|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
   |
Posted - 2012.11.11 20:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:They just need to up it to 32vs32.
This , this and oh yesd.. this.
It would not be such a big problem if we had bigger teams with the same current vehicle allowed at one time cap we have. As it currently stands though, when 2 or more tanks with gunner seats filled hits the field, game begins to go to ****. thats 6 guys right there just from them 2 tanks out of available 16 people.. when you got 4 tanks and a dropship it's just fkn pathetic. |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 20:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Wintars Boar wrote:There has also been talk to vehicle deployment being based on squad WP. Any corroboration on this?
I like the idea of it, havn't heard anything from devs about something like that.. but I like it. Not as much as needed for an OB, but some wp so it cant be initially dropped right from start.
like
LAV - No cost
Dropship - 200 wp
HAV - 350 wp
Gunship/jet ( if it happens) - 500 wp |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 21:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Regis Mk V wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:They just need to up it to 32vs32. More players means more vehicles.
Not if they keep current vehicle cap with a 32 v 32, if we ever went 64 v 64 like ccp claims will be , then ofc there is need for a higher cap. but 5 tanks per side for a 32 v 32 is plenty, that's 15 people right there per side using tank/dropship
And for those who think " but I specced into tanks and now somene with lesser skills can call one in before me so I can't do anything until he gets blown up" learn to use other stuff aswell. Tanks should not be a neccessary thing for every battle and have to be called in right from the start. Which is why i'm fond of the wp required to deploy idea, you will have to fight on the ground with a suit, earn a few points and escalate the battle.. then call in a tank if you feel it's needed. Not just call in a tank immediatly at start of a battle just because you can. |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:They just need to up it to 32vs32. Will just mean more vehicle spam, tbh. Wps needed to call in a vehicle is a good idea. That's a ******* awful idea. How about, EVERYONE has to use Militia Assault Rifles and then can only upgrade once they've got a certain amount of WPs in a match (So, Militia, then say 200 WP for next weapon, then another 200 WP for another). Sounds good right? By making it so only players with WP in a match are allowed to use a Vehicle, you effectively destroy any attempt at making a solely vehicle character. If you hadn't noticed, many skills now have "Infantry" in front of them, which means that you will have to choose which role you want to go into until much later in the game, which means if this WP system was in place, Vehicle players (Who will have put all their SP into vehicles) will be nowhere near as good as Infantry only players, which means they'll rarely get to use the vehicles that are costing them 10x what your suits are costing you.
It can be based off squad WP then, will it really kill you to stay in militia AR or sniper starter you have selected for a min or 2 before jumping into tank? It will cut down alot of the initial vehicle spam that imediatly decides most matches |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES COTTUS wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Regis Mk V wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:They just need to up it to 32vs32. More players means more vehicles. Not if they keep current vehicle cap with a 32 v 32, if we ever went 64 v 64 like ccp claims will be , then ofc there is need for a higher cap. but 5 tanks per side for a 32 v 32 is plenty, that's 15 people right there per side using tank/dropship And for those who think " but I specced into tanks and now somene with lesser skills can call one in before me so I can't do anything until he gets blown up" learn to use other stuff aswell. Tanks should not be a neccessary thing for every battle and have to be called in right from the start. Which is why i'm fond of the wp required to deploy idea, you will have to fight on the ground with a suit, earn a few points and escalate the battle.. then call in a tank if you feel it's needed. Not just call in a tank immediatly at start of a battle just because you can. Stupidity
Ignorance ^ |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
[/quote]
Not if they keep current vehicle cap with a 32 v 32, if we ever went 64 v 64 like ccp claims will be , then ofc there is need for a higher cap. but 5 tanks per side for a 32 v 32 is plenty, that's 15 people right there per side using tank/dropship
And for those who think " but I specced into tanks and now somene with lesser skills can call one in before me so I can't do anything until he gets blown up" learn to use other stuff aswell. Tanks should not be a neccessary thing for every battle and have to be called in right from the start. Which is why i'm fond of the wp required to deploy idea, you will have to fight on the ground with a suit, earn a few points and escalate the battle.. then call in a tank if you feel it's needed. Not just call in a tank immediatly at start of a battle just because you can.[/quote]
Stupidity
[/quote]
Ignorance ^[/quote]
Is that how it works in EVE ...egghead.Can i not get out my Titan....lol[/quote]
No, it does not work in eve like that.. you dont just get in your titan and hey guys im here for the fkn party woooooo... there is logistics set in motion before that titan can do a thing. |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote:Vehicles were spammed like mother *******, 2-3 infantry and the other 12 people in vehicles, yeah, real fun game CCP.
I won't say much more as I'm hoping you implement a no vehicle game-mode. Not sure how you are able to talk like you were in the tournament... NPC corps weren't let in. :P
could be an alt letting his feelings out? |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 01:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ignorance ^[/quote]
Is that how it works in EVE ...egghead.Can i not get out my Titan....lol[/quote]
No, it does not work in eve like that.. you dont just get in your titan and hey guys im here for the fkn party woooooo... there is logistics set in motion before that titan can do a thing.[/quote]
A tank driver will put in 4 million skill points be fore its all said and done for PROTO everything.Some guy bitching that his Assault only character cant compete with that is quite frankly....nonsense.The COST is the MECHANIC.[/quote]
And what you think it takes 500 skillpoints to max and proto everything for an assault or forge guy?
edit* how the fk did our quotes get all fkd |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 18:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vance Alken wrote:This thread is chock full of people who don't understand the concept of mechanized warfare...
Our suits are mech also, mech warfare does not mean vehicle spam. Sure the original dawn of mech warfare with tanks in ww1 was vehicle only.. but we are thousands of years in the future hear where everything is technological and machine driven. Oh and by the way this isn't labled as mech warfare or mech warriors online.. it's a fps with more infantry roles than vehicle.. so point is mute |
Knightshade Belladonna
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
288
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 19:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tony Calif wrote:Having played the tournament, whoever brings the best vehicle game wins. Because they remove the oppositions vehicles. That gives you air superiority & armour superiority. Infantry are worthless at that stage.
Infantry is just the name given to people waiting for vehicles.
lol, sad but pretty much true |
|
|
|
|
| |
|