Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
mikegunnz
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
425
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:47:00 -
[61] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:Everyone in this thread who is bitching about vehicles needs to get proto something whether it SWARMS or A FORGE or get some vehicle skills.....please cease the crying.Tanks cost 3.5 million ISK. Please ....you get pissed cuz your running around as a flesh bag and havent even spent a tenth of that......even if you rock all proto assault you wouldnt spend that.
1 side bitches about drop ships but the drop ships take out snipers and bombard tanks....Tanks remove turrets and are area denile weapons Im sorry its called ARMOR for for a reason.Go fuckin play ambush.
people are so 1 dimensional....and egotistical and can believe it when they die .I think whats more sad is there ok kickin the **** out of unorganized newbs while there in a squad of kick ass FPS players and have that crutch...go 25/30 and 0 alot of matches then ***** when they get owned by a tank....Im ok with it....to me its just karma biting me in the ass.Ill end up skilling vehicles at some point and SWARS and FORGE so it really doesnt matter at all.Ill be doing the same **** they are.Give me somthin to shoot for .Those same guys get out of the tank and they get owned there skills are in vehicles...if you want to hide in some Kidnegarten game mode go ahead.
EDIT:oh yeah 1 more thing you ***** about tanks but you dont ***** when someone on your team gets out a tank to kill all the LAV spam ....you know the guys that will be running over you when your running around in your VK01 with your Duvall lol get real.
Not as easy as you'd like to think. A leveled up tank may run 2-3mil isk, but a good driver in it, can go at least a dozen matches before even losing ONE. Pretty cost efficient.
Now you can make the argument "oh, just stop being one-dimensional and use a proto AV weapon" Not that easy. A proto AV along with a complex dmg modifier, will allow you to do 2000-2500 dmg pts, HOWEVER, that leveled up tank we talked about... it can have 8-10,000 HP!!! Even WITH your proto weapon, it can take you 4 shots to drop the tank. Good luck with that! A good driver will have killed you after the first shot. Chances are, the AV trooper will die SEVERAL times, either to the tank, while trying to destroy it... or two other infantry, since he/she is more vulnerable to them while using AV weapons. Realistically, you need at least 3 good AVers to take down a good tanker. Let's compare apples to apples, instead of giving abstract examples of "oh I took down a tank by myself the other day, you just need a proto forge" Chances are, this guys was using a proto forge, against a low-level tank.
BF series may have free vehicles, but it's balanced. Vehicles act as support to what the main game is...an FPS. They can play an important role in a battle, and in the right hands, be a HUGE factor, but if the opponents have one or two good AVers, they can keep them at bay. In Dust, you need 3 AV, just to stand a chance.
I'm not sure what the best way to balance the vehicles with infantry is, but I know right now, it's NOT where it should be. (IMO) |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:53:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ignorance ^[/quote] Is that how it works in EVE ...egghead.Can i not get out my Titan....lol[/quote]
No, it does not work in eve like that.. you dont just get in your titan and hey guys im here for the fkn party woooooo... there is logistics set in motion before that titan can do a thing.[/quote]
A tank driver will put in 4 million skill points be fore its all said and done for PROTO everything.Some guy bitching that his Assault only character cant compete with that is quite frankly....nonsense.The COST is the MECHANIC.[/quote]
And what you think it takes 500 skillpoints to max and proto everything for an assault or forge guy?
edit* how the fk did our quotes get all fkd |
Tien TheSecond
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
198
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ayo, who wants to watch me do drive bys in my Erebus?
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:19:00 -
[64] - Quote
mikegunnz wrote:HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:Everyone in this thread who is bitching about vehicles needs to get proto something whether it SWARMS or A FORGE or get some vehicle skills.....please cease the crying.Tanks cost 3.5 million ISK. Please ....you get pissed cuz your running around as a flesh bag and havent even spent a tenth of that......even if you rock all proto assault you wouldnt spend that.
1 side bitches about drop ships but the drop ships take out snipers and bombard tanks....Tanks remove turrets and are area denile weapons Im sorry its called ARMOR for for a reason.Go fuckin play ambush.
people are so 1 dimensional....and egotistical and can believe it when they die .I think whats more sad is there ok kickin the **** out of unorganized newbs while there in a squad of kick ass FPS players and have that crutch...go 25/30 and 0 alot of matches then ***** when they get owned by a tank....Im ok with it....to me its just karma biting me in the ass.Ill end up skilling vehicles at some point and SWARS and FORGE so it really doesnt matter at all.Ill be doing the same **** they are.Give me somthin to shoot for .Those same guys get out of the tank and they get owned there skills are in vehicles...if you want to hide in some Kidnegarten game mode go ahead.
EDIT:oh yeah 1 more thing you ***** about tanks but you dont ***** when someone on your team gets out a tank to kill all the LAV spam ....you know the guys that will be running over you when your running around in your VK01 with your Duvall lol get real. Not as easy as you'd like to think. A leveled up tank may run 2-3mil isk, but a good driver in it, can go at least a dozen matches before even losing ONE. Pretty cost efficient. Now you can make the argument "oh, just stop being one-dimensional and use a proto AV weapon" Not that easy. A proto AV along with a complex dmg modifier, will allow you to do 2000-2500 dmg pts, HOWEVER, that leveled up tank we talked about... it can have 8-10,000 HP!!! Even WITH your proto weapon, it can take you 4 shots to drop the tank. Good luck with that! A good driver will have killed you after the first shot. Chances are, the AV trooper will die SEVERAL times, either to the tank, while trying to destroy it... or two other infantry, since he/she is more vulnerable to them while using AV weapons. Realistically, you need at least 3 good AVers to take down a good tanker. Let's compare apples to apples, instead of giving abstract examples of "oh I took down a tank by myself the other day, you just need a proto forge" Chances are, this guys was using a proto forge, against a low-level tank. BF series may have free vehicles, but it's balanced. Vehicles act as support to what the main game is...an FPS. They can play an important role in a battle, and in the right hands, be a HUGE factor, but if the opponents have one or two good AVers, they can keep them at bay. In Dust, you need 3 AV, just to stand a chance. I'm not sure what the best way to balance the vehicles with infantry is, but I know right now, it's NOT where it should be. (IMO)
ur scenario is a 1v1 with fg and a tank its obv who will lose that most times but get 2-3 FGs on a tank and u are on point
ppl expect to solo tanks too much
always here ppl talkin about teamwork this and teamwork that but never when it comes to infantry taking out a tank
Vehicle play in DUST atm: Teamwork can take down a tank super fast Teamwork is thus required to keep said tank up and running |
TheReaper852
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
62
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
Like it or not but most people play FPS games for the on foot shooting. The few games that use vehicles make it so they can be taken out easily or can't control the battlefield. You don't see game makers making games called FVS (first vehicle shooters) simply because the market for those type of games is so much smaller than FPS. I've been playing this beta for a while and enjoy the game but if they make Dust a FVS it won't have a big enough player base to succeed free or not. |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:39:00 -
[66] - Quote
mikegunnz wrote:HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:Everyone in this thread who is bitching about vehicles needs to get proto something whether it SWARMS or A FORGE or get some vehicle skills.....please cease the crying.Tanks cost 3.5 million ISK. Please ....you get pissed cuz your running around as a flesh bag and havent even spent a tenth of that......even if you rock all proto assault you wouldnt spend that.
1 side bitches about drop ships but the drop ships take out snipers and bombard tanks....Tanks remove turrets and are area denile weapons Im sorry its called ARMOR for for a reason.Go fuckin play ambush.
people are so 1 dimensional....and egotistical and can believe it when they die .I think whats more sad is there ok kickin the **** out of unorganized newbs while there in a squad of kick ass FPS players and have that crutch...go 25/30 and 0 alot of matches then ***** when they get owned by a tank....Im ok with it....to me its just karma biting me in the ass.Ill end up skilling vehicles at some point and SWARS and FORGE so it really doesnt matter at all.Ill be doing the same **** they are.Give me somthin to shoot for .Those same guys get out of the tank and they get owned there skills are in vehicles...if you want to hide in some Kidnegarten game mode go ahead.
EDIT:oh yeah 1 more thing you ***** about tanks but you dont ***** when someone on your team gets out a tank to kill all the LAV spam ....you know the guys that will be running over you when your running around in your VK01 with your Duvall lol get real. Not as easy as you'd like to think. A leveled up tank may run 2-3mil isk, but a good driver in it, can go at least a dozen matches before even losing ONE. Pretty cost efficient. Now you can make the argument "oh, just stop being one-dimensional and use a proto AV weapon" Not that easy. A proto AV along with a complex dmg modifier, will allow you to do 2000-2500 dmg pts, HOWEVER, that leveled up tank we talked about... it can have 8-10,000 HP!!! Even WITH your proto weapon, it can take you 4 shots to drop the tank. Good luck with that! A good driver will have killed you after the first shot. Chances are, the AV trooper will die SEVERAL times, either to the tank, while trying to destroy it... or two other infantry, since he/she is more vulnerable to them while using AV weapons. Realistically, you need at least 3 good AVers to take down a good tanker. Let's compare apples to apples, instead of giving abstract examples of "oh I took down a tank by myself the other day, you just need a proto forge" Chances are, this guys was using a proto forge, against a low-level tank. BF series may have free vehicles, but it's balanced. Vehicles act as support to what the main game is...an FPS. They can play an important role in a battle, and in the right hands, be a HUGE factor, but if the opponents have one or two good AVers, they can keep them at bay. In Dust, you need 3 AV, just to stand a chance. I'm not sure what the best way to balance the vehicles with infantry is, but I know right now, it's NOT where it should be. (IMO) you tell e what tank has 8k hit points and isnt the slowest swarm/forge sponge in the game.....not only that tanks now have weak points a bad ass forge can do 3500 damage in one shot...if he hits the tank in the right spot game over.The forge cost no where near the same.
All you got to do is get on your mic ask for a nano an beam the tank from range....a heavy anti vehicle sniper ....hmm imagine that |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:52:00 -
[67] - Quote
mikegunnz wrote:HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:Everyone in this thread who is bitching about vehicles needs to get proto something whether it SWARMS or A FORGE or get some vehicle skills.....please cease the crying.Tanks cost 3.5 million ISK. Please ....you get pissed cuz your running around as a flesh bag and havent even spent a tenth of that......even if you rock all proto assault you wouldnt spend that.
1 side bitches about drop ships but the drop ships take out snipers and bombard tanks....Tanks remove turrets and are area denile weapons Im sorry its called ARMOR for for a reason.Go fuckin play ambush.
people are so 1 dimensional....and egotistical and can believe it when they die .I think whats more sad is there ok kickin the **** out of unorganized newbs while there in a squad of kick ass FPS players and have that crutch...go 25/30 and 0 alot of matches then ***** when they get owned by a tank....Im ok with it....to me its just karma biting me in the ass.Ill end up skilling vehicles at some point and SWARS and FORGE so it really doesnt matter at all.Ill be doing the same **** they are.Give me somthin to shoot for .Those same guys get out of the tank and they get owned there skills are in vehicles...if you want to hide in some Kidnegarten game mode go ahead.
EDIT:oh yeah 1 more thing you ***** about tanks but you dont ***** when someone on your team gets out a tank to kill all the LAV spam ....you know the guys that will be running over you when your running around in your VK01 with your Duvall lol get real. Not as easy as you'd like to think. A leveled up tank may run 2-3mil isk, but a good driver in it, can go at least a dozen matches before even losing ONE. Pretty cost efficient. Now you can make the argument "oh, just stop being one-dimensional and use a proto AV weapon" Not that easy. A proto AV along with a complex dmg modifier, will allow you to do 2000-2500 dmg pts, HOWEVER, that leveled up tank we talked about... it can have 8-10,000 HP!!! Even WITH your proto weapon, it can take you 4 shots to drop the tank. Good luck with that! A good driver will have killed you after the first shot. Chances are, the AV trooper will die SEVERAL times, either to the tank, while trying to destroy it... or two other infantry, since he/she is more vulnerable to them while using AV weapons. Realistically, you need at least 3 good AVers to take down a good tanker. Let's compare apples to apples, instead of giving abstract examples of "oh I took down a tank by myself the other day, you just need a proto forge" Chances are, this guys was using a proto forge, against a low-level tank. BF series may have free vehicles, but it's balanced. Vehicles act as support to what the main game is...an FPS. They can play an important role in a battle, and in the right hands, be a HUGE factor, but if the opponents have one or two good AVers, they can keep them at bay. In Dust, you need 3 AV, just to stand a chance. I'm not sure what the best way to balance the vehicles with infantry is, but I know right now, it's NOT where it should be. (IMO) oh and Ive never seen you go against Death from Afar....and if you had. You wouldnt go 12 matches. Youd burn up 12 tanks and be broke for forever...now if you see him in a match and dont get yours out ,well then thats on you for letting your team get raped. |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:00:00 -
[68] - Quote
TheReaper852 wrote:Like it or not but most people play FPS games for the on foot shooting. The few games that use vehicles make it so they can be taken out easily or can't control the battlefield. You don't see game makers making games called FVS (first vehicle shooters) simply because the market for those type of games is so much smaller than FPS. I've been playing this beta for a while and enjoy the game but if they make Dust a FVS it won't have a big enough player base to succeed free or not.
The Battlefield series is on what number now?And there coming out with a fourth for console...and how many copies combined would you say that was?How long has that franchise been going?Do you play EVE?A vehicle game........huh what? |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:07:00 -
[69] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:
A tank driver will put in 4 million skill points be fore its all said and done for PROTO everything.Some guy bitching that his Assault only character cant compete with that is quite frankly....nonsense.The COST is the MECHANIC.
Quote:Knightshade Belladonna] And what you think it takes 500 skillpoints to max and proto everything for an assault or forge guy?
edit* how the fk did our quotes get all fkd
NO not even close...... |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:09:00 -
[70] - Quote
Caeli SineDeo wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:At most times Imp had 5 guys in vehicles. The other 10 where infantry with either AV fits or set up going against other infantry.
So no tourney was not won by a spam of vehicles. Yes Vehicle users kept there vehicles up at all times but that was it.
So get of this high horse of vehicles destroying gameplay i think everyone can agree on corp v corp matches this adds to the excitement It adds to multi lvl planing for corps. And yes to keep vehicles up and running it cost corps tons of isk. So yes you need to be good to afford running vehicles.
Having good vehicle users does not make you automatically win the game. They are just a important assest. Yes a none vehicle team will get ran over by a team that supports decent vehicle users. But if that tank does not have ground support he is toast.
So no the tourney is not a testament to what you said because the 1st place corp did not spam vehicles.
Unless you count the 3 vehicle users that called in vehicles to replace the ones they loss.
You're talking about an organized corp match where you have guys pre-selected into certain fits with certain jobs to do for the entire game. We are talking about regular random pub matches, in which most games are played. Did you read the title??? "Tourney was a testiment to what I've always said."
Apologies...got involved with tank situation. Forgot which thread that I was in |
|
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:22:00 -
[71] - Quote
Funny...I read one side arguing about folks being one-dimensional then turn around and say no to wps because they're afraid of going up against other infantry because they specced into vehicles only lol.
Anyway...wps wasn't my idea, I just liked the idea. Is it a fair one?...maybe not. So, they can scratch it off the board. But it's rather funny how vehicle operators are worried about being in a fight with infantry because they haven't leveled any of those skills. Well, what about infantry? Infantry has to level up their skills to survive ground combat and AV. Not to mention, you can't really be both. You have a swarm launcher or an AR. A forge or an HMG.
If CCP allowed infantry to use an AR with an effective AV weapon in the same dropsuit....then that may just be enough. There's no reason why we can't strap a rocket launcher onto the back of our dropsuits. We can do it in others and this is a space game with future tech, right? |
Vrain Matari
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
404
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
Any estimates on what today's 4 battles cost both sides? Today we saw 4 battles, but it will take something like 12 to take a planet, and we had no OB today. So say a minimum of 3X today's layout for planetary capture. It will give us a feeling for what break-even will be for district battles.
Also not factored in today was cost of the MCC, cost of clones, cost of ammo.
We mercs are definitely going to be negotiating Contracts as Payroll + expenses. |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:41:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Funny...I read one side arguing about folks being one-dimensional then turn around and say no to wps because they're afraid of going up against other infantry because they specced into vehicles only lol.
Anyway...wps wasn't my idea, I just liked the idea. Is it a fair one?...maybe not. So, they can scratch it off the board. But it's rather funny how vehicle operators are worried about being in a fight with infantry because they haven't leveled any of those skills. Well, what about infantry? Infantry has to level up their skills to survive ground combat and AV. Not to mention, you can't really be both. You have a swarm launcher or an AR. A forge or an HMG.
If CCP allowed infantry to use an AR with an effective AV weapon in the same dropsuit....then that may just be enough. There's no reason why we can't strap a rocket launcher onto the back of our dropsuits. We can do it in others and this is a space game with future tech, right?
afraid of going up against other infantry......hmm Ive never seen you in a match before.....Ill have to drop by and say hello.AR style.YOU the mercenary are buying a tank out of your own wallet....it shouldnt be a piece of crap...who would buy it? |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:43:00 -
[74] - Quote
Vrain Matari wrote:Any estimates on what today's 4 battles cost both sides? Today we saw 4 battles, but it will take something like 12 to take a planet, and we had no OB today. So say a minimum of 3X today's layout for planetary capture. It will give us a feeling for what break-even will be for district battles.
Also not factored in today was cost of the MCC, cost of clones, cost of ammo.
We mercs are definitely going to be negotiating Contracts as Payroll + expenses.
Yep |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 03:56:00 -
[75] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Vehicles were spammed like mother *******, 2-3 infantry and the other 12 people in vehicles, yeah, real fun game CCP.
I won't say much more as I'm hoping you implement a no vehicle game-mode.
Oh and btw why didnt you just stick with this tag? The one you used for this thread? AIR |
TheReaper852
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
62
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:12:00 -
[76] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:TheReaper852 wrote:Like it or not but most people play FPS games for the on foot shooting. The few games that use vehicles make it so they can be taken out easily or can't control the battlefield. You don't see game makers making games called FVS (first vehicle shooters) simply because the market for those type of games is so much smaller than FPS. I've been playing this beta for a while and enjoy the game but if they make Dust a FVS it won't have a big enough player base to succeed free or not. The Battlefield series is on what number now?And there coming out with a fourth for console...and how many copies combined would you say that was?How long has that franchise been going?Do you play EVE?A vehicle game........huh what?
I bet over half of the people that play battlefield play it for the ground gun game, not vehicles. Also unlike Dust most BF players can blow of vehicles while still being ground assualt guys. So all in all vehicles don't run BF since they can be handled and don't control the whole battle.
I was going to mention BF in my original post but I kind of figured some people would be smart enough to realize that most people do play BF for the gun game, yeah it does appeal to the small amount with vehicles but it doesn't spam vehicles and it doesn't make the vehicles win the matches. Dust can and should use vehicles but need to find a better balance than they have.
I sigh at you even mentioning EVE. Is EVE on ps3 huh? Next you are going to say something about Halo being on Ps3.
Edit: Also on BF do you see people speccing into AV? Or AV weapons being the main weapon? BF also has inside objectives to avoid vehicles, BF also has a vehicle limit so there isn't a vehicle spam. Do you want to list any other games that have vehicles but use them in a completly different way? |
slap26
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION
462
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:20:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Caeli SineDeo wrote:At most times Imp had 5 guys in vehicles. The other 10 where infantry with either AV fits or set up going against other infantry.
So no tourney was not won by a spam of vehicles. Yes Vehicle users kept there vehicles up at all times but that was it.
So get of this high horse of vehicles destroying gameplay i think everyone can agree on corp v corp matches this adds to the excitement It adds to multi lvl planing for corps. And yes to keep vehicles up and running it cost corps tons of isk. So yes you need to be good to afford running vehicles.
Having good vehicle users does not make you automatically win the game. They are just a important assest. Yes a none vehicle team will get ran over by a team that supports decent vehicle users. But if that tank does not have ground support he is toast.
So no the tourney is not a testament to what you said because the 1st place corp did not spam vehicles.
Unless you count the 3 vehicle users that called in vehicles to replace the ones they loss.
You're talking about an organized corp match where you have guys pre-selected into certain fits with certain jobs to do for the entire game. We are talking about regular random pub matches, in which most games are played. This Game should be balanced on organized corp matches. That is what will keep this game going, the hardcore players and the community. If this game turns into another COD clone I for one will not be playing. Clan battles are what keeps players playing. MAG tried to balance the game towards casuals and we all know how that turned out... After playing IMP in the tourney I can say Vehicles are balanced with Infantry. Its the Pub battles where red dots try to kill my sagaris with an ar. |
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS
Doomheim
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:20:00 -
[78] - Quote
TheReaper852 wrote:HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:TheReaper852 wrote:Like it or not but most people play FPS games for the on foot shooting. The few games that use vehicles make it so they can be taken out easily or can't control the battlefield. You don't see game makers making games called FVS (first vehicle shooters) simply because the market for those type of games is so much smaller than FPS. I've been playing this beta for a while and enjoy the game but if they make Dust a FVS it won't have a big enough player base to succeed free or not. The Battlefield series is on what number now?And there coming out with a fourth for console...and how many copies combined would you say that was?How long has that franchise been going?Do you play EVE?A vehicle game........huh what? I bet over half of the people that play battlefield play it for the ground gun game, not vehicles. Also unlike Dust most BF players can blow of vehicles while still being ground assualt guys. So all in all vehicles don't run BF since they can be handled and don't control the whole battle. I was going to mention BF in my original post but I kind of figured some people would be smart enough to realize that most people do play BF for the gun game, yeah it does appeal to the small amount with vehicles but it doesn't spam vehicles and it doesn't make the vehicles win the matches. Dust can and should use vehicles but need to find a better balance than they have. I sigh at you even mentioning EVE. Is EVE on ps3 huh? Next you are going to say something about Halo being on Ps3. What happened on BF3 when they introduced CQB? Nobody played it... |
TheReaper852
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
62
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 04:25:00 -
[79] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:TheReaper852 wrote:HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:TheReaper852 wrote:Like it or not but most people play FPS games for the on foot shooting. The few games that use vehicles make it so they can be taken out easily or can't control the battlefield. You don't see game makers making games called FVS (first vehicle shooters) simply because the market for those type of games is so much smaller than FPS. I've been playing this beta for a while and enjoy the game but if they make Dust a FVS it won't have a big enough player base to succeed free or not. The Battlefield series is on what number now?And there coming out with a fourth for console...and how many copies combined would you say that was?How long has that franchise been going?Do you play EVE?A vehicle game........huh what? I bet over half of the people that play battlefield play it for the ground gun game, not vehicles. Also unlike Dust most BF players can blow of vehicles while still being ground assualt guys. So all in all vehicles don't run BF since they can be handled and don't control the whole battle. I was going to mention BF in my original post but I kind of figured some people would be smart enough to realize that most people do play BF for the gun game, yeah it does appeal to the small amount with vehicles but it doesn't spam vehicles and it doesn't make the vehicles win the matches. Dust can and should use vehicles but need to find a better balance than they have. I sigh at you even mentioning EVE. Is EVE on ps3 huh? Next you are going to say something about Halo being on Ps3. What happened on BF3 when they introduced CQB? Nobody played it...
Edit: Also on BF do you see people speccing into AV? Or AV weapons being the main weapon? BF also has inside objectives to avoid vehicles, BF also has a vehicle limit so there isn't a vehicle spam. Do you want to list any other games that have vehicles but use them in a completly different way?
I added that after you quoted me, was just thinking more ways you are wrong.
Just because you stopped playing the game doesn't mean nobody played it, people still played it |
RankRancid
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
51
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 09:20:00 -
[80] - Quote
Vehicles are here to stay. Get used to the fact. This game is not BF3 or BO2 or MW3. This is Dust514. A game that is trying to be different.
Don't know if I can speak for everyone that participated in last nights finals. Vehicles made that game awesome. Going against well versed vehicle players was a blast.
You really feel like death is around every corner.
I had really hoped that because it was The Imperfects vs SI. That for 1 Monday there would be no complaining on the forums about vehicles.
Edit: The finals were not only vehicle spam. It was a part of the warfare. Clones were getting dropped by all sorts of weapons. |
|
AltTest
Doomheim
21
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 09:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
There are no competitive shooters where vehicles are more important than infantry. DUST will fail. |
Jason Pearson
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
742
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 09:44:00 -
[82] - Quote
RankRancid wrote:Vehicles are here to stay. Get used to the fact. This game is not BF3 or BO2 or MW3. This is Dust514. A game that is trying to be different.
Don't know if I can speak for everyone that participated in last nights finals. Vehicles made that game awesome. Going against well versed vehicle players was a blast.
You really feel like death is around every corner.
I had really hoped that because it was The Imperfects vs SI. That for 1 Monday there would be no complaining on the forums about vehicles.
Edit: The finals were not only vehicle spam. It was a part of the warfare. Clones were getting dropped by all sorts of weapons.
RankRancid is such a good shot he's taken Tank Drivers out. - DUST News.
^_^
AltTest wrote:There are no competitive shooters where vehicles are more important than infantry. DUST will fail.
You're an idiot. Vehicles aren't more important than Infantry, Vehicles are part of the battle, a good Tank (That is actually out fighting, not on the redline like the majority of scrubs in tanks) will be risking his ass to win, he'll be covering you blueberries in a match only to have you all run off and leave him to his own devices. A tank left by itself against a couple of Forge Gunners will die, hell even if a squad took out Militia Swarms (3 Militia Swarms, 1 guy to cover with a AR perhaps?) would get even the harder tanks running, especially in a good position.
Oh and on that topic, LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION. If you're a forge gunner and you're stupid enough to stand out in the open or a Swarm Launcher standing next to the tank, you're a moron. Get height advantage on the tank, get cover and hidden for a Dropship. It's really not hard. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2283
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 09:59:00 -
[83] - Quote
AltTest wrote:There are no competitive shooters where vehicles are more important than infantry. DUST will fail.
DUST will have gladiator arenas for eSports play the modes we are playin now suppose to more represent war skirmishes than eSports competitive matches |
Wako 75
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
76
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 10:23:00 -
[84] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Wintars Boar wrote:There has also been talk to vehicle deployment being based on squad WP. Any corroboration on this? I like the idea of it, havn't heard anything from devs about something like that.. but I like it. Not as much as needed for an OB, but some wp so it cant be initially dropped right from start. like LAV - No cost Dropship - 200 wp HAV - 350 wp Gunship/jet ( if it happens) - 500 wp
hopefully battlecommander or squadleader would authorize the request and it would take away from the wp going to the OS's just so you dont have noobs calling in noob tanks
|
Guardylyus
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 11:19:00 -
[85] - Quote
well, I think the class 'pilot' should arrive in the next update ... I think maybe solve the problem if it was a relatively weak class, and could only use pistols and only she was capable of piloting vehicles and dropships... |
Ty 'SweetCheeks' Borg
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
192
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 13:04:00 -
[86] - Quote
ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Vehicles were spammed like mother *******, 2-3 infantry and the other 12 people in vehicles, yeah, real fun game CCP.
I won't say much more as I'm hoping you implement a no vehicle game-mode.
Obvious WARRIOR is obvious. |
Grimmiers
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
158
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 13:22:00 -
[87] - Quote
Regis Mk V wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:They just need to up it to 32vs32. More players means more vehicles.
There's a cap on how many a team can have on the field. |
Nstomper
Th3-ReSiStAnCe-SEC.0
205
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 13:33:00 -
[88] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:AltTest wrote:There are no competitive shooters where vehicles are more important than infantry. DUST will fail. DUST will have gladiator arenas for eSports play the modes we are playin now suppose to more represent war skirmishes than eSports competitive matches but ofcourse the dude doesnt know that cause he is new |
Caeli SineDeo
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
294
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:20:00 -
[89] - Quote
RankRancid wrote:Vehicles are here to stay. Get used to the fact. This game is not BF3 or BO2 or MW3. This is Dust514. A game that is trying to be different.
Don't know if I can speak for everyone that participated in last nights finals. Vehicles made that game awesome. Going against well versed vehicle players was a blast.
You really feel like death is around every corner.
I had really hoped that because it was The Imperfects vs SI. That for 1 Monday there would be no complaining on the forums about vehicles.
Edit: The finals were not only vehicle spam. It was a part of the warfare. Clones were getting dropped by all sorts of weapons. +1 to that RankRancid it adds a great dimension to the corp battles which adds alot of excitement. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
349
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:27:00 -
[90] - Quote
agreed, snipers were really doing their part against forge gunners! and the forge gunners were tearing them drop ships up like no tomorrow. in the first 2 minutes a drop ship went down, a tank shortly after that... it was mayhem. such a close match resulted in heavy losses on both sides. by the end of it, the expense rallied up in 1 game alone was way into the millions. My 2 deaths alone cost 350k.
if we were at the same level as everyone else, the balance between fielding out decent vehicles would be much much more difficult. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |