Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
What do you think? |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's fine where it's at. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
They must not be using the shotgun very well then. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
A full magazine directly into an assault? |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
no |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG.
And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun.
And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring.
Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
It takes very few rounds of an advanced smg to kill an advanced scout or logi |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine.
Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun. |
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun.
It loses out on effective range and reload spead Also the targets would have to be standing less than a foot away with each other |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 08:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun. It loses out on effective range and reload spead Also the targets would have to be standing less than a foot away with each other You can 1HK with a shot gun, lets see you do that with an SMG. SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. |
dust badger
BetaMax.
283
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons.
You mean AR's? :P |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Exactly what shotgun is a ohk against an equal tier armour |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P
+1 |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10.
Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons.
Those are both smgs
Mac 10
Higher rof, more damage
P90
Higher ammo per mag, longer range |
Beta Phish
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:What do you think?
its only common sense something lacking from ccp |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. Those are both smgs Yes they are.. But a P90 is much more powerful than a MAC10. That's like saying a Thomson and and M16 are both Assault rifles, while it may be true, they are in a much different class. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. Those are both smgs Yes they are.. But a P90 is much more powerful than a MAC10. That's like saying a Thomson and and M16 are both Assault rifles, while it may be true, they are in a much different class.
Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? |
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:25:00 -
[21] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different.
And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks.
LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol stocks on the weapons and the weapon types posture(how you hold it in the various firing positions) are not classifications due to other action games no matter how much they say they are accurate lol |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:54:00 -
[25] - Quote
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol Read the rest of the thread before you start quoting. I understand when the thread is 5 pages or longer, you don't want to look for the reply, but seriously, if you had read the first post on page 2 you would've seen a response clarifying that I was unaware the Thompson is classified as an SMG. |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. i have they sell tach kits that allow for it to be shouldered and in fact have a attachment for the front that extends hand grip for a front grip on the weapon for controlled firing..
8 years army infantry and special marksman :) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals.
I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol Read the rest of the thread before you start quoting. I understand when the thread is 5 pages or longer, you don't want to look for the reply, but seriously, if you had read the first post on page 2 you would've seen a response clarifying that I was unaware the Thompson is classified as an SMG. ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
I think this link is relevant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Sub_Machine_Carbine
After reading the suggestion to Wiki things, I went through Wikipedia's list of SMGs. I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns, and didn't bother to read much of that article because I don't care a whole lot about real-world guns in general. A design like that which acts as a high-RoF, CQC focused alternative to ARs would work in DUST though. It's officially, according to the creators, a "Submachine Carbine" to differentiate it from other SMGs. Compare the size to the H&K MP7 if you want to see the difference in size (although stopping power might be another matter - like I said, never read the article).
But if you want a real reason why SMGs shouldn't be primary weapons and shotguns should, here's one.
I can use a Militia Shotgun against an Advanced Heavy and have them dead before I have to reload. Against the same Heavy with a Militia SMG that has more SPs invested into it, and specifically has a 25% damage bonus that the Shotgun doesn't get, I have to reload at least once before I can get the kill, even when I'm staying close enough to land every hit.
At the moment, the whole range of ARs is well-suited to mid-range combat and decent at long-range, but with a focus on precision fire rather than volume of fire, and the whole range of SMGs are very limited in effective range with a focus on insane RoF and CQC viability. Would be nice to have some kind of middle ground - a high-RoF full-automatic primary weapon with CQC and mid-range capabilities, but NOT viable at long-range. Whether they add a new class of weapon (SMC = Submachine Carbine = heavy SMG) or a high-RoF low-accuracy AR that's less viable for long range, I don't care, but it's a gap that I'd quite like to see filled as well. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:04:00 -
[30] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know Retracts? Into the gun..? That thing is tiny, how could it hold a stock in there? lmao
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? I'm all for the 2nd Amendment, and if it gets repealed you can bet your ass I will find myself an illegal fire arm. However I am not old enough to carry a weapon legally, so I have not looked into any weaponry information. And I'm not really that interested in stocking up on high powered weaponry, or researching it in general. I would rather just be able to carry a pistol around.
Not all of us want to have an M16 or something of the like in our possession, or even care to do much research beyond what we pick up from those who do know the information. |
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:06:00 -
[31] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:I think this link is relevant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Sub_Machine_CarbineAfter reading the suggestion to Wiki things, I went through Wikipedia's list of SMGs. I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns, and didn't bother to read much of that article because I don't care a whole lot about real-world guns in general. A design like that which acts as a high-RoF, CQC focused alternative to ARs would work in DUST though. It's officially, according to the creators, a "Submachine Carbine" to differentiate it from other SMGs. Compare the size to the H&K MP7 if you want to see the difference in size (although stopping power might be another matter - like I said, never read the article). But if you want a real reason why SMGs shouldn't be primary weapons and shotguns should, here's one. I can use a Militia Shotgun against an Advanced Heavy and have them dead before I have to reload. Against the same Heavy with a Militia SMG that has more SPs invested into it, and specifically has a 25% damage bonus that the Shotgun doesn't get, I have to reload at least once before I can get the kill, even when I'm staying close enough to land every hit. At the moment, the whole range of ARs is well-suited to mid-range combat and decent at long-range, but with a focus on precision fire rather than volume of fire, and the whole range of SMGs are very limited in effective range with a focus on insane RoF and CQC viability. Would be nice to have some kind of middle ground - a high-RoF full-automatic primary weapon with CQC and mid-range capabilities, but NOT viable at long-range. Whether they add a new class of weapon (SMC = Submachine Carbine = heavy SMG) or a high-RoF low-accuracy AR that's less viable for long range, I don't care, but it's a gap that I'd quite like to see filled as well. THIS is what I want, though you said it much, much better than I did. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:08:00 -
[32] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:I think this link is relevant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Sub_Machine_CarbineAfter reading the suggestion to Wiki things, I went through Wikipedia's list of SMGs. I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns, and didn't bother to read much of that article because I don't care a whole lot about real-world guns in general. A design like that which acts as a high-RoF, CQC focused alternative to ARs would work in DUST though. It's officially, according to the creators, a "Submachine Carbine" to differentiate it from other SMGs. Compare the size to the H&K MP7 if you want to see the difference in size (although stopping power might be another matter - like I said, never read the article). But if you want a real reason why SMGs shouldn't be primary weapons and shotguns should, here's one. I can use a Militia Shotgun against an Advanced Heavy and have them dead before I have to reload. Against the same Heavy with a Militia SMG that has more SPs invested into it, and specifically has a 25% damage bonus that the Shotgun doesn't get, I have to reload at least once before I can get the kill, even when I'm staying close enough to land every hit. At the moment, the whole range of ARs is well-suited to mid-range combat and decent at long-range, but with a focus on precision fire rather than volume of fire, and the whole range of SMGs are very limited in effective range with a focus on insane RoF and CQC viability. Would be nice to have some kind of middle ground - a high-RoF full-automatic primary weapon with CQC and mid-range capabilities, but NOT viable at long-range. Whether they add a new class of weapon (SMC = Submachine Carbine = heavy SMG) or a high-RoF low-accuracy AR that's less viable for long range, I don't care, but it's a gap that I'd quite like to see filled as well.
Or a lmg
Ps i think you mean a pdw |
Milk Supreme
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
127
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Why can't we just have no drop off distance and proper ballistics calculations?
I'm quite sick of not being able to hit someone 50m away with my SMG |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know Retracts? Into the gun..? That thing is tiny, how could it hold a stock in there? lmao GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? I'm all for the 2nd Amendment, and if it gets repealed you can bet your ass I will find myself an illegal fire arm. However I am not old enough to carry a weapon legally, so I have not looked into any weaponry information. And I'm not really that interested in stocking up on high powered weaponry, or researching it in general. I would rather just be able to carry a pistol around. Not all of us want to have an M16 or something of the like in our possession, or even care to do much research beyond what we pick up from those who do know the information. why you must familiarize yourself with such technologies :) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know Retracts? Into the gun..? That thing is tiny, how could it hold a stock in there? lmao GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? I'm all for the 2nd Amendment, and if it gets repealed you can bet your ass I will find myself an illegal fire arm. However I am not old enough to carry a weapon legally, so I have not looked into any weaponry information. And I'm not really that interested in stocking up on high powered weaponry, or researching it in general. I would rather just be able to carry a pistol around. Not all of us want to have an M16 or something of the like in our possession, or even care to do much research beyond what we pick up from those who do know the information.
Yep and go with a compact smg. Volume of fire strikes fear into every unarmoured person's heart |
Darkz azurr
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
105
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
i have never been killed by the scrabler pistol as everyone uses a sub machine gun as a secondary, that i have come across. it's weird when many people use a secondary weapon (the smg) as there primary. i never see anyone with a primary as a scrabler pistol. why ? because the smg performs like a primary already. it would need a slight increase in base range if the was changed tho. i personally find it very weird that the smg is a seconday , im assuming there will be 4 pistols at release for each faction. wich i wouldnt use , why use a pistol when i could have another machine gun. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:25:00 -
[37] - Quote
Darkz azurr wrote:i have never been killed by the scrabler pistol as everyone uses a sub machine gun as a secondary, that i have come across. it's weird when many people use a secondary weapon (the smg) as there primary. if it was a primary it would need a slight increase in range. i personally find it very weird that the smg is a seconday , im assuming there will be 4 pistols at release for each faction. wich i wouldnt use , why use a single shot pistol when i could have another machine gun.
+1 |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns Or a lmg Ps i think you mean a pdw You're probably right. Thanks for the correction.
And just to avoid misunderstandings, no, I'm not being sarcastic. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns Or a lmg Ps i think you mean a pdw You're probably right. Thanks for the correction. And just to avoid misunderstandings, no, I'm not being sarcastic.
You're welcome and are you gonna add me on psn |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Darkz azurr wrote:i have never been killed by the scrabler pistol as everyone uses a sub machine gun as a secondary, that i have come across. it's weird when many people use a secondary weapon (the smg) as there primary. i never see anyone with a primary as a scrabler pistol. why ? because the smg performs like a primary already. it would need a slight increase in base range if the was changed tho. i personally find it very weird that the smg is a seconday , im assuming there will be 4 pistols at release for each faction. wich i wouldnt use , why use a pistol when i could have another machine gun. Good Scrambler Pistol users can quickly destroy SMG users before the SMG guy gets into his weapon's effective range. And can sometimes dance through CQC against an AR and come out on top. They're surprisingly powerful in skilled hands (and unsurprisingly useless in the hands of someone who's bad with them - like me). |
|
Mobius Wyvern
BetaMax.
1216
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 11:57:00 -
[41] - Quote
Debacle Nano wrote:They must not be using the shotgun very well then. ^This. SMG is nice, but I can outshoot it easily. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 20:28:00 -
[42] - Quote
Darkz azurr wrote:i have never been killed by the scrabler pistol as everyone uses a sub machine gun as a secondary, that i have come across. it's weird when many people use a secondary weapon (the smg) as there primary. i never see anyone with a primary as a scrabler pistol. why ? because the smg performs like a primary already. it would need a slight increase in base range if the was changed tho. i personally find it very weird that the smg is a seconday , im assuming there will be 4 pistols at release for each faction. wich i wouldnt use , why use a pistol when i could have another machine gun. When KBM is introduced, you will begin to see a lot of scrambler pistols. I have very literally be 1HK'd by a scrambler pistol before... albeit it was a proto and I was the standard type 2 assault suit. Regardless, those things are very powerful, and very hard to aim with on a DS3 with horrible deadzones. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 20:30:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Debacle Nano wrote:They must not be using the shotgun very well then. ^This. SMG is nice, but I can outshoot it easily. A lot of people don't seem to understand that an SMG isn't really that powerful, some people just have good enough aim and evasion to kill swiftly with it. I personally love running around with my SG -and- my SMG, CQC hell for anyone using a forge gun or swarm launcher :D |
Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 22:00:00 -
[44] - Quote
That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad.
.45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere.
Do your research next time, m'kay? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
Sandromin Hes wrote:That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad. .45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere. Do your research next time, m'kay?
Ok first off the p90 fires a 5.7x 28 which is smaller than a 9m but has a higher velocity and less stopping power. The 9m and 45acp are shaped identically which means it has similar penetration. The mac11 is a modified version of the 45 acp mac 10 that fires a 9m. You're a complete idiot and a troll. You have an internet connection use it or are you too stupid to use it for anything other than dust 514 |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sandromin Hes wrote:That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad. .45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere. Do your research next time, m'kay?
sigh......first of all, you just flamed him when you were just as bad....
9mm parabellum isnt penetrating multiple layers of anything..... in fact there are problems with a 9mm cause it is too weak and takes multiple shots to kill sometimes...
.45 ACP hits much harder than 9mm, and even though it has a slower velocity, it is in every way a superior round, except for recoil.
the P90 basically fires a special high velocity 9mm round (well basically an armor piercing 9mm round), very different from 9mm parabellum. actual size is 5.7x28mm
i speak from actual experience with these rounds and not from the stats page of COD or BF.
edit: to the above post, the FN 5.7x28mm round for the FN P90 actually was made for the purpose of being better than the 9mm parabellum. Better terminal ballistics for piercing body armor and certainly isnt any less lethal... |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD Legacy Rising
746
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
Wikipedia?.. Really?
Anyway I cannot believe people are arguing over such things. The SMG is fine where it is due to it's relative compact stature in terms of being a weapon. It's designed to be small, compact, portable, and still be leathal as a weapon. It's done that just fine actually. All I am interested in is seeing what the other variants will look like -- Amarr, Caldari, and Gallente.
Also the ammo one uses should not really make the difference. Back in WWII the Germans MP44 variant used the famous 9mm round, and the Russians are famous for repurpossing the same ammo variant to conserve time, money and resources. So really it's a moot point. What wee need to see are some other weapon variants that will hopefully make an apearance soon. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:46:00 -
[48] - Quote
no use of wikipedia here... |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Sandromin Hes wrote:That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad. .45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere. Do your research next time, m'kay? sigh......first of all, you just flamed him when you were just as bad.... 9mm parabellum isnt penetrating multiple layers of anything..... in fact there are problems with a 9mm cause it is too weak and takes multiple shots to kill sometimes... .45 ACP hits much harder than 9mm, and even though it has a slower velocity, it is in every way a superior round, except for recoil. the P90 basically fires a special high velocity 9mm round (well basically an armor piercing 9mm round), very different from 9mm parabellum. actual size is 5.7x28mm i speak from actual experience with these rounds and not from the stats page of COD or BF. edit: to the above post, the FN 5.7x28mm round for the FN P90 actually was made for the purpose of being better than the 9mm parabellum. Better terminal ballistics for piercing body armor and certainly isnt any less lethal...
Where was i in the wrong?
|
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! |
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:50:00 -
[51] - Quote
well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you.
edit: ESPECIALLY after seeing the guy say a single 9mm round would penetrate and kill multiple bodies in one shot....... |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids!
I cross reference with more trusted sites |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:53:00 -
[53] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites
i fire the guns. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:54:00 -
[54] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you.
Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:56:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites i fire the guns.
I would if i could but I'm a minor so ballistic gel will have to be my guide for now |
Kira Lannister
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
711
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:56:00 -
[56] - Quote
I liked dual wielding p90's in Golden Eye 64. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:58:00 -
[57] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you. Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name?
PSN: Lurchasaurus
its secret, no one can no my real name tho.....so dont let anyone see.....
i appreciate your knowledge here and your willingness to shoo away the......shenanigans
im an avid gun guy and that really hits a nerve lol. People think they know it all after seeing COD. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:02:00 -
[58] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you. Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name? PSN: Lurchasaurus its secret, no one can no my real name tho.....so dont let anyone see..... i appreciate your knowledge here and your willingness to shoo away the......shenanigans im an avid gun guy and that really hits a nerve lol. People think they know it all after seeing COD.
I have proven that cod is for kids. I let my 6 year old cousin play it for a while and he went over twenty kills each match
Edit: do you have a headset |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:05:00 -
[59] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you. Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name? PSN: Lurchasaurus its secret, no one can no my real name tho.....so dont let anyone see..... i appreciate your knowledge here and your willingness to shoo away the......shenanigans im an avid gun guy and that really hits a nerve lol. People think they know it all after seeing COD. I have proven that cod is for kids. I let my 6 year old cousin play it for a while and he went over twenty kills each match Edit: do you have a headset
im not surprised.
its funny looking at those stat sheets where they have the "power" of guns shown by a bar graph.....like you need 7 shots with an smg to kill a guy....where he can keep running away if you dont hit him enough..
if i shot a guy with my desert eagle i would blow his leg off.
edit: and people complain about single shot kills with a sniper rifle..........lol
even if your body armor stops a .308, your ribs are piercing your lungs and heart and you drown in your own blood. Dotn even get me started on .338 Lapua
but alas, this is a video game... |
Tbone322
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
124
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:07:00 -
[60] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites i fire the guns.
Have you fired a PS90? I'm thinking of picking one up after I finish my AR15 build i'm currently working on. |
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:11:00 -
[61] - Quote
I'm so confused, how did this go from a discussion regarding in game weapons, to an information war about real life ballistics? o.o All I did was make a comparison, I seem to have started a war. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:11:00 -
[62] - Quote
Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:13:00 -
[63] - Quote
Tbone322 wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites i fire the guns. Have you fired a PS90? I'm thinking of picking one up after I finish my AR15 build i'm currently working on.
meh....ammo is scarce and its kinda a gimmick....i have had more fun shooting .223. again, finding 5.7 is kinda hard
im more of a rifle guy myself tho so dont let me dissuade you. Its a sleek gun and its fun to shoot something so compact for a change.
edit: if your looking at something for after your AR, take a look at H&K.....great stuff there if you havent already set your sights on a p90 |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:17:00 -
[64] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel
I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy.
believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head |
Tbone322
D3ath D3alers RISE of LEGION
124
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Tbone322 wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites i fire the guns. Have you fired a PS90? I'm thinking of picking one up after I finish my AR15 build i'm currently working on. meh....ammo is scarce and its kinda a gimmick....i have had more fun shooting .223. again, finding 5.7 is kinda hard im more of a rifle guy myself tho so dont let me dissuade you. Its a sleek gun and its fun to shoot something so compact for a change. edit: if your looking at something for after your AR, take a look at H&K.....great stuff there if you havent already set your sights on a p90
My cousins's a H&K guy so i may have to look at some of their stuff, I do know it's pretty pricey though...
Sorry for hijacking the thread, so back on topic.
The forge gunner in me really thinks I need that SMG to stay alive, but the dropship pilot in me would really like to see all those pesky swarm launcher's have to carry a pistol to sacrifice for the ability to blow me up. Either way I'm fine but I think i'm leaning towards keeping it as a sidearm. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:20:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy. believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head
It might be 7 in. Like the American copy but i don't know for sure |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:22:00 -
[67] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy. believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head It might be 7 in. Like the American copy but i don't know for sure
lol they dont make a 7 in.
my gun is an IMI from like the 70's. the gun statred being made in the US in 95, then briefly ent back to israel under IWI a couple years later. Now its back in the US tho. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy. believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head It might be 7 in. Like the American copy but i don't know for sure lol they dont make a 7 in. my gun is an IMI from like the 70's. the gun statred being made in the US in 95, then briefly ent back to israel under IWI a couple years later. Now its back in the US tho.
I wasn't sure but i know they make a standard(6in.) And a long barrel (10in.) |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:29:00 -
[69] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:I wasn't sure but i know they make a standard(6in.) And a long barrel (10in.)
they make a bunch of different variants now, and they arent all in large calibers. it a fun gun tho. |
Regis Mark V
249
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:29:00 -
[70] - Quote
If SMG's go into the main slot then snipers are ****** in CQC. Making SMG a secondary is good but maybe it should only be for scouts. Or make semi and full auto pistols. That's the only way putting the SMG in the primary only spot reasonable! |
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Regis Mark V wrote:If SMG's go into the main slot then snipers are ****** in CQC. Making SMG a secondary is good but maybe it should only be for scouts. Or make semi and full auto pistols. That's the only way putting the SMG in the primary only spot reasonable! Or, make variants for the primary slot? It's not like you can't have one without the other.. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:32:00 -
[72] - Quote
Regis Mark V wrote:If SMG's go into the main slot then snipers are ****** in CQC. Making SMG a secondary is good but maybe it should only be for scouts. Or make semi and full auto pistols. That's the only way putting the SMG in the primary only spot reasonable!
bottom line, smg is a secondary for a reason. |
Arceus Evoxazon
Hikahotaru
119
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:48:00 -
[73] - Quote
My name is Arceus Evoxazon and this is my favorite thread on the Dust Forum. This time, I mean it. |
Ten-Sidhe
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
414
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:07:00 -
[74] - Quote
p90 is a pdw(personal defense weapon), similar to smg but not the same.
smg(mac10, mp-5) fire pistol ammo, 9x19mm or .45 for example pdw(p90, mp7) fire miniture rifle ammo,designed for pdw, 4.6x30mm or 5.7x28mm for example assault rifle(ak-47,m-16) fire reduced power rifle rounds, 7.62x39mm or 5.62x45mm for example battle rifle(m-14,m-1)(and many designated marksmen) fire full power rifle, 7.62x51mm or 7.62x54mm for example |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:09:00 -
[75] - Quote
Ten-Sidhe wrote:p90 is a pdw(personal defense weapon), similar to smg but not the same.
smg(mac10, mp-5) fire pistol ammo, 9x19mm or .45 for example pdw(p90, mp7) fire miniture rifle ammo,designed for pdw, 4.6x30mm or 5.7x28mm for example assault rifle(ak-47,m-16) fire reduced power rifle rounds, 7.62x39mm or 5.62x45mm for example battle rifle(m-14,m-1)(and many designated marksmen) fire full power rifle, 7.62x51mm or 7.62x54mm for example
i know?
was there a point there?
edit: cause if so, id love to talk about it |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:10:00 -
[76] - Quote
Pdw are compact rifles (pdw r) smgs are any automatic pistol caliber weapon |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:17:00 -
[77] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Pdw are compact rifles (pdw r) smgs are any automatic pistol caliber weapon
lol sorry dude.....a pdw is a pdw......compact rifles are called carbines...... |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:33:00 -
[78] - Quote
My mistake i saw pdws as carbines with even shorter barrels |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:38:00 -
[79] - Quote
pretty much in simple, generalized not too picky terms:
battle rifle - high powered rifle round assault rifle - rifle rounds (ak rounds or .223) carbine - just a shorter version of the same rifle, meant originally for calvary use, but then moved to any kind of non infantry stuffs like naval use smg - pistol rounds pdw - pistol round sized rifle rounds(new era hybrid round bullshit) |
Sandromin Hes
Sand Mercenary Corps Inc.
204
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:33:00 -
[80] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you.
edit: ESPECIALLY after seeing the guy say a single 9mm round would penetrate and kill multiple bodies in one shot.......
I meant unarmored, sorry for the confusion. Yeah, the 9mm is useless against body armor because its impact is simply too small to penetrate body armor. It can however penetrate non-armored objects, which isn't optimal for some jobs; for example, Delta Force rejected the 9mm (which was in current use) because on something like an airplane during a hostage crisis, it could possibly go through the enemy and hit a civilian, thus they chose the .45 round (the grease gun and the m1911) because its stopping power was higher, and its velocity was slower (thus being safer in a CQ hostage crisis). Anyways, I forgot what the original argument was, probably something petty (I think it was mac10 is better than p90 that guy said? I might have misquoted too. Meh, it barely matters. Mac10 is by far inferior to the P90 and M1928 Thompson was all I was trying to say.)... Also, never played CoD so I actually have no clue what the guns, much less the stats, are.
Sorry for misunderstandings. |
|
Abron Garr
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
256
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 20:44:00 -
[81] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Exactly what shotgun is a ohk against an equal tier armour
Allotek Breach. When placed right, I can OHK a proto assault. Proto heavy requires 2 shots. SMG is fine. It's niche is in CQC, outside of that and the SMG effectiveness drops pretty quick. |
Sha Kharn Clone
Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS.
1087
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 21:02:00 -
[82] - Quote
Lol yea lets do it. This would be the single greatest buff to my scout suit |
Finn Kempers
BetaMax.
222
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 22:11:00 -
[83] - Quote
My sniper build would be screwed if so because CQC with snipers leads to the quickest discussion with down below. In other words no. Or you can use single/burstfire pistols, though the burst fire ones are pants. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |