DUST Search - I Have been AFK Listed.

All Channels

General Discussions

I Have been AFK Listed.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 00:41:00 - [1] - Quote lol I want into this I AFK every Wednesday. theres no reason to play if you get nearly the same if you AFK besides working on gun game which I think I have down by now or well I would hope I was decent at it. it might really hurt my feeling is im not in the AFK list.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 00:44:00 - [2] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update. Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and use them to the max.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 00:48:00 - [3] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: OH noooo there's a list!??!!! Curious to see if this list is published here on the forums. Pretty sure it violates the terms of use. Threaten, harass, "stalk", abuse, slander, defame or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others; ^ without proof, I'm pretty sure it's slander :P yup listing people on a naughty list does violates...
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 00:52:00 - [4] - Quote ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote: ladwar wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update. Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them. FYP exploit is just a mean way to say it, like rail tanks exploiting their range over other tanks or exploiting the use of fuse nades to throw volleges when at supply depots. it sounds bad when it really isn't when you look at it.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 00:58:00 - [5] - Quote Mithridates VI wrote: Logi Bro wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Mithridates VI wrote: Retribution at this stage would be a really lame move. Because AFK farming isn't equally or more lame Because taking time off from improving the game to spite players that found an exploit in their poorly designed game isn't equally or more lame. If they consider it an exploit, they've had long enough to say so. IMO, it would be an exploit if it was a theoretically solid design with an oversight in it. This isn't a solid design, it's a design which blatantly rewards lack of effort. That's on them. 1+ and its been brought up on the forum plenty w/o CCP stating that's its breaking any rule(which it isn't)
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 01:09:00 - [6] - Quote ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote: ladwar wrote: ChargersGirlLuvsDP wrote: ladwar wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: I still hold out that CCP has a way of tracking those who abuse this "mechanic" and have all SP gained that way removed in the Uprising update. Omg the lulz lol I have enough non afk matches to beat my afk matchs so wouldn't takes much sp away. no reason to punish those who know the mechanics and exploit them. FYP exploit is just a mean way to say it, like rail tanks exploiting their range over other tanks or exploiting the use of fuse nades to throw volleges when at supply depots. it sounds bad when it really isn't when you look at it. Rail tanks are working as intended, so are supply depots. Please ignite your strawman as I would like to roast marshmallows while sniping (which sadly isn't working as intended, damn shield flash) rail turrets sure... skills no and actually I was blaming the fuse nades for being OP not the supply depots. really go look up exploit no wait I'll give it to you. 1" a notable or heroic act " 2" to make productive use of " 3 ""to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage" if your using number 3 which would make the most sense my simples of it fit just as well as AFK so you want every weapon to have the same range and damage to while your at it so someone can't exploit(2) them? exploit is just a bad word if you think it is like any other words.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 01:18:00 - [7] - Quote im scared sarcasm i'd really love to see this list so we can group up to AFK more effectively and give them a super big hug w/o nades in hand and congrats for somehow bugging you.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 01:20:00 - [8] - Quote Mithridates VI wrote: AFKing: Not against the rules. Evading content filter to forum rage: Actually against the rules. ^ yup.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 01:25:00 - [9] - Quote well till he post it its theoretical not actual but could count.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 109	Posted - 2013.04.11 01:54:00 - [10] - Quote hey steroids are dangerous and should never be used in a mean joke like that.

ladwar Dead Six Initiative 110	Posted - 2013.04.11 02:15:00 - [11] - Quote DUST Fiend wrote: Logi Bro wrote: That's not even a valid comparison.....you are really just trolling now, which doesn't help your anti-AFK campaign at all. Getting ahead by putting in little effort where others put in full effort.... Seems like a valid comparison to me. steroids can cause bodily harm so a rule was made to prevent the usage AFK using the game mechanics to the extend in which it was made, no rule about or of and no harm to actual people. so how is it valid again?
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 110	Posted - 2013.04.11 02:27:00 - [12] - Quote hey I totally think the mechanics need to be changed, till they do its like oblivion all over again. * hm... I want to run faster.. hey I have a rubber band... 7hours later, sweet 60 levels!*-inner thoughts bad mechanic will be surpassed by those who don't want to be suppressed by them
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 110	Posted - 2013.04.11 02:35:00 - [13] - Quote Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Thog A Kuma wrote: You LITERALLY laughed your ass off? dumbass I can't really speak for Caeli's intelligence, but anyone who takes such a common phrase literally must be stupid. http://i.imgur.com/GlqwNtS.jpg you sir win that one
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 114	Posted - 2013.04.11 22:48:00 - [14] - Quote Thog A Kuma wrote: Kitten Commander wrote: Thog A Kuma wrote: BlG MAMA wrote: Mithridates VI wrote: ITT: People who feel like playing the game demonise AFKers to feed their own delusions of grandeur. FACT Not fact. An uneven distribution of AFK'urs is detrimental to the team with more, this affects K/D (some people care) and Dropsuit expenses, also the most important thing, Winning. Having a PRO on your team also has a negative impact on winning as well. Your point? ad homonym for what purpose? did I hurt your feelings? did you take offense because PRO makes you mad? you, your opinion of me or my corp are irrelevant to this discussion. Your response however makes it appear that you wish to change the subject. Most posting Pro AFK are Vocal and seem to be proud of it.Why bother trying to misdirect? Maybe a simple guilty conscious lol. AFK'urs are harmful to the game. It appears CCP doesn't want to take a stand on it (at this time) so it is quite legal. Harmful to the game, harmful to the team of random scrubs you don't care about. If there was such a thing as Karma it would be harmful to that too. Just not against the rules. i'd rather have an afker than a pro guy on my team, less handicap to work with. karma is not something that CCP has a big interest in
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 119	Posted - 2013.04.12 04:21:00 - [15] - Quote Logi Bro wrote: Sighs But........am I being unethical? Not until CCP says it's a bad thing, verbatim, not some, "We'd prefer if you didn't," bull. Am I being selfish? Yes. However, even though I know it's an evasion, I could just as easily call you selfish for not camping with me. As far as I know, Skirmish has no time limit, so if everyone camped, we'd all get massive SP rewards from a single game. You are cheating all these poor SP-less blueberries out of easily earned SP by discouraging AFKing. I would love to see a full game of AFKers, best sp for both sides.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 123	Posted - 2013.04.12 23:18:00 - [16] - Quote Natu Nobilis wrote: In EVE, fleet commanders tend to kill their stupid teammates to serve as an example of what not to do in fleets. We-¦ll be seeing a lot of teamkilling and kicking of people in Dust when the option is available =p not really...
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 123	Posted - 2013.04.12 23:42:00 - [17] - Quote they actually said that friendly fire is only going to be on in corp matches.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 123	Posted - 2013.04.12 23:53:00 - [18] - Quote Natu Nobilis wrote: Baal Omniscient wrote: Natu Nobilis wrote: In EVE, fleet commanders tend to kill their stupid teammates to serve as an example of what not to do in fleets. We-¦ll be seeing a lot of teamkilling and kicking of people in Dust when the option is available =p CCP has said it is unlikely that TKing will ever be put into pub matches back when we had a big debate about it a month ago. Which means..... no, the players wont be able to fix it. I meant at corp matches. Im not considering playing on pub ones, thr same way i dont fleet up with strangers in eve. Loooooots of room to be killed or messed up by strangers. you can do that now.. so this really doesn't apply to you at all does it?
ladwar Dead Six Initiative 154	Posted - 2013.04.17 23:04:00 - [19] - Quote NightEagle11 wrote: I to have officially been afk listed. Got a message after one of my matches.... I chuckled I feel lonely I have not got a message that I been listed yet.