|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
What do you think? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
A full magazine directly into an assault? |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
It takes very few rounds of an advanced smg to kill an advanced scout or logi |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine.
Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun.
It loses out on effective range and reload spead Also the targets would have to be standing less than a foot away with each other |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Exactly what shotgun is a ohk against an equal tier armour |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P
+1 |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons.
Those are both smgs
Mac 10
Higher rof, more damage
P90
Higher ammo per mag, longer range |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:18:00 -
[10] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. Those are both smgs Yes they are.. But a P90 is much more powerful than a MAC10. That's like saying a Thomson and and M16 are both Assault rifles, while it may be true, they are in a much different class.
Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? |
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:30:00 -
[11] - Quote
Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals.
I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:08:00 -
[13] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:I think this link is relevant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Sub_Machine_CarbineAfter reading the suggestion to Wiki things, I went through Wikipedia's list of SMGs. I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns, and didn't bother to read much of that article because I don't care a whole lot about real-world guns in general. A design like that which acts as a high-RoF, CQC focused alternative to ARs would work in DUST though. It's officially, according to the creators, a "Submachine Carbine" to differentiate it from other SMGs. Compare the size to the H&K MP7 if you want to see the difference in size (although stopping power might be another matter - like I said, never read the article). But if you want a real reason why SMGs shouldn't be primary weapons and shotguns should, here's one. I can use a Militia Shotgun against an Advanced Heavy and have them dead before I have to reload. Against the same Heavy with a Militia SMG that has more SPs invested into it, and specifically has a 25% damage bonus that the Shotgun doesn't get, I have to reload at least once before I can get the kill, even when I'm staying close enough to land every hit. At the moment, the whole range of ARs is well-suited to mid-range combat and decent at long-range, but with a focus on precision fire rather than volume of fire, and the whole range of SMGs are very limited in effective range with a focus on insane RoF and CQC viability. Would be nice to have some kind of middle ground - a high-RoF full-automatic primary weapon with CQC and mid-range capabilities, but NOT viable at long-range. Whether they add a new class of weapon (SMC = Submachine Carbine = heavy SMG) or a high-RoF low-accuracy AR that's less viable for long range, I don't care, but it's a gap that I'd quite like to see filled as well.
Or a lmg
Ps i think you mean a pdw |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know Retracts? Into the gun..? That thing is tiny, how could it hold a stock in there? lmao GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? I'm all for the 2nd Amendment, and if it gets repealed you can bet your ass I will find myself an illegal fire arm. However I am not old enough to carry a weapon legally, so I have not looked into any weaponry information. And I'm not really that interested in stocking up on high powered weaponry, or researching it in general. I would rather just be able to carry a pistol around. Not all of us want to have an M16 or something of the like in our possession, or even care to do much research beyond what we pick up from those who do know the information.
Yep and go with a compact smg. Volume of fire strikes fear into every unarmoured person's heart |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Darkz azurr wrote:i have never been killed by the scrabler pistol as everyone uses a sub machine gun as a secondary, that i have come across. it's weird when many people use a secondary weapon (the smg) as there primary. if it was a primary it would need a slight increase in range. i personally find it very weird that the smg is a seconday , im assuming there will be 4 pistols at release for each faction. wich i wouldnt use , why use a single shot pistol when i could have another machine gun.
+1 |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns Or a lmg Ps i think you mean a pdw You're probably right. Thanks for the correction. And just to avoid misunderstandings, no, I'm not being sarcastic.
You're welcome and are you gonna add me on psn |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:30:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sandromin Hes wrote:That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad. .45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere. Do your research next time, m'kay?
Ok first off the p90 fires a 5.7x 28 which is smaller than a 9m but has a higher velocity and less stopping power. The 9m and 45acp are shaped identically which means it has similar penetration. The mac11 is a modified version of the 45 acp mac 10 that fires a 9m. You're a complete idiot and a troll. You have an internet connection use it or are you too stupid to use it for anything other than dust 514 |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:47:00 -
[18] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Sandromin Hes wrote:That guy wrote: Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
P90 has a higher velocity, due to the 9mm round and longer barrel. And you're an idiot. He was comparing Mac and P90. Thompson uses a .45 round, which is larger than a 9mm. You had no thoughts flowing, and your argument is invalid. Your invalidity is bad and you should feel bad. .45 round fires much slower than a 9mm, so it only hits with a thud, like a punch. The 9mm on the other hand fires at a much higher velocity, and can penetrate through multiple objects, so you could kill multiple people with one shot. The mac fires a 9mm, the P90 fires a 9mm, and the Thompson fires a .45 ACP. The biggest round has a different purpose. Shut up and take your invalidity elsewhere. Do your research next time, m'kay? sigh......first of all, you just flamed him when you were just as bad.... 9mm parabellum isnt penetrating multiple layers of anything..... in fact there are problems with a 9mm cause it is too weak and takes multiple shots to kill sometimes... .45 ACP hits much harder than 9mm, and even though it has a slower velocity, it is in every way a superior round, except for recoil. the P90 basically fires a special high velocity 9mm round (well basically an armor piercing 9mm round), very different from 9mm parabellum. actual size is 5.7x28mm i speak from actual experience with these rounds and not from the stats page of COD or BF. edit: to the above post, the FN 5.7x28mm round for the FN P90 actually was made for the purpose of being better than the 9mm parabellum. Better terminal ballistics for piercing body armor and certainly isnt any less lethal...
Where was i in the wrong?
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:50:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids!
I cross reference with more trusted sites |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you.
Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name? |
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 02:56:00 -
[21] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Kira Lannister wrote:Silly Rabbit Wikipedia is edited by kids! I cross reference with more trusted sites i fire the guns.
I would if i could but I'm a minor so ballistic gel will have to be my guide for now |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:well, the only thing i saw was you saying the FN 5.7x28mm having less stopping power than 9mm...while it does have a little less actual force, and by that i mean a minimal amount, the p90 cartridge is basically a rifle round, not a pistol round. The terminal ballistics because of that make it a superior cartridge and id say the increased penetration make it have more stopping power.....
was being really picky after seeing the idiots above you. Against unarmoured targets the 9m is superior because of it's larger cavitation but it is near useless against most body armor. Anyways thanks for backing me up and what is your psn name? PSN: Lurchasaurus its secret, no one can no my real name tho.....so dont let anyone see..... i appreciate your knowledge here and your willingness to shoo away the......shenanigans im an avid gun guy and that really hits a nerve lol. People think they know it all after seeing COD.
I have proven that cod is for kids. I let my 6 year old cousin play it for a while and he went over twenty kills each match
Edit: do you have a headset |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy. believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head
It might be 7 in. Like the American copy but i don't know for sure |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 03:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Which d eagle did you get. The standard or long barrel I have a real desert eagle, its an imported IMI .41/.44 from back when they still exported the guns and you didnt have to get an American copy. believe its a 6 in. but i could be wrong, dont know off the top of my head It might be 7 in. Like the American copy but i don't know for sure lol they dont make a 7 in. my gun is an IMI from like the 70's. the gun statred being made in the US in 95, then briefly ent back to israel under IWI a couple years later. Now its back in the US tho.
I wasn't sure but i know they make a standard(6in.) And a long barrel (10in.) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:10:00 -
[26] - Quote
Pdw are compact rifles (pdw r) smgs are any automatic pistol caliber weapon |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 04:33:00 -
[27] - Quote
My mistake i saw pdws as carbines with even shorter barrels |
|
|
|