| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
J-Lewis
Edimmu Warfighters
Gallente Federation
21
   |
Posted - 2013.04.08 13:46:00 -
[271] - Quote
A'Real Fury wrote:
If you want something that is antipersonnel then CCP could introduce a new vehicle class that sits between LAVs and HAVs which gives you 2 turrets, better Armor and Shields than a LAV/Worse than a HAV, but slower than a LAV/Faster than a HAV.
Finally I would like to see a new turret which functions in a similar fashion to an MD. very effective at short range but limited at long range.
WTB Boundless MTAC 15M ISK!
Because AFAIK MTACs are going to be the medium size ground vehicles (proper mechs, not exoskeletons). |
Nexus Tau
DIOS EX.
30
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 15:16:00 -
[272] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:NO! NO NOT COOL! I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE! It even made it into my post. THAT IS NOT COOL! Nor is it fair! STOP THAT!
Reav Hannari you are a horrible and you should feel bad.
 I have never seen a dev mad before. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1212
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 16:00:00 -
[273] - Quote
Yah, because the fixes to the TAR were superb, which is why you see so many people using it today.
Man if you really are the reason why the TAR got effed up as bad as it did then... I hate you.
Don't use the AR enough to be able to comment.[/quote]
Not really. I ve made a topic how to balance the tac AR with multiple soloutions. (like less range, more recoil etc.) And CCP picked the recoil variant cause appearently it wouldnt change the base stats on it. The reason for this is to punish modded controller users which insta killed people further away then a laser could shot. In a way you can thank the scrubs who used modded controllers to make it fully auto for them and with that easy mode. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
783
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 16:11:00 -
[274] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Sloth9230 wrote:My AV fit costs 75K. If I lose just 3 then I've already lost 225K, which is probably more than I'l make in a match considering I'm focusing on the tank and not getting much WP otherwise. I'm pretty much guaranteed to die at least 3 times if the tank has decent infantry support, and I can guarantee that I won't do much damage to a tank if I don't have other AV players helping me either.
So even if you did lose a 2 million ISK tank, I can almost guarantee that your tank did more ISK damage to my team than we did to you, unless we we're all using militia fits of course.
Edit: The sad part is that I do think tanks are slightly UP, but since they can be called into Ambush, where they're pretty much guaranteed to have very little opposition, they can suck it. Assuming everyone on your team is running similar fittings to your own, worth about 75,000 ISK, that means the tank needs 26 kills to match its 2 million ISK value. A decent cheaply-fitted Sica can get 3 kills to pay for itself by this logic.
I never said the tank has to land the kills itself, it just has to be a factor in getting those kills. Like dumb blue berries running into a field of reds while trying to hit the tank with a swarm, or an entire team hiding in 1 spot cause they don't want to get exposed to the tank.
bringing in any vehicle usually won't help the individual player much, but it will help the team, not that anyone cares about the team  |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
Red Rock Consortium
478
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 17:33:00 -
[275] - Quote
Nexus Tau wrote:CCP FoxFour wrote:NO! NO NOT COOL! I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE! It even made it into my post. THAT IS NOT COOL! Nor is it fair! STOP THAT!
Reav Hannari you are a horrible and you should feel bad. I have never seen a dev mad before.
I'm not sure if he's mad or enjoying the attention. More research needed.
~~ Reav 'The Horrible' Hannari
|
loumanchew
Ametat Security
Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 16:15:00 -
[276] - Quote
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:The dark cloud wrote:Tech Ohm Eaven wrote:Solo tank driver can only move tank or activate reppers with NO guns.
Two in a tank then all of the above and ONLY main gun fires.
Three in a tank and all of the above plus the small turrets fire.
Sounds fair.
Takes three infantry to kill a tank then it needs to be three infantry to operate it. Nope tanks aint becoming another "dropship". And you sir sound mad that i recommend equal SP investment. Sore infantry player much? So if it takes 4m sp to operate a tank then give me a OHK javelin for 4 m sp that also OHK infantry.
It's called a forge gun. |
arimal lavaren
L.O.T.I.S.
189
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 16:34:00 -
[277] - Quote
The dark cloud wrote:Just you wait. Because ive mentioned and suggested this CCP is going to implement it at some point. You wanna know why? Cause it would extend the games lifetime. Sure it wont be with the new build that we get soon. But probs after that. CCP introduced quite alot of my suggestions into the game. LIke the fix for TAC AR' and the added recoil on normal AR'S. All my soloutions to "balance" the game.
We seem a little full of ourselves, like there were not a few hundred other voices on the forums clamoring for the same fixes. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |