Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
What do you think? |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's fine where it's at. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier |
Debacle Nano
Shadow Company HQ
639
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
They must not be using the shotgun very well then. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
A full magazine directly into an assault? |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
808
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
no |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG.
And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun.
And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring.
Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
It takes very few rounds of an advanced smg to kill an advanced scout or logi |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine.
Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun. |
|
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 05:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun.
It loses out on effective range and reload spead Also the targets would have to be standing less than a foot away with each other |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 08:58:00 -
[12] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:I see it beat shotguns easily for a sidearm
Ps shotguns of the same tier I can beat Shotguns when I bring my SMG. And I can beat SMGs when I bring my Shotgun. And I can be beaten by people using both weapons regardless of which one I bring. Shotgun works differently, not better or worse, but it's less suited to being a sidearm. SMGs are fine. Why would an sg be less suited to be a secondary. Relatively low ammo and low rof sounds a lot like a scrambler Until you consider the multi-target possibilities and less reliance on fine aim for damage, and I'm pretty sure the damage potential is higher with the Shotgun. It loses out on effective range and reload spead Also the targets would have to be standing less than a foot away with each other You can 1HK with a shot gun, lets see you do that with an SMG. SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. |
dust badger
BetaMax.
283
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons.
You mean AR's? :P |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
Exactly what shotgun is a ohk against an equal tier armour |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P
+1 |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10.
Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons.
Those are both smgs
Mac 10
Higher rof, more damage
P90
Higher ammo per mag, longer range |
Beta Phish
Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:What do you think?
its only common sense something lacking from ccp |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. Those are both smgs Yes they are.. But a P90 is much more powerful than a MAC10. That's like saying a Thomson and and M16 are both Assault rifles, while it may be true, they are in a much different class. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:18:00 -
[20] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:dust badger wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote: SMG's are fine as a side arm, however it might be nice to see higher powered or somehow upgraded versions as primary weapons. You mean AR's? :P No, I don't. I mean something like a P90 vs a MAC10. Edit: AR's don't have the RoF like SMG's do, they aren't CQC weapons. Those are both smgs Yes they are.. But a P90 is much more powerful than a MAC10. That's like saying a Thomson and and M16 are both Assault rifles, while it may be true, they are in a much different class.
Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? |
|
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:25:00 -
[21] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research?
The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different.
And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks.
LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol stocks on the weapons and the weapon types posture(how you hold it in the various firing positions) are not classifications due to other action games no matter how much they say they are accurate lol |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:54:00 -
[25] - Quote
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol Read the rest of the thread before you start quoting. I understand when the thread is 5 pages or longer, you don't want to look for the reply, but seriously, if you had read the first post on page 2 you would've seen a response clarifying that I was unaware the Thompson is classified as an SMG. |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. i have they sell tach kits that allow for it to be shouldered and in fact have a attachment for the front that extends hand grip for a front grip on the weapon for controlled firing..
8 years army infantry and special marksman :) |
vermacht Doe
93
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals.
I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know |
GreasyFinger Bumsticker
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 09:56:00 -
[28] - Quote
Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Wikipedia can tell you how wrong you are. The thompson is an smg and the mac fires a larger round. Did you use cod stats for research? The Thompson is classified as an SMG? Thats news to me. And as far as I'm aware, the MAC10 is a single-hand weapon, where as the P90 is a shouldered weapon, I think accuracy between the two might be, just slightly... different. And what "stats" did I list? I don't recall giving out any numbers. I'm making my claims on information I have heard, read, and can manage to remember. My memory is a PoS so excuse me if I get some things wrong. No need to think I'm a "CoD kiddie", I'm not about to confuse anything with CoD, that's just a bunch of BS thrown into a video game, and re-released every year with a new title and cover art... no thanks. LMAO you must be joking.....do you even know why or what the history of a thompson sub machine gun is? LMAO it fires pistol rounds not rifle rounds .45acp pistol rounds lol Read the rest of the thread before you start quoting. I understand when the thread is 5 pages or longer, you don't want to look for the reply, but seriously, if you had read the first post on page 2 you would've seen a response clarifying that I was unaware the Thompson is classified as an SMG. ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
1849
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
I think this link is relevant:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Sub_Machine_Carbine
After reading the suggestion to Wiki things, I went through Wikipedia's list of SMGs. I'm openly willing to admit I don't know a lot about guns, and didn't bother to read much of that article because I don't care a whole lot about real-world guns in general. A design like that which acts as a high-RoF, CQC focused alternative to ARs would work in DUST though. It's officially, according to the creators, a "Submachine Carbine" to differentiate it from other SMGs. Compare the size to the H&K MP7 if you want to see the difference in size (although stopping power might be another matter - like I said, never read the article).
But if you want a real reason why SMGs shouldn't be primary weapons and shotguns should, here's one.
I can use a Militia Shotgun against an Advanced Heavy and have them dead before I have to reload. Against the same Heavy with a Militia SMG that has more SPs invested into it, and specifically has a 25% damage bonus that the Shotgun doesn't get, I have to reload at least once before I can get the kill, even when I'm staying close enough to land every hit.
At the moment, the whole range of ARs is well-suited to mid-range combat and decent at long-range, but with a focus on precision fire rather than volume of fire, and the whole range of SMGs are very limited in effective range with a focus on insane RoF and CQC viability. Would be nice to have some kind of middle ground - a high-RoF full-automatic primary weapon with CQC and mid-range capabilities, but NOT viable at long-range. Whether they add a new class of weapon (SMC = Submachine Carbine = heavy SMG) or a high-RoF low-accuracy AR that's less viable for long range, I don't care, but it's a gap that I'd quite like to see filled as well. |
Veigar Mordekaiser
Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire
676
|
Posted - 2012.08.01 10:04:00 -
[30] - Quote
vermacht Doe wrote:Veigar Mordekaiser wrote:vermacht Doe wrote:Pistols are also one handed but are meant to be fired with both and the mac has a stock so it can also be considered shouldered Hmm, well, I haven't seen a MAC10 with a stock before, but I'm sure you see my point. Just because to weapons have the same label, doesn't make them equals. I do and the stock retracts so that explains why you didn't know Retracts? Into the gun..? That thing is tiny, how could it hold a stock in there? lmao
GreasyFinger Bumsticker wrote:ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz ill point out whatever detail i choose to in your post it so happens i picked the one thats usually common knowledge to most 2 amendment americans but hey not all of us right? I'm all for the 2nd Amendment, and if it gets repealed you can bet your ass I will find myself an illegal fire arm. However I am not old enough to carry a weapon legally, so I have not looked into any weaponry information. And I'm not really that interested in stocking up on high powered weaponry, or researching it in general. I would rather just be able to carry a pistol around.
Not all of us want to have an M16 or something of the like in our possession, or even care to do much research beyond what we pick up from those who do know the information. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |