU GOT A MERC PACK, UNLESS CCP DOES SOMETHING TO REMOVE SAID MERC PACK, YOU SHOULD NOT GET ANOTHER. Caps lock used in an attempt to make it sink in, but alas, some people are simply immune to logic.
It's not a "ANOTHER merc pack" it's all part of the one they sold. We still haven't received all of the items sold in the merc pack, because the rest of it comes at commercial release. |
Plastic-Jesus
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 23:02:00 -
[28] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:[quote=Ryder Azorria][quote=JL3Eleven]
I bought a Merc Pack under the specific agreement that I would get all that stuff back at Commercial Release. That's WHAT WE PAID FOR.
With the assumption that there would be a reset at Commercial Release.
|
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2363
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 23:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
So those who purchased it get reset and are behind the sp curve? The ones who supported the game in beta?
That doesn't seem like a reasonable solution. Its just saying the opposite of what some are saying, that want a full refund and keep their SP. And truthfully this is what they most likely will have to do or reset everybody. Their can't be a punishment to a group that want their contract with merc pack to be upheld. Its all or none. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1130
|
Posted - 2013.04.15 23:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Plastic-Jesus wrote:Baal Roo wrote:[quote=Ryder Azorria][quote=JL3Eleven]
I bought a Merc Pack under the specific agreement that I would get all that stuff back at Commercial Release. That's WHAT WE PAID FOR. With the assumption that there would be a reset at Commercial Release.
I made no such assumption, don't punish me for CCP's mistakes. |
|
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1994
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 00:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
My god. I leave this thread alone for just half a day and this is what I see when I get back? I thought I told all of you folks to keep your flames to a minimum. This thread was a recommendation on what CCP should do in regards to this issue.
My recommendation was not in any way shape or form based on biased speculation. It is directly based on the literal interpretations of the merc pack descriptions in question.
I am one of those players who don't care about receiving anything in return, but I am also the kind of person who doesn't want to infringe on the rights of other players as consumers.
That said, I want to make it absolutely clear to everyone here that nowhere in the description did it state that a reset must occur on refunding for commercial release. The reset part of CCP's obligation has already been satisfied on multiple occasions. All that remains to be met is the commercial release part. CCP had already made it clear that we are not in commercial release and they have retracted any statement about May 6 being the commercial release as well. At least they said not yet.
Also, it is not fair to hold a buyer's earnings (in this case their SP) hostage because the customer did not agree to such a term and CCP had already made it clear there will be no such resets in a way that brings them back to being a brand new character. Again, the merc pack description mentions no such thing for commercial release.
Again, I'm ok with not getting a refund and CCP go ahead and put a note on their bulletin board saying "Maken doesn't want a refund" for all I care. But I do care about the rights of others as consumers who have been given a certain level of expectation by CCP to not have their SP completely reset in addition to getting the final refund for commercial release.
This is not me being greedy. This is me defending the rights of others. I thought about this carefully for the past week or so and this is the only logical conclusion I came up with based on the literal interpretation of the merc pack description as well as official statements posted by CCP. |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
149
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 00:45:00 -
[32] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
I paid my money and you probably did not. Now you are trying to take away from me what's mine and call it fair? |
Tidaen
Nova Corps Marines
36
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 00:55:00 -
[33] - Quote
Agreed with the OP. The 'refund clause' in the merc pack was included to assure players that their purchase would be safe in the event of a reset including the one originally planned for commercial release. Then CCP decided to give the playerbase a big gift and declared that no SP would be reset on release day.
In my way of thinking, CCP's decision to let us keep our SP was a nice action that I will respond to with gratitude and happily release them from their agreement to refund the merc pack upon launch.
For those people who want CCP to refund their merc packs, I will say that you purchased that merc pack at a time when a launch day reset was expected. If you expect CCP to refund your merc pack, then you should also accept the character reset which the 'refund clause' was intended to PROTECT YOU against.
How about this? Why not turn around the idea laid out in the original post. Upon release, have players opt in to waive their refund in return for avoiding a character reset. This way CCP is honoring their original agreement by default but allowing people to keep their characters if they agree to a modified terms of service.
|
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1994
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tidaen wrote:Agreed with the OP. The 'refund clause' in the merc pack was included to assure players that their purchase would be safe in the event of a reset including the one originally planned for commercial release. Then CCP decided to give the playerbase a big gift and declared that no SP would be reset on release day.
In my way of thinking, CCP's decision to let us keep our SP was a nice action that I will respond to with gratitude and happily release them from their agreement to refund the merc pack upon launch.
For those people who want CCP to refund their merc packs, I will say that you purchased that merc pack at a time when a launch day reset was expected. If you expect CCP to refund your merc pack, then you should also accept the character reset which the 'refund clause' was intended to PROTECT YOU against.
How about this? Why not turn around the idea laid out in the original post. Upon release, have players opt in to waive their refund in return for avoiding a character reset. This way CCP is honoring their original agreement by default but allowing people to keep their characters if they agree to a modified terms of service.
No, that is not what I meant. Did you even read my OP in detail? There was no mention anywhere in the merc pack that CCP would originally reset your SP in the event of commercial release. Commercial release and reset are two separate things that are mutually exclusive as worded by the merc pack during closed beta.
Don't twist my words. Where are people getting this idea that a reset was intended for commercial release? |
blue gt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:24:00 -
[35] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level.
don't care about level I care about double dipping, If this really is about keeping CCP honest or consumer rights then you would accept the refund with reset. if its about anything else....... |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1132
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:26:00 -
[36] - Quote
blue gt wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. don't care about level I care about double dipping, If this really is about keeping CCP honest or consumer rights then you would accept the refund with reset. if its about anything else.......
Just cuz?
Seriously, why would we want to get unfairly reset just to receive the stuff we bought? I don't understand your "logic". |
Tidaen
Nova Corps Marines
38
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Tidaen wrote:Agreed with the OP. The 'refund clause' in the merc pack was included to assure players that their purchase would be safe in the event of a reset including the one originally planned for commercial release. Then CCP decided to give the playerbase a big gift and declared that no SP would be reset on release day.
In my way of thinking, CCP's decision to let us keep our SP was a nice action that I will respond to with gratitude and happily release them from their agreement to refund the merc pack upon launch.
For those people who want CCP to refund their merc packs, I will say that you purchased that merc pack at a time when a launch day reset was expected. If you expect CCP to refund your merc pack, then you should also accept the character reset which the 'refund clause' was intended to PROTECT YOU against.
How about this? Why not turn around the idea laid out in the original post. Upon release, have players opt in to waive their refund in return for avoiding a character reset. This way CCP is honoring their original agreement by default but allowing people to keep their characters if they agree to a modified terms of service.
No, that is not what I meant. Did you even read my OP in detail? There was no mention anywhere in the merc pack that CCP would originally reset your SP in the event of commercial release. Commercial release and reset are two separate things that are mutually exclusive as worded by the merc pack during closed beta. Don't twist my words. Where are people getting this idea that a reset was intended for commercial release?
Apologies, no word twisting was intended. I did indeed read your original post and re-read it again just now. I was under the impression that their would be a character reset upon release until CCP announced that their wouldn't be. This is what I thought the purpose of the 'commercial release' refund was for.
|
blue gt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Tidaen wrote:Agreed with the OP. The 'refund clause' in the merc pack was included to assure players that their purchase would be safe in the event of a reset including the one originally planned for commercial release. Then CCP decided to give the playerbase a big gift and declared that no SP would be reset on release day.
In my way of thinking, CCP's decision to let us keep our SP was a nice action that I will respond to with gratitude and happily release them from their agreement to refund the merc pack upon launch.
For those people who want CCP to refund their merc packs, I will say that you purchased that merc pack at a time when a launch day reset was expected. If you expect CCP to refund your merc pack, then you should also accept the character reset which the 'refund clause' was intended to PROTECT YOU against.
How about this? Why not turn around the idea laid out in the original post. Upon release, have players opt in to waive their refund in return for avoiding a character reset. This way CCP is honoring their original agreement by default but allowing people to keep their characters if they agree to a modified terms of service.
No, that is not what I meant. Did you even read my OP in detail? There was no mention anywhere in the merc pack that CCP would originally reset your SP in the event of commercial release. Commercial release and reset are two separate things that are mutually exclusive as worded by the merc pack during closed beta. Don't twist my words. Where are people getting this idea that a reset was intended for commercial release?
for as long as I can remember that was the understanding of the entire community before CCP said no more resets. In fact their are entire threads requesting that we should get some sort of benefit upon release as beta testers.
and +1 tidaen. |
blue gt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:33:00 -
[39] - Quote
actualy this whole mind set that we should be anything but grateful(or afraid that it will kill the game) that there will not be resets, happened only after people found a nice little loophole in the mercpack wording. thats when this became hostile. |
HowDidThatTaste
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
2366
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:41:00 -
[40] - Quote
What's the real problem with just honoring the merc pack and giving those who bought them and supported this game with real money. The terms of the agreement?
Everyone wants to punish those who purchased merc packs by resetting only those characters, when in reality they just took advantage of sale, that you get to use twice?
So what if they get extra boosters, they took advantage of a sale.
Maybe everyone would be happy if for one week they offered merc pacs for sale that would also be refunded at commercial release. Allowing everyone to get in on the deal. Announce it for a month so people can save up then everyone you purchase for that time frame is essentially doubled like the original ones.
Everyone wins and ccp makes money. Basically a two for one sale. |
|
blue gt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:blue gt wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. don't care about level I care about double dipping, If this really is about keeping CCP honest or consumer rights then you would accept the refund with reset. if its about anything else....... Just cuz? Seriously, why would we want to get unfairly reset just to receive the stuff we bought? I don't understand your "logic". Will this be your position on any offer CCP puts up that you think is "unfair". "Sure, you can buy an Armored Pack, but you only get half the tanks unless you take a reset. Which isn't mentioned until after you buy it." wouldn't want to be "unfair" or "double dip" amirite?
you did receive the stuff you bought and you spent it, every thing you did with that gear will have a consequence in the release you would have gotten twice the gear and twice the benefit with out a reset.
This stupid belief that the wording meant anything other the a release day reset only came about when ccp said that was not the case.
this is my point no one would accept these terms, the only reasonable ones, unless they were truly being altruistic and not trying to double dip and in the case of the latter YOU CAN GO **** YOUR SELF!
you know what **** it CCP tell these guys they can have their refund and reset every one ****** IF I CARE I would rather have that then a victory for these **** gobbling self righteous/serving ass hats that would abuse technicalities just because they can. just give me a way to op out of that refund. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1999
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:49:00 -
[42] - Quote
@blue and Tidaen
From what you describe, this seems like a community-fostered understanding. Has this been clearly confirmed (as in written in stone aka link) by CCP in the past?
Pardon me for asking. I have been around since replication but even veterans can have difficulty remembering that far back for something like this. |
XeroTheBigBoss
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz Noir. Mercenary Group
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 01:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
Please lock these threads... It isn't commercial release yet so why everybody is trying to come up with solutions and demands right now is irrelevant making these kind of posts INVALID.
THE END. |
blue gt
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 03:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ryder Azorria wrote:Illuminaughty-696 wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:Firstly you have questionable legal grounds at best for demanding a refund, gotta love that EULA (you signed away your consumer rights with regards to in game items and currency - in case you forgot to read the legally binding document before signing it ). Secondly, even if CCP is legally obligated to give you your stuff back, they still have the legal right to destroy your existing stuff first, again, gotta love that EULA. CCP agreed to a purchase agreement that stated the merc pack would be refunded upon commercial release.. However, yes, they could delete anyone's character,. EULAs attempt to argue you have no rights to any of the 'virtual' property, but plenty of EULA's have had clauses proven unenforceable and voidable in court. The entire virtual property concept is relatively new and its legal implications are still being determined. Would it hold up in court? The at times obnoxious thing about the legal system in many places today is that i the end result is not always what it could or should logically be, especially when dealing with such novel concepts as virtual property with real world value. Regardless, the damage CCP would do to their image as a corporation that can be trusted and deserve to be supported would not be insignificant if they took the approach you suggest. They would be walking the same path as EA, now synonomous with bad customer service, horrible incomplete games, and screwing over their customer base. Unlike EA, CCP has a solid reputation that they should and likely will seek to maintain. Deleting characters of paying customers simply for expecting what they paid for would do as much, if not more damage, than any court case. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing these points in the forums except CCP has shown they can sometimes consider all the QQ in these forums far too much and if more sane, less idiotic viewpoints aren't offered then all CCP sees is the idiocy many spew herein. Putting any legal stuff aside for now, you seem to have conveniently skipped over the part where you you have no Moral right to demand a second, free, merc pack. Basically YOU HAVE ALREADY GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR - YOU PAID FOR A MERC PACK (or whatever) AND YOU GOT A MERC PACK, UNLESS CCP DOES SOMETHING TO REMOVE SAID MERC PACK, YOU SHOULD NOT GET ANOTHER. Caps lock used in an attempt to make it sink in, but alas, some people are simply immune to logic.
oh god now youve done it brought morality and ethics into it, but it is a good point, it is ethically unsound far more so then CCP not refunding the packs on release, in fact one could say it would be more unethical for CCP to refund the packs then to not, as they would be giving a advantage to closed beta testers over open beta testers.
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
2597
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 03:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair.
I don't think they should have a full SP reset, they should just lose all SP gained through boosters. |
Drud Green
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 04:12:00 -
[46] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I say reset the characters that want the 're-issue' of the item. Its the only true way to be fair. I don't think they should have a full SP reset, they should just lose all SP gained through boosters.
How long has New Eden cared about fairness? Htfu
|
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1141
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 04:26:00 -
[47] - Quote
HowDidThatTaste wrote:What's the real problem with just honoring the merc pack and giving those who bought them and supported this game with real money. The terms of the agreement?
Everyone wants to punish those who purchased merc packs by resetting only those characters, when in reality they just took advantage of sale, that you get to use twice?
So what if they get extra boosters, they took advantage of a sale.
Maybe everyone would be happy if for one week they offered merc pacs for sale that would also be refunded at commercial release. Allowing everyone to get in on the deal. Announce it for a month so people can save up then everyone you purchase for that time frame is essentially doubled like the original ones.
Everyone wins and ccp makes money. Basically a two for one sale.
This is a great idea honestly.
I just don't understand what everyone's problem is with the Merc Pack refund. They keep making all of these arguments, but I can't make heads or tails of their reasoning, logic, or motivations. It just seems like misplaced anger.
I didn't make the Merc Pack or put it up for sale, I just bought the thing. It's not my fault CCP changed their plans. Just because THEY change what they are doing, doesn't mean I shouldn't get what I purchased anymore (or at least something of equal value).
I see people saying that the assumption was that there would be a reset at commercial release. I don't know about you, but I don't make purchased based off of unspoken assumptions. This situation is a perfect example of WHY.
I bought a Merc Pack under the specific terms that I would receive a refund of all items used during the beta at Commercial Release. That's what I was sold.
When they made the announcement about "no more SP resets", again, a bunch of people made assumptions. Nowhere did CCP say anything about the Merc Pack terms changing. Not once. They still haven't said anything about it, at least, not really. I continued to operate under the written agreement I had with CCP, that I could use all of those items and that Aurum during the beta, and it would be refunded at release. Again, they never said otherwise, and they had put it in writing. Why would I assume anything had changed?
Just cuz. Cuz some forum warrior has a theory.
It's absolutely ridiculous. The irony of these people with their juvenile arguments calling ME the child is telling of the quality of minds that frequent these boards. Ever wonder why it's always the same 15 or 20 clowns posting (myself included most of the time)? It's because all anyone here does is troll each other.
But this is a situation in which we get to see what CCP are actually made of. Whether they can follow through with anything. The endless empty promises and pipe dreams about SOON are amusing when it's all about the F2P stuff, but this is real people money. This is the part where we figure out if we should trust them with our actual money. |
Tidaen
Nova Corps Marines
39
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 04:57:00 -
[48] - Quote
Honestly, I have no problem with CCP giving out free merc packs to those who were fortunate to purchase one early on the game. However if this comes at the cost of a mandatory character reset for everyone on launch day, then I would very much like to see some other sort of solution be proposed so as to prevent this. My arguments are not based on any malice towards those who expect CCP to re-issue the merc pack. I've just realized that I have been rather swept away by all this forum rage without actually seeing any source material from CCP. How much of this debate is based upon speculation and how much is based upon actual comments made from CCP employees? If we are all just shouting in the dark at each other, perhaps it would be a better usage of time to request clarification from CCP and give them time to formulate a sane response. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2000
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 05:36:00 -
[49] - Quote
Tidaen wrote:Honestly, I have no problem with CCP giving out free merc packs to those who were fortunate to purchase one early on the game. However if this comes at the cost of a mandatory character reset for everyone on launch day, then I would very much like to see some other sort of solution be proposed so as to prevent this. My arguments are not based on any malice towards those who expect CCP to re-issue the merc pack. I've just realized that I have been rather swept away by all this forum rage without actually seeing any source material from CCP. How much of this debate is based upon speculation and how much is based upon actual comments made from CCP employees? If we are all just shouting in the dark at each other, perhaps it would be a better usage of time to request clarification from CCP and give them time to formulate a sane response.
That is another point I'm trying to make in my original post.
Too many assumptions with too little hard evidence. It's like we're inventing evidence out of thin air here and that is what I believe to be the source of all of this endless debate, thread after endless thread. I believe it is high time that CCP start coming out of the shadows and speak up for once on this. We need an official statement on this right now as this is getting way out of control and not a day goes by now that I don't see new refund threads popping up.
CCP, where is that dev blog/announcement you promised us that addresses this? Those details better be worth the wait and needlessly spent aspirin. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1144
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 08:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here Maken.
There's basically 10 or 20 dudes shooting the **** about this here, on a message board that basically no one uses. To pretend like it's some sort of massive movement, or huge monkey wrench in CCPs plans is laughable at best. |
|
Three Double-A Batteries
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 09:54:00 -
[51] - Quote
Why are you guys making this hard for yourselves?
Just wait for the decision CCP may eventually make - i.e. this heap of crap may never get out of beta.
If they do make one and you don't think it is accordance with the T&Cs then just do a credit card charge back.
No need for elaborate plans or choices.
|
Illuminaughty-696
Omega Risk Control Services
251
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 14:37:00 -
[52] - Quote
blue gt wrote:Ryder Azorria wrote:[quote=Ryder Azorria]Putting any legal stuff aside for now, you seem to have conveniently skipped over the part where you you have no Moral right to demand a second, free, merc pack. Basically YOU HAVE ALREADY GOT WHAT YOU PAID FOR - YOU PAID FOR A MERC PACK (or whatever) AND YOU GOT A MERC PACK, UNLESS CCP DOES SOMETHING TO REMOVE SAID MERC PACK, YOU SHOULD NOT GET ANOTHER. Caps lock used in an attempt to make it sink in, but alas, some people are simply immune to logic. oh god now youve done it brought morality and ethics into it, but it is a good point, it is ethically unsound far more so then CCP not refunding the packs on release, in fact one could say it would be more unethical for CCP to refund the packs then to not, as they would be giving a advantage to closed beta testers over open beta testers.
The fact that some of you actually believe consumers have no moral right to what they paid for is unbelievable. We paid for a merc pack that would be refunded on every reset AND commercial release. Simple. But clearly you don't get that.
I'm no longer going to try to convince you how wrong you are. Your view of reality is clearly far too gone for any words to change it. Again, CCP screwed up here, but that's not the fault of the players who bought the packs. This CCP White Knight Syndrome is ridiculous. You're beginning to sound like fanatics (the root word of fan interestingly).
As far as logic goes, try sitting on the ground and observing the sun and how the earth moves in relation to it. Your observations would make it appear the sun is moving around the earth, not the other way around. It's called a logical fallacy, much like your so-called logic here, except I'll call it what it really is, logic fail. But you are right, though. Some people are indeed immume to logic and common sense. Thanks for proving both.
P.S.
Yeah, the troll in me came back and had to respond. Meh. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2517
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
Three Double-A Batteries wrote:Why are you guys making this hard for yourselves?
Just wait for the decision CCP may eventually make - i.e. this heap of crap may never get out of beta.
If they do make one and you don't think it is accordance with the T&Cs then just do a credit card charge back.
No need for elaborate plans or choices. Depending on bank, there's a maximum of 2 months from date of purchase to initiate a chargeback. Sometimes as little as 30 days.
Think we'll have hit commercial release and seen what happened within 2 months of a Merc Pack purchase that was made almost a year ago?
Didn't think so.
In saying this, any debate we have here is purely intellectual, since we don't know what CCP are planning. Until we do, no progress can actually be made. All these threads are achieving nothing more than simply keeping the problem visible. While that alone is worthwhile, I don't think any of us should assume that our particular viewpoint is (or deserves to be) more valid than the rest.
So the "wait and see" part of the above quoted post is really the best advice. (even if I'm going to keep posting my personal opinion regardless) |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
can we move these to the requests and issues page? maybe a moderator can get involved and move all these threads? |
Kamiya Musume
Suffer Inc.
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:25:00 -
[55] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:As far as logic goes, try sitting on the ground and observing the sun and how the earth moves in relation to it. Your observations would make it appear the sun is moving around the earth, not the other way around. It's called a logical fallacy, much like your so-called logic here, except I'll call it what it really is, logic fail. But you are right, though. Some people are indeed immume to logic and common sense. Thanks for proving both.
P.S.
Yeah, the troll in me came back and had to respond. Meh.
Unfortunately, sitting on the ground observing the passage of the Sun could also lead you to the conclusion that BOTH ARE STATIONARY AND THE EARTH MERELY SPINS ON IT'S AXIS.
talk about logic fail. *smh |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2517
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 15:57:00 -
[56] - Quote
Illuminaughty-696 wrote:The fact that some of you actually believe consumers have no moral right to what they paid for is unbelievable. We paid for a merc pack that would be refunded on every reset AND commercial release. Simple. But clearly you don't get that.
I'm no longer going to try to convince you how wrong you are. Your view of reality is clearly far too gone for any words to change it. Again, CCP screwed up here, but that's not the fault of the players who bought the packs. This CCP White Knight Syndrome is ridiculous. You're beginning to sound like fanatics (the root word of fan interestingly). As a fan of DUST, I have to say I'm offended by the way I'm being lumped in with the people who are claiming there's a valid argument against the Merc Pack credits.
I don't support the people saying they get "a second Merc Pack free" on release - the terms were a "full credit" of the contents of the Pack, which is slightly different.
To re-use (as I have previously) the "Golden Gun" example that was used earlier, there are two possibilities:
1. A "golden gun" BPO - if you still have it, you don't get a second one. You can only be eligible for a credit on something you spent, not on something you still have. If you deleted it, when release hits, you get a replacement.
2. A "golden gun" BPC - if you still have it, you don't get a second one. Same reasoning as fort he BPO. There's a much better chance in this case of the player in question no longer having their BPC, however, since it wil be destroyed if you die using it.
Using the HK4M Shotgun as an example, that's a 50-item limited run set of Shotguns with good stats and no skill prerequisites. They're awesome, but we all know that you only get the 50 you bought, and when they're gone, the only way to get more is from another Merc Pack. EXCEPT that we've also been told in clear and unambiguous terms that, if we bought our Merc Pack under the old (or Gamestop's) conditions, we're eligible for them to be credited back to our accounts on commercial release. Not "at every reset including the one at commercial release", but "every character reset AND for commercial release" - if that implies anything, it implies that there WON'T be a reset on release, except for the contents of the Merc Pack.
If you know that using the item means you don't get it back ever under any circumstances if you die, many players WON'T be using those items. People who bought the Merc Pack after the change in terms, this includes you. If you know that no matter what happens, on the game's official release day there will be 50 HK4Ms in your name, it won't matter that you managed to burn through them all trying to kill a competent Sagaris driver with your Shotgun Scout. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2004
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 19:16:00 -
[57] - Quote
Overall, this conversation has led me to believe that the fairest thing for CCP to do in terms of appeasing both sides of the debate and as well as following the literal interpretations of the merc pack descriptions is to simply allow players to choose whether or not they want a refund via an in game message.
PLEASE KEEP IN MIND...
That choosing either option will not result in a complete reset because the descriptions in closed beta and in Gamestop made no mention whatsoever of a reset needed upon commercial release.
Also, the option should only effect purchases of the merc packs made during closed beta and, if possible to track, those bought under terms mentioned by Gamestop.
I remember bringing up the possibility of any negative impact on the economy of DUST as a result of this in a previous (but now locked) thread. However that post was made under the assumption that the DUST economy will open up in the next build. But since CCP now confirmed that the economy will remain closed for the next build, the possibility of a negative impact is gone.
One more thing to point out.
Many of you appear to believe that the original terms were understood to include a reset upon commercial release even though the original terms made no such mention. This understanding appears to be community-fostered and so far I don't see anyone posting from CCP with an official declaration of such a thing. Therefore this understanding will have to be regarded as just another assumption. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2535
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 19:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Many of you appear to believe that the original terms were understood to include a reset upon commercial release even though the original terms made no such mention. This understanding appears to be community-fostered and so far I don't see anyone posting from CCP with an official declaration of such a thing. Therefore this understanding will have to be regarded as just another assumption. These terms?
http://www.dust411.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MercPackTerms.jpg
I'm pretty sure that states pretty clearly that the Merc Pack contents will be credited back on commercial release. It doesn't state they'll be credited back exactly as they are in their current state, but that CCP can "substitute items of similar value" if they choose.
As always though, waiting on official word from CCP... |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2005
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 20:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Many of you appear to believe that the original terms were understood to include a reset upon commercial release even though the original terms made no such mention. This understanding appears to be community-fostered and so far I don't see anyone posting from CCP with an official declaration of such a thing. Therefore this understanding will have to be regarded as just another assumption. These terms? http://www.dust411.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MercPackTerms.jpgI'm pretty sure that states pretty clearly that the Merc Pack contents will be credited back on commercial release. It doesn't state they'll be credited back exactly as they are in their current state, but that CCP can "substitute items of similar value" if they choose. As always though, waiting on official word from CCP...
I was referring to the kind of reset that results in your character getting set back to zero. The credit of the merc pack contents (or equivalent thereof) is something I already know about. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2538
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 20:27:00 -
[60] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Many of you appear to believe that the original terms were understood to include a reset upon commercial release even though the original terms made no such mention. This understanding appears to be community-fostered and so far I don't see anyone posting from CCP with an official declaration of such a thing. Therefore this understanding will have to be regarded as just another assumption. These terms? http://www.dust411.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MercPackTerms.jpgI'm pretty sure that states pretty clearly that the Merc Pack contents will be credited back on commercial release. It doesn't state they'll be credited back exactly as they are in their current state, but that CCP can "substitute items of similar value" if they choose. As always though, waiting on official word from CCP... I was referring to the kind of reset that results in your character getting set back to zero. The credit of the merc pack contents (or equivalent thereof) is something I already know about. That has the full terms which actually imply the exact opposite of a reset at release. The terms "character reset" and "commercial release" are listed separately as conditions for the same thing, making it obvious that there isn't a correlation between the two. |
|
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2008
|
Posted - 2013.04.16 20:35:00 -
[61] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Many of you appear to believe that the original terms were understood to include a reset upon commercial release even though the original terms made no such mention. This understanding appears to be community-fostered and so far I don't see anyone posting from CCP with an official declaration of such a thing. Therefore this understanding will have to be regarded as just another assumption. These terms? http://www.dust411.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MercPackTerms.jpgI'm pretty sure that states pretty clearly that the Merc Pack contents will be credited back on commercial release. It doesn't state they'll be credited back exactly as they are in their current state, but that CCP can "substitute items of similar value" if they choose. As always though, waiting on official word from CCP... I was referring to the kind of reset that results in your character getting set back to zero. The credit of the merc pack contents (or equivalent thereof) is something I already know about. That has the full terms which actually imply the exact opposite of a reset at release. The terms "character reset" and "commercial release" are listed separately as conditions for the same thing, making it obvious that there isn't a correlation between the two.
That's exactly what I was trying to point out to everyone.
As an equivalent value in regards to the boosters, CCP can legally substitute the boosters with limited run copies of weapons that are of similar aurum value (in total) so as to mitigate the fear of players getting too much SP out of the deal in question. After all, CCP did say they can give substitutes. They just didn't mention what those substitutes are.
Edit
Or will limited run tanks do as an alternative? |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2010
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 00:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Let's just hope CCP puts out an official announcement on this discussion sooner rather soonGäó. |
mollerz
s1ck3r Corp
136
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 03:05:00 -
[63] - Quote
It comes down to- is time worth more or a nominal amount of money?
In my mind, time is infinitely more valuable.
Keep the SP. |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2010
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 04:57:00 -
[64] - Quote
mollerz wrote:It comes down to- is time worth more or a nominal amount of money?
In my mind, time is infinitely more valuable.
Keep the SP.
You can never put a price on time even though businessmen see it as money. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2544
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 07:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Or will limited run tanks do as an alternative? That would be hilarious.
"Alright, Merc Pack people, we're reimbursing you with the appropriate number of our new AUR Prototype tank. You need to train up to at least Advanced level, and they have a Hybrid turret, a Missile turret and a Laser turret, each of which requires different skills - also trained ot advanced level. ENJOY!"
...I hope you meant no-prereq tanks (I'm sure you did), but that would be a hilarious troll by CCP. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1305
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 08:49:00 -
[66] - Quote
JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level.
Wrong ! This isnt about being leveled ! This is about a bunch of ppl wanting to expliit something and boring most players that arent interested in such petty attempt to grab back money. This aint a ccp wish.
So. If you want your money back then deal with being resetted while the rest of us stay as they are. And then grow up.
Ccp can certainly set a page to which you log in with your psn account and then click "yes me wants money back" after agreeing with dome conditions. Sets DB then use DT to reset ppl registered.
And i m pretty sure NONE of those asking for that refund would actually do it if they re alone to be resetted. |
Drud Green
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 09:06:00 -
[67] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:If you wipe one single person wipe everyone. Wanna be level then set the bar level. Wrong ! This isnt about being leveled ! This is about a bunch of ppl wanting to expliit something and boring most players that arent interested in such petty attempt to grab back money. This aint a ccp wish. So. If you want your money back then deal with being resetted while the rest of us stay as they are. And then grow up. Ccp can certainly set a page to which you log in with your psn account and then click "yes me wants money back" after agreeing with dome conditions. Sets DB then use DT to reset ppl registered. And i m pretty sure NONE of those asking for that refund would actually do it if they re alone to be resetted.
When did Ccp hire you? They didn't? So your just a troll who's a little jealous?
|
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
2012
|
Posted - 2013.04.17 15:00:00 -
[68] - Quote
@Everyone
Guys, I don't need to remind all of you that this is my thread and I don't allow anyone to flame in it. If you have a personal beef with someone, vent it out in your own thread.
Once again, everyone should remember that CCP never said anything that would amount to holding a buyer's SP hostage in exchange for a refund of the merc pack contents or of equivalent value. Such a notion is something that is community fostered with no metrics to back up such a concept. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |