| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
354
   |
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Who else has received this message in game. I literally laughed my ass off. I am now on a official AFK list.
Is there a special bar i can enter because of this. A little VIP club. What does this give me. :) |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
758
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
I didn't get one :(
Who is maintaining this official list? |
Logi Bro
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
1136
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
No fair, I haven't gotten it, you lucky bastard!  |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
lol I want into this I AFK every Wednesday. theres no reason to play if you get nearly the same if you AFK besides working on gun game which I think I have down by now or well I would hope I was decent at it. it might really hurt my feeling is im not in the AFK list. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2485
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz |
gbghg
L.O.T.I.S.
1116
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Who from? ccp? |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
758
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz
They've had ample time to discourage this and haven't done so.
Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz
lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and use them to the max. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
1061
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
OH noooo there's a list!??!!!
Curious to see if this list is published here on the forums. Pretty sure it violates the terms of use.
Threaten, harass, "stalk", abuse, slander, defame or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
^ without proof, I'm pretty sure it's slander :P
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2485
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move.
Because AFK farming isn't equally or more lame |
|
|
ChargersGirlLuvsDP
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
ladwar wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them.
FYP |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:OH noooo there's a list!??!!!
Curious to see if this list is published here on the forums. Pretty sure it violates the terms of use.
Threaten, harass, "stalk", abuse, slander, defame or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
^ without proof, I'm pretty sure it's slander :P
yup listing people on a naughty list does violates... |
Orin the Freak
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
Noir. Mercenary Group
370
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
Edit:
Lets just say, I'm not AFKing. I'm roleplaying a saboteur. |
Crash Monster
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:OH noooo there's a list!??!!!
Curious to see if this list is published here on the forums. Pretty sure it violates the terms of use.
Threaten, harass, "stalk", abuse, slander, defame or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
^ without proof, I'm pretty sure it's slander :P
I don't think it's slander to put a game identity on a list for AFKing... nor do I think game identities need to be concerned about privacy with respect to public in-game actions. |
Logi Bro
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
1136
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move. Because AFK farming isn't equally or more lame
Because taking time off from improving the game to spite players that found an exploit in their poorly designed game isn't equally or more lame. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote:ladwar wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them. FYP
exploit is just a mean way to say it, like rail tanks exploiting their range over other tanks or exploiting the use of fuse nades to throw volleges when at supply depots. it sounds bad when it really isn't when you look at it. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
758
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move. Because AFK farming isn't equally or more lame Because taking time off from improving the game to spite players that found an exploit in their poorly designed game isn't equally or more lame.
If they consider it an exploit, they've had long enough to say so.
IMO, it would be an exploit if it was a theoretically solid design with an oversight in it.
This isn't a solid design, it's a design which blatantly rewards lack of effort. That's on them. |
ChargersGirlLuvsDP
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
ladwar wrote:ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote:ladwar wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them. FYP exploit is just a mean way to say it, like rail tanks exploiting their range over other tanks or exploiting the use of fuse nades to throw volleges when at supply depots. it sounds bad when it really isn't when you look at it.
Rail tanks are working as intended, so are supply depots.
Please ignite your strawman as I would like to roast marshmallows while sniping (which sadly isn't working as intended, damn shield flash) |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
758
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:OH noooo there's a list!??!!!
Curious to see if this list is published here on the forums. Pretty sure it violates the terms of use.
Threaten, harass, "stalk", abuse, slander, defame or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others;
^ without proof, I'm pretty sure it's slander :P
I don't think it's slander to put a game identity on a list for AFKing... nor do I think game identities need to be concerned about privacy with respect to public in-game actions.
Previous lists of AFK players have been locked for being stupid. |
Sgt Kirk
SyNergy Gaming
EoN.
565
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
I'm Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection
|
|
|
Crash Monster
Ostrakon Agency
Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Quote:
Previous lists of AFK players have been locked for being stupid.
That works... |
Dr Debo Galaxy
GunFall Mobilization
Covert Intervention
306
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:57:00 -
[22] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:Who else has received this message in game. I literally laughed my ass off. I am now on a official AFK list.
Is there a special bar i can enter because of this. A little VIP club. What does this give me. :)
Was it an e-mail froma player or a message that popped up on screen from within the game?
|
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 00:58:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Logi Bro wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move. Because AFK farming isn't equally or more lame Because taking time off from improving the game to spite players that found an exploit in their poorly designed game isn't equally or more lame. If they consider it an exploit, they've had long enough to say so. IMO, it would be an exploit if it was a theoretically solid design with an oversight in it. This isn't a solid design, it's a design which blatantly rewards lack of effort. That's on them.
1+ and its been brought up on the forum plenty w/o CCP stating that's its breaking any rule(which it isn't) |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2487
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
I love how people still try to justify it to themselves, instead of just admitting how lame they are.
This game, I'm tellin' ya. |
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
759
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
They definitely don't like it. Devs have been in IRC saying very clearly "we don't like AFKing we want players to play the game" but it's their responsibility to make a game in which playing is more worthwhile than AFKing, both in terms of ISK/SP rewards and player enjoyment. |
Logi Bro
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
1136
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I love how people still try to justify it to themselves, instead of just admitting how lame they are.
This game, I'm tellin' ya.
I think the problem your having is that we aren't "justifying" it, it's perfectly fine with me, your the only one that's calling it a bad thing. If CCP starts rewarding us for playing the game MORE than just being in the game, I will stop AFKing. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations
Covert Intervention
2487
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:I think the problem your having is that we aren't "justifying" it, it's perfectly fine with me, your the only one that's calling it a bad thing. If CCP starts rewarding us for playing the game MORE than just being in the game, I will stop AFKing.
I know right, it's almost like I'd rather the game be better for everyone, instead of being selfish and just making it better for me |
Maken Tosch
OPERATIVES OF THE GOAT
1953
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
I have a problem getting on that list. I like to get on that list. But I can't because I can't stop running to my target. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
109
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote:ladwar wrote:ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote:ladwar wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update.
Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them. FYP exploit is just a mean way to say it, like rail tanks exploiting their range over other tanks or exploiting the use of fuse nades to throw volleges when at supply depots. it sounds bad when it really isn't when you look at it. Rail tanks are working as intended, so are supply depots. Please ignite your strawman as I would like to roast marshmallows while sniping (which sadly isn't working as intended, damn shield flash)
rail turrets sure... skills no and actually I was blaming the fuse nades for being OP not the supply depots. really go look up exploit no wait I'll give it to you.
1" a notable or heroic act "
2" to make productive use of "
3 ""to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage"
if your using number 3 which would make the most sense my simples of it fit just as well as AFK so you want every weapon to have the same range and damage to while your at it so someone can't exploit(2) them?
exploit is just a bad word if you think it is like any other words. |
Logi Bro
Eyniletti Rangers
Minmatar Republic
1139
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 01:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
And you are making this game better by advocating CCP to **** people who are rightfully bored of this build out of SP....? |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |